Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and Authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical” (Video)

Newt goes there.
The former Speaker told an audience in Iowa, “President Obama is legitimately and authentically a Saul Alinsky radical.”
Freedom’s Lighthouse reported:

From the video: Speaking in Iowa, Newt Gingrich says the “core argument” conservatives have with President Barack Obama is that he is “legitimately and authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical.”

Of course, Newt is right.

Barack Obama taught the principles of Saul Alinsky in Chicago. Notice the flow chart indicating the flow of money and power out of productive businesses (“CORP”) and into the political class (“MAYOR”). The heading at the top reads “POWER ANALYSIS”. The sub-heading reads “RELATIONSHIPS BUILD ON SELF INTEREST”. The symbol on the arrow between “CORP” and “MAYOR” is the “$” sign.

Saul Alinsky came up with the idea of power analysis, which looks at relationships built on self-interest between corporations, banks and utilities. Barack Obama taught students in Chicago the Alinsky Principles.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Gloria Gilson

    2012 is going to be Predator v. Alien,

  • gus

    Nah, Opie the jug eared wonder boy is a MODERATE.

  • Alana

    Bout time somebody started talking real. I’m sick of everybody pussyfooting around facts that are easily, abundantly, available. Through the horse’s own mouth, even.

    Not being able to call Obama the things he really is is just more PC constraints.

  • Pingback: Freedom's Lighthouse » Newt Gingrich Says President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and Authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical” – Video 12/1/11()

  • Valerie

    I really to like Gingrich when he gets into professorial mode.

  • Valerie

    You know what would drive the Democrats nuts if Gingrich were the Republican candidate as either president or VP? Gingrich is the kind of intellectual that they pretended that BO is. Gingrich could school BO, via both speeches and debate.

    It’s be like a bullfight.

  • donh

    and NEWT is legitimately and authentically Barney Frank’s fanny may I have another brother.

  • onbe

    About time!

  • gus

    Donh. Newt may be the second biggest horses ass on the planet. But Obama needs to go.

    You do understand that don’t you?

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and Authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical” (Video) | Nice Messages()

  • Tom Doniphon

    I thought that Barry taught Constitutional Law! I don’t remember reading anything about “Power Analysis” in the Constitution. Cotporations, banks and utilities aren’t mentioned in the Constitution! WTF???!!!

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is �Legitimately and …()

  • MrGoodWench

    Wrong Newt.
    Obama ‘s tactics may be marxist – radical,
    but his goals are islamic.

  • Ace

    Say what you want about Gingrich, but he’s already proved he can landslide an arch liberal.
    The only thing that can save “Obama” is if conservatives get all “purist” while their country burns.

  • gus

    Right ACE. You would NEVER get PURIST. Right??

  • Kermit the Frog

    Dang! Did we get a headliner for Cain when he said back in 31 MAR 2011 that Obama agenda is “Alinsky style … radical socialism”?

    Cutting Edge Newt. Cutting Edge!

  • spend spend spend…we need to get the middle of the road dems to play obama poker so they can be educated on the overspending of this president, and how you can’t overspend and give away ‘free’ taxpayer money…it doesn’t get you anywhere!!!!!

  • Valerie

    C’mon, Kermit, you know you want to say it:

    CAIN/GINGRICH 2012

    It would be a fun ticket!

  • Texas_Treeroach

    It’s a good start Newt — Time to expose the imposter President!!
    It’s time to resurrect the 1857 eligibility ruling of the Supreme Court.
    We’ve swallowed swill long enough.

  • Kermit the Frog

    C’mon, Kermit, you know you want to say it:

    CAIN/GINGRICH 2012

    It would be a fun ticket!

    Honestly, I have listened to Cain ten years ago when he sub’d for the nominally libertarian talky show mouth Neil Boortz and loved his style. When Cain peaked I thought Newt would be a good VP for him before their debate (Newt being a policy wonk and all that).

  • StrangernFiction

    Say what you like about Newt, but at least he is willing to talk a good game. Mittens isn’t even willing to do that. Hell, I don’t think Mittens is even capable of doing that.

  • Valerie
  • Granny

    #21 December 2, 2011 at 11:12 pm
    StrangernFiction commented:

    Say what you like about Newt, but at least he is willing to talk a good game. Mittens isn’t even willing to do that. Hell, I don’t think Mittens is even capable of doing that.
    ____________

    One of the reasons I have always liked Newt – and I don’t like most politicians – is because he has always been willing to tell it like it is. One of the reasons I have never liked Romney is because he isn’t capable of telling it like it is – if he even recognizes it.

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and … : PlanetTalk.net - Learn the truth , no more lies()

  • jorgen

    Newt may not be a Conservative, but he says what should be said!

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and Authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical” (Video) reblogican.com | reblogican.com()

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and Authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical” (Video) | Liberal Whoppers()

  • Sam

    Lol, so what if Obama taught that system to his students?

    Newt is part of the system himself! Does Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ring a bell…?

    Hello….?

    Are you buffoons gonna give him a free pass?

    This guy is a lobbyist!

  • Pingback: Saturday morning links - Maggie's Farm()

  • George Will does not think Newt was very wise in saying that Obama is a Saul Alinsky radical.

  • Mikey

    It is EXACTLY because of statements like this and much much more that I like candidate Newt. He is the ONLY one that will take it straight to the Loser in Chief. He is not afraid of the media or anything. He has already been there and done that. He knows how to handle them. When Newt was on Hannity the other night, I felt like I was watching the future president. There were no uhs or ahs or hesitation. He just answers the questions. It is real easy to answer questions when you don’t have to remember to cover lies and are telling the truth. GINGRICH 2012

  • theBuckWheat

    When Professor Obama views our free market through the lens of “POWER ANALYSIS”, he will then totally misunderstand the following idea that was so well stated by Adam Smith in the Wealth of Nations:

    “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest. ”

    Socialists believe that we each should (and must) live at the expense of others, and this can only come about via compulsion and coercion. The free market can only exist under the rule of law and cannot function unless it is voluntary and mutually beneficial. Thus, socialism is shown to be utterly antithetical to the free market. Socialism must be power-oriented. The free market must be principle-oriented.

    Moreover, the moment that participants in a free market see to secure a government blessing or some other advantage, they start to distort the market. While they may enrich themselves, they do so at the expense of others, and they start to degrade the efficiency and mutual prosperity of the market. In the process, they make us all less prosperous, in a way that is similar to what happens when community organizers seek to distort free market decisions to the advantage of their demographic group or ideological clique.

    The free market is based on the mutual offering of superior value to the parties involved. Since socialism is based on coveting and theft of the wealth of one party to the advantage of another. Because of this, it must of necessity violate two of the Ten Commandments. Moreover, socialism can only destroy wealth so any claims that it is a superior system that is more just and will lead to the perfect socialist man, and thus to the long hoped for secular Utopia is a blatant lie, and thus it violates yet another Commandment. It is sad to see many Christians who are ignorant of these simple truths.

  • tru

    #30 BigAlSouth commented:
    George Will does not think Newt was very wise in saying that Obama is a Saul Alinsky radical.

    Who cares what George Will thinks. In January 2009 Will hosted a dinner in his Chevy Chase Md. home for pres elect Barak Obama. Guests included Bill Kristol, David Brooks, and Charles Krauthammer. Will and friends live in a bubble inside the beltway. How’s that working out for us?

  • Jenny

    It is true about osma using the tenants of islam. I reread the islam chapter in my son’s world history textbook last night. Mohammad wanted equality between rich and poor. Rich merchants were despised and taken down. CAIR must be so happy right now, except for the fact the American people are rising up against this subtle soft jihad.

  • Greg

    Excellent comment Buckwheat

  • 68Truthseeker

    Newt Gingrich : Obama’s Radical Ideology Will Be An Issue If I Am The GOP Nominee – 11/30/11

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDHmguOpgY8

  • RealityCheck

    GINGRICH/CAIN 2012 – yes love it, they can run on family values. Gingrich can campaign on how he cheated on his wife then broke up with her while she was in hospital with cancer. Cain can run in his helping others namely paying Ginger White money fir 13 years for ‘services rendered’. It will be a landslide.

  • Sam

    Lol, RealityCheck, you nailed it.

    Oops….

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and Authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical” (Video) » bornconservative.com()

  • bg

    ++

    “Welcome to the NWO”

    oh you didn’t know?? (ht Valerie)

    yes, we’re transitioning as i type, have been for some time..

    Obama was selected to “speed it up” so to speak..

    as all of the “designers” (including Green Pioneer Muhammad), no
    matter how hard they try to clone themselves in time, are on their
    way out..

    ==

  • bg
  • Valerie

    #37 December 3, 2011 at 9:25 am
    RealityCheck commented:

    You wish they would run on family values, instead of the utter failure of the Democrats to govern.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3m0EyCCs8U

  • MJ

    “RealityCheck”

    Yep….and what about Bill BJ Clinton…Remember that? That was his ‘private life’, and his ‘private life’ was none of our business.
    Hypocrisy everywhere.

  • MJ

    I am glad that someone FINALLY calls this EVIL slime what he is.

  • Looks like Newt has been visiting Gateway Pundit………………..just saying………….

  • bg

    ++

    MJ #43 December 3, 2011 at 11:34 am

    ehat to disapoint, and i’m also glad he did..

    but Newt is far from being the first (or the last) to
    call Obama anything, including an Alinsky radical..

    he’s just the first to be given recognition for it..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    gee! #45 December 3, 2011 at 11:38 am

    think Obama hasn’t?? 😉

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    RealityCheck #37 December 3, 2011 at 9:25 am

    drink koolaid much??

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    re: #48 December 3, 2011 at 12:16 pm bg

    The Truth

    who you going to believe, the witness (who is not the only one to verify
    that version), or the known to be a bias ass AS who proffers no proof??

    ==

  • Practical Jane

    Gingrich has called for a Constitutional Ban on Sharia.
    That alone is reason enough to elect him.

  • Now if Newt would just add the simple fact that Saul Alinsky was the leading American communist of the 20th century. He did not join the party because he thought they were dinosaurs. He wanted to achieve communist domination the Gramsci way, via a long march through the institutions. He was the American Gramsci, and in Obama has succeeded in full.

  • thank goodness Gateway has its own personal omnistcient……… never thought that one simple remark …………..could poke- someone’s eye-out…..my bad

  • bg

    ++

    gee! #52 December 3, 2011 at 1:55 pm

    who’s being omnistcient ❓

    get over yourself, i am..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    Practical Jane #50 December 3, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    great!!

    seriously so glad to hear it..

    just hope my great grandkids aren’t bowing to Mecca by the
    time not only that gets passed, but ObamaCare is repealed..

    / 🙁 s/

    ==

  • Benson II

    Newt’s not a conservative, Newt’s not a conservative, Newt’s not a conservative.

    Get with the program people, Newt is a conservative. He is a bona fide conservative. You can pick little itsy bitsy tiny pieces of a whole plan that isn’t very conservative but overall the plan is as conservative as you can get.

    If your really interested in the truth instead of just sounding off with opinion and liberal talking points why not look at the 21st Century Contract with America on Newt’s website. Listen to his points and what he wants to accomplish and then tell me again he’s not a conservative. He’ also not a career politician, has anyone read his bio? He’s also not damaged goods for mistakes in his past, are we all as pure as the driven snow? Does no one go on with their life and learn from their mistakes?

    It’s time to get serious people. No more liberal talking points or uninformed opinion.

    Read, learn and then decide. It won’t take you any longer than it takes to write a comment on a website.

  • When a candidate’s character doesn’t matter to you:

    Newt Gingrich’s Skeleton Closet
    http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2011/11/newt-gingrichs-skeleton-closet.html

    The Real Newt Gingrich
    http://chasvoice.blogspot.com/2011/11/real-newt-gingrich-part-1.html

  • bg# you remind me of my ex-wife …………….she always had to have the last word………….and i’m going to do what i did best…………walk away……i might be red-neck ……………but i’m gentleman……….

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and Authentically a Saul Alinsky Radical” (Video) |()

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and … – Election 2012 Coverage()

  • Pingback: Newt Gingrich: President Barack Obama is “Legitimately and … « Feeds « Newt Gingrich For President- News Watch()

  • Questionman

    How do you know that he’s pure evil if you’ve never met him? And if he really is so evil (spoiler alert: he’s not), why don’t you hate him? You only think he’s evil because he doesn’t think like a white American, as excepted from someone who supports the party promoters of hate, racism, bigotry and ignorance!

    Wikipedia info on Alinsky excerpted: “His organizing skills were focused on improving the living conditions of poor communities across North America. In the 1950s, he began turning his attention to improving conditions of the African American ghettos, beginning with Chicago’s and later traveling to other ghettos in California, Michigan, New York City, and a dozen other “trouble spots”………..

    Alinsky did not join political organizations. When asked during an interview whether he ever considered becoming a Communist party member, he replied:

    “Not at any time. I’ve never joined any organization—not even the ones I’ve organized myself. I prize my own independence too much. And philosophically, I could never accept any rigid dogma or ideology, whether it’s Christianity or Marxism. One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as ‘that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you’re right.’ If you don’t have that, if you think you’ve got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated. The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to Communist purges and Nazi genocide.”[4]

    Nor did he have much respect for mainstream political leaders who tried to interfere with growing black-white unity during the difficult years of the Great Depression. In Alinsky’s opinion, new voices and new values were being heard in the U.S., and “people began citing John Donne’s ‘No man is an island,'” he said. He observed that the hardship affecting all classes of the population was causing them to start “banding together to improve their lives,” and discovering how much in common they really had with their fellow man.[4] He stated during an interview a few of the causes for his active organizing in black communities:

    “Negroes were being lynched regularly in the South as the first stirrings of black opposition began to be felt, and many of the white civil rights organizers and labor agitators who had started to work with them were tarred and feathered, castrated—or killed. Most Southern democrat politicians* were members of the Ku Klux Klan and had no compunction about boasting of it.”

    *before some liar tries to use this to smear current Democrats, the racist Southern Democrats still alive in the 1970s became Republicans thanks to the party’s sucessful Southern Strategy to recruit them

    I’ve followed Net for 30 years and he is everywhere whoring himself out to whoever has some loot to hand him. He is the apotheosis of a Political *****, a disgrace to to himself, his family and the nation. Obama will crush him in 2012 as he exposes one scandal after another.

  • Pingback: Newt Calls A Socialist A Socialist « Tai-Chi Policy()

  • Homero

    Questionman is dealing with facts and reality. Another response actually regrets the “PC” restraints on calling Obama who he really is. Yet how could such a person know who Obama really is?

    Why can so many of us whites think that labeling people and assaulting them with name-calling is a form of intelligent argument? Since the vast majority of us do have the ability to think critically and clearly, I fear that hate and prejudice lead to cognitive dissonance when we are exposed to verifiable fact and truth. Since emotion is more powerful in people who have not learned to discipline their feelings with grounded reasoning, we give into the emotion and thus fall prey to the propaganda of Corporate America.