Bishops Renew Their Call For Legislative Action on Religious Liberty

The United States Conference on Catholic Bishops came out with a atatement yesterday following the news that President Obama was rethinking his assault on religious freedom. The bishops in their remarks continue to call on Congress for legislative action on religious freedom.
The United States Conference on Catholic Bishops reported, via Free Republic:

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) have issued the following statement:

The Catholic bishops have long supported access to life-affirming healthcare for all, and the conscience rights of everyone involved in the complex process of providing that healthcare. That is why we raised two serious objections to the “preventive services” regulation issued by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in August 2011.

First, we objected to the rule forcing private health plans — nationwide, by the stroke of a bureaucrat’s pen—to cover sterilization and contraception, including drugs that may cause abortion. All the other mandated “preventive services” prevent disease, and pregnancy is not a disease. Moreover, forcing plans to cover abortifacients violates existing federal conscience laws. Therefore, we called for the rescission of the mandate altogether.

Second, we explained that the mandate would impose a burden of unprecedented reach and severity on the consciences of those who consider such “services” immoral: insurers forced to write policies including this coverage; employers and schools forced to sponsor and subsidize the coverage; and individual employees and students forced to pay premiums for the coverage. We therefore urged HHS, if it insisted on keeping the mandate, to provide a conscience exemption for all of these stakeholders—not just the extremely small subset of “religious employers” that HHS proposed to exempt initially.

Today, the President has done two things.

First, he has decided to retain HHS’s nationwide mandate of insurance coverage of sterilization and contraception, including some abortifacients. This is both unsupported in the law and remains a grave moral concern. We cannot fail to reiterate this, even as so many would focus exclusively on the question of religious liberty.

Second, the President has announced some changes in how that mandate will be administered, which is still unclear in its details. As far as we can tell at this point, the change appears to have the following basic contours:

·It would still mandate that all insurers must include coverage for the objectionable services in all the policies they would write. At this point, it would appear that self-insuring religious employers, and religious insurance companies, are not exempt from this mandate.

·It would allow non-profit, religious employers to declare that they do not offer such coverage. But the employee and insurer may separately agree to add that coverage. The employee would not have to pay any additional amount to obtain this coverage, and the coverage would be provided as a part of the employer’s policy, not as a separate rider.

·Finally, we are told that the one-year extension on the effective date (from August 1, 2012 to August 1, 2013) is available to any non-profit religious employer who desires it, without any government application or approval process.

These changes require careful moral analysis, and moreover, appear subject to some measure of change. But we note at the outset that the lack of clear protection for key stakeholders—for self-insured religious employers; for religious and secular for-profit employers; for secular non-profit employers; for religious insurers; and for individuals—is unacceptable and must be corrected. And in the case where the employee and insurer agree to add the objectionable coverage, that coverage is still provided as a part of the objecting employer’s plan, financed in the same way as the rest of the coverage offered by the objecting employer. This, too, raises serious moral concerns.

We just received information about this proposal for the first time this morning; we were not consulted in advance. Some information we have is in writing and some is oral. We will, of course, continue to press for the greatest conscience protection we can secure from the Executive Branch. But stepping away from the particulars, we note that today’s proposal continues to involve needless government intrusion in the internal governance of religious institutions, and to threaten government coercion of religious people and groups to violate their most deeply held convictions. In a nation dedicated to religious liberty as its first and founding principle, we should not be limited to negotiating within these parameters. The only complete solution to this religious liberty problem is for HHS to rescind the mandate of these objectionable services.

We will therefore continue—with no less vigor, no less sense of urgency—our efforts to correct this problem through the other two branches of government. For example, we renew our call on Congress to pass, and the Administration to sign, the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act. And we renew our call to the Catholic faithful, and to all our fellow Americans, to join together in this effort to protect religious liberty and freedom of conscience for all.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • nana

    Game on. Obama thinks he can circle the wagon and pretend he’s giving in and he’s not.

  • ironbill

    Thankfully the Bishops see through this ruse. Again, Obama, the smartest man ever, is too clever by half. He believes that if he says you don’t have to pay for it, only the insurance company you pay (and that will now increase your premiums) actually provides these services – never mind the fact that everything he has done, both in the last several days and with the Affordable Care Act, is an extra-constitutional breach of the law.

    To my liberal friends I offer some points to ponder:
    You may sympathize with and give support to the notion of free health care, and unfettered reproductive health access, but do you realize that everything this man has done is an abject abuse of power? And that these acts set the precedent that presidential power is unlimited whenever the current executive says so?

    The consequence of this behavior will only be revealed to you when you are not in power. The Founders were smart enough to see this kind of malfeasance two and a quarter centuries ago. Maybe they were the smartest guys ever.

  • bg


    about damn time..

    there is a God, and we are the people..


  • JPL17

    There he goes again, playing “Lucy and the Football” with Catholics.

    Last time idiots like Stupak and Sister Carol Keenan fell for it.

    Let’s pray they’ve learned their lesson.

  • Ken

    No employer should have to have contraception control as part on their insurance policies
    Christian or otherwise That is the point

  • they don’t need legislative action, just get the politicans to follow the constitution.

    has obama ever done anything that the majority of the citizens are for?

  • dba…vagabond trader

    We don’t need anymore legislation, we have the First Amendment, don’t they teach that in the seminary?

    Complete repeal of Obamacare, nothing less is acceptable!

  • StrangernFiction

    And the GOP establishment is trying to shove Romney down our throats. You would be hard pressed to come up with a worse candidate on this monumental issue.

  • Greg

    Last paragraph of statement is very interesting…. We will continue to aggressively work to correct this problem with the two branches of govt…legislative to ensure the law is corrected,,,and renew our call to the people to join together.

    Deliberately leaves out the courts, and the call to people seems like a voter drive

  • dba…vagabond trader

    @tommy mc donnell :

    Sorry, didn’t read your comment. gmta 🙂

  • Redlite

    Government has no business being involved with woman’s reproduction. Where in the Constitution does it say anything about providing free contraception, sterilization, or abortion?

    This nothing but a smoke screen to give Barry some cover.. The Lucy and a football analogy is very much on point.

  • Bitter Clinger

    How on earth will the “legislative process” correct this tyranny? Do you think King Hussein will sign any piece of legislation that comes down from our objections? See Mark Steyn’s piece in Orange County Register. Obama is now King Henry VIII and the Act of Supremacy is in place. Like Henry VIII, Obama has set himself above the church. Off with the heads of those who object: Cardinal John Fisher and Sir Thomas More as prominent examples.

  • Fionnagh

    Too little, too late. Where was the Church’s outrage over BHO’s documented support of late-term abortions? Where was the Church’s outrage over the planned mosque at Ground Zero? What about covering up the cross at the university? Didn’t 80% of Catholics vote for this fraud? At this point we don’t need statements from the bishops. We need another Battle of Lepanto.

  • Jason

    “We will continue to prevent any attempt for women to enjoy sexual intercourse so we can impose 12th century ideals on as many people as possible.”

    One thing Catholic bishops and you Conservative clowns have in common: you have no idea how to pleasure a woman.

  • Kissmygrits

    We already have this protection under the Constitution and no further legislation is needed. Just some reps with the nerve to use current law to stop this madness. Zero has no legal authority to do what he is doing.

  • truth teller

    Sorry #14…I likely pleasured your woman (or women) while you were busy being lazy.

    And yes…it was the best for her…sorry!

  • Fionnagh

    #14 You’ve missed the point entirely.

  • Pingback: Bishops Renew Their Call For Legislative Action on Religious Liberty | ()

  • truth teller

    #17…didn’t miss any point…just pointing out my physical prowess!!! 😉

  • bigL

    the Contraceptive and AB issue is in the law as passed by Congess.It is probably in many different paragraphs as were other issues. The Obama HealthNoCare Law no matter how they did it was
    passed. It will take Congress, rehearing the legislation without the AB and contraceptive paragraghs to undo it. Congress must undo it. IT is not for Obama to just order things changed. He has no power to order insurance cos to cover this pill or that Rx.
    But the companies are craven and won’t fight him. And the GOP won’t fight either. Very sad.
    We need a complete clean-out of D.C. Staff and congress.
    And Note that Roman Catholics vote DEmocrat. The Catholcs do NOT vote for GOPers. In 2012, no matter what has happened: arrests, 140 million dollar fines, closings- Roman Catholics will still vote for Obama
    So all this controversy is Obama getting the votes in, paradoxically. More than 50 million probably.

  • Han Solo

    Frankly as a catholic I have to say…..serves the church right for being such mouthpieces for socialist healthcare over the last few years.

    They are getting just what they asked for.

  • Multitude

    I’m calling Omaha’s Catholic leadership Monday to let them know that if they force me to pay for their abortions and birth control, we’ll be organizing protests on their church steps calling them out as welfare baby killers.

    It’s beyond repugnant to pretend you’re maintaining your morality by pushing the cost of your sins onto someone else. Do I have to show up for confession and pray for forgiveness for all the babies Catholics kill using my money extracted by the health insurance companies? If you’re going to abort, you need to pay for it (financially and morally) on your own.

    Jesus may have died for your sins but that doesn’t mean your neighbor should pay for them too.

  • olm

    That is absolutely correct. Catholics are fully at fault here, and it pains me, except that watching them fight back is terrific.
    Vote Republican you asses. The Democrats have been using you idiots for years and they don’t intend to stop now.
    As far as pleasuring women………….the only thing I see is that this whole debate is pleasuring liberal woman to no end. I really don’t see them as worth a second thought, but if you do….there really doesn’t seem to be a challenge there.

  • The Elector of Saxony

    Unfortunately, the Church may believe that a compromise with evil is possible. They will have to learn the hard way that there is no compromise with the Marxists in our government. Obama and those like him will never stop until no objection to abortion, gay marriage, contraception is permitted anywhere in society, even inside the Sanctuary, from the Pulpit, anywhere. There will no refuge for people of conscience. They want to drive Christian pharmacists from their profession, drive Christian physicians and nurses out of the profession. If you will not kill babies, they want you out. The Obamacare law was clear that it would force every health care provider to supply and provide “women’s health” which has always meant abortion, contraception, and sterilization. Until Obama is defeated and his laws repealed, there will be no refuge for the faithful. I fear, though that our Church will allow itself to be corrupted, just as the Church of England allowed itself to be corrupted to the point it now advocates for euthanasia in support of the socialist health scheme in that country.

    Of course, the Church allowed Obama to have an honorary doctorate at Notre Dame, a formerly Catholic institution. What can we do when our Church abandons Christ?

  • Multitude

    The one bit of great news out of all of this is that President Obama has shown us how to win the second amendment debate. Let’s rebrand gun rights as “Violent Offender Abortion Rights” and demand women be able to abort rapists and murders with the right to carry handguns, shotguns, whatever, whenever. We should not burden women with the certainty of rape or death against a more powerful male aggressor. Allow her to control her own body and have the right to keep a rapist from intruding upon her person with the right to carry.

    Bring it, NRA. Let’s see how the Leninist in the White House stands up for women when the second amendment is made relevant to their rights.

  • Pingback: The “Compromise” That Wasn’t « For What It's Worth . . .()

  • bg


    when is Notre Dame going to apologize??

    October 1, 2011

    Notre Dame president “bewildered” by Obama’s
    contraception, sterilization, morning-after pill mandate

    more here (scroll for more, or not, your choice)..

    Obama’s mind set via Mama & Papa, not to
    mention the “radical” friends he sough, etc..


  • bg


    re: #27 February 11, 2012 at 11:11 am bg

    O’s mindset, etc..


  • Sandy

    While I am not a Catholic I am so proud that The Catholic Church is fighting back against what is not only an intrusion into religious rights but Constitutional Rights as well.

    Hannity had a great program on this yesterday. I want to see Congress force a vote on this issue so that we can affirm once again the Separation of Church and State.

  • sistrum

    How illuminating of Obama’s mind it is that when the Catholic Church complains of being forced to act against their religious beliefs, and pay for it besides, he thinks it’s a concession to make them do it for free. As if the money were the only sticking point, and “moral conviction” merely a term used in the rhetoric of haggling.

  • snusan

    Thank you God for giving the bishops clarity of vision and courage to see thru and fight this evil. I agree with many of you who say the Catholic Church was partially responsible for the mess we are in. My rep is Donnelly, one of the Stupak stooges who caved to Obama. The story I heard was that Donnelly couldn’t withstand the pressure Obama was dishing out. What a Man! NOT!!! Now this creep is running for Senator in Indiana. Hopefully and with plenty of prayers we can defeat him. I don’t know about the rest of you but I have been crying quite a bit about the horror of killing innocent human life but also the methodical destruction of my country. God willing, I will fight to reverse course. Remember, with God on our side who can defeat us.

  • squeaky

    [Bloomberg evicts churches from using public schools, but allows labor unions]
    [Pastor Matt Brown of Park Slope Church has been meeting in John Jay High School in Brooklyn for the past eight years. He pays a fee of $3,200 a month to cover maintenance costs and is one of the clergymen being forced to relocate.] i know there’s a message being sent [dum dee dum] now just what is it [snort]. picture me puzzled [not].

  • darcy

    As long as Roe v Wade is the law of the land the state will NEVER give up its plan to subordinate our First Amendment rights to the manufactured right imposed by SCOTUS of a “right to privacy under the due process clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution [that] extends to a woman’s . . . ” right to kill her unborn child. (Quoted material from Wikipedia.)

    And other writers on this board have rightly noted that the Catholic Church has permitted the left to chip away at our freedoms over these past 50 years with nary a whisper of protest. It is reaping what it has sown. And how many Catholics voted for the execrable Obama? That a church body could have so many deluded members speaks volumes to the failure of the church to uphold orthodoxy. Any parishioner who understood that Obama promoted infanticide could never in good conscience have voted to him.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    I’m Catholic, but I just can’t muster up much sympathy for these guys. That they only had a problem with Obie only after their ox was being gored tells me it was only their interests they gave a you-know-what about.

    The clergy should have known better, especially American and American-educated ones.

  • squeaky

    obama and his Catholic plan

  • Pingback: Bishops Renew Their Call For Legislative Action on Religious Liberty | Liberal Whoppers()

  • SturJen

    It’s as if Obama is saying, “Hey, you don’t need to be a part of that armed robbery, just drive the getaway car.” Like it’s something totally different. I get the idea that this man has no concept of religion, faith, morals, or anything even close to that. He thinks he’s comprimising!

    I’m still thinking that the Catholic Church is getting their comeuppance for all that buddy-buddy antics they’ve done with the Progressive Left over the last 40 years. As I’ve said before, You sleep with whores, you’ll eventually get crabs.

    As to pleasuring a Liberal Woman sexually—- can that actually be done in the presence of men? I thought that was what those mechanical devices were made for.

  • The Catholic Church has had mixed emotions about Obama because like it he is for open borders.

    Now they see what they are dealing with– a cross between a Tammany Hall weasel and an out of control politburo chief.

    Obama may have capitulated to the Catholics regarding contraception but after doing so he went on to strong-arm insurance providers. If given the chance he would turn all the means of production over to the government.

    His socialism infuriates me.

  • JPL17

    @SturJen #37:

    “It’s as if Obama is saying [to Catholic employers], ‘Hey, you don’t need to be a part of that armed robbery, just drive the getaway car.’”

    GREAT analogy for Obama’s bogus “compromise”!

    “As to pleasuring a Liberal Woman sexually — can that actually be done in the presence of men? I thought that was what those mechanical devices were made for.”

    Absolutely correct! An now a study proves it…

  • Pingback: Democrat Schakowsky: No Americans Actually Follow Their Christian Faith (Video) | FavStocks()