(FSR)

He must have liked how Newt man-handled the media in the debates this week.
Chuck Norris threw his support behind Newt Gingrich this week.
WND reported:

Chuck Norris, identified this election as the endorsement most sought after by Republicans, says he’s throwing his considerable influence behind the campaign for president in 2012 of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich because “we need a veteran of political war who has already fought Goliath.”

In a new column published on WND, Norris explains he agrees with Gingrich’s statement that there is no enemy this year but Barack Obama.

Gingrich had explained, “We have no opponents except Barack Obama. I think that’s very important.”

“I’m tired of watching our country being torn to shreds by those who think the answer is more government debt and control. I’m tired of being in bondage to a tax system that robs U.S. citizens like the King of England did before the Revolution,” Norris writes. ”I’m tired of watching our sovereignty being sold by foreign loans and loose borders. And I will not sit back and merely watch this decay and degradation of the U.S. and then hand it over to my children and grandchildren to deal with.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. #1 January 20, 2012 at 6:52 pm

    James commented:

    Wow, another republican committing suicide in the 2012 election. Since we are defaulting the 2012 election, should we begin discussing candidates for the 2016 election.

  2. #2 January 20, 2012 at 6:54 pm

    kay commented:

    Gingrich will definitely go for the throat and not back down. He’s the nuclear weapon in the presidential contest. Romney is the diplomat and we had one of those in 2008 and he lost! Santorum? I’m bothered that he didn’t win his own state! What happened with that? Was it just O’s coat tail? Also, I don’t think Santorum can stand up to the relentless harshness and will cave. Not through any fault of his own. Just….he’ll be beaten down by the end of the process. Gingrich has been through the wringer, came out fighting, again and again, and can talk on the fly. Sometimes that’s not a great thing and he has to walk it back. Sometimes its right on the money. Romney can talk about anything because he’s had a position on everything on each side. No wonder nobody knows who to vote for. And Elmer Fudd aka Ron Paul has 1 good idea – get rid of the Federal Reserve. Anything else out of RP’s mouth is BS. IMO.

  3. #3 January 20, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    kay commented:

    Dare I ask: Is it too late for Palin to get in?

  4. #4 January 20, 2012 at 7:00 pm

    Patty commented:

    Like Chuck Norris. He also endorsed Huckabee in 08. Norris’s comments are great.

  5. #5 January 20, 2012 at 7:09 pm

    Rose commented:

    Thought Norris endorsed McCain in ’08.

    Well, Huckleberry did endorse McCain in ’08, even before he dropped out, himself.

    Well, they can have him. I won’t vote for him.

  6. #6 January 20, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    #1AMERICAN commented:

    Anybody but the mooslime POS….enough bashing each other…start bashing the anti christ POS illegal Kenyan fraud

  7. #7 January 20, 2012 at 7:15 pm

    MustComment commented:

    Mike Huckabee has a problem with Newt. Interesting? On O’Reilly right now stumping for Romney (again).

  8. #8 January 20, 2012 at 7:31 pm

    Patty commented:

    OT

    Video: Canadian Talk Show Host Destroys Obama Over Keystone Decision

    This is great stuff. I was going to add it as an update to the previous post on this topic but it deserves its own headline. Ezra Levant hosts a show, The Source, for Canada’s Sun News. In a very well-researched presentation, he takes a comprehensive look at Obama’s idiocy over the Keystone Pipeline. Be sure to watch the whole thing and pay particular attention to the map of the alleged “pristine, environmentally sensitive area” through which the pipleline will pass. I don’t know who this guy is, but he certainly did his homework.

    http://conservatives4palin.com/2012/01/video-canadian-talk-show-host-destroys-obama-over-keystone-decision.html

  10. #10 January 20, 2012 at 7:33 pm

    Christopher Taylor commented:

    Its not just the debt, dammit, its his abuse of executive power to heap regulation on business, its his expansion of the government to more and more of my life. Debt is a CONSEQUENCE of the problems, not the problem its self. Its a symptom of a greater sickness.

  11. #11 January 20, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    Patty commented:

    Mitt Romney, for example, doesn’t make small talk with reporters about sports, the news of the day or the food at his events like Gingrich. No one gets close enough.

    The contrast between the two couldn’t have been any clearer than Wednesday, when Romney stopped at a BBQ joint to shake hands and approached a family with a basket full of hush puppies. When a Washington Post reporter innocuously asked Romney if he planned to try one, the staff cut him off, insisting it was an off-the-record stop.

    When the press tweeted about the incident, angry emails were dispatched from the former Massachusetts governor’s staff to offending reporters.

    While Romney won’t take questions outside the safety of controlled press conferences, Gingrich is perfectly comfortable in unscripted situations, content to make small talk while working the public at events.

    In New Hampshire, when he visited the world’s longest candy counter in Littleton, Gingrich was asked by a reporter about his favorite candy. He didn’t think twice: gummy bears.

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71741.html#ixzz1k3LrKQXe

  14. #15 January 20, 2012 at 8:16 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    ht squeaky:

    Chicago conservative African Americans to support Newt Gingrich

    [The Illinois African American Libertarian Alliance (IAALA) is home to hundreds of Chicago African American conservatives and has decided to endorse Newt Gingrich for the upcoming 2012 election. “Newt Gingrich represents the values of many conservatives—White, Latino, or Black. He is honest about who he is and is the perfect person to turn a falling country around,” says IAALA President David Lemar.]

    ==

  15. #16 January 20, 2012 at 8:19 pm

    owl commented:

    #13…..I will take either Newt or Mitt but will gamble on Newt’s Mouth. Thomas Sowell’s endorsement is the most important endorsement I have seen.

  16. #17 January 20, 2012 at 8:30 pm

    hardresetamerica.com commented:

    I am for Newt, have been for quite a while. But if Romney is the nominee, I will work for his election, period. I am more concerned about having an Obama administration that is not concerned about a re-election campaign in four years.

    This is what the left wants, all of us fighting and not daily focusing on all the damage Obama has done and getting THAT message out. Support whomever you prefer of this final four, but when the dust settles, in the name of all thats holy, we need to come together and defeat Barack Obama in a way that leaves no doubt about the wishes of the American people.

  17. #18 January 20, 2012 at 8:32 pm

    Sasja commented:

    I know this is OT, and maybe some won’t even care, but am sharing anyway.

    http://pjmedia.com/tatler/headline/job-killer-obama-admin-hands-big-air-force-contract-to-brazil/

  18. #19 January 20, 2012 at 8:53 pm

    GladHeart commented:

    No matter who the GOP candidate turns out to be, we need to all gather behind him and support him with the common goal of taking the White House back, as well as our country. A divided house falls.

  19. #20 January 20, 2012 at 9:04 pm

    gee! commented:

    #8 Patty thanks for link…………..Canada has its own Glen Beck…….that was great ……..just sayin

  20. #21 January 20, 2012 at 9:22 pm

    Greg commented:

    Neil Cavuto on Fox this evening proposed that Gingrich was out of line responding to the opening question at the debate regards Gingrich ex…. I will no longer watch fox news….When I can get first hand information on the internet that is not manipulated, there is no longer a reason to watch any of the networks including those that purport to be fair and balanced

  21. #22 January 20, 2012 at 9:36 pm

    JoyO commented:

    If you don’t vote for “anyone but Obama”, you might as well vote for Obama! The 2012 election is the most important election ever for our country — we cannot afford four more years of Obama. If you think the damage to our country and our Constitution that Obama/Pelosi/Reid have done since the 2008 elections is appalling, can you imagine what he will do if he wins in 2012 and doesn’t have to worry about campaigning for the 2016 elections! Four more years under Obama will make the last three years look like a cakewalk. America will be Europe and “We the People” will be serfs with only the freedoms the Progressives/Socialists permit. I, for one, do not believe I can live with the Teleprompter-in-Chief and his supporters who want Other People’s Money.

  22. #23 January 20, 2012 at 9:45 pm

    Taqiyyotomist commented:

    I have to disagree with Gingrich on one point here:

    Gingrich had explained, “We have no opponents except Barack Obama. I think that’s very important.”

    We have no opponents except Barack Obama and His Media Empire.

    And the schools. And the film industry. And the television industry. And the book-publishing industry. And the rest of the so-called “Arts”. And ACORN-spinoffs. And New Black Panther thug pieces of dogs&&t.

    Those are some of our opponents.

    Soon the bricks, rocks, and molotovs will be flying through Republican campaign headquarters nationwide, at the explicit behest of the aforementioned groups.

    What’s the Intrade odds on the number of these incidents occurring between now and November? I’m guessing (based on the last two presidential campaigns) that it will be, by november, greater than 100 acts of vandalism against Republican headquarters.

  24. #25 January 20, 2012 at 10:04 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    Patty #8 January 20, 2012 at 7:31 pm

    great find..

    unfortunately he’s preaching to the choir..

    there’s an enormous amount of know it all know nothings out there who,
    for all they understand, probably think he’s speaking a foreign language..

    ==

  25. #26 January 20, 2012 at 10:16 pm

    Molon Labe commented:

    Well I wonder who Barney Frank is going to endorse. Probably the same candidate as Anthony Weiner.

  26. #29 January 21, 2012 at 12:49 am

    ogee commented:

    So Chuck is sick of the tax code and all the raiding of the gov coffers. ………well Excuse me but Gingrich is not the one to fix it as he will just keep the status quo and the taking down of USA. Besides, Chuck only endorses democrats so what’s up with that? This must mean that ginRICH is a closet dem of sorts. Chuck watches too much MSM TV. It shows.

