Pelosi’s Office Says She Doesn’t Have Dirt on Newt After All …(Pelosi Is Running Mouth Again)

#1 January 25, 2012 at 1:35 pm

KornKing commented:

Sure hope he wasn’t doinking her on that couch

#2 January 25, 2012 at 1:43 pm

Molon Labe commented:

Pelosi is suffering from dementia and has for some time. She is also afflicted with that disease common to dhimmierats, forked tongue-hoof in mouth.

#3 January 25, 2012 at 1:44 pm

gee! commented:

This was to plant-doubt in minds of the people…………….another policial tactic thats work soo well for liberals so far…………reminder here Cain………….The Examiner…………what really happened in the Gingrich ethics case……………..http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/what-really-happened-gingrich-ethics-case/336051

#4 January 25, 2012 at 1:45 pm

Blacque Jacques Shellacque commented:

It is senile.

Won’t stop the idiots in SF from voting for this loathsome piece of crap, however…

#5 January 25, 2012 at 1:48 pm

MustComment commented:

Maybe if she’d sober up, she’d make more sense. No. Not even then…

#6 January 25, 2012 at 1:53 pm

Sally commented:

“There is something I know”.

Maybe he steered stimulus (Tarp I) funding to his spouse’s tuna canning empire in Western Somoa?

Perhaps he quaudzulpled his income while in office (ok; he probably did do that)

He probably blocked credit card reform while investing millions in exclusive visa stock offerings

It is likely his brother in law was a major investor in a solar company that received a $737 million loan guarantee from 1 billion dollars approved from the Department of Energy

He also probably used multiple military aicraft like they were his “private fleet’
http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/11-air-pelosi-scandal

What ever she knows we know it probably won’t surprise us.

Sadly, we know the majority of them are thugs, criminals and apparently are either so frightened or threatened they can’t or won’t advocate for us.

#7 January 25, 2012 at 1:54 pm

Granny commented:

Suggested? SUGGESTED??? “There is something I know” is absolutely NOT suggested. It is a bald faced LIE.

#8 January 25, 2012 at 1:56 pm

myohmy commented:

It must be the botox. This woman is pathetic.

#10 January 25, 2012 at 1:57 pm

FurryGuy commented:

Hmmm, lies being uttered with intent to maliciously influence an election.

In a perverse way the more Queen Nan expels noxious fumes from her piehole the more I might like to see Newt gain the nomination.

#11 January 25, 2012 at 1:58 pm

Skandia Recluse commented:

Pelosi did not say ‘she had dirt on Gingrich’, what she said was ‘she knows something’. That something could be that she knows how the ballots will be counted in the next election, or some other part of the election process that would prevent Gingrich being elected. She could also ‘know something’ about a possible future event that would have a dramatic impact on the next election.

The most reasonable explanation is that Pelosi, and the democrat party have a plan that they believe will work. Pelosi’s comment is nothing more than that, she ‘knows something’ believes something, and simply said so. In her universe, Gingrich can’t win the election.

The democrats have a plan, they always have a plan, nothing is ever an accident. The only question is, will it work.

#12 January 25, 2012 at 1:59 pm

gee! commented:

Sorry folks had no idea that the link had been posted earlier………..just sayin

#13 January 25, 2012 at 2:02 pm

Rachelle commented:

I really do suspect she is in early stage Alzheimer’s.

#14 January 25, 2012 at 2:05 pm

BlackBush commented:

Granny Nancy is a skin tag with dentures. Why do we care what she says again?

#15 January 25, 2012 at 2:06 pm

Patty commented:

Pelosi has some hungry squirrels running around the inside of her head, looking for nuts. They just found the mother load.

#17 January 25, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Patty commented:

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/what-really-happened-gingrich-ethics-case/336051

What really Happened: Gingrich’s ethics Case.

btw some of his articles have been taken off the net.

#18 January 25, 2012 at 2:11 pm

Gus commented:

Skandia douche. How do fuktards like you look yourselves in the mirror?

I have a theory. You’ve never been honest, you have no character, so to be a bag of crap comes naturally to you.

#19 January 25, 2012 at 2:12 pm

listingstarboard commented:

Unfortunately the ridiculously fickle electorate are buying into it. Congratulations to Matthew Drudge–you have succeeded in “Newt-ering” GIngrich with you pro Romney campaign. This Republican primary smells worse than the Democrat 2008 fiasco!!

#20 January 25, 2012 at 2:14 pm

Patty commented:

The IRS also checked out the evaluations written by students who completed the course. The overwhelming majority of students, according to the report, believed that Gingrich knew his material, was an interesting speaker, and was open to alternate points of view. None seemed to perceive a particular political message. “Most students,” the IRS noted, “said that they would apply the course material to improve their own lives in such areas as family, friendships, career, and citizenship.”

The IRS concluded the course simply was not political. “The central problem in arguing that the Progress and Freedom Foundation provided more than incidental private benefit to Mr. Gingrich, GOPAC, and other Republican entities,” the IRS wrote, “was that the content of the ‘Renewing American Civilization’ course was educational…and not biased toward any of those who were supposed to be benefited.”

The bottom line: Gingrich acted properly and violated no laws. There was no tax fraud scheme. Of course, by that time, Gingrich was out of office, widely presumed to be guilty of something, and his career in politics was (seemingly) over.

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/what-really-happened-gingrich-ethics-case/336051

FurryGuy commented:

#11 January 25, 2012 at 1:58 pm
Skandia Recluse commented:

You applaud Clinton when he hyper-parsed words with his “what the meaning of is is”?

Words have meaning, and the Botox Queen was quite clear in what she meant.

#22 January 25, 2012 at 2:16 pm

Alvin commented:

She is noise. Research your candidates, decide for yourself.

#23 January 25, 2012 at 2:18 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#19 January 25, 2012 at 2:12 pm
listingstarboard commented:

Newt ain’t done until the fat lady has sung. He ain’t out yet, it has been only three primaries so far.

Reagan was discounted as unelectable in 1980, and look at the results.

For that matter in 2000 the Left was sure Bush was a losing candidate while McCain would win if he were the GOP nominee.

#24 January 25, 2012 at 2:19 pm

Molon Labe commented:

#20
Patty you are quite right but I can’t help but wonder why there was a revolt against Newt. On the other hand the leadership of Newt as Majority Leader seemed to be excellent compared to Bonier’s disasterous stewardship.

But it is time for conservatives to rally around the man most likely to advance conservative principles successfully. The alternative is another RINO or Obama, though I rather suspect Obama will crush Romney as he did McCain.

#25 January 25, 2012 at 2:21 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#24 January 25, 2012 at 2:19 pm
Molon Labe commented:

The revolt was primarily by the GOP Party Elites whose applecart Newt was about to upset.

#26 January 25, 2012 at 2:25 pm

dba...vagabond trader commented:

Get the nets for this fluttering lunatic.

#27 January 25, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Liz commented:

Who doesn’t have dirt on Grinch? That’s the question. Please, take your drama elsewhere Gingrich, we are in crisis right now. Your 40 years in government did NOT help.

#28 January 25, 2012 at 2:27 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#24 January 25, 2012 at 2:19 pm
Molon Labe commented:

….though I rather suspect Obama will crush Romney as he did McCain

Just my two pence but I have suspicions it would be even more of a blowout if Romney is the GOP candidate. Romney is too much of a mirror image of Obama, much more so than McCain was. McCain’s biggest problem was he was actively campaigning FOR Barry, not his record being as grossly progressive as Mitt’s is.

#29 January 25, 2012 at 2:28 pm

tommy mc donnell commented:

if she does know something about gingrich that should prevent him from being president doesn’t she have an obligation to tell the american people. wouldn’t it be in the best interest of the people and the country for her to inform them? how immoral and unethical can you get.

#30 January 25, 2012 at 2:30 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#29 January 25, 2012 at 2:28 pm
tommy mc donnell commented:

if she does know something about gingrich that should prevent him from being president doesn’t she have an obligation to tell the american people. wouldn’t it be in the best interest of the people and the country for her to inform them? how immoral and unethical can you get.

This is a Democrat we are talking about here. Immoral and Unethical is their Modus Operandi.

#31 January 25, 2012 at 2:31 pm

J commented:

She almost sounds like a mafia moll. She really did learn things from her family’s acquaintances in baltimore.

#32 January 25, 2012 at 2:32 pm

BlackBush commented:

Ill take the Grinch over Obamination any day.

#33 January 25, 2012 at 2:32 pm

plainslow commented:

Maybe they had an affair.

#34 January 25, 2012 at 2:37 pm

Sally commented:

Outstanding point, SR #11

#35 January 25, 2012 at 2:42 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#34 January 25, 2012 at 2:37 pm
Sally commented:

So willfully lying to unduly influence an election is acceptable to you? It doesn’t matter what she said, the intent was criminal.

if such had been uttered about a Dem it would have been a major firestorm of righteous indignation.

#36 January 25, 2012 at 2:45 pm

Concentrate commented:

#6, Sally – You should really look into these things, and get them straight, before
regurgitating what you read on the internet. For one thing, there is no evidence that
Pelosi’s husband owned $17 million of Star-Kist or Del-monte stock, as this internet meme claims.

Also, the tuna canneries are n American Samoa, not Western Samoa, which is and
independent nation.

#37 January 25, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Neo commented:

It seems that former-Speaker Pelosi is suffering from a case of Möbius-rectum, her head is so far up her ass that it as wrapped around a couple of times.

#38 January 25, 2012 at 2:47 pm

Concentrate commented:

#35…get a clue. It’s done all the time in negative campaining.

As for influencing an election….Gingrich isn’t currently IN one.

#39 January 25, 2012 at 2:52 pm

Militant Conservative commented:

ANY of our candidates WILL crush Obama.

The public knows Obama is poison to what is “normal” American economics.

NAN is trying to enter fear ,(pun intended), with an election.

I think she is liable already.

powder is dry

#40 January 25, 2012 at 2:55 pm

Militant Conservative commented:

#38 January 25, 2012 at 2:47 pm
Concentrate commented:

Really, so my voting early in a primary election is not an election?

brain damage much?

#41 January 25, 2012 at 2:57 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#36 January 25, 2012 at 2:45 pm
Concentrate commented:

You going to provide a link to back up your refutation of what Patty had to say, or are you going to demand we take your specious word at being the truth? At the least Patty provided a link so people can make up their own minds as to the truthfulness of what she had to say, something you haven’t done.

—————————————————————

#38 January 25, 2012 at 2:47 pm
Concentrate commented:

You going to do a Clintonesque parsing of what words mean like he did with “what the meaning of is is”? Last time I checked primaries and caucuses are still elections because people are choosing a candidate.

From dictionary.com:

World English Dictionary
election (ɪˈlɛkʃən) [Click for IPA pronunciation guide]

—n
1. the selection by vote of a person or persons from among candidates for a position, esp a political office
2. a public vote on an official proposition
3. the act or an instance of choosing

So what if lies are part and parcel of negative campaigning? Does that make it acceptable and ethical?

#42 January 25, 2012 at 2:59 pm

Molon Labe commented:

#28
Furry:

I agree with your points. Romney won’t attack Obama. I doubt he can. His policies are too close to Obama’s. His record as gov is dismal. The primaries prove he has no appeal beyond metrosexuals, mobys, and RINOs. Even McCain as erratic as he was, as you pointed out, will probably do better than Romney because of Palin.

You also pointed out the cocktail party elites are upset with Newt. They like the go along, get along system. They want to preserve their perks and power rather than represent the interests and desires of Americans. Newt may not be perfect but he is a fighter, and brighter and more mentally agile than anyone else on the stage at this point.

Appreciate your comments and thoughts.

#43 January 25, 2012 at 3:01 pm

Molon Labe commented:

#41
Furry:

You neutered that guy.

#44 January 25, 2012 at 3:05 pm

Militant Conservative commented:

#43 January 25, 2012 at 3:01 pm
Molon Labe commented:
#41
Furry:

You neutered that guy.

Agreed. sometimes it is fun to beat up mental midgets.

#45 January 25, 2012 at 3:12 pm

#1AMERICAN commented:

when is this beeotch going to stop breathing our air once and for all…..what a sick C U N &

#46 January 25, 2012 at 3:19 pm

Sasja commented:

Newt told her to put up or shut up. One positive about Newt. He’s a fighter.

#47 January 25, 2012 at 3:20 pm

Bluebay commented:

The real question is what does the Newt have on stretch pelosi/dnc/rnc? I bet it’s huge… a real whitehouse burner, in fact. He could just be the vessel needed to blow this thing wide open and level the playing field for we the people.

#48 January 25, 2012 at 3:21 pm

squeaky commented:

“…gingrich that should prevent him from being president doesn’t she have an obligation..” with nancy i would expect that she would love an october surprise. much like they sat on accusation against mark foley so as to coincide charges with the election rather than doing something a bit more timely for the good of the children and all.

#49 January 25, 2012 at 3:22 pm

sonya321 commented:

Unfortunately a disgrace is Romney who jumped on Pelosi’s bandwagon.
This father of RomneyCare and grandfather of ObamaCare is a disgrace.
IF we really finish with him as a nominee, we will have for more years of Obama.

#50 January 25, 2012 at 3:23 pm

Francesca commented:

I will say that Miz Nancy is certainly looking very good. New hairdo. New ????
She is 70 years old and looks very good.
However, her thought processes are a bit lacking. Delusional at best.

#51 January 25, 2012 at 3:30 pm

EBL commented:

Nancy cannot admit she has anything because that in itself would be a violation of House ethics rules (since she presumably got it from working on Gingrich’s case). That said, I am sure the Dems have a huge opposition file on Gingrich. Whether it works for them remains to be seen. Newt is catching plenty of attack from Romney and his supporters.

#52 January 25, 2012 at 3:34 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#49 January 25, 2012 at 3:22 pm
sonya321 commented:

Having Mitt as the GOP nominee doesn’t necessarily mean an automatic reelection for Barry, stranger things have happened.

Should Romney be the nominee AND win the general election would mean the direction the US is headed wouldn’t be all that much changed. We’d still be heading for a Euro-hell of Socialism.

#53 January 25, 2012 at 3:36 pm

olm commented:

I have no doubt she has something. As someone else said, who doesn’t?
Newt is a politician and I’m sure there is an honorable bone somewhere in his body,but it would be tough to find.
This is funny though, with her office saying that she has nothing. She is losing it. Reallly, really fast. Is she running again? Maybe the Alhiezmer’s(sp?) wing doesn’t have a bed open yet.

#54 January 25, 2012 at 3:38 pm

bg commented:

++

told ya, but alas i digress..

==

#55 January 25, 2012 at 3:39 pm

USMC Thomas commented:

The MSM only reports the malicious lie as if the truth, never the retraction.
Insinuating a malicious lie is grounds for slander, sue the botox bitch.

#56 January 25, 2012 at 3:40 pm

Patty commented:

The SOMETHING I know is: Should she have something why say anything now, wait to see if Gingrich is the nominee then say that someum something. If IS something so horrible than some Americans may stay home or vote for Obama.

Is there a secret society somewhere in Outer Space where Pelosi is the Queen. or Princess.

These interviews and her blurpping out, “I know something you don’t know” does it have legs or is she trying to scramble brains.

#57 January 25, 2012 at 3:42 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#51 January 25, 2012 at 3:30 pm
EBL commented:

The simple fact that she alludes to having “something” on Newt shows she is totally void of ethics, so she knowingly and willfully HAS violated House Ethics rules regardless of the source of her information.

Now the question devolves to whether she will be called on her violation and forced to pay for her disregard of said Ethics rules. That is the crux of the matter.

#58 January 25, 2012 at 3:42 pm

bg commented:

++

hah, for all intent & purpose, could be the other way around..

Newt Gingrich Slams Nancy Pelosi As
“Despicable, Dishonest And Vicious”

==

#59 January 25, 2012 at 3:43 pm

gastorgtrab commented:

I heard that Newt and Nancy enjoy the same kind of women.

Could this secret have something to do with his social life

#60 January 25, 2012 at 3:46 pm

Robert commented:

The Pelosi monster attacks again. This crazy bitch needs to go sit down somewhere and have a nice long time out. This crooked bitch has violated so many ethics rules at this point I honestly believes she thinks she is above the law. She makes millions off of invite only ipo’s that she herself worked on the legislation for, then she liable’s newt multiple times. This crazy bitch is the definition of corruption. The liberal progressive Soros movement in this country is te most corrupt, far reaching abuse of power in our lifetime. The Manchurian candidate Obama that Soros created was the Trojan horse he needed to infect our electorate. Wake up America, they’re here and they’re tearing down the walls. Time to get these traitors out of office and in front of a jury where they belong.

#61 January 25, 2012 at 3:51 pm

Patty commented:

Where are her ethics. And did she swear to uphold the work of the people. As I recall, Pelosi: “we have to pass the health care bill so that you can find out what is in the bill. Obamacrare.”

This was not the work of the people. She violates her oath. But she gets by with it. Why didn’t you all grill Pelosi on ‘Astroturf?’ Herman Cain asked this question.

There are so many like her in this administration and because of this no cooperation across the Isle.

She of all people has to rat out Gingrich, then she doesn’t, then she does. Rather wishy washy. America needs guts, we need Gingrich and he isn’t going away as long as the American people don’t allow the ignorance of Pelosi and Washington get to them.

#62 January 25, 2012 at 3:55 pm

bg commented:

++

btw, we missed these nuggets:

January 22, 2012

A Close Look at Newt Gingrich’s Landlside Victory in South Carolina

[Among Independents, Gingrich beat Paul
by 7%, and Mitt Romney beat Paul by 1%.

[..]

But in addition to losing the Independent vote, Ron Paul also lost the
military vote. And not just by a little and not just to Newt Gingrich. He
lost to Rick Santorum by 4%, Mitt Romney by 20%, and Newt Gingrich
by a whopping 27%.]

==

#63 January 25, 2012 at 3:56 pm

Bill Mitchell commented:

Wow, Intrade is sure flakey. After 3 polls showing Newt up by 7 or more in FL, one poll comes out (CNN/Time – most unreliable pollsters in history of Earth) showing Mitt up by 3 and Newt collapses to 33% chance of winning FL.

Funny.

#64 January 25, 2012 at 3:59 pm

Patty commented:

And this is a fact: a few Republicans are afraid of Newt and the democrats are scrambling as they do see Newt if they told the truth as more experience and the fear is palpable.

When the drag out the princess it is serious. That is why some of democrat pundits have been honking Romney as the Republicans best choice.

That is the truth.

#65 January 25, 2012 at 4:00 pm

bg commented:

++

Patty #56 January 25, 2012 at 3:40 pm

no, it’s propaganda, ergo, no legs.. and btw, it’s her brain that’s
scrambled, has been for quite some time, i blame the botox, but
i’m sure there’s a lot more to it..

==

#66 January 25, 2012 at 4:00 pm

FurryGuy commented:

#43 January 25, 2012 at 3:01 pm
Molon Labe commented:

#44 January 25, 2012 at 3:05 pm
Militant Conservative commented:

I personally prefer having a discussion/debate with someone that is a challenge, especially if there is no personal rancor despite the difference of opinions being aired. Eviscerating someone with zero logic skills is no great task or fun.

#67 January 25, 2012 at 4:02 pm

Mutnodjmet commented:

American Bald Eagle Turds on SOTU!

#68 January 25, 2012 at 4:03 pm

bg commented:

++

gastorgtrab #59 January 25, 2012 at 3:43 pm

==

#69 January 25, 2012 at 4:04 pm

LDW commented:

Where does Nancy find the time to get her face done so often? If she gets her skin any tighter she will bend over backward and stick her head up her…well you know.

#70 January 25, 2012 at 4:09 pm

bg commented:

++

Mutnodjmet #67 January 25, 2012 at 4:02 pm

ooh, that’s so , funny too, thanks..

re: SOTU

January 24, 2012

Gingrich: Obama Called for More ‘Big Government’

[For the president and a large part of the political class, it’s about their power, their right to rule. They just want to take money from Joe the Plumber – the small business people who makes over 90 per cent of the new jobs -- and redistribute it to the government bureaucracy and their political friends and allies. That’s why so much of that nearly trillion-dollar stimulus didn’t create jobs but just went into the pockets of special interests who support President Obama and the leadership of the Democratic Party.

No better example of this exists than in the crisis of American energy. President Obama and his political allies – not of few of whom love living in energy inefficient houses or driving gas-guzzling luxury vehicles – openly admit they want gas prices to remain high so that the rest of America will learn to live more modestly. They think it’s good for rest of us. Only recently, the president canceled the Keystone XL Pipeline that would have created countless new jobs and helped America on the way to energy independence because he wanted to appease the far left of his party. And yet not a single word on the Keystone XL pipeline tonight.

To create jobs and growth in this country, we must start with dramatic tax reform that lowers taxes and maximizes capital investment and job creation. We must return to a dollar as good as gold whose purchasing power is the same in thirty years as it is today. We must dramatically expand American energy production. We must have smarter regulation at the same time we abolish destructive and costly regulatory systems beginning with Obamacare,Dodd-Franks, and Sarbanes-Oxley. And finally, unlike the current administration, we must have faith in job creators.]

1980 Memo Shows Gingrich Urged
Reagan to Reach Out to Black Voters

[And so, I’m prepared, if the NAACP invites me, I’ll go to their convention to talk about why the African American community should demand pay checks and not be satisfied with food stamps. And I’ll go to them and I’ll explain a brand new social security opportunity for young people, which would be particularly good for African American males, because they’re the group that gets the smallest return on social security because they have the shortest life span. And under social security today, you don’t build up an estate, but if you’re allowed to build up an estate, if your tax money went into your savings and it was your money, if something happened to you, your family got you restate, the difference in transfer of wealth to the black community would be amazing.]

more here..

Tea Party Response to SOTU – Featuring Herman Cain

more here..

==

#71 January 25, 2012 at 4:27 pm

Rock commented:

Well, most here have pretty well picked the bones and exposed the lie that is San Fran Piglosi, not much to add, accept, wish The CIA had water boarded her pungent filthy mouth, and shipped her off to Gitmo. But then that may have been considered inhuman treatment of the current occupiers.

#72 January 25, 2012 at 4:49 pm

Estragon commented:

Face it: if you can support Gingrich knowing what is already out there, it wouldn’t matter if he murdered his mother.

But hey – immoral, dishonest, adulterous, backstabbing, cheating, lying miscreants deserve representation, too, and apparently Newt has found his natural constituency among them.

#73 January 25, 2012 at 4:50 pm

randtruth commented:

Nancy Pelosi is a “failed disgrace”? Doesn’t that mean she’s not a disgrace?

I just assumed she meant that Gingrich won’t be elected because he’s an idiot.

#74 January 25, 2012 at 4:54 pm

Gus commented:

Olm. Pelosi is not honest. It’s that simple.

#75 January 25, 2012 at 4:57 pm

Gus commented:

I think someone who believes failed and disgraced are the same thing is an idiot.
Randtruth, if you beileve that Newt Gingrich is an idiot, you’re a clown.
I’m not fan of Gingrich, but he is no idiot.
Carry on Randclown.

#76 January 25, 2012 at 5:02 pm

donh commented:

We have to pass the Newt to nomination to see what is in it.

#77 January 25, 2012 at 5:03 pm

Vicky Hernandez commented:

Sally @#6 January 25, 2012 at 1:53 pm:
…Sadly, we know the majority of them are thugs, criminals and apparently are either so frightened or threatened they can’t or won’t advocate for us.
Hear! Hear!

They don’t seem to care that We The People are the sovereign, NOT THEM! We only let them borrow our power. Oh how quickly they forget that once they’re elected.

And whan embarassing and disgraceful display of high-school cattiness by Pelosi. Especially coming from a woman of 70+ years of age who was once two steps away from the US Presidency. Really.

#78 January 25, 2012 at 5:08 pm

olm commented:

Gus, i know.
I’m saying that Newt’s closet is full of skeletons……but so is hers.
I can not see SanFranNan coming out the winner of a one on one between her and Newt.

#79 January 25, 2012 at 5:14 pm

Vixen commented:

Nan looks like she had quite a bit of work done during the recess. But anyhoo, she also predicted the House would remain firmly in Democrat control in 2010. Not so good on prognostication. Put a sock in it, Nan. No one cares what you think and in case you’ve forgotten, YOU’RE NOT THE SPEAKER ANYMORE. Go away, biddy.

#81 January 25, 2012 at 6:45 pm

Marmo commented:

There is a black hole in Pelosi’s head. Nothing intelligent has a chance of escaping.

#82 January 25, 2012 at 7:45 pm

Ausonius commented:

During his tenure as speaker, 84 ethics complaints against him were filed. Obviously, all but 1 went no where. The point of a complaint oftentimes is to embarass the subject.
Pelosi was on the ethics committee for some or all of that time. It is perceived that uncomfortable info is available and could be leaked.
This happened once with a video or audio recording of an interview (perhaps Jim McDermott?) during Newt’s most known complaint.
Pelosi is bound by rules (perhaps it is a criminal felony) not to release any info from ethics complaints.
Washington rules would dictate that info like that would be released indirectly to the media, so everyone can deny having been the one to have leaked the info.

#83 January 25, 2012 at 8:14 pm

bg commented:

++

Marmo #81 January 25, 2012 at 6:45 pm

brilliant!!

ROTF MBO!!

==

#84 January 25, 2012 at 8:15 pm

WillofLa commented:

No, I think Nancy has been hitting the bottle a bit to much. Anyone who serves a $100,000 worth of booze on her big trip to Spain behind the jet of the First Lady, has to be a lush. Even though she took, what, 40 or 60 of her dearest friends, relatives, and whoever else didn’t have anything to do but get drunk on a flight across the Atlantic and a weeks stay at Spain’s finest hotels, with more booze pouring out of their ears by this time, has to have a serious drinking problem.

Remember the Texas representative …Tower? I can’t remember his first name, but he was another drunk in the Congress. As a matter of fact he stayed drunk so often that the other member’s of Congress ordered him to resign due to the fact that he couldn’t be trusted to vote correctly enough. So he left in disgrace as a drunkard. I think maybe Nancy might have a problem herself. Now, I do have to admit she doesn’t sound like she’s drunk like her speech isn’t slurded, or incoherent. But she sounds to me like she is so full of hate that she can’t be trusted to vote for what’s best according to the Constitution enough to do us any good anytime. She sounds like she’s just another drunk who is careful enough to not be too drunk on the job, but Kattie bar the door when she leaves for the night.

I don’t know because I never did drink anything clear enough to know the difference, but I’ve heard that people who drink Gin are like Nancy. They don’t seem drunk, but can be. They just don’t have the ordinary symtoms that people who drink whiskey have. Is that true? Also I heard that when you drink Gin, it can’t be smelled on your breath or around about you like people who drink whiskey. Is that true? I really don’t know. Somebody tell me so maybe we can figure out what is Nancy’s drug of choice.

#85 January 25, 2012 at 8:45 pm

valerie commented:

#84 January 25, 2012 at 8:15 pm
WillofLa commented:

It’s not the color of the drink, but the chemistry of the body. Some people seem to have a large capacity, and can walk and talk and drink until they black out. Then there’s people like me, who have to work up to tolerating two drinks, and invariably barf somewhere during the third. The first type can easily become alcoholics, the second rarely do, and it has nothing to do with virtue.

#86 January 25, 2012 at 8:48 pm

valerie commented:

#82 January 25, 2012 at 7:45 pm
Ausonius commented:

And, he Gingrich was cleared of that one that stuck.

http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/article/what-really-happened-gingrich-ethics-case/336051

#87 January 25, 2012 at 9:33 pm

bg commented:

++

valerie #86 January 25, 2012 at 8:48 pm

hey there, you’re wasting your precious time, i have provided the same
info several times in response to Ausonius LIE in previous posts.. ergo,
i fully expect to see Ausonius LIE in future posts..

however, perhaps that’s a good thing, as more and more people may
get to view the video, and perhaps be enlightened as to the fact that
Gingrich was innocent, and that the Dems, MSM & Romney are LIARS!!

==

#88 January 25, 2012 at 9:36 pm

Locutisprime commented:

I think the Botox is reaching toxic levels in her system. The woman is looking and acting more and more like Jack Nicholson’s caricature of the Joker every day

#89 January 25, 2012 at 9:43 pm

valerie commented:

Newt was asked about what Nancy said, and his response was “Spit it out.” He also talked about the SOTU and the charges that he had acted as a “lobbyist.”

http://www.breitbart.tv/newt-to-pelosi-spit-it-out/

#90 January 25, 2012 at 9:45 pm

Adi commented:

I thought her own daughter said she’ll retire.

Remember the botox/plastic surgery-addicted mom from Brazil? Nancy P reminds me of her:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnx95KyQEAA

Facelift doesn’t matter, you’re still getting OLD (and yes, it shows). So Nancy, is your OLD brain still unaffected by OLD age and capable of governing, or NOT?

#91 January 25, 2012 at 10:19 pm

Ausonius commented:

#86 and #87:

Neither of you seem to want to embrace reality

Gingrich was not “cleared” by the ethics committee, he was REPRIMANDED and FINED $300,000 by a 395-28 House of Representatives vote. It should further be noted he agreed to these terms in advance, and made the following statement:

“I did not manage the effort intensely enough to thoroughly direct or review information being submitted on my behalf. In my name and over my signature, inaccurate, incomplete, and unreliable statements were given to the committee, but I did not intend to mislead the committee.”

The $300,000 fine was to cover the additional investigation involved due to the conflicting information he provided.

The IRS cleared him of the tax exempt complaint regarding GOPAC involvement with the college courses he taught.

Now, anyone who wishes to should look it up for yourself.
Denial will not change the fact that if he is the nominee, you will see much more of this story no doubt. Pretending it doesn’t exist is irrational.

By the way, did anyone else catch Rush earlier this week; he was saying Newt’s on record as stating FDR was his favorite president. Real conservative indeed!

bg: grow up,

#92 January 25, 2012 at 10:33 pm

Ausonius commented:

Valerie:

By the way, I am familiar with Byron York’s article you linked to. The opening sentence says what I said: he was reprimanded and fined.

I am not disputing the original tax issue nor the fact that the IRS did not charge him. The problem is, and will be, that he was reprimanded for providing false info to the committee, and admitted doing so. Most voters will not care to look any further than that. There will be ads run that repeat what I just said, and they will not be lies (provided they don’t go beyond the facts). Most people do not care if the original charge was later cleared. Most people will likely not care if Newt was inadvertant or intentional.

This is only one problem he has.
I don’t dislike Newt, I just find Rick far more beyond reproach in terms of his conservative credentials; not perfect, but better.

The current potus doesn’t respect precedent. If he thinks debating Newt would be damaging to him, he may not agree to debate at all and simply run with a billion dollar ad campaign. At that point, we are left with a great, fiery debater with no debate.

#93 January 26, 2012 at 7:54 am

MJ commented:

Concentrate…go back to school and learn to write!

Pelosi’s Office Says She Doesn’t Have Dirt on Newt After All …(Pelosi Is Running Mouth Again)

Posted by Jim Hoft on Wednesday, January 25, 2012, 12:07 PM

KornKing commented:

Molon Labe commented:

gee! commented:

Blacque Jacques Shellacque commented:

MustComment commented:

Sally commented:

Granny commented:

myohmy commented:

FurryGuy commented:

Skandia Recluse commented:

gee! commented:

Rachelle commented:

BlackBush commented:

Patty commented:

Patty commented:

Gus commented:

listingstarboard commented:

Patty commented:

FurryGuy commented:

Alvin commented:

FurryGuy commented:

Molon Labe commented:

FurryGuy commented:

dba...vagabond trader commented:

Liz commented:

FurryGuy commented:

tommy mc donnell commented:

FurryGuy commented:

J commented:

BlackBush commented:

plainslow commented:

Sally commented:

FurryGuy commented:

Concentrate commented:

Neo commented:

Concentrate commented:

Militant Conservative commented:

Militant Conservative commented:

FurryGuy commented:

Molon Labe commented:

Molon Labe commented:

Militant Conservative commented:

#1AMERICAN commented:

Sasja commented:

Bluebay commented:

squeaky commented:

sonya321 commented:

Francesca commented:

EBL commented:

FurryGuy commented:

olm commented:

bg commented:

USMC Thomas commented:

Patty commented:

FurryGuy commented:

bg commented:

gastorgtrab commented:

Robert commented:

Patty commented:

bg commented:

Bill Mitchell commented:

Patty commented:

bg commented:

FurryGuy commented:

Mutnodjmet commented:

bg commented:

LDW commented:

bg commented:

Rock commented:

Estragon commented:

randtruth commented:

Gus commented:

Gus commented:

donh commented:

Vicky Hernandez commented:

olm commented:

Vixen commented:

Marmo commented: