Democrats Announce Plans to Go After Handguns

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced plans to outlaw 120 specifically-named firearms including certain semiautomatic rifles, handguns, and shotguns.
Via Drudge:

Feinstein’s bill will mandate that “grandfathered weapons be registered.”

More… Did anyone else notice the good senator used the word “devises” when she meant “devices“? If she’s going to take away our guns is it too much to ask that she use the correct words?

 

  • Joe Blow

    Are they still stupid enough to think the “bad guys” have legally purchased and registered their guns? My guess is the answer is “Yes”, they are that stupid.

  • Mark

    JB, are you stupid enough to think that this has anything to do with crime?

  • soxfanscott

    and high-capacity ammunition feeding “devises”. Nice spelling…..good god…

  • http://holgerawakens.blogspot.com Holger Awakens

    It’s almost like Feinstein is itching for a fight.

  • srdem65

    Uh, should this anti-American crappola be passed, “grandfathered guns” will be hidden from sight, just like crazy Grandpa.

  • Amalgamated Cliff Divers, Local 157

    Assault weapons? Bwhahaha! Hows abouts life disrupters? They’ll have to murder the language first!

  • ★FALCON★

    The tax cheats go after wealth and the armed go after firearms.

    Another day in Communist USSA.

    I just wonder what will be the straw that breaks the proverbial camel’s back.

  • Pingback: Democrats Announce Plans to Go After Handguns « infowarsusa()

  • Skandia Recluse

    If you think this bill will never pass, you probably also thought that Obama’s health care plan would never pass, and if passed would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

  • ★FALCON★


    #9 December 27, 2012 at 10:26 am
    Skandia Recluse commented:

    If you think this bill will never pass, you probably also thought that Obama’s health care plan would never pass, and if passed would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

    Roberts attacked the Commerce Clause and then passed taxation via the Bench – do you seriously think he wouldn’t attack the Second Amendment?

  • Bigkahuna

    Not saying it can’t be passed but this time dummycrats don’t control the house.

  • Stephana

    The idiot has references about the 1994 assault weapons ban and it effectivness that have been refuted many times.

  • Elizabeth

    So let me get this straight: 120 models of guns are to be banned. Does that mean that if the “Bushmaster” is banned, the manufacturer can just rename the model? Is this like banning the “Toyota Camry” so that all Toyota needs to do is market a “Camree” instead? And how does a bayonet make a gun more dangerous?

  • Bigkahuna

    Tell that ugly skank to pass a budget and cut spending a sh$t load and STFU until she does.

  • King

    If any new infringements of our right to bear arms is passed into law it’s time for open revolt.

  • Stella Baskomb

    “Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) announced plans to outlaw 120 specifically-named firearms”

    Well, that’s progress – if you’re a Progressive I mean.

    And what’s next?

    How about outlawing 120 specifically-named words? Hey why stop at 120?

    Just don’t start yapping about the First and Second Amendments. To the Constitution I mean. You know, the Constitution? That old, out-of-date, virtually useless obstacle to good government? Time to get rid of that Constitution.

    Lissen, without the Constitution in the way, we could proceed quickly to a single-party system that could enact all sorts of Progressive things we want. Don’t you want all sorts of Progressive things?

    Or are you against progress?

  • Pingback: Democrats Announce Plans to Go After HandgunsPolitifreak()

  • Libtards Lie

    The gun grab has begun.

    Based on the language, she is going after any handgun that is “semi auto” i.e. any that hold 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 or 15.

    Oh how these people lie.

  • rhonda

    wonder how many guns are protecting her fat ass?

  • briscuit

    Just another Progressive power grab and trashing of the Constitution. When are we going to listen to what TJ recommended when a government becomes a dictator?