  27. #30 January 21, 2012 at 12:54 am

    ogee commented:

    PS. Ron Paul is not a David Duke fan so the joke’s on you. Daffy duck can endorse Ron Paul and it means nothing. Ron can’t control others nor does he want to.

  28. #31 January 21, 2012 at 12:56 am

    ogee commented:

    Obama or Gingrich? Same shat different day. Why bother. The two are the same. Sorry you can’t see it.

  29. #32 January 21, 2012 at 1:03 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    ogee #31 January 21, 2012 at 12:56 am

    Barry & Newt, samo samo??

    rotf :lol: mbo!!

    as if saying it makes it so, too funny..

    ==

  30. #33 January 21, 2012 at 1:09 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    ht mcc: Newt-Goldwater 1976

    [Long before there was a mighty Republican machine running Georgia,
    there was a handful of brash conservatives plotting to lift their tiny,
    financially struggling party so they could end more than a century of
    Democratic dominance.

    Among the chief architects was Newt Gingrich, a West Georgia College
    assistant professor who ran for Congress three times in a blue-collar
    district – twice against an entrenched Talmadge Democratic incumbent
    - before finally winning.

    Gingrich, now a presidential hopeful, traveled West and North Georgia
    during the 1970s and ’80s, preaching the Republican gospel and arguing
    that the GOP had to choose between remaining a silent, permanent
    minority or aggressively taking the fight to Democrats.

    He chose confrontation and played the role of
    provocateur, unwilling to accept second place….

    U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Savannah, calls Gingrich an “indispensable early
    trailblazer” for Georgia Republicans. Kingston remembers his college days,
    when Gingrich came to the University of Georgia to recruit students to
    get involved in GOP politics.    ]

    Gingrich engineered the first Republican takeover of the House
    of Representatives in 40 years – followed by the first balanced
    budget in 40 years.

    ==

  31. #34 January 21, 2012 at 1:57 am

    Rose commented:

    I’ve heard through the grapevine that Chuck’s FANS are letting him know on his website they are not pleased with an endorsement for an unmitigated sleazeball of the Clinton stripes.

    Doesn’t mean they are happy with other candidates – but to EMPOWER a SLEAZEBALL with your POWER OF ATTORNEY is a very different kettle of fish to have to answer to the Lord for, for those calling themselves the UPHOLDERS of Family Values and Constitution!

  32. #35 January 21, 2012 at 1:58 am

    Rose commented:

    Ogee – RON PAUL promised to hire Dennis Kucinich back on 9/22/2011 – Rush Limbaugh

  33. #36 January 21, 2012 at 2:02 am

    Rose commented:

    Some are set to lock a 25million lb millstone(R) around their neck and jump in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.

    I want you to know, if you hold your breath, I’ll be right there to save you and bail you out. count on it! You hear?

  34. #38 January 21, 2012 at 5:46 am

    CommieBlaster commented:

    Chuck, It’s been 40 Years since we met. Take a look here and please revise your thoughts….

    http://www.commieblaster.com/RINO

  35. #39 January 21, 2012 at 6:12 am

    Who Cares commented:

    Chuck Norris? Chuck Norris is relevant? Why?

  36. #40 January 21, 2012 at 9:10 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    robo Rose hate blows everywhere she goes.. :P

    ==

  37. #41 January 21, 2012 at 9:19 am

    Jamessir Bensonmum commented:

    A lot of good comments on this thread. I strongly agree with Comment #10.

    I appreciate reading about Mr. Norris’ opinion. He’s a much more likeable person than celebrities like Alec Baldwin.

  38. #42 January 21, 2012 at 9:31 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    moral values??

    “When looking at cases of consensual sex between a person aged 15 and
    a person aged 30, why can we not leave these people alone if this is what
    they want, or at the most ostracize them for being ‘gross’, if that’s what
    you think of it.””

    more here..

    sex, drugs & Ron Paul.. yeeeeehypocriticalhaaaaawww!! /s/

    ==

  39. #43 January 21, 2012 at 9:42 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    #38 January 21, 2012 at 5:46 am
    CommieBlaster

    that ethics crap is not true..

    all the charges were dismissed..

    Newt Gingrich was vindicated, but you won’t hear that via
    mainstream anything, including so called Conservative blogs..

    not going to take the time to vet the rest of your so called info, the
    fact that you have he “cheated on 2 wives” tells meal all i need to
    know pertaining to the depth of investigative reporting you did re:
    Newt Gingrich.. sorry, but i’m an “in context” type fact seeker..

    ==

  40. #44 January 21, 2012 at 9:46 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    #41 January 21, 2012 at 9:19 am
    Jamessir Bensonmum

    i concur..

    Chuck Norris = one of the few ROLE MODELS FOR
    GOOD this past century & evidently the one we’re
    in at present so far.. :-)

    ==

  41. #45 January 21, 2012 at 9:59 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    re: #42 January 21, 2012 at 9:31 am bg

    Ron Paul wants to legalize crystal meth..

    Ron Paul wants to legalize drugs, including heroin..

    “Just because I favor the legalization of drugs doesn’t mean I’m
    in favor of using them. As a physician, I know they’re bad stuff.”

    oh yah, Ron OWS Paul is a “conservative” alright, what a joke, and
    so are all the RINO’s in Congress.. heck, John & Robert F. Kennedy
    were more Republican than any of those in the so called leadership
    & then some..

    ==

  42. #46 January 21, 2012 at 10:21 am

    Mama Grizzly commented:

    #29 is correct.

    I implore you all to hop off the Gingrich Express before you’re taken for a ride you’ll REALLY regret.

    Newt will hand the election to Obama. Don’t fall for this.

  43. #47 January 21, 2012 at 10:23 am

    Mama Grizzly commented:

    I realized that my post sounded “alarmist” in a way. Sorry. Seriously though–China is in Play and all is NOT what it seems.

    Gingrich is not the man of the hour.

  44. #48 January 21, 2012 at 10:27 am

    Mama Grizzly commented:

    The other thing is that Chuck Norris may be popular with the over50 crowd, but there are SO many Chuck Norris jokes with younger people , and now Sarah Plain???

    Think: Newt is using your frustrations to take the election from Romney–the BIGGEST threat to China.

    Most Americans don’t understand the Chinese. They are of more concern than Iran.

  45. #49 January 21, 2012 at 10:44 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    yes, Chuck Norris is “universal” so to speak..

    and they are GOOD JOKES pertaining to the Texas Ranger character
    he plays, not sickly personal attacks, unles you don’t think there is a difference..

    ie: Chuck Norris has a grizzly bear carpet in his
    room. The bear isn’t dead it is just afraid to move.

    When Chuck Norris breaks a sweat… sorry my mistake…

    oh btw, The Texas Rangers reruns are one of the most aired shows on
    regular tv (iow: for those who cannot afford all those fancy stations full
    of garbage)..

    ==

  46. #50 January 21, 2012 at 11:10 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    (b. 1943)
    A member of Congress for 20 years, Republican Newt Gingrich was speaker
    of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 1999. Regarded as the
    chief architect of the Contract with America, he was also considered a major
    force behind the 1994 victory that established Congress’s first Republican
    majority in 40 years.

    Interview conducted Spring 2001

    Newt Gingrich

    [NEWT GINGRICH: It was personally painful in the sense that you hated to be demonized, but you have to make a decision early on: Are you in the business to achieve change, or are you in the business to be popular? I thought my job was to be the executor of the American people's will on very specific things -- balance the budget, cut taxes, reform welfare, strengthen defense, modernize the House of Representatives.]

    mission accomplished..

    and look where the “good old bi-partisansnessness on both sides of the
    isle” have taken US since they purged your evilness from their midst.. /s/

    ==

  47. #51 January 21, 2012 at 11:12 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    oops re: #50 January 21, 2012 at 11:10 am bg

    bi-partisansnessness = bi-partisans

    ==

  48. #52 January 21, 2012 at 12:14 pm

    Ret-Vet commented:

    Can’t believe anyone wants a liar and a cheat in the Oval office. Newt is a low life in any way shape and form. You want someone fined $300k in the House? Stupid is as stupid does. The country will fall if we have BO or Newt in 2013!

  50. #54 January 21, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    charlie commented:

    What this shows is that conservatives don’t care about serial philandering, unless it’s being done by a Democrat.

    Part of the race for the White House is a test of character. People said Bill Clinton failed that test as he couldn’t keep his hands to himself, but they are quite happy to gloss over Newt Gingrich’s infidelities.

    Hypocrits.

  51. #55 January 21, 2012 at 4:18 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    charlie #54 January 21, 2012 at 1:28 pm

    okay, exactly what did Newt Gingrich LIE about??

    ==

  52. #56 January 21, 2012 at 6:12 pm

    charlie commented:

    So a lie to you is worse than cheating on your wife? Nice.

  53. #57 January 21, 2012 at 10:05 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    charlie #56 January 21, 2012 at 6:12 pm

    hah, you mean cheating on your cheating wife with a wife cheater??

    btw, when did God die & crown you God??

    “vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord”, you ain’t no lord, and Marianne
    (who also cheated on Newt) is obviously a very disturbed woman with
    a vengeful heart.. which Newt probably understands better than any of
    us, hence, could be why he refuses to retaliate against her, as it seems
    as if she might go further over the edge so to speak.. :-(

    ==

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk