Democrats Announce Plans to Go After Handguns

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced plans to outlaw 120 specifically-named firearms including certain semiautomatic rifles, handguns, and shotguns.
Via Drudge:

Feinstein’s bill will mandate that “grandfathered weapons be registered.”

More… Did anyone else notice the good senator used the word “devises” when she meant “devices“? If she’s going to take away our guns is it too much to ask that she use the correct words?

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Joe Blow

    Are they still stupid enough to think the “bad guys” have legally purchased and registered their guns? My guess is the answer is “Yes”, they are that stupid.

  • Mark

    JB, are you stupid enough to think that this has anything to do with crime?

  • soxfanscott

    and high-capacity ammunition feeding “devises”. Nice spelling…..good god…

  • It’s almost like Feinstein is itching for a fight.

  • srdem65

    Uh, should this anti-American crappola be passed, “grandfathered guns” will be hidden from sight, just like crazy Grandpa.

  • Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157

    Assault weapons? Bwhahaha! Hows abouts life disrupters? They’ll have to murder the language first!

  • ★FALCON★

    The tax cheats go after wealth and the armed go after firearms.

    Another day in Communist USSA.

    I just wonder what will be the straw that breaks the proverbial camel’s back.

  • Pingback: Democrats Announce Plans to Go After Handguns « infowarsusa()

  • Skandia Recluse

    If you think this bill will never pass, you probably also thought that Obama’s health care plan would never pass, and if passed would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

  • ★FALCON★

    #9 December 27, 2012 at 10:26 am
    Skandia Recluse commented:

    If you think this bill will never pass, you probably also thought that Obama’s health care plan would never pass, and if passed would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

    Roberts attacked the Commerce Clause and then passed taxation via the Bench – do you seriously think he wouldn’t attack the Second Amendment?

  • Bigkahuna

    Not saying it can’t be passed but this time dummycrats don’t control the house.

  • Stephana

    The idiot has references about the 1994 assault weapons ban and it effectivness that have been refuted many times.

  • Elizabeth

    So let me get this straight: 120 models of guns are to be banned. Does that mean that if the “Bushmaster” is banned, the manufacturer can just rename the model? Is this like banning the “Toyota Camry” so that all Toyota needs to do is market a “Camree” instead? And how does a bayonet make a gun more dangerous?

  • Bigkahuna

    Tell that ugly skank to pass a budget and cut spending a sh$t load and STFU until she does.

  • King

    If any new infringements of our right to bear arms is passed into law it’s time for open revolt.

  • Stella Baskomb

    “Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced plans to outlaw 120 specifically-named firearms”

    Well, that’s progress – if you’re a Progressive I mean.

    And what’s next?

    How about outlawing 120 specifically-named words? Hey why stop at 120?

    Just don’t start yapping about the First and Second Amendments. To the Constitution I mean. You know, the Constitution? That old, out-of-date, virtually useless obstacle to good government? Time to get rid of that Constitution.

    Lissen, without the Constitution in the way, we could proceed quickly to a single-party system that could enact all sorts of Progressive things we want. Don’t you want all sorts of Progressive things?

    Or are you against progress?

  • Pingback: Democrats Announce Plans to Go After HandgunsPolitifreak()

  • Libtards Lie

    The gun grab has begun.

    Based on the language, she is going after any handgun that is “semi auto” i.e. any that hold 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 or 15.

    Oh how these people lie.

  • rhonda

    wonder how many guns are protecting her fat ass?

  • briscuit

    Just another Progressive power grab and trashing of the Constitution. When are we going to listen to what TJ recommended when a government becomes a dictator?

  • GotFreedom

    Bring it on Bi-otch!!!

    How about we outlaw 120 specifically named (for starters; could name more) govt employees who continually abuse their positions and the Constitution!!!

  • I’m sure all the criminals and mentally unstable will be first in line to comply. This is going to solve the problem. After this passes, there will be no more crimes committed with guns ever again. Just take a look at Mexico, see how well their ban on guns is working? Only 40,000 or so innocent citizens murdered so far. Not to mention, such a ban putting gun and ammo manufacturers and all associated with guns out of business. Gee, that ought to be real good for the economy. Sometimes I think these Dems and Liberals are from another planet. Sen. Feinstein has outlived her usefulness. She needs to retire.

  • Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157

    Is she going to secure our borders? Without sealing our borders the black market will thrive with respect to smuggling guns that are banned.

    Why not just go full Animal House:
    “This calls for a really futile and stupid gesture on somebody’s part”—Zombie John Belushi

  • Sam Stone

    The war notice has been issued by Feinstein, a concealed carry permit holder in California.

  • StandUpChuck

    Found this at another site.

    Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out
    Alan Korwin – Author Gun Laws Of America

    Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own. Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in the UK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.

    Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.

    Gun-ban list proposed. Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady’s plan to introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady’s current plans and targets of opportunity. It’s horrific. They’re going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They’ve made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states’ rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):

    Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
    M1 Carbine,
    Sturm Ruger Mini-14,
    Bushmaster XM15,
    Armalite M15,
    Thompson 1927,
    Thompson M1;
    NHM 90,
    NHM 91,
    SA 85,
    SA 93,
    Olympic Arms PCR;
    Calico Liberty ,
    Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU,
    Fabrique National FN/FAL,
    FN/LAR, or FNC,
    Thompson 1927 Commando,
    Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
    SKS with detachable magazine,
    SLG 95,
    SLR 95 or 96,
    Steyr AU,
    Galil and Uzi Sporter,
    Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).
    Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
    Calico M-110,
    MAC-11, or MPA3,
    Olympic Arms OA,
    TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10,
    Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
    Armscor 30 BG,
    SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
    Striker 12,
    Streetsweeper. Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
    A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:
    (i) a folding or telescoping stock,
    (ii) a threaded barrel,
    (iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see
    (iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.
    Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than
    10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles).
    A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a
    detachable magazine, and has:
    (i) a second pistol grip,
    (ii) a threaded barrel,
    (iii) a barrel shroud or
    (iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and
    (v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10
    A semiautomatic shotgun with:
    (i) a folding or telescoping stock,
    (ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
    (iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity
    of more than 5 rounds, and
    (iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
    Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.
    Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any “semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.”

    Note that Obama’s pick for this office, Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this determination, the bill says, “there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.” In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public.

    The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn’t have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose — is that devious or what? And of course, “sporting purpose” is a rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.

    Respectfully submitted, Alan Korwin, Author Gun Laws of America

  • Will someone and I MEAN THIS look that bitch in the face and explain to her that CRIMINALS DO NOT FOLLOW THE LAW!!! All this will do is leave people defenseless, Also we are not stupid we know this req to register all weapons is part of the ultimate goal of gun grab once they have everyone’s names and what they own!

  • Conservative Ken

    In all probability, the regime will have the opportunity to make two additional Supreme Court appointments. We are screwed.

  • ★FALCON★

    Last week the Official Chinese Communist Statist paper demanded America be disarmed. And Feinstein sides with the Communists and not the American people.

    That should tell everyone all they need to know about this regime.

  • Sam Stone


  • ★FALCON★

    I, personally, don’t intend to comply with any of these new communists law. They’re Unconstitutional and against God’s Plan for Mankind.

    Everyone should be able to defend themselves against a killer or a maniacal government.

    I will not comply.

  • The real Wow

    #21 December 27, 2012 at 10:53 am
    GotFreedom commented:

    Now that suggestion I like!!!! Could we expand it to a few more? And while we are at it, could we do away with their pay, Cadillac healthcare plans, and retirement???

  • democrats don’t want your guns because they are concerned about school violence. they want your guns because they know they have enslaved the american worker and they are afraid the slaves might stage an uprising.

  • Sam Stone

    #27 Conservative Ken, the oldest most likely to retire on SCOTUS is Ginsburg. The make up will not change with an Obama pick there. Next is Scalia Kennedy and Breyer. Scalia is still healthy and good for another 4 years, either of the other 2 may go. Neither is a solid Framer Justice.

  • It’s not even the new year yet, the leader of this regime has not even been sworn in yet, but we are seeing all sorts of anti American plans rushing us. I grieve for future generations, I grieve for our once great Nation. States better speak up. People need to know, WHERE TO GO to continue living under the United States Constitution.

  • Molon Labe.

    I mean….”what guns?”

  • I hope my Uncle _______ is paying attention!

  • wales

    It’s all just theater folks. Read this and tell me if you think DDay is being planned right now…

  • #25standup…the politicans are not concerned about your ability to defend yourself againist criminals, they are worried about your ability to defend yourself againist them.

    we only have thousands of gun control laws now, how well are they working out againist the adam lanzas.

    molon labe(and i don’t own a gun)

  • OldSailor

    There is no requirement at present for gun registration in my community, no record of who holds what weapon. Nearly 1 million people in this city alone. How many weapons I wonder.

    To hell with the gun-grabbers.

  • For My Liberty

    This has NOTHING to do with crime….it has EVERYTHING to do with the NWO, Agenda 21, and America becoming a SOCIALIST Country….. THIS needs to be read by EVERYONE and KNOW what is coming FAST right at us….and that we are SO SCREWED!

  • west1890

    Molon Labe………………

  • Catherine

    dinna finestien is a capo.

    Look at ww2

    No these evil polies (democrats) cannot take the right to bare arms away from the American People.


  • CR

    Well, we knew this kind of unlawful tripe was on the way. These legislators refuse to do their jobs and are complicit in illegal activities like Fast and Furious. They’re nothing but a pack of criminals and I don’t listen to criminals.

    They are seriously deluded if they think I would comply with any part of that bill. I no longer recognize their authority and there’s nothing they can do about it. They could send their agents to try and confiscate my weapons, but they would only lose those agents.

  • Bart Roberts

    “All this will do is leave people defenseless,…”

    This is intentional. The “esteemed” Nancy Pelosi speaks for every democrat, dead and alive!

    This is part of dictator barry hussein soetoro saebarkah’s plan for us.
    Street gangs and drug cartels will become our new masters under “The New Dictatorship”!

    Nice website, by the way; I just got done bookmarking it.

    Bartholomew Roberts

  • Mad Hatter

    I’ve said it at least a dozen times on this site in the past few weeks, and I’ll say it again. The Gun Gestapo is out in force, and they’re showing how they have a hatred for the 2nd Amendment.

    In the past, they would hide their agenda. Now, they’re being very brazen about their goals to wage Prohibition on the 2nd Amendment.

  • TruthTeller

    Do not participate. Do not comply. Bury.

  • Dana

    Gun CONtrol is a traitorous anti Second Amendment Democrat CON game that pretends to prevent crime, while infringing upon the Constitutional rights of TRUE AMERICANS.

    Keep track of the vermin who vote for this bill and if they’re up for re-election in 2014, vote them out of office.

    The greatest danger to America are anti Second Amendment Democrats.

  • Patty

    “Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test”

    “The bayonet is still very much a useful tool. That was kind of a dumb thing for him to say.”

    Read more:


    Americans voted for Obama, thanks, guys. SARC

  • Bigkahuna

    Watch out for this port worker strike. It could be a catalyst for something bigger.

  • OldSailor

    First, every politician who wants “gun control” should first step up and give up his guns and armed body guards and also remove his kids from any school or other location protected by armed guards or cops.

    Step up and set the pace guys … or sit down and STFU about disarming the law abiding citizens.

  • Patty

    #50 December 27, 2012 at 12:03 pm
    ponderon commented:

    And you can take that to the bank. Washington is stirring up a brew that is will be dangerous. Americans do cling to their guns and bible.

  • bacadog

    If that Kalifornia socialist thinks I am going to drag all of my weaponry down to the local “gun registration office” she can kiss my ass.

    I’ll never register anything with them. If they want my serial numbers, come get em’. I’ll be waiting.

  • Patty

    #51 December 27, 2012 at 12:03 pm
    OldSailor commented:
    😆 waiting for that to happen. They are hypocrites. Don’t you know.

  • thomas

    i do believe open revolt is needed …………..start making plans now folks…………..once these guns are taken we belong to them……………….im going to buy my guns and not register anything hide them until its time to bring them out im going to start prepping because i feel theres somthing terrible brewing

  • Patty


  • DecentAmerican

    And……this EXACT type of banning occurred just before Stalin, Hitler, and Mao instituted tyranny and murdered tens of millions of people. The founding fathers put in the 2nd amendment, and brave men and women in our military fought and died, to prevent this type of tyranny in the United States of America.

    But then, you can’t believe that the diabolical one in the white house can be that evil?

    Yes, he can, Because he IS the Evil One.

  • Carol-Christian Soldier

    you have D. Feinstein becasue of the R party!

    The NRSC came to CA and together with the CRP- “sprung ” M.Huffington upon us- when a man of honor -Congressman Dannemeyer was winning the primary ..
    seasoned volunteers said that Huffington would be worse than Feinstein- so they voted for her-

    SO- THANK the R elites for D Feinstein!!-

    THANK YOU NRSC and the R elites! SARC!

  • Patty
  • Lance o Lot

    Why is it that the Left’s solution to every “crisis” always involves depriving Americans of their money, their liberty, or both?

    And why do we let them get away with it?

  • mark1973

    I said last night that the SOB in the White House return had nothin to do with the so-called “Fiscal Cliff”. It had to do with Firearms control and the fact that they are starting to lose the narrative and the momentum. As-a-matter of fact, i don’t believe the Majority of the American people were ever on board the Assault Weapons or any other type of Ban. But now since Christmas and the congressional recess has taken attention away from Sandy Hook, Obama has to rush back and be ready when those marxists/islamists advisers of his,launch a new more Horrific “False Flag”,, to regenerate enthusiasm for an Assault Weapon’s ban,so he can issue an Executive Order.

    Remember,they can’t enslave us untill they get all of our Firearms. They are not going to stop untill they are STOOD Up To AND STOPPED! They are not going to back-off of this insane quest to Get all of our Firearms because it is the Key to everything for them. As far as the repubs are concerned they are going to cave if Obama doesn’t issue an outright decree Banning them. The repubs want us to be disarmed as much as the dems because they are also NWO lefties who have been posing as Conservatives and are Scared to death,of what the American people will do when they find out the repub establishment is nothing more than plan B for the Bankster oligarch’s: Rockefeller/Rotschild, in enslaving the world in a,”New World Order,One World Government” marxist/islamist slave state.

  • Patty

    Just a fun fact:

    Michael Moore’s Bodyguard Arrested on Airport Gun Charge

    Read more:,2933,144921,00.html#ixzz2GHI8bVkx

  • Patty

    Blogger Retaliates Against Paper That Published Gun Owner Addresses by Creating Interactive Map of Its Employees


  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Interesting. The scumbag in a congressional chamber controlled by a majority of scumbags has time for guns but no time for a budget.

  • TrickyDick

    You can have the guns when you disarm the secret service and make capitol hill a gun free zone. Until then. STFU!

  • marcus tullius cicero


  • minionoftruth

    Can we ban yentas?

  • Pingback: MEET POLICE CHIEF TIM FITCH! | Angry White Dude()

  • Owen

    Every single one of you making braggadocios comments isn’t going to do a damn thing about it, and you know it. You’ll vent your spleen on the interwebs, but when push comes to shove you’ll do just like the Australians and the British and hand them over.

    I’m not saying this to be taunting. I’m saying it because it pisses me off that all this “Molon Labe” talk is nothing but bluster.

    Just face it, we’re already serfs. The saddest part? That’s what we deserve to be.

  • Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157

    Speak for yourself, Owen. Since you’ve already admitted you’re a serf, don’t lump the rest of us in with your pu$$ified bs.

  • Owen

    Yeah right. When the boys in blue come you will be running out with your hands up and you know it.

  • bigL

    Mark Belling (sp) in for Rush said the ban comes from atreatywith theUN. Even Donk Sens asked Obie to pull it in the Summer of ’12 because theyd sink on it. But there is a prob in that the Constitution says that it is the Law of the Land incluuding treaties being up held. Something like that. So does the UN treaty on eliminating hand guns become supportedas a part of the Cunstitution?
    And he said that the standard folows a list like the one above but alos hasto have one military use or capacity like firing a bullet.
    I think the power and water will be turned off section by section to assure compliance

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    I’m not saying this to be taunting. I’m saying it because it pisses me off that all this “Molon Labe” talk is nothing but bluster.

    You’re probably right where blue states are concerned, especially their blue metro areas.

  • Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157

    I own a shotgun—that’s it. Since I’m peaceful and law-abiding(unless someone threatens me or my family), I don’t see why I’d need to come out of my house with my hands in the air, but I’m sure you’ve already envisioned yourself surrendering to some imaginary person of authority or submitting your defenseless family to thugs.

    Quit projecting your own impotence onto others. Accept the fact that your bravery is limited to your anonymity on the internet—and it suits you.

  • Patty


  • Sam Stone

    #52 Patty commented: “Americans do cling to their guns and bible.”

    Notice he is coming after both?

  • Patty


    As we know, Eric Holder’s “Fast and Furious” scheme has sparked outrage among the American people. The DOJ’s “Fast and Furious” operation placed guns into the hands of drug smugglers who have committed crimes through entrapment, which was directly responsible for the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Holder’s ultimate goal was to circumvent his own criminal activity by blaming gun stores in America for selling the very guns that the ATF put in the hands of smugglers. Of course, his plans were botched before he could blame the American people.

    Today, news broke that the ATF Director Todd Jones recently warned employees that they will face “consequences” if they don’t “respect the chain of command,” in what Republican lawmakers are decrying as an “ominous message” meant to shut up potential whistleblowers in the wake of the “Operation Fast and Furious” scandal.

    In the video above, released July 9, the acting director says, “… if you don’t find the appropriate way to raise your concerns to your leadership, there will be consequences. …”

    Where America stands

    Article 2 of the American Bill of Rights states:

    “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed (encroached upon)” (emphasis added).

    Founding Father and first president of the United States, George Washington, said that the right to bear arms is the “peoples’ liberty’s teeth.”

    The third president of the U.S., Thomas Jefferson said, “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

    And in The Federalist No. 46, James Madison, known as the Father of the Constitution and fourth president of the U.S., stated that the Constitution preserves “the advantage of being armed which Americans posses over the people of almost every other nation … (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”

    Benjamin Franklin brings forth the affirmation as well when he said, “Never trust a government that doesn’t trust its own citizens with guns.”

    This video below explains how 56 million people have been exterminated in the 20th century through the guise of gun control: go to video

  • Patty

    #76 December 27, 2012 at 1:59 pm
    Sam Stone commented:

    Ya! I have noticed that since 2008. Actually before his immaculate inauguration.

  • Patty

    If their intentions are to tear the Constitution apart in any way. Americans will revolt.

  • Owen

    The whole question is, are you going to be law abiding if this bill is passed? Are you going to be law abiding if an outright confiscation bill is passed?

    Many will answer that with a cry of Molon Labe, but how much of that is merely bravado? I suspect 90% of it. And that is exactly why the creep of tyranny continues unchallenged — everyone just goes along with it because this or that thing in and of itself isn’t worth going to prison or the cemetery for. Everyone will come up with a reason to just comply, especially when at first it’s just a pinch of incense for Caesar.

    There’s a reason the Left has been kicking asses and taking names for 100 years. If you want to know the reason all you have to do is look in the mirror.

  • Skip

    So basically, she wants to ban nearly every semiauto handgun. Utter lunacy. I hope (and pray) this never makes it out of committee.

  • Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157

    Alright Owen. So, what’s your action plan? C’mon, spell it out. Armed revolt! What is it that YOU’RE going to DO. My guess is you’ll b!tch and moan, kick your dog, or beat up your boyfriend, or someone else you feel you that you can physically intimidate.

    Since your initial comment was just a childish insult, I doubt you have the intellectual capacity to carry a serious debate regarding the practicality involved in confiscating 300 million guns.

    Show us how it’s done, Owen. Become a an hero. Go out guns ablazin’. It’s for teh cause™!

  • imtorqued

    “Keep track of the vermin who vote for this bill and if they’re up for re-election in 2014, vote them out of office.”

    Don’t you understand that there is no longer a ballot box option for us?

  • Sam Stone

    They can’t register sex offenders or illegal aliens, how will they register 170,000,000 people and 300,000,000 firearms?

  • Owen

    I’ve already told you the plan, Mr. Cliffdiver. Bend over and grab your ankles. That will be your plan and everyone else’s too. The Left won the Culture War. It’s a clean up operation now.

    Childish insult? More like 100% reality.

  • bg
  • Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157

    Good plan, Owen. I’m sure your boyfriend approves. Do you do a little role playing? Armed citizen and the government gun-grabber(pun intended).

  • American Woman

    They never limited the rights of wanton criminals, who crossed our borders, but they have no problem attacking the rights of free people born in America. This is the Progressive mindset, fascist to the core.

  • Pingback: Born Conservative | Blog Archive | Democrats Announce Plans to Go After Handguns()

  • Sandy

    Excuse me, I was wondering about the Fiscal Cliff — have we gone over it already or are the Dems just ignoring it in favor of Gun Control? I guess there are so many downsides to a Fiscal Plan that the Dems are going to ignore it in favor of something the media will enjoy covering. As Marie Antoinette once said LET EM EAT CAKE.

  • usamopatriot

    Come an get em you gutless mfers.

  • FMB42


    Those won’t be around much longer (and if they are, they’ll be corrupted by voter fraud).

    Don’t be surprised if, and when:

    1. Nearly all public sector employees are partly re-defined as “public safety” officers and, as such, are exempt from this new gun ban law (care to guess who’ll get your confiscated guns?).

    2. A “fiscal cliff” or some other staged national “disaster” brings about a declaration of marshal law followed by:

    3. A suspension of Federal Elections, if not all elections both State and Federal. A logical follow-up to this would be:

    4. White House operations are moved to Hawaii, or some other location that’s well isolated from the continental remains of what was once the United States.

    Sounds improbable, if not impossible you say?

    Well most, if not all, of the above is exactly how Hitler took control of Germany.

    Also keep in mind that Stalin, and Tojo, used very similar tactics as a means of taking control of Russia and Japan.

  • JoyO

    The Progressives have a one-track mind — they have to destroy our Constitution so the Government can control every aspect of our lives. They’re trying to spend as much money as they can to speed up the process. Once they take our guns, take over our healthcare, they own us!

  • mark1973

    Hey #80, Are you one of the people mentioned in this piece who is payed by the Obama administration to infest and troll the sites and discussion forums? Yep, i bet you are? Just one question,as scared as we are,we know what happens if we give up our Firearms… Genocide. Because that has been what has happened at every other time it has been done. So we have really no choice. If we give up our Firearms we will be enslaved and then Murdered. If we don’t give up our Firearms and stand our ground,we have aMUCH better than 50/50 chance of overthrowing these tyrants and getting our Liberty and Freedom back. Are you gonna be First through my door coming for my Firearms? LOL I didn’t think so. By the way,how much does Media Matters pay you to troll?

  • dwdude

    #85 owen
    do you forget that most insurrection is led by a small group dragging the masses along?
    if the lords of leftism think this is going to fly without severe retaliation, they are dreaming.

  • dwdude

    no one saw the tea party coming as peaceful resistance to tyranny, the politicians will not see the armed resistance group coming either.

  • mg4us

    I say hold the line until we get to the bottom of fast & Furious. .

    Who knew what when and gave the order to bypass current system of requiring background checks by shipping guns illegally to Mexico.

    As for Feinstein. . I say cut back spending in California. . starve the state. . eat out less. .buy less. . .drive less and let California feel the sting of dollars going elsewhere.

  • tomas

    these liberal democrats are coming up on getting more than they wished for. theyll get their guns one bullet at a time. hypocrites that own guns trying to take law abiding civilians guns. the tyranny knows no bounds. they are not our bosses…WE ARE THEIRS.

  • Frank

    Fail to see any legislature addressing the root cause “mental illness”.

  • Winston Wolfe

    When the boys in blue come you will be running out with your hands up – Owen

    Not a chance, boy. Not a chance.

    If I’m going down, they’re going down, too.

    I’ve done enough in this life. Bring on the next one.

  • Tricky Dick

    Feinstein’s bill will mandate that “grandfathered weapons be registered.”

    Let me translate that for you. That’s preconfiscation registration. They want to know what doors to go kick in if when the time comes that they pass laws to confiscate your guns and you fail to show up.

  • Zelsdorf Ragshaft III

    Jefferson said “The beauty of the 2nd Amendment is that it will only be used in they try to take it away. I wonder if they will try to enforce the anti gun laws in Washington DC when the millions of us decend on that city to protest, with force, the “shall not be infringed” part of that right?

  • Barracuda

    Are they still stupid enough to think the American people will ALLOW them to take our guns, regardless of what laws they pass?

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    I say hold the line until we get to the bottom of fast & Furious. .

    Two problems: 1) When is the bottom of Fast & Furious going to be reached? Haven’t heard a peep out of anyone on this, not even Darrell Issa. As far as the ignorant voting public is concerned, this is old news, and bringing it up again will only be seen as an attempt to smear Obie.

    2) In the event that the whole story of Fast & Furious is exposed, and Obie is somehow revealed to have been a crucial part of the operation, what then? Impeachment? Possibly. Conviction in the Senate? Unlikely, and the chance of any Senate Democrat paying the price for not voting to convict will be very, very small.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Are they still stupid enough to think the American people will ALLOW them to take our guns,…

    In the case of blue states, the answer is probably yes.


    I don’t break their laws. They have no rights to my rights.

  • Truth Teller

    Those who want to take away our rights must understand they don’t live in a bubble disconnected from the reality the rest of us live within.

    Start collecting and publishing the addresses of politicians, media participants, and those leading efforts against the Constitution.

    They need to understand that we are watching them as much as they are watching us. They also need to be reminded that we outnumber me.

  • Truth Teller

    Outnumber them…damn autocorrect

  • halodoc

    It’s not a matter of her using the correct word. It’s a matter of her KNOWING how to spell the word she means (or her grunts should).

    It is rumored her husband earns a living buying and selling weapons, particularly guns. Someone should looking into any family investments in blind trusts, investment portfolios and such. This phony knows this is dead in the water. Follow the money. Also, this is typical bait and switch Democrat tactic. Go for the gusto, then come back with a “lesser” version and then claiming, “fine, see, we’re willing to ‘compromise.'” And the dumbass RINOs in the capitol fall for it every time and hop right on board the idiot train.

  • bg




  • dallasdan

    What a bitch.

  • Multitude

    I did some preliminary analysis tonight regarding Red Counties / Blue Counties and per-capita gun crime. It’s perhaps one of the more shocking indications of just where the problems reside in our society, from the limited data set I worked with. Consider this: you know the 2012 county-specific map that showed that the United States is overwhelmingly a red-state country, except for the high urban counties?

    It’s worse than that. We’re truly two nations, culturally, and even more specifically, when it comes to per capita gun crimes. In the counties that vote blue (Democrat), they simply can’t handle their guns. Gun crimes are a problem, again, per capita (meaning I’m factoring out population). Blue counties, from my limited but so far consistent analysis, have several times the gun crime problem. One could conclude they are a people and a culture that cannot handle guns.

    Red counties are Switzerland. We have guns, and we don’t have gun crime.

    Two nations. Two cultures. What’s even more curious is that the blue counties have some of the most rigorous gun-control laws, yet from other studies, they tend to backfire (there needs to be much more extensive analysis of this).

    The single most important question we need to ask is this: Why can’t progressives handle guns without killing each other? What is this violence that lurks within the “gimme free stuff” progressive serf? Is there a lurking violence within the recipient of unearned presents? Is there a pathology to the parasite, where perhaps, self loathing leads somewhere? Is Sandra Fluke a ticking time bomb? All of this speculation is well above my pay grade, but something suggests the violence problem is profoundly cultural, and specifically localized to the blue-state culture.

    These are questions the media has hidden, imposing “Godwin’s Law” and other bogus arguments to prevent the lifting up of rocks that require serious questions be answered about progressive ideology and its direct connection to totalitarianism, genocide and violence. We know of Sanger’s connection to black baby genocide, as do we understand President Wilson’s connection to the Klan-implicated progressive ideology. Some of us are also quite familiar with the deep anti-semetic, genocidal roots of progressive ideology. When Democrats scream about “rich Wall Street bankers,” some of us understand this is code for Jew hatred.

    Democrats: why do you so readily hate and kill? The data shows it’s not the guns. The rest of us do just fine with them. What is so pathologically wrong with you?

  • Another Bob

    Well when a 100 million people say NO what are they going to do?

  • Another Bob

    This will never pass the House

  • YourMaster

    sex causes STD’s, AIDS/HIV, and other deadly diseases.

    Therefore, we should all demand the senate write up a bill that bans sex for liberals only…
    and enforce it by making all the liberals sign up for castration by a rusty knife, classes, and registering or wearing an armband that identifies them as liberal to everybody else.

    so that the world can be a better place without their stupidity
    and liberalism will die out naturally.

    ….that is the next proposal that should be made to the White house. *lol*

  • TrickyDick

    You can have my gun when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers you petty tyrant!

  • All this is going to do is make us criminals, force good police officers to make the choice whether or not to arrest us. Force us to decide whether or not to go peacefully.

    And the whole time SHE’LL not be anywhere near the crisis. Above the fray wondering what the hell just happened and yapping on the Sunday shows. Just living large in Washington D.C. making bad laws and endangering all of us- and for what? Crime has been going down for years, long after the “ban” was lifted and semi-autos made affordable and plentiful. Feinstein was hoping to get this law passed after Fast and Furious. When that blew up she must had thought Aurora and Newtown were blessings.

    She is a bad person.

    Crazy people are everywhere, no change in the law there, huh? Just today I read some crazy woman killed another subway commuter by pushing him in front of a train.
    Sad, just sad that we allow people like her anywhere near the halls of power.

    Things are going to get sporty if she gets her way.

    Read my book.

  • Ripped

    Where does this Btupid Sitch get off thinking she can carry a concealed weapon herself and then tell me I can’t.

    Huck Fer!

  • NoResolution

    Liberals caused drug addiction, racism, AIDS, and mass shootings. Time to ban Liberals who are the real nuts in America.

  • Pingback: 450 Teachers Apply for 24 Spots in a Free Ohio Firearms TrainingPolitifreak()

  • Pingback: 450 Teachers Apply for 24 Spots in a Free Ohio Firearms Training | END TIME HEADLINES()

  • Pingback: 450 Teachers Apply for 24 Spots in a Free Ohio Firearms Training | Andrea EndTimeNews()

  • Pingback: 450 Teachers Apply for 24 Spots in a Free Ohio Firearms Training | Endtime News with Prophecy in Mind()

  • Pingback: US Marine Pens Viral Letter to Anti-Gun Senator Dianne Feinstein: “No Ma’am”Politifreak()

  • Pingback: U.S. Marine Pens Letter To Gun Grabbing Hypocrite Dianne Feinstein « THE WAKING GIANT()

  • dillon

    Well, I’ll continue to repeat what I’ve heard a comedian say. The worst job in America would become “Federal firearms seizier”. “Hi, I’m here to take your guns away.” High turn over.

    Do we need firearms used by the military or police?

    “There are going to be situations where people are going to go without assistance. That’s just the facts of life.”
    — LA Police Chief Gates.

  • Pingback: Monday Morning Catch-Up: In Your Face- Obama Taps Hagel for Pentagon, Brennan for CIA « Nice Deb()

  • Pingback: The Right of the People to Bear Arms Shall Not Be Infringed — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami()