Republican Jewish Coalition Bans Ron Paul From Debate: “Inviting Paul Would Be Like Inviting Obama to Speak”
Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, December 2, 2011, 12:06 PM
True.
In fact, Ron Paul’s foreign policy is even to the left of Barack Obama’s.
The Republican Jewish Congress will ban Ron Paul from their debate next week. They say he’s just too far outside of the mainstream of the Republican party.
Reason.com reported:
On Wednesday, Dec. 7, the Republican Jewish Coalition will host a presidential-candidates forum featuring Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Jon Huntsman, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, and Rick Santorum. Not invited is the GOP candidate currently polling around third in New Hampshire and second in Iowa: Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas). The explanation:
Paul was not invited to attend the RJC’s candidates forum because the organization – as it has stated numerous times in the past – “rejects his misguided and extreme views,” said [RJC Executive Director Matt] Brooks.
“He’s just so far outside of the mainstream of the Republican party and this organization,” Brooks said. Inviting Paul to attend would be “like inviting Barack Obama to speak.”
Maybe the fact that Ron Paul believes that Israel encouraged and started Hamas had something to do with today’s announcement?
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rough Night… Obama Loses 36 Arkansas Counties to Unknown Democrat – Loses 67 Kentucky Counties to “Uncommitted”
Published May 23, 2012 at 4:57 am - 64 Comments
Miles commented:
Sad state of affairs when this racist antisemite is even allowed to be a part of the GOP.
dba...vagabond trader commented:
Actually I’d like to see him stumble thru a few pointed questions, but thats just me.
amdg commented:
> Inviting Paul to attend would be “like inviting Barack Obama to speak.”
Are they sure? It seems they do not dare to say he is not a friend of Israel. Poor USA, bending to the interests a remote, small state.
You will have what you deserve.
RKflorida commented:
I have avoided looking into this guy’s ideas. I hope I can keep myself “pure” until he is no longer on the campaign trail.
Greg commented:
Paul is a loon and a distraction that adds no value to the party. Keeping him out will improve quality of discussion
dunce commented:
I have always liked Ron Paul as a congressman but only for his constitutional views never for his foreign policy positions. He is needed in congress not in the oval office. In congress he has often been the lone voice of reason.
Militant Conservative commented:
#3 December 2, 2011 at 1:22 pm
amdg commented:
Read the Bible son and you’ll be enlightened.
Paz commented:
Ron Paul wants to eliminate all foreign aid and this coalition has their panties in a bunch. Call the whambulance!
gee! commented:
#6……..bing
dba...vagabond trader commented:
@ # 3:
Appease muzz and Paulbots will have what they deserve.
ahem commented:
Golf clap.
Sam commented:
Disgusting decision. Who the heck cares about the RJC? Most Jews are Dems anyway. It’ll be a worthless debate. Both Ron and Rand are right. Cut foreign aid to everyone. America comes first.
bg commented:
++
rotf
mbo!!
==
Nancy commented:
One of the few signs of common sense I’ve seen in the Republican party.
Derrick commented:
“By now we know that Ron’s position on Israel is exercising personal responsibility, something that they are totally capable of, and respecting their sovereignty is not popular among the more religious branch of the GOP.” but, GIVING ISRAEL IT’S SOVEREIGNTY IS NOT BAD!!!
Paul is just saying Israel should be able to do what they want to do and not have to ask the US when they want to make a decision. Let them be their own country. It doesn’t mean he doesn’t appricaiate them as a trade partner.
He believes in Isreal and in all countries; and that they should have the right to do as they choose and stand on their own two feet. Smaller countries should not have some super power telling them what to do. I think Israel needs this type of over baring big brother.
…. do some research before you begin hating a man for something, He is only respecting our founding fathers.
Derrick commented:
(don’t think)
Bob Stevens commented:
I have never in all my life seen such an authentic American running for president. Ron Paul is everything America stands for. We love you Ron. Keep the good fight, our forefathers are behind you. Ron Paul 2012!
Sam commented:
15. Derrick
Don’t bother using reason with these war-mongering neocons. They take pride in their ignorance, parrot everything Rush Limbaugh says and actually thought Rick Perry and Hermain Cain could become POTUS.
Derrick commented:
And what dumb-ass called Paul antisemitic. Ron Paul believes all countries should be treated evenly by the US; ….so now he hates an entire race??…. Some people should put their face in the corner and not breed…. EVER
Derrick commented:
Thanks, Sam.
More Liberty commented:
Personally I don’t care about this minor coalition debate. It’s not even televised. Additionally private organizations can invite and not invite anyone whom ever they wish. As a person that supports individual liberty, and as someone that supports most of Ron Paul’s policies, I think it’s their choice.
However, I also believe that the US taxpayer shouldn’t be forced to hand over their hard earned money to Israel under force (taxes) or have to give their taxes to Israel enemies. It’s none of our business. Private Americans should be able to donate their money but I don’t support foreign aid to any other country in the form of taxes.
More Liberty commented:
We shouldn’t be giving money to the Palestinians, Israelis, Egyptians, Pakistanis or any-other country. If private individuals want to donate then they should but taxpayers shouldn’t.
NeoCons are all about foreign welfare.
Paz commented:
#22 – Exactly.
They want to prop up our useless foreign meddling and then they start talking about reducing spending.. but don’t touch def…OFFENSE!
bg commented:
++
“He’s just so far outside of the mainstream of the Republican party
and this organization,” Brooks said. Inviting Paul to attend would be
“like inviting Barack Obama to speak.”
albeit that’s all too true..
re: Ron Paul wants to eliminate all foreign aid
uhm, so does Perry, no??
oh wait, maybe he means he’ll start it back up again
as soon as it hopefully wins him the election.. /sarc/
==
Sam commented:
No problem, Derrick. Yeah strange how being neutral to Israel is anti-Semitic. Even most Jews wouldn’t dare to place the race card, especially on TV (unless your name is Ben Stein). If you’ve seen some of the threads, you’ll see that a lot of these same people who hate Ron Paul are rather xenophobic, paranoid and believe America should police the world.
Sam commented:
24. bg
Perry’s a complete dumbass who will parrot anything Paul says on domestic issues to sound original. He doesn’t have a frickin’ clue what he’s doing out there most of the time. Completely out of his depth. You can tell he’s just been prepped his ideas a few days earlier.
#1AMERICAN commented:
ron paul needs to be put out to pasture…enough with this loony bin dude
Frieda commented:
Anti-semitism comes in many sizes.
Spider commented:
I’m not going to call Cong. Paul names.
But I wish he would use a different forum to advance his ideas than the Republican primary process.
He has a few valuable and very conservative ideas, but the whole package is flawed.
(package is flawed not the congressman)
More Liberty commented:
@ #27
I know what a loony. I mean can you believe that he actually wants to follow the US Constitution..pppft…what a kook. I mean is he serious? Taxpayers of America have an obligation to give Israel their money, and if attacked, the life of American soldiers and marines.
Bert commented:
Ron Paul is the best choice for Republican nominee. #15 has said it best — “…. do some research before you begin hating a man for something. He is only respecting our founding fathers.” Who else is there, anyway? Newt? Mitt? Perry? They won’t make the radical changes necessary to return the country to Constitutional principles; they are “tweedle-dee” and “tweedle-dum.”
Also, #7, the Bible doesn’t say the USA must support Israel at all costs (if that’s what you’re implying). The state of Israel is an invention of the UN, bearing little resemblance to the kingdoms of Israel and Judah of the O.T, and likely not the “fulfillment of Bible prophecy” we have been sold.
If, however, you mean the the Bible lesson that’s taught in 2 Chronicles, about how a nation that turns from God is destined to destruction, and you apply that lesson to the USA, I’m in full agreement.
More Liberty commented:
Good point Spider. How dare Ron Paul try and push a return to Constitutional conservatism. What American needs is more debt, but just slightly less debt than the Dems promise. America needs an increase in the size of the federal government but not as big as the liberals want. When the Republicans are in charge of the government debt is OK, but when the Dems are in charge they are un-American.
Sam commented:
27. AMERICAN
That’s all you simpletons can blabber isn’t?
29. Freida
Don’t you DARE play the race card.
30. The package isn’t flawed. The party is flawed. He has brought them to his side on every issue except FP. He already has the Dems and Independents on his side for that, depends on whether the GOP want to open their mind and move towards him on that issue as well.
Besides, if Romney gets the nomination, the GOP loses. If Gingrich gets the nomination, the GOP will be humiliated.
Spider commented:
GP threw some meat at the Paulbots.
How dare anyone express an opinion – that would be a 1st amendment right.
harris commented:
Ron said he would consider a 3rd Party ticket if he didnt win the nomination.
If he does, the dem’s will thank him and the repub’s will blame him.
bg commented:
++
Ron Paul Again Blames US for 9-11 Attacks
seriously, what’s the difference between Ron Paul and Barack Obama
ideology, well, except for the fact that Obama has already positioned
Muslim Brotherhood members w/in our own government, but who’s
to say Ron Paul wouldn’t leave them there, or, position even more
/truth sarc/
==
More Liberty commented:
Are you serious Spider? Individuals debating isn’t counter to the 1st Amendment to the US Constitution. We don’t need less debate – we need more. Even the Jewish Coalition deciding to not invite Paul is perfectly constitutional. Private organizations are more than allowed to make such choices, and i support such free and independent choices. But others have the ability to debate and voice their opinion as well.
harris commented:
Paul response on Iran having nukes.
“Weeell, why not, everybody else does”.
S. Wolf commented:
Poor Ron Paul, poor crazy old guy who has overstayed his supposed career in Congress. Isn’t he a medical doctor by training? Yet he went into politics and has been in Congress since 1976. Doesn’t that show how mediocre he is? And every four years like clockwork he dodders off to run for president yet again. Soon he’ll be shuffling and pushing a walker across the stage to debates. Time for the rocking chair and some nice prune juice, Paul.
bg commented:
++
i think Ron Paul is as nutty as space cadet Kicinich, however, if the #1
tyrannical dictator in the world (aside from the up & coming into his own
Obama) can speak at Universities, and the most pro abortion man on
the planet can be honored at Notre Dame, not to mention freedom of
speech or discrimination, then he should, by all means ,”be invited”..
==
Spider commented:
Discussions about Ron Paul are not debates. They are one sided poo throwing when some one disagrees with one of the congressman’s stands.
Go for it.
More Liberty commented:
bg are you serious?
Are you aware that Ron Paul actually cited and referenced the 9/11 commissions report when he said this. The 9/11 Commission specifically said that American bases in Saudia Arabia, as well as various support for certain dictators inflamed the moron jihadist. The USA closed it’s bases in Saudi Arabia a year and a half later. Furthermore, Ron Paul blames IN PART the US government NOT the American people.
More Liberty commented:
Spider said: “Discussions about Ron Paul are not debates. They are one sided poo throwing when some one disagrees with one of the congressman’s stands.”
It’s debate dude. Try reading and talking to others that don’t believe the same neocon stuff you do – it could help.
bg commented:
++
More Liberty #38 December 2, 2011 at 2:41 pm
excellent!!
your post just set ironic alarm bells off
throughout my lazy grey matter today..
IF RON PAUL IS AS TRUE A CONSTITUTIONALIST AS HE AND HIS
SUPPORTERS CLAIM, THEN HE WOULD BE THE FIRST TO AGREE
WITH AND SUPPORT THEIR DECISION TO NOT INVITE HIM..
==
Doug commented:
Paul wants to legalize drugs and prostitution. He’s like the crazy old uncle you talk to at Thanksgiving just so you can have a good laugh.
RedBeard commented:
Mention Ron Paul’s name, and the thread becomes a Paulian free-for-all. Very entertaining, I must say.
I wish I had brought popcorn.
S. Wolf commented:
RedBeard #47
I’m try to get the corn popping. Actually Paul represents my district in SE Texas so I know more about him than those Paulbots who adore him so much. Paul is a fricking embarrassment and its time he shuffled off to his taxpayer funded retirement home. He’s made more in Congress counting benefits and lifetime pension, and not counting insider trading, than he would have earned as a doctor, and doctors can’t gad about running for president.
DoctorElefant commented:
Lobbyists never bother with Ron Paul. Nothing new. Sure hope he wins!
real rale commented:
IF you stand for freedom of speech, candidates as well as free people can choose to boycott the debate and the RJC, else you are an enemy of the constitution and a hypocrite, PERIOD! rEVOLution 2012
Paz commented:
Iran can’t even refine their own gasoline and we’re scared of them? LULZ
bg commented:
++
DoctorElefant #49 December 2, 2011 at 3:38 pm
heh, another thing he & Obama have in
common, and just a sample, go f$gure..
==
bg commented:
++
re: #52 December 2, 2011 at 4:04 pm bg
Ron Paul one of only four House Republicans
to request earmarks for 2011 budget 12/10
[Taxpayers for Common Sense released a database Tuesday of all the earmarks requested by members of Congress for Fiscal Year 2011. Over $130 billion was requested across 39,294 earmarks. With most House Republicans abstaining from the process, the majority of those requests came from Congressional Democrats. House Democrats requested over $51 billion, outpaced by Senate Democrats with just under $55 billion. On the other hand Senate Republicans only asked for $22 billion, with the four House Republicans accounting for a little over $1 billion in earmark requests. Louisiana Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu had the highest request total for the year at around $4.5 billion.]
==
Militant Conservative commented:
#18 December 2, 2011 at 1:59 pm
Sam commented:
Sam is a clueless person with a room temp IQ……..in celcius.
Rush agrees with me, due to the internet I know things a day or two before rush comments.
He agrees with me.
Brian commented:
Sad state of being when a persons religion is ahead of his country. Sad state of being when what is right, is turned away from simply because his views for getting there is wrong. Just because someone doesn’t want to defend someone, doesn’t mean they are anti anything, it just means that person doesn’t feel like that someone needs defended.
Why don’t we allow Israel to fight it’s own battles? Why does Israel need us to save them every time someone farts in the wind? Does Israel not have one of the best Airforces in the world, a great military, equipment from both the US and Russia? Does the US scream for help if someone attacks us? Let Israel fight their own battles for a bit, and get Israel out of our government. This is the US, and if you don’t like it, go home. If you don’t like what I am saying, go to a country that doesn’t have free speech…In fact, here is a website that might help shed some light on what really came about to bring Israel where it is today… http://www.iamthewitness.com/books/Andrew.Carrington.Hitchcock/Synagogue.of.Satan/index.htm
nader paul kucinich gravel mckinney baldwin ventura sheehan perot carter commented:
with only 1.7% of the US population;
Why are there so many Israel-first dual-nationals in the US government?
Militant Conservative commented:
Brian comment number 54 applies to you also.
JM commented:
Bawk Bawk Chickens. It isn’t that Paul is out of step. It is just that the GOP would rather commit hari kari than to let diverse ideas be debated. Ve must be pro war. Ve must be pro bank. Here comes Obamer term 2. Thanks a lot, all you idiot hawks.
MH commented:
Forget President, Bigots Like Ron Paul Shouldn’t Even Be In Congress
MH commented:
In other words, Ron Paul is a kook. His supporters are kooks. Kooks don’t get elected POTUS.
Thank God.
MH commented:
Sorry. I messed up my html tags. Here’s the link:
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2011/11/forget-president-bigots-like-ron-paul.html
bg commented:
++
More Liberty #43 December 2, 2011 at 2:47 pm
don’t really know what you’re rambling on about, but yes, i’m serious, and i find it laughable that you believe SA closed it’s bases due to anything RP said.. like he was the only one involved.. dang, RP heads are way too big for their own good, i mean RP may say a lot of great sounding things, but he has zero solutions for the consequences to the fallout so to speak.. but geniuses are like that, good sounding thoughts, little accountability for the flashback, heh, just look at Obama & all the consequences of his knowing exactly what needed to be done, and we ain’t seen nothin’ yet, unfortunately, our future generations will be seeing way too much of the “good Obama et al have done for them” than we ever will.. uhg!!
oh yes, the best intentions, a bag of chips
& all that jazz, or something like that.. /s/
==
Molon Labe commented:
#3
Amdog:
You’re right we got Obama, Commissar Zero.
uncivil & right commented:
#56 December 2, 2011 at 4:20 pm
nader paul kucinich gravel mckinney baldwin ventura sheehan perot carter commented:
“with only 1.7% of the US population;
Why are there so many Israel-first dual-nationals in the US government?”
With a nick like that you’ve got chutzpah to question anyones loyalty. I’m not 100% certain Ron Paul is a Jew hater, he just attracts them like maggots to roadkill.
Molon Labe commented:
I’d rather hand feed a honey badger than try to reason with Ron Paul or his mothership followers.
Molon Labe commented:
#58
What brand of Kool Aide do you drink at the Occupy Shanty Town?
DoctorElefant commented:
Re: #52 and 53
Ron Paul said: “I think you’re missing the whole point. I have never voted for an earmark. I voted against all appropriation bills. So, this whole thing about earmarks is totally misunderstood.
Earmarks is the responsibility of the Congress. We should earmark even more. We should earmark every penny. So, that’s the principle that we have to follow and the — and the responsibility of the Congress. The whole idea that you vote against an earmark, you don’t save a penny. That just goes to the administration and they get to allocate the funds.”
bg commented:
++
Brian #55 December 2, 2011 at 4:18 pm
just a sample of much more..
Hitler, The Mufti Of Jerusalem And Modern Islamo Nazism
History of Religion
Imperial History of the Middle East
The world’s collective amnesia
Roots the Club
==
bg commented:
++
DoctorElefant #67 December 2, 2011 at 5:23 pm
actions speak louder than words hey..
==
bg commented:
++
re: #68 December 2, 2011 at 5:24 pm bg
“For the flight and fall of the other villages it is our leaders who are responsible because of their dissemination of rumors exaggerating Jewish crimes and describing them as atrocities in order to inflame the Arabs … By spreading rumors of Jewish atrocities, killings of women and children etc., they instilled fear and terror in the hearts of the Arabs in Palestine, until they fled leaving their homes and properties to the enemy.”
– The Jordanian daily newspaper Al Urdun, April 9, 1953.
==
Sam commented:
46. Doug
So what? Do you wanna prohibit alcohol too? I think that’s already been tried…
54. Militant Conservative
The fact that you take pride in agreeing with Rush Limbaugh on anything should set alarm bells off that you’re completely nuts.
48. S.Wolf
Well at least you’re unashamed in your hilariously blatant lying.
59. MH
What kind of conservative complains about bigotry? Have you watched the GOP debates?
raybojabo commented:
Maybe they didn’t want to stink up the place with Code Pink, Truthers, Iraq Veterans Against the War, and all the other Marxists, Nazis and antisemites that got their heads up Rue Paul’s butt.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/09/ron_pauls_poisonous_partisans.html
DoctorElefant commented:
Re: #69
Yes, voting “no” is a loud and clear action. Ron Paul is “Dr. No.”
usamopatriot commented:
Sam, get the hell back under your rock, moron. You’re the epitome of a blinded paulbot. If Mr. Paul would stop spending half his time talking out of both sides of his mouth and the other half being incoherent then I might consider supporting him. Just because someone claims to be a strict constitutionalist doesn’t make them one.
Noah commented:
From a far, I will say you ALL SEEM LIKE CULT MEMBERS.
It’s a shame that the people who have gone through THE MOST
Are unfortunately THE ELITE OF THE ELITE when it comes to blatant outright ignorance.
You’ll get yours.
GOP_Shariah commented:
it’s hard to take such groups seriously, and blogs that parrot this nonsense, that claim to champion free speech yet they don’t even let folks like Ron Paul speak
the GOP’s equivalent of shariah law and the blogs who rehash this bigotry don’t really want change in America – and will get more of the same as Obama cruises to victory over a lame GOP
JB commented:
Ron Paul supporters are throwing around strawmen and dual-loyalty charges.
The reason why RJC would exclude Paul from the debate is that he’s okey-dokey with Iran getting a nuke and thinks we can be buddy-buddy with them.
S. Wolf commented:
Sam #71
Moi lie?
Militant Conservative commented:
Sam.’
Your a remnant of thought.
Conservatism is farmand away the system
Of fairness not your pos.
Defend socialism i dare ya.
billy mays commented:
FOX NEWS BOYCOTT FOR TAKING DR RON PAUL OUT OF THE DEBATE PASS IT ON
BOYCOTT FOX BOYCOTT BOYCOTT THE ADVERTISERS AN HERE THEY ARE …CAN WE COUNT ON YOU?
http://foxnewsboycott.com/fox-news-sponsors/fox-sponsors-a-l/
Valerie commented:
#54 December 2, 2011 at 4:15 pm
Militant Conservative commented:
I haven’t the faintest idea whether Rush agrees with me, or not. I think you pegged it with the IQ level. It’s definitely not Farenheit.
And I am really tired of having people assume that anybody with a TEA Party orientation must be “a war-mongering neo-con.” I would assume that went with the IQ level, except that the Washington Post used to quote my letters to the editor (actually, Ombudsman) and say “conservatives say….” as if an interest in factual reporting were something only of interest to conservatives.
James commented:
Ron Paul hates Israel? Is that why he was one of the only Congressman to vote AGAINST condemning Israel when it bombed Iraqs nuclear reactor?
Paul was in Congress when Israel bombed Iraq’s Osirak nuclear plant in 1981 and—unlike the United Nations and the Reagan administration—defended its right to do so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul
BS61 commented:
No Ron Paul supporter has ever replied when I ask them if our founders did not start a war with the Muslim pirates under Jefferson. Obviously we didn’t just make it about us way back then.
BS61 commented:
And still no RP supporter can explain why a Canadian should be treated like an Iranian. We have morals and ethics here in the US!
RedBeard commented:
Ron Paul is absolutely correct on a great many Constitutional issues. I applaud him for that. No other candidate seems able to grasp the basic founding tenet of limited federal government, let alone speak out about it. It’s as though none of the others have ever read the Constitution, and can’t understand the clear and unambiguous language of the 9th and 10th Amendments.
But…
Ron Paul is also a crazy man who thinks it’s just ducky for Iran to have nukes, a dogmatic and unthinking isolationist lunatic in a dangerous world where isolationism is a self-inflocted death wish.
There is no way I can ever support a man who is right half the time, and the rest of the time needs a long vacation at the Happy Haven Rest Home and Laughing Academy.
RedBeard commented:
self-inflicted
[all those in favor of an edit function for these comments, raise your hands]
Sam commented:
75. mopatriot
Ron Paul can’t help it that you’re deaf.
Sam commented:
79. S.Wolf
It’s what you do best.
80. Militant Conservative
How about you defend it, ya neocon.
Ron M commented:
Everywhere I go I see RP supporters bitterly clingling to the one Osiraq reactor vote from 1981, the talking point from the Ron Paul campaign..
But I never see them talking about Ron Paul voting with Hezbollah, refusing to condemn them while the terrorist organization was bombarding Israeli civilians. I never see them quoting that out of the entire US congress, only Ron Paul and Denis Kucinich refused a vote to condemn Mahmoud Ahmedinejad when he called to wipe Israel from the map. I never see them quoting the fact Ron Paul votes with Hamas, the Islamic terrorist organization, never see them quoting him comparing Israelis to Nazis by calling gaza a ‘Concentration Camp’.
Since 1981 there has been vote after vote where Ron Paul votes anti Israel, he’s always standing nearly alone in his ‘Israel votes’ with Kucinich, or Cynthia Mckinnney, or Jimmy Carter. It’s a cuckoo train. That’s the reality. but how much truth can you expect from many Alex Jones and Ron Paul supporters? Not very much.
Let me give you some, I am Israeli, I live in Tel Aviv and we’d rather have Obama (a total disaster for Israel, the Mid East and US interests) than Ron Paul. That says A LOT. If Ron Paul wanted the pro Israel American vote (about 65%+ of US citizens) he should have thought about that during the 30 years he was voting with Terrorists and voting anti Israel time after time. Support whomever you please, but tricking people, distorting the very ugly record, gaming polls.. It’s pitiful.
Sam commented:
90. Ron M
Oh please…AHAHAHA!!!!
Try harder troll.
usamopatriot commented:
Sam #91
You need to get back on your meds……..seriously.
S. Wolf commented:
Sam #89
Ron M commented:
Dear Mr Sam. I am not a troll. I visit thegatewaypundit often, linked to Jim Hoft’s most excellent blog a long time ago from my own blog, comment here, at hotair, at RCP, therightscoop and a number of conservative sites very very often. I am a fiscal and jewish conservative and I live in Israel. Sorry, but the truth hurts.
S. Wolf commented:
RonM
Sam is a troll..
Truth Teller commented:
S. Wolf #48 – guess you don’t know that much about Ron Paul. He’s doesn’t take the lavish pension program, citing it as “hypocritcal and immoral” (source: http://huff.to/o259xI)
bg #45 – why would Paul supporters restrict their own Freedom of Speech by not publicly disagreeing with the RPJ’s decision? Is it not infringing on another’s First Amendment right to exercise their own… this is the problem with today’s school system, we don’t teach the constitution and bill of rights anymore. Nobody even understands it, and it’s really not that difficult.
Sandy commented:
It would be good if the Republican Party also stated that they disagree with Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy. However, its nice to see the Paulbots are alive and kicking on this December day.
Marty commented:
Republican Jewish Coalition? What is there like 7 of you guys?
The reason you left Dr. Paul out is because you didn’t want more GOP candidates present than RJC members. The poor guy would have had to sit all by himself while RJC members tried to lobby the others.
Truth Teller commented:
RJC’s decision not RJP… raising my hand RedBeard
Truth Teller commented:
billy mays – this is not the fox news debate. Its an untelevised debate that will take place on wednesday – though I’m not sure if it will be streamed online?
mah29001 commented:
@More Liberty
I’ve had it with people like you whining about stating that if we do not support wRONg Paul you’re against liberty and U.S. Constitution….that’s the same idiotic behavior an O-bot would have by saying you’re “racist” for opposing Obama….shut up.
BS61 commented:
#101 December 3, 2011 at 11:14 am
mah29001 commented:
@More Liberty
I’ve had it with people like you whining about stating that if we do not support wRONg Paul you’re against liberty and U.S. Constitution….that’s the same idiotic behavior an O-bot would have by saying you’re “racist” for opposing Obama….shut up.
Yes! That’s why I don’t support RP or Alex Jones, they protest like liberals!
MJ commented:
People should have more of an issue with his vote to repeal DADT than anything else, since beastiality and sodomy is now ‘kosher’ in the American military.
MJ commented:
I dont have an issue with Paulans, per se.
BUT-I DO have an issue with them blaming “Zionists” for everything when “Zionists” are people that just believe in Israel and God.
They *NEVER* point out the FACT that it is BOLSHEVIK/MARXISTS that are screwing this nation up six ways to Sunday..
When they attack “zionists” it is INSANITY to me, because that is who the ‘progressive-left’ attacks…
They are confusing to me (Paulans)
Truth Teller commented:
MJ – Being one myself, I know lots of Ron Paul supporters. I have never once heard one of them blame, attack, or even mention “zionists.” I don’t know who you’re talking to.
PistolPackingPatriot commented:
I don’t see what all this hooplah is about. Doesn’t everyone agree that America exists to do the bidding of Israel, even to the last American life? Duh. I guess we need to hold a Constitutional Americans/Freedom/Anti-Tyranny debate, and exclude everyone *except* Ron Paul. This Jewish boycott is identical to Henry Ford telling us we can “have a Model T in any color we want – as long as it’s black.”
BS61 commented:
#105 December 3, 2011 at 12:01 pm
Truth Teller commented:
MJ – Being one myself, I know lots of Ron Paul supporters. I have never once heard one of them blame, attack, or even mention “zionists.” I don’t know who you’re talking to.
Apparently you have not been reading the message boards. Unfortunately for RP, his supporters will do him in.
Truth Teller commented:
Oh, the message boards, I see! Well those people must all be real.
Maybe you should try talking to some real-life Ron Paul supporters, and listening to the words of Dr. Paul himself. That is likely to give you a much different impression of the principles that we support and believe in.
Will commented:
Will be the greatest day ever when President Paul wins the nomination and then is inaugurated – and then suspends criminal US taxpayer funded sham aid to parasitic and leech nations like Israel, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. Bunch of fascist, evil and hypocrite nations.
Sean commented:
Calling Ron Paul an anti-Semite is the most ignorant assault on the man’s character and has no basis at all.
His argument for ending foreign aid to ALL countries (not just Israel) is founded in the fact that foreign aid acts as a bribe—we bribe the governments to adopt policies that the PEOPLE may object to and are harmed by, and therefore FOREIGN AID UNDERMINES THE SOVEREIGNTY AND SECURITY OF CITIZENS FROM BOTH COUNTRIES.
We are undermining the security, safety, and sovereignty of Israeli citizens by providing money to countries, and it eventually creates entangling alliances—which our Founders warned against (“Peace Commerce and Honest Friendship with all, entangling alliances with none” was the Jefferson quote).
He is arguing for the policy that best serves the Israeli people, whereas the neo-conservatives advocate the policy that best serves the Israeli Government.
BS61 commented:
#108 December 3, 2011 at 12:40 pm
Truth Teller commented:
Oh, the message boards, I see! Well those people must all be real.
Maybe you should try talking to some real-life Ron Paul supporters, and listening to the words of Dr. Paul himself. That is likely to give you a much different impression of the principles that we support and believe in.
Truth Teller, I have listened to RP and his supporters. Unfortunately, even as a former Dem, I’m not with him on Foreign Policy. I don’t equate an Iranian to a Canadian. That’s my personal belief.
BS61 commented:
#108 December 3, 2011 at 12:40 pm
Truth Teller commented:
Oh, the message boards, I see! Well those people must all be real.
My point is you are here posting, and I am getting an impression of you, a RP supporter.
BS61 commented:
#106 December 3, 2011 at 12:03 pm
PistolPackingPatriot commented:
I don’t see what all this hooplah is about. Doesn’t everyone agree that America exists to do the bidding of Israel, even to the last American life? Duh. I guess we need to hold a Constitutional Americans/Freedom/Anti-Tyranny debate, and exclude everyone *except* Ron Paul. This Jewish boycott is identical to Henry Ford telling us we can “have a Model T in any color we want – as long as it’s black.”
Why aren’t you concerned about the Maoist in the White House?
BS61 commented:
#110 December 3, 2011 at 3:22 pm
Sean commented:
Well then, where does RP stand on the Jefferson war against pirate Muslims?
Carpenter commented:
Ron Paul takes money from White Supremacists! That is a fact. Why would a Jewish group allow him? Why should they?
And he adores (even seems to worship) Ayn Rand who said that she wants to destroy all Religions including Christianity in a TV interview. Before she went to Hell Ayn Rand was an APOSTATE Jew. Do you know what the Bible says about apostates? And Ron Paul is Ayn Rands her mouthpiece here on earth.
Inviting Ron Paul would be like inviting one of Yassar Arafat’s biggest supporters!
Inviting Ron Paul would be like inviting Anton Levay who was also a Big Ayn Randian.
Also Ron Paul is NOT even a Republican he is a LIB ER TAR IAN. Libertarians are NOT Republicans. He doesn’t belong at a Republican event.
lehrbob007 commented:
I’m a fanatical LIBERAL and I think aid should be cut off to Israel and Pakistan, etc.
It’s not a matter of race or religion – it’s the fact that Israel persecutes the Palestinians. Pakistan supports Al-queda while kissing our butts, too. How many Saudi’s on 9/11 airplanes, etc?
DoctorElefant commented:
Re: 114
Pirates? What do they have to do with entangling aliances? Pirates attacked Americans, so Jefferson got Congressional approval to go after them. Terrorists attacked Americans, so Bush got Congressional approval (including Ron Paul’s vote) to go after Al-Queada. Jefferson didn’t invade Iraq or Iran or anyplace else because of some alleged weapon they might build. Neither would Ron Paul.
DoctorElefant commented:
Re: #115
Ron Paul’s heros are Ludwig Von Mises and Murray Rothbard. He has pictures of them up in his office. Yeah, Jewish guys. Not Jewish lobbyists.