Conservative Governor Rick Perry found time to address the VFW today.

Republican presidential candidate, Texas Gov. Rick Perry gestures while addressing the Veterans of Foreign Wars 112th National Conference, Monday, Aug. 29, 2011, in San Antonio. Perry was invited to speak on behalf of Texas before he formally entered the presidential race. (AP/Eric Gay)
Veterans of Foreign Wars officials are outraged after the Obama Administration snubbed the group this week for the first time in the history of the organization. The White House will not send a top-tier official to speak at the convention this week.
FOX News reported:
The Veterans of Foreign Wars convention this week will not feature a top-tier official from the Obama administration, a breach in tradition that the group’s commander described as an “insult of the highest magnitude.”
However, an administration official claimed Monday that the White House made “every effort” to provide a speaker for the event, offering up a range of top officials.
“In all instances, the VFW declined those offers,” the official said.
The veterans group is accustomed to playing host to the nation’s most powerful people at its national conference. Obama addressed the VFW in 2009, followed by Vice President Biden in 2010.
But the 2-million strong VFW accused the administration of snubbing its members by not providing a “first-tier speaker” for the first time in VFW history.
“The VFW has had a long-standing tradition of inviting the sitting president to address our convention,” Richard Eubank, national commander of the organization, said in a statement, adding that the White House typically chooses a “high-level administration official” to speak if the president cannot attend.
“It is an insult of the highest magnitude that for the first time in the history of the VFW, the White House has apparently decided that this great and iconic organization of combat veterans and all of its members are not worthy of its notice by not at least offering a first-tier speaker from the administration.”
…Deputy White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that W. Scott Gould, deputy secretary of Veterans Affairs, will be addressing the convention.
ADVERTISEMENT
Published May 22, 2012 at 5:04 am - 24 Comments
FurryGuy commented:
I am actually very glad Barry thumbed his nose at the VFW. It shows his true feelings regarding this country, her people and its institutions.
aeroguy48 commented:
Rick Perry attended and gave a speach
Blick commented:
The Obama Admin could not find (does not have) a MAN to address the Real men and women of this country. This is what you can expect of liberal cowards and president Beta.
MrGoodWench commented:
So how many muslims are members of VFW ?
Conservative Ken commented:
The VFW should consider this a compliment. They gave their service to overthrow dictators like Bozo.
Little Jo commented:
The VFW is better off without the empty suit addressing its members.
Doug Wakeman commented:
This administration has no “first-tier speaker” that would even know how to address the VFW. It doesn’t even have a speech writer who would know how to write a speech for any “first-tier speaker” to address the VFW. The VFW should be pleased to have avoided pollution by any member of this administration.
Joanne commented:
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28
Obama campaigned as a Christian, but numerous times made it very clear he is a muslim. Watch this video to see time and time again how he is telling the world he is a muslim and his loyalty lies with Islam and its followers.
Americans have been duped – the fox is in the hen house, and the chickens are cowering in the corners, while he eats a chicken one at a time.
MrGoodWench commented:
Hey maybe Hussein should send John Kerry ..
Ginger commented:
Come on Sarah Palin and John Bolton announce your running for the presidency!!!! We need some excitement instead of more of the same! Motor mouth Perry!
Palin/Bolton
or
Bolton
Palin
Joanne commented:
Obama hates the U.S. military. He knows that if all the U.S. servicemen stood down until he proved his eligibility, he would be finished…….but they don’t.
Muslims hate Americans because they are at war with muslims, so why would anyone think a muslim in the Whitehouse would hate them any less.
befuddled commented:
They must not have had any Wagu beef and enough envelopes stuffed with cash to make it worth his while.Besides, he has enough illegals that will vote for him, he doesn’t have to pretend anymore.
No Do Re Mi
No See Mi
– What Obama learned in Jakarta.It’s not personal, it’s the Chicago way.
Rachelle commented:
The Lawn Jockey in Chief doesn’t like Americans.
Rock commented:
Oh come on, does this really come as a surprise, the cat is pretty much out of the bag on WTF, why would he expose himself to a bunch of men who have fought against Socialism most of their adult lives. And membership at one time was over 2 million, now that’s. a vote or two
Then again it may be nothing but a ploy, seems VFW leadership is facing a membership uprising that started last year, following link gives a start point.
http://bigpeace.com/mrwolf/2010/10/11/burn-those-vfw-membership-cards/
retire05 commented:
Since Rick Perry is a member of the VFW, he was a natural to speak at their convention.
And if you want more on what Perry has done for veterans, try this:
http://bluestarchronicles.com/2011/08/28/rick-perry-signs-law-exempting-disabled-veterans-from-property-taxes
Be sure to scroll down past the photo for more on how Rick Perry helps veterans.
Greg commented:
Why are they outraged? Would they be offended if Alcaida would snub them too? So, what seems to be a problem?
retire05 commented:
Ginger, why did Palin choose a lobbyist as her running mate for governor?
Fenway_Nation commented:
OMG! Look at the podium! This proves that Perry some sort of sooper seekrit dominionist a dn that the VFW put up this theocratic
Goddogwhistle!!!11111EleventyTjexcite commented:
The next target the the left will attack, VFW. For their dislike of this snub, they have to be racists or something oh and baby killers
Marsh626 commented:
Liberals once elected to office (or on TV), sure do a good job of pretending they support our military.
But we all know from real world personal experience that they hate this country and view our soldiers as psychotic school dropouts.
retire05 commented:
Perry helps veteran who lost his legs due to medical error:
http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2011/08/air-force-rick-perry-pleads-read-case-082991w
And for all you nay-sayers, this was in July before he announced his run.
Rock commented:
#8 August 29, 2011 at 9:14 pm
Joanne,
A scary link. More troubling is the supposed professional, Secrete Service Service that is either profoundly derelict in their duties, of criminally complicate in the nature of this fraud. But then most of them are Ivy League educated and as a group are less patriotic than the average high school grad who joins the Marines or any of the other services.
moron commented:
Sorry, this administration only has teleprompter readers, no speakers. Next year please request a teleprompter reader. Thank you.
retire05 commented:
#18, either learn to spell or learn to type
donh commented:
It must not be a PAID speeking fee invitation. Obama has a relection to fund …No pro bonos.
Craig commented:
Congressman Ron Paul is also a veteran. He served in the military as a flight surgeon in Air Force. He sponsored most of the bills in favor of veterans. Most of VFW endorses Ron Paul.
saveus commented:
obummer cancelled on the boys scouts 100th anniversary to go on the view, so the vfw is not alone
gus commented:
Obama isn’t a man. This was an event for men. And brave women.
jainphx commented:
I as a veteran would not want the fraud in chief speaking to me. He was afraid to come and see all the ghosts of all the brave that have fallen. I mean he did say while addressing some of our finest, “we honor all those who have fallen and I see some of them are today” This guy is a joke, but I’m not laughing!
jainphx commented:
Craig==== was that our Air Force?
bg commented:
++
“insult of the highest magnitude.”
hah, they ain’t seen nothin’ yet!! and if they’re lucky,
they’ll have departed this planet long beforehand..
==
gus commented:
These a UNITED STATES VETERANS of FOREIGN