Obama 2008: “I Am Not Going To Take Your Guns Away, That Just Ain’t True” (Video)

Barack Obama in 2008 made this promise to his supporters.

“I believe in the Second Amendment. I will not take your shotgun away. I will not take your rifle away. I won’t take your handgun away… But I am not going to take your guns away. So if you want to find an excuse not to vote for me, don’t use that one because it just ain’t true. It ain’t true.”

Via Free Republic:

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California said Sunday the president will soon have legislation “to lead on” in the gun control debate, announcing she will introduce a bill next month in the Senate to place a ban on assault weapons. The senator added she believes President Barack Obama will support the legislation.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • RealMc

    You LIE.

  • Pingback: Obama 2008: “I Am Not Going To Take Your Guns Away, That Just Ain’t True” (Video)Politifreak()

  • Mahdi Al-Dajjal

    Everything about Barack is a lie, his past, who he is, where he came from, where he was born, who is father is, who his mentors were, what he believes in, and on and on. One big-ass lie.

  • His entire worthless life is a lie.

  • Dudette

    And everyone knows Obama is a lying sack. He never tells the truth about ANYTHING and can’t be trusted.
    You can easily check Obama’s anti Second Amendment record while he was an Illinios senator.
    He voted for every anti Second Amendment bill that came up and was fully in favor of bankrupting the firearms industry by allowing law suits against them that claimed the industry was responsible for crimes committed using guns. Fortunately none of the anti Second Amendment laws Obama voted for ever did become law.

  • Pingback: Obama 2008: “I Am Not Going To Take Your Guns Away, That Just Ain’t True” (Video) « infowarsusa()

  • Pingback: Freedom's Lighthouse » Flashback: Obama Trolled for Votes of Gun Owners, Promising “I Believe in the 2nd Amendment. . . I Will Not Take Your Shotgun, Rifle, Handgun Away. . . I Am Not Going to Take Your Guns Away. . . It Just Ain’t T()

  • Pingback: Freedom's Lighthouse » Flashback: Obama Trolled for Votes of Gun Owners, Promising “I Believe in the 2nd Amendment. . . I Will Not Take Your Shotgun, Rifle, Handgun Away. . . I Am Not Going to Take Your Guns Away. . . It Just Ain’t T()

  • ar05075

    WE know you’re not Barry.

  • ★FALCON★

    Gun control will be the end of Democrat control.

    I hope it ends as the Cold War – with no shots fired, but I’m not that optimistic.

  • Economan

    A liar has the devil as his father.

  • Obamao

    Sounds like a bit overcompensating.

    One of Barrack’s own proposals was to ban transfers/sales of all firearms within 5 miles of any school or park. Pretty neat trick given his experience in Hawaii would have shown him that it is not possible to be five miles from any park and still be on dry land; his experience in Illinois (which I believe is broken down into six mile square townships) it would be pretty hard to get more than five miles from any township park.

  • Elizabeth

    I saw the news tonight, where St. Louis’s own pompous idiot Charles Jerko was ranting about how the 2nd Amendment should be amended or abolished. Clearly Charles is just your typical dumbed down and uninformed Democrat, for he doesn’t know that a Constitutional Amendment requires a 2/3 majority in the House of Representative and a 2/3 majority in the Senate, as well as 3/4 majority of the states OR a Constitutional Convention called for by 2/3 of the states legislatures.

    Then Jerko tried to say that the well regulated militia in the Second Amendment is not we the people, but the police and military! Clearly Jerko must have flunked American history in 5th grade. Many of the writings of America’s Founding Fathers clearly point to the militia as every able bodied person who could carry a gun.
    George Mason ” What is the militia? It is the whole people.”
    Patrick Henry “The great object is that every man be armed.”
    Thomas Jefferson ” What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.”
    James Madison ” The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms”.
    Many more quotes of those TRUE AMERICANS are there for anyone to investigate the meaning of the Second Amendment.

    Like America’s Founding Fathers, we are better off when we do not trust our government.
    It is Patriotic.
    We would do well, like wise not to trust today’s press, for they have their own corrupt agendas, as Jerko demonstrated.

  • mg4us

    That was before he gave millions and billions away to “friends” through crony capitalism stimulus

    The Tonopah Solar company is in Harry Reid’s Nevada!!


  • mg4us

    “Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian.”

    Henry Ford

  • Its ok to lie to infidels to advance your cause….truth doesn’t help his cause.

  • mg4us

    In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. >From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated

    In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.

    China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated

    Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.

    Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.

    You won’t see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

    Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

    Take note my fellow Americans, before it’s too late!

    The next time someone talks in favor of gun control, please remind them of this history lesson.
    With guns, we are ‘citizens’. Without them, we are ‘subjects’.

    During WWII the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!

    If you value your freedom, please spread this antigun-control message to all of your friends.


    Spread the word everywhere you can that you are a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment!

  • buffy

    I haven’t read the posts here but I bet no one has offered the tactic that Barry’s promises to the lefties can be used to cause chaos in their thinking processes…comprende’ amigos? He promises and does the opposite. It’s his hallmark. You can set a clock by it.
    It is a tactic ripe for picking………turn the tables. No body gets more scared than the left about getting lied to. Easy. Everyone got that? Now kiddies..start your engines.

  • bg
  • Spread Eagle

    “it just ain’t true. It ain’t true.” This was spoken by the “Great Orator”? Sounds more like a ghetto thug…

  • #13 Elizabeth… HEAR, HEAR!

  • bg



    December 29, 2012

    Obama’s ‘welfare case’ space pioneer buys $17 million mansion

    [“Taxpayers footed the bill for a $465 million loan to troubled electric
    car-maker Tesla as part of President Barack Obama’s ‘green energy’
    stimulus. But Tesla’s CEO Elon Musk is now riding high with the purchase
    of his new $17 million mansion,” Wynton Hall reports at Breitbart.com.]


  • bg


    i still believe AUSONIUS states the case extremely well:

    The pure argument (which few have the guts to say and defend
    these days) for private weapon ownership was, and still is, so
    that a population can remain citizens and not subjects to tyrants.

    Run from it if you must, but this was, and still is, the truth. It is not
    about hunting, “sporting use”, or the like. Once you buy into these
    notions, you get boxed into a corner from which there is no escape.

    The argument for possessing modern weapons is simply that those
    are what you will face should tyrants wish to “compel” your compliance.

    We have an open marxist party which holds the Senate, the White
    House, and much of the courts. They are making their plans very clear.
    It will not stop with compelling you to purchase health insurance, eat
    “right”, drive eco-cars, practice their “approved” religions, and the like.

    Marxists in the 20th century murdered tens of millions of their own
    citizens who disagreed with them. Why would anyone believe the
    21st century marxist will operate any differently?

    I wake to a country that I do not recognize.


  • SeniorD

    If we believe that line of crapola, I’m sure he has a deal on some fine beach front property in Nevada.

  • Stella Baskomb

    “I will not take your shotgun away. I will not take your rifle away. I won’t take your handgun away… But I am not going to take your guns away. ”

    But I don’t believe you any more.

  • Highlander

    Elizabeth, I would LIKE to think you’re right, but from what I’ve seen recently, I have my doubts. Constitutionality doesn’t matter to this administration. If it did, we wouldn’t have Obamacare. It all comes down to interpretation of the law, and when we have Justices caving in to political pressures instead of doing their job and upholding the Constitution, all bets are off ….

  • Highlander

    Obama 2008: “I Am Not Going To Take Your Guns Away, That Just Ain’t True …”

    So that means he’s going to try to take them, right?

  • DecentAmerican

    Just makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

    The demon in the whitehouse used to say that American guns were being trafficked to Mexico, and that was a reason for the need for more gun control. When he was proven wrong, he then was determined to make it happen….that resulted in Fast and Furious. Brian Terry and hundreds of Mexican citizens died because of the demon. It was outright treasonous to arm our border agents with beanbag bullets, and arm the enemy with assault rifles.

    So what is the worst thing that can happen that would make Americans demand gun control? It would have to be a massacre on innocent children. Nothing could be more heinous and induce more anger. I’m not saying that the demon caused Sandy Hook to happen. But in light of him causing Fast and Furious to happen, you have to ask, can someone be truly that Evil? And would this Evil be willing to sacrifice Anerican lives in Benghazi? He was.

    And would this Evil be willing to sacrifice children’s lives to advance his political goals?

    No one can truly be that Evil, can he?

    Makes you wonder……doesn’t it?

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Barack Obama in 2008 made this promise to his supporters.

    Two words: Expiration date.

  • Jack

    Who gives a damn what he said four years ago. Does it really matter? Does it really matter what he says now? If you comply then you deserve what you get.

  • Truth Teller

    Obama and Feinstein can pass whatever they wish.

    Compliance relies on their false assumption that we give a fu(k what they say.

    Legislate what you want, you traitorous mother fu(kers…implementation is going to be a bit(h.

  • Truth Teller

    Forgot the “c” in my last word

  • Patty

    Why Gun Control is Unconstitutional

    One of the biggest arguments and dividing lines that come between Democrats and Republicans is the topic of gun control. The Republicans are staunch in their beliefs that the right to own a gun is protected by constitutional law while the Democrats believe that there should be so many stipulations and laws placed on gun ownership that it should be more or less illegal to own a firearm.

    The bottom line is that gun control is unconstitutional. Why? The Founding Fathers signed a document back in 1787 that according to the Second Amendment of the Constitution that the people of the United States have the right to ‘form a militia and the right to own and bear arms’.

    When looking at the Second Amendment in the day it was written and in today’s world, you have to study it hard. Back in those days, guns and militias were needed to protect ourselves from possible invasion from the British. Over the years, the right to bear arms has been a time honored tradition where even Presidents themselves have lavished over hunting rifles and the such. Fast forward to today and now you have murders and reckless gun handling. Laws have been put in place to curtail such things. There are waiting periods and background checks to be able to purchase firearms. These are not unconstitutional. In most cases these laws are needed to protect society. What’s unconstitutional is the outright banning of gun ownership.

    That is the thing. There are people out there who want to actually ban guns all together. You have to look at it in common sense terms. The responsible gun owners far outweigh the ones who break the law with firearms. The reason that the bad ones get all the limelight is because it is the first thing that you see on the nightly news. Liberals feed on that kind of stuff. I seriously doubt that a person who commits a robbery or triple murder took gun safety classes and is a member of the NRA. Like the NRA says, when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will own guns.

    Gun control is unconstitutional because that right for people to own guns has been around too very long. There should be laws for safe gun ownership. There shouldn’t be any to ban the outright owning of firearms. http://learnarms.com/why-gun-control-is-unconstitutional/

  • Jack

    Just by the fact that I exist and am not a felon gives me the right to defend life, liberty and property against people and tyrants that wish to do me harm any way I choose.

  • Highlander

    Patty, gun control is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because the Constitution says “the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED”. Period. All the arguments about militias and advances in weaponry are irrelevant. If you read the writings of the founders, it’s perfectly clear what they intended to do with the second amendment. They knew that firearms would always be the only thing between the citizens of this country and a tyrannical government, and they wanted to make sure that we would always be capable of throwing off such a government. Anyone who argues to the contrary should be considered an enemy of the people …

  • Bart Roberts

    Thank you, mg4us!

    barry hussein soetoro saebarkah is a SERIAL-LIAR!

    His name is a lie. His citizenship is a lie. Every word out of his COMMIE mouth is a lie.

    “…unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated…”

    This is part of hussein soetoro’s PLAN FOR US, it’s intentional
    and part of his Firearms Confiscation Plan!

    barry soetoro’s real plan for us:
    Life in the USSA will become like life in Communist nK.
    Complete with forced labor camps!

    Anybody want to argue this is far fetched? Anyone want to argue that I’m “full of it?”

    Anyone want to argue that the White House isn’t a seething cesspool of Communism?

    John Bartholomew Roberts

  • Highlander

    Oh, and another thing …

    Advances in firearms technology are no reason to limit the peoples’ choice of weaponry. In fact, those advances are all the more reason why the PEOPLE should be able to own equally advanced firearms. There must be limits of course … nobody is in favor of putting WMD’s or artillery in the hands of the citizenry, but allowing the government to limit us to shotguns and single shot pea shooters when they have M16’s at their disposal is nothing short of a recipe for tyranny …

  • saveus

    everthing he says is a LIE

  • saveus

    no matter what the Constitution says if obama gets a few more Supreme Court appointments they will do whatever they wish and nothing can stop them

  • bg
  • Patty

    #39 December 29, 2012 at 11:23 pm
    saveus commented:

    no matter what the Constitution says if obama gets a few more Supreme Court appointments they will do whatever they wish and nothing can stop them


    correct, add to this ignorant voters, spineless REPUBICANS, we are doomed.

  • NoResolution

    King Hussien and Dianne Liberalstein have plans up their sleeves but unless they send an army to take guns away her little fantasy ain’t gonna happen. Besides Homicide-Chicago, Illinois needs some guns in the hands of ordinary citizens to defend against King Hussien’s thugs.

  • YourMaster

    But how will 0bama implement the communist utopia on the populance if they resist
    and armed with guns massacre all the 0bamabots?
    how will 0bama make sharia the law of the land and gay sex with 5 yr olds – and take the rights of infidels, and women away – he’ll have to take your guns first

  • CV1

    Pay no attention to his words. Pay close attention to what he does.

  • backhoe

    Har, har

  • squeaky

    [The Obama administration is making a two-fold argument for why it can force Christians to act against their faith in complying with the regulation it has issued under the Obamacare law that requires virtually all health care plans to cover, without co-pay, sterilizations, contraceptives…] key word force. eventually everyone may be called on to comply to the dictates of a tinhorn dictator. when you no longer have the freedom of choice. this is a big warning shot.

  • squeaky

    […I think pledging to end “life as usual” ought to be sending up red flags. Barring us from going back to our “lives as usual” is not in the job description, and shouldn’t be.] you can say that again and again. now he can demand with a lot more fire power than what he had as a mere second rate politico. after 4 plus years. i’m tired of waiting for the other shoe to drop.

  • dba_vagabond_trader

    He’ll let the cong minions do the dirty work, then deny any involvement. This a-hole just can’t lose.

  • suzanne

    I wonder if those Democrats who voted for 0bama and hunt and want to protect their family will be clinging to their guns like the rest of us now? Let’s hope we make it through 4 more years!!!!!!

  • bg


    re: #19 December 29, 2012 at 8:09 pm bg

    listen carefully.. he’s saying a heck of a lot more
    than he’s pretending to be at a loss for answers..

    btw, haven’t heard him address the need to make sure the “criminal” or
    certain that the “mentally deranged” don’t get their hands on guns, etc,
    re: Newtown, all i’ve heard from the “politicians” is a call to take away
    “law abiding sane folks” rights to bear arms..


  • squeaky

    “He’ll let the cong minions do the dirty work..” that’s all he’s ever done. even voting present rather than actually putting himself on the line with a yea or nea vote.

  • usamopatriot

    Damn right you won’t, you POS. I’m not going to let you, I don’t give a rats @ss what legislation you and your commie democrat @sswipes in dc come up with. F you.

  • squeaky

    bg ” re: Newtown, all i’ve heard from the “politicians” is a call to take away law abiding sane folks” rights to bear arms..” i think there’s some push back of blame by the mental health care community. i wouldn’t even go there if i thought there would be an even handed discussion with mental health care shortcomings leading the way. “Our system in mental health is designed to respond at the very last minute,” Wolfe said. when you try to control the uncontrollable in a system that doesn’t give you the tools to atleast make a decent attempt.

  • west1890

    Did he swear on a stack of Korans? When are those spineless cretins in Congress going to address the fact that he is not eligible to hold the office, he has violated the Constitution innumerable times, he was elected and re-elected by massive voter fraud, he has violated US law again and again and his “papers” are forgeries.

    Just prove he is ineligible and you can invalidate everything he has signed since taking office. The way to fix the mess is plain and simple- but there isn’t any backbone in Congress. They’re either complicit or cowards and they, along with John Roberts, will go down in history as traitors.

  • bg


    squeaky #53 December 30, 2012 at 7:33 am

    just a sample:

    Was the Connecticut Shooter Adam Lanza
    Also On Hardcore Psychotropic Drugs?

    [In mass shootings, the usage of pharmaceutical drugs, particularly
    psychotropic drugs, is one of the first things that should be examined
    when attempting to piece together the incident. Adam Lanza, the
    Connecticut shooter, was most likely dosing up on outlandish levels
    of pharmaceutical drugs just like shooters before him.

    that’s because mental illness is not the problem per se,
    toxic drugs are, that is the mental illness connection to
    violence (bit more here & here & here)..



    Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest. – Mahatma Gandhi, in Gandhi, An Autobiography, p. 446

  • bobmark

    Citizen arms – individually operated, solid firing, home kept, sporting and defensive
    State arms –crew operated, shell firing, arsenal kept, defensive and attacking uses
    2nd amendment denotes the right of citizens to their arms without state interference

    The dividing line is pretty well established under current court decisions and traditional usage. Few arms crossover between the two.

  • Carlos

    Right on, Truth Teller!
    Let the commies pass whatever p-ssy a$$ laws they wish, it won’t effect me one GD bit..until they come to try to confiscate, and then they will incur tremendous casualties. This is not a game, uncle Sammy, err, I mean uncle Bammy.

  • west1890

    Ever wonder how the Jews felt in Hitler’s Germany? We’re about to find out. There is no such thing as ‘gun control’- just like there is no such thing as being ‘a little dead’ or ‘a little pregnant’.


    Gun control in Obamaspeak means they have total control and Americans have no guns. Not the ‘approved” guns, not the ‘grandfathered” guns- no guns-none-period. Think it won’t be that way? How about a little recent history- like Obamacare. We were told if we liked our insurance we could keep it. We were told our premiums would go down. We were told it was a”penalty”, umm, no, it was a “tax’, no, a “penalty”. Were we told the truth? No. And we aren’t being told the truth this time either. We’re on the verge of a total dictatorship, and total elimination of our rights and freedoms. They have to get the guns away from us to do it. And guess what trolls……………you don’t get a free pass. Your life, if they let you keep it, will be just as bad as what the rest of us are headed for. You’ll be just as cold, just as hungry, just as controlled as the rest of us. Once they take the guns they don’t need you, your approval, your cruising blog sites and extolling the virtues of Lord and Savior Obama, or your vote. So welcome to Hell comrades……..you get to share all the opression you wished on us and worked to ensure we get.

  • Chippy

    A socialist president which is Obama 12/30/12:
    “”I think there are a vast majority of responsible gun owners out there who recognize that we can’t have a situation in which somebody with severe psychological problems is able to get the kind of high capacity weapons that this individual in Newtown obtained and gun down our kids. And, yes, it’s going to be hard.”

    A true patriot president who loved America-Ronald Reagan 1980;
    “We must reject the idea that every time a law is broken, society is guilty rather then the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions”

  • NoResolution

    We know one thing for certain #49. His thugs hang on to their guns in Chicago-Homicide, Illinois.

  • Truth Teller

    The Second Amendment is the line…without it, all other rights are easily taken.

    Stand six feet tall now…or lay six feet under soon.

  • dba_vagabond_trader

    Yeah, just like we could keep our current healthcare and premiums will go down. Anything this commie says, the opposite is what he wants.

  • Truth Teller

    Seems like we need a Million Patriot March…something to demonstrate our willingness to put our mouths and feet where are hearts and minds are.

  • carrier pigeon

    “Ain’t…..Y’all…. Folks…”

    Yeah, right.

    The O Admin is one big psyop.

  • Pingback: Obama Hopes to Pass New Restrictions on Gun Ownership in America | The Penn Ave Post()

  • RS

    If Obama tells you the sun is coming up tomorrow morning, take a flashlight.

  • Pingback: Obama Announces Plans to Pass New Restrictions on Gun Ownership in America | The Penn Ave Post()

  • Pingback: Obama Announces Plans to Pass New Restrictions on Gun Ownership in AmericaPolitifreak()

  • Joe Normal

    We are now at WAR with the criminal.

  • Pingback: Moonbattery » Liar()

  • Pingback: Ed Driscoll » Promise Reaches Expiration Date()

  • Winston Wolfe

    We are now at WAR with the criminal.

    No. We’re at war with the entire Left … and that includes eveyrbody’s leftist family members and everybody’s so-called leftist ‘friends’.


  • Tricky Dick

    Haven’t you figured it out yet.

    Barry Soetoro + lips moving = liar

  • Patty

    Post is bottom half of article

    Sandy Hook: How Television Takes Your Guns

    This is how a handful of television interviews with skillfully prepped guests can make all the difference in the world. Especially, in the case of Sandy Hook, when gun ownership is now at stake. Do I have to draw a picture for you?

    Because, admit it, if you were the father or mother of a child who was murdered, wouldn’t you have at least a few serious thoughts about revenge? Wouldn’t you? Wouldn’t you think about the .45 you have in the closet upstairs?

    Television, though, teaches you what to feel.

    If after watching a number of these tragedies play out on television, you are completely reprogrammed into some grotesque version of “love everybody all the time and forgive everything,” and you need an outlet, a way to vicariously and subconsciously experience what you REALLY feel, you can always:

    Go to the movies. The movies give you a different slant. You can be Mel Gibson killing people to get his kidnapped daughter back. You can be Charles Bronson wiping out street scum to avenge the loss of his wife. You can be Stallone or Arnie. You can roam the countryside spilling blood at every street corner.

    The movies give you vicarious license to destroy evil. Television news takes it away.

    It’s called the whipsaw effect, and it’s modern mind control, and it puts you in the “excluded middle,” where nothing happens and you remain locked up and passive.

    Where the powers-that-be want you to remain.

    Have a nice, nice day.


    read beginning portion on site

  • Patty

    Posted is the second half of this article

    Americans never give up your guns

    For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or “talking to them”, it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.

    The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?

    No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

    So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.

  • Russell Lissuzzo

    The POS “bobble-head” of the sportsmens organization is an east-coast frat-boy club. The SECOND AMENDMENT has not one iota to do with shooting sports or hunting.
    So the POSW and his organisation decided to vote for an admitted socialist (marxis) AND MARIST/SOCIALIST/COMMUNISTS NEVER LIE!!

    I WILL NEVER STAND FOR “LAW” WRITTEN BY MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD IS THE ONLY JUSTICE GIVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    BYE-THE-WAY, that promise that bambam made was before he had a SOE-IN CRISIS so the punk-ass messiah can executive order-away our CONSTITUTION!

    Does anyone (with a brain) really believe bambam focused on Constitutional Law at havard (on our dime) because he LOVES AMERICA and what it’s ieas and ideals stand for?

  • tom

    Every single gun owner who voted for this president deserves to have their guns taken away. Their vote cast for Hussein Obama just proves they aren’t capable of owning a firearm safely and they have NO right to complain. Those idiots don’t deserve to own any.

    The rest of us? It’s going to get ugly.

  • Pingback: Obama flat-out lied on gun control, MSM suffers silent amnesia « Pull My Chain()

  • Pingback: gun control has been and is a failure, has been and always will hurt the law abiding, has been and always will be racist. « rumcrook()

  • bill o’rights

    And you’re not a Marxist either, are you Black Jesus.

  • Pingback: Obama Announces Plans to Go For Guns in America | Undivided US()

  • Pingback: ‘It Ain’t True’ : The Other McCain()

  • Jpmn

    Never trust a Democrat, ANY Democrat with your freedom. Unfortunately, even the NRA hasn’t figured this out yet.

    That A Rated Democrat may vote with you on one issue but in every other way they will keep the progressive agenda moving toward total State control and yes that ultimately means your right to own a firearm will be lost.

  • Good thing for Obama he isn’t a Republican.

    Can you imagine what the Liberal Media would do to him?

  • stuart

    Obama: “I am not going to take your guns away, that just ain’t true.

    Stuart: Damn right you’re not.

  • BigFrankinTexas

    Yes yes, we all agree. Doesn’t matter.
    WE MUST make the “other side” understand. The problem is several-fold.

    1) They look at us as a bunch or crazed ‘gun-nuts’ – not patriots
    2) They believe the second amendment is outdated (so, isn’t the first?)
    3) They *feel* better with no guns around. Logic has no place in their thought process
    4) They don’t see the *need* for a __________ (fill in blank, gun)
    5) They were taught, continue to listen to and adhere to the Pro-government, anti-conservative , trash in the media and on higher-learning campuses
    6) Most have never fired a gun – let alone a __________ (fill in blank, gun)
    7) They rarely have any concept of history. Thanks -mg4us- for posting that excellent synopsis. Can we stop preaching to the choir now and get it to the ones who NEED to read it?
    8) We must always be rational when dealing with these lunatics. The moment we become agitated we are, again, put in the “crazy box” and ignored.

    No offense to all who have posted here, but let’s come up with solutions to bring the other side to our table rather than patting each other on the back for our constitutional and correct views. This approach is tantamount to scolding Charles Manson for being a “bad boy”.

    In closing, how do we, as freedom-loving, gun-owning, constitutionalists sway the other side?

    One word – compassion. Yes I said it; compassion. We must *feel* equal to their feelings. Understand that they want safety and are afraid. Teach them about real fear (government) and real safety (self reliance).

    Let’s be compassionate – that’s all they understand.

    Love they neighbor as thyself (even if they are lunatics)…

  • CDK