U.N. Launches Conference To Destroy Free Speech Censor The Internet

Free Speech must be stopped.

The United Nations just launched an 11-day conference in its ongoing scheme to take over the Internet.  Leading the charge is Russia, declaring its “sovereign right to regulate the national Internet segment”.

Fox News reports,

A U.N. conference that kicked off today in Dubai has sparked fear of Internet censorship in the U.S. — something U.S. Ambassador Terry Kramer said he is doing everything in his power to prevent.

“Nothing regarding the Internet do we want subject to U.N. review and regulation,” Kramer told FoxNews.com.

Monday marked the first day of an 11-day conference. Kramer, who leads the U.S. delegation at the conference, said that the first day had “gone well” and so far delegates are “still in the early stage, talking about what should be reviewed when.” No specific regulations have been debated yet.

“[Proposals] on content review and on pricing the transfer of content, which would essentially tax the Internet… we are actively opposing those,” Kramer said.

While almost all of the U.N. meeting is secret, many documents have leaked, including one proposal from the Russian delegation declaring “the sovereign right … to regulate the national Internet segment.”

It echoes a call from Russian President Vladimir Putin last year calling for “global control over such [Internet] exchange. This is certainly a priority on the international agenda.”

Kramer said the Russian proposal worried him.

“Candidly, we were very concerned with the Russian proposal. I think it was the most stark in nature of all the proposals that have been put out, because it basically is proposing Internet governance managed either by the ITU or the national government. There are traffic routing proposals in there that would open the door to potential censorship, which obviously we don’t agree with,” Kramer said. …

“The development of the Internet itself shows a different model of international co-operation than the U.N. uses. The U.N. tried to help build the Internet. They had their own network standard in the 1980s and nobody used that, and it died. Instead engineers in the U.S., China, Brazil — around the world — reached consensus about the rules for the web.”

Ambassador Kramer said the U.S. delegation is opposing Internet regulation because the hands-off approach has worked so well.

“The Internet had thrived because it has been left in an open environment, and all the commercial opportunities that accrued, and the rights to free speech and democracy, are because it’s been left alone.”

Here’s a shock.  Russia is denying their pursuit to censor the Internet…despite the fact that their secret documents reveal otherwise.  Of course, the Russian bureaucrats are known for their honesty.

Hat tip: Guest Blogger John

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • All_IS_LOST

    Free and open information can be so bothersome. People get offended, dictators lose power…it must be stopped.

    Google and many others have done a bang up job getting freedom lovers killed in despot nations when they cave to governmental dictates that affect their bottom dollar.

  • Pingback: U.N. Launches Conference To Destroy Free Speech Censor The InternetPolitifreak()

  • shadow

    THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!

  • SeniorD

    To quote Princess Leia: “The more you tighten your fist, the more systems fall through your fingers.” Only despots (Obama, Congress, Bureaucrats, Morsi, Putin, Un, and their ilk) see this as a Good Thing.

  • ★FALCON★

    I don’t think I could hate the UN more than I already do, but it might be possible.

  • Another Bob

    There is way to much freedom going on in cyberspace, plus it would be a great thing to tax

  • Good rule of thumb: If the U.N. if FOR something, OPPOSE IT!!

  • FMB42

    We can thank the flash mobs, wikileaks, and the OWS and Arab Spring protests, etc, etc, for providing the U.N. an excuse for launching this conference.

  • Pingback: U.N. Launches Conference To Destroy Free Speech Censor The Internet | Born Conservative()

  • Pingback: Plastic bulb development promises better quality light | IowaDawg Speaks to Everyone()

  • Comrade J

    Funny to note, having been spanked with the facts on the “Southern Strategy” this blog’s resident libtard propagandist Shadow resorts to clucking childish mockery on other posts. Is that because in posting anything else s/he gets frequently caught lying? LOL

  • Remco Kimber

    The John Birch Society has good and effective programs for org. just regular folks against these mega-government tactics.

    http://www.jbs.org/

  • http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/28/AR2011022803719.html?tid=wp_featuredstories&sid=ST2011030101974………….obama regime are working for the same goal here don’t be fooled… muslim masters want to control of info about the crimes they are committingt and making it a crime to say anything against their false-God.and Islam….anti-christ is giving his power over to the beast to do the dirty work for him, so he can keep up with false imagine of himself in the eyes of the public.

  • Mad Hatter

    We almost had the Senate give over a lot of Freedom to the U.N. today.

    A United Nations treaty to ban discrimination against people with disabilities went down to defeat in the Senate on Tuesday in a 61-38 vote.

    The treaty, backed by President Obama and former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole (R-Kan.), fell 5 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed for confirmation as dozens of Senate Republicans objected that it would create new abortion rights and impede the ability of people to home-school disabled children.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/un-treaties/270831-senate-rejects-un-treaty-for-disabled-rights-in-vote

    Here’s the RINO’s that voted for the U.N. to have influence and control over decisions for the disabled.

    Republican Sens. Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), John Barrasso (Wyo.), Scott Brown (Mass.), Susan Collins (Maine), Dick Lugar (Ind.), John McCain (Ariz.), Olympia Snowe (Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) voted with Democrats in favor of the treaty.

    If we have Senators that are willing to hand over Freedom to the U.N. in regards to the disabled, then they’ll vote to hand over control of the Internet to the U.N.

    We have a lot of house cleaning to do in the Senate.

  • susanm

    THE U.N. SHOULD GET OUT OF OUR LIFE? WHO ARE THEY TO TELL THE WORLD WHAT TO DO, WHEN TO DO IT, HOW TO LIVE, WHERE TO LIVE. LEAVE US ALONE……….YOU WANT A FIGHT, ”WE THE PEOPLE” ARE ON STAND-BY.

  • thegoldman

    You mean the way the media dose….

  • #14 thank goodness!

    THE U.N. OUT OF THE U.S. AND THE U.S. OUT OF THE U.N.!

    And for a bit of fun, because we all like to feel in control… LOL

    http://www.turnofftheinternet.com/#

  • thegoldman

    a

  • kay

    I can hardly wait until the “free cell phone” people who text and email using internet protocol on their phones comes to a screeching HALT. Also those that watch streaming video, youtube, and don’t have a TV anymore all are in a dark hole because they’ve let the internet usurp their lives.

    Most of the websites will be taken down. Most that are still up? Will have to pay a tax to be on the net (it will be called a user fee). Right now you can register your domain and away you go – start posting and writing and selling.

    Not…any….more.

    I laugh at the UN ambassador saying he’s working hard to stop this.
    I’m sorry but why don’t I believe that?

  • shadow

    We almost had the Senate give over a lot of Freedom to the U.N. today.

    A United Nations treaty to ban discrimination against people with disabilities went down to defeat in the Senate on Tuesday in a 61-38 vote.

    And what freedom was that? The freedom to discriminate against people with disabilities? I’m pretty sure that’s a freedom we already lack. (see Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    A U.N. conference that kicked off today in Dubai has…

    It sure would be nice if the UN were kicked off our shores…for good.

  • Mad Hatter

    #20,

    Shadow you’re an uniformed Obama voter.

    This would have given the U.N. the right to set standards, rules, and laws that would override U.S. laws, and parental rights. I would try to explain this to you, but you’re too stuck on John Stewart, and the Daily Kook as news sources.

  • Comrade J

    ‘Shadow’ goes full retard.
    It (s/he) now provides rebuttal to it’s own post in the same post:

    And what freedom was that? The freedom to discriminate against people with disabilities? I’m pretty sure that’s a freedom we already lack. (see Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

    So do we “discriminate” now? If so, then it’s a “freedom” we loose.

    But if [since] Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 already provides protection for [the real disabilities], what freedom does UN want to grab via regulation?

    Which one is it ‘Shadow’?

    You see ladies and gentlemen. Libtardism is a MENTAL DISORDER. Unfortunately for ‘shadow’ it is not covered under Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

  • elliot

    thefoxnewschannel.blogspot.com ISRAEL

  • JoyO

    I think the UN is trying to become the government for the whole world and the Dems led by George Soros are right in-step with the UN’s plan because they want to be one of the powerful world elites. I do not think Americans should participate NOR should taxes from hard-working Americans be used to fund such an endeavor.

  • SeniorD

    Shadow, thanks to my incurable Multple Sclerosis, I fall under the provisions of the ADA. I’ve never once been discriminated against, never had a pony tailed lawyer or community organizer come to ‘rescue’ me from ‘The Man’s’ oppression.

    Pity the ADA doesn’t include Libtardism, you’d qualify in an instant.

  • shadow

    This would have given the U.N. the right to set standards, rules, and laws that would override U.S. laws, and parental rights. I would try to explain this to you, but you’re too stuck on John Stewart, and the Daily Kook as news sources.

    You could try to explain it to me, but you’d have to know what you’re talking about, first. And I don’t see that happening anytime soon.

  • shadow

    So do we “discriminate” now? If so, then it’s a “freedom” we loose.

    But if [since] Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 already provides protection for [the real disabilities], what freedom does UN want to grab via regulation?

    Which one is it ‘Shadow’?

    I’ll use small words so you have a chance of understanding, but I wouldn’t put money on it.

    I am not the one who claimed that we would lose some freedom. That was your fellow paranoids. I said it is already against the law to discriminate based on disability. Personally, I don’t see the benefit in signing the treaty, except as being an example for other countries that have no such laws. On the other hand, I don’t see the harm. But then I don’t have the “tin foil hat” they’re all out to get us, psycotic disorder gene.

  • shadow

    Shadow, thanks to my incurable Multple Sclerosis, I fall under the provisions of the ADA. I’ve never once been discriminated against

    See how the law deters such behavior.

  • Mad Hatter

    You could try to explain it to me, but you’d have to know what you’re talking about, first. And I don’t see that happening anytime soon.

    _____________________________________________________________

    This is the power grab in a nutshell.

    Article 4 of the convention would require member states to embrace “economic, cultural and social rights” that are rooted in the concept that government creates rights.

    People with disabilities, many whom I’ve worked with, have many Laws protecting them from forms of discrimination. Last I checked, there are not lawsuits lined up suing this, or that company because people with disabilities have been denied access or employment.

    The U.N. has an open ended definition of what economic rights, cultural rights, and social rights are. They do this so they can make them what they want, and can change or add to those rights. The U.S. would have to accept how a group of third world leaders would define these particular rights for us to live under.

    You might want to live under the authority of the U.N., but the rest of us prefer the Constitution.

  • FurryGuy

    #25 December 4, 2012 at 5:07 pm
    JoyO commented:

    I think the UN is trying to become the government for the whole world and the Dems led by George Soros are right in-step with the UN’s plan because they want to be one of the powerful world elites. I do not think Americans should participate NOR should taxes from hard-working Americans be used to fund such an endeavor.

    Kinda hard to do when the US pays for 22% of the UN’s budget, nearly double of the second highest “contributor” Japan. UN Funding

  • Comrade J

    Yesterday we discussed Libtardism – mental disorder that contradicts itsefl.

    Today on exhibit A we have Libtardism – stuck on stupid.

    Both are kindly illustrated to you by ‘shadow’.

  • Dave

    How about we tell the U.N. to pound sand? And if the U.S. government signs on, we tell the same thing to the U.S. government and bypass government-regulated servers? I for one am not willing to forfeit my rights just because someone else thinks it’s a good idea.

  • Comrade J

    @shadow #28

    RONFL, I never said you did claim ‘we are loosing freedom’ (maybe it is me who should use the small words?)

    You made the self contradicting statement about ‘freedom’ seeking to dismiss other commentator’s point. I exposed the self contradiction in your “dismissal” by making the very point you are now parroting. That is there is no need in UN regulation as US regulation already covers it. And as it has been demonstrated by Mad Hatter, redundancy, was not the goal of the UN “regulation”.

    Anyway, thank you for admitting that both the prior commentator and I were right.

    P.S.: did I use too many big words for you?

  • Pingback: Free speech: US, India, Canada reject UN Internet regulation treaty | Newsnet 14()