Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced plans to outlaw 120 specifically-named firearms including certain semiautomatic rifles, handguns, and shotguns.
Via Drudge:

Feinstein’s bill will mandate that “grandfathered weapons be registered.”

More… Did anyone else notice the good senator used the word “devises” when she meant “devices“? If she’s going to take away our guns is it too much to ask that she use the correct words?

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Disable Refresh for 30 Days

Cookies and JavaScript must be enabled for your setting to be saved.

1 2 3 7

`
  1. Are they still stupid enough to think the “bad guys” have legally purchased and registered their guns? My guess is the answer is “Yes”, they are that stupid.

  2. JB, are you stupid enough to think that this has anything to do with crime?

  3. and high-capacity ammunition feeding “devises”. Nice spelling…..good god…

  4. It’s almost like Feinstein is itching for a fight.

  5. Uh, should this anti-American crappola be passed, “grandfathered guns” will be hidden from sight, just like crazy Grandpa.

  6. Assault weapons? Bwhahaha! Hows abouts life disrupters? They’ll have to murder the language first!

  7. The tax cheats go after wealth and the armed go after firearms.

    Another day in Communist USSA.

    I just wonder what will be the straw that breaks the proverbial camel’s back.

  8. If you think this bill will never pass, you probably also thought that Obama’s health care plan would never pass, and if passed would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.


  9. #9 December 27, 2012 at 10:26 am
    Skandia Recluse commented:

    If you think this bill will never pass, you probably also thought that Obama’s health care plan would never pass, and if passed would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

    Roberts attacked the Commerce Clause and then passed taxation via the Bench – do you seriously think he wouldn’t attack the Second Amendment?

  10. Not saying it can’t be passed but this time dummycrats don’t control the house.

  11. The idiot has references about the 1994 assault weapons ban and it effectivness that have been refuted many times.

  12. So let me get this straight: 120 models of guns are to be banned. Does that mean that if the “Bushmaster” is banned, the manufacturer can just rename the model? Is this like banning the “Toyota Camry” so that all Toyota needs to do is market a “Camree” instead? And how does a bayonet make a gun more dangerous?

  13. Tell that ugly skank to pass a budget and cut spending a sh$t load and STFU until she does.

  14. If any new infringements of our right to bear arms is passed into law it’s time for open revolt.

  15. “Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced plans to outlaw 120 specifically-named firearms”

    Well, that’s progress – if you’re a Progressive I mean.

    And what’s next?

    How about outlawing 120 specifically-named words? Hey why stop at 120?

    Just don’t start yapping about the First and Second Amendments. To the Constitution I mean. You know, the Constitution? That old, out-of-date, virtually useless obstacle to good government? Time to get rid of that Constitution.

    Lissen, without the Constitution in the way, we could proceed quickly to a single-party system that could enact all sorts of Progressive things we want. Don’t you want all sorts of Progressive things?

    Or are you against progress?

  16. The gun grab has begun.

    Based on the language, she is going after any handgun that is “semi auto” i.e. any that hold 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 or 15.

    Oh how these people lie.

  17. wonder how many guns are protecting her fat ass?

  18. Just another Progressive power grab and trashing of the Constitution. When are we going to listen to what TJ recommended when a government becomes a dictator?



1 2 3 7


`

© Copyright 2014, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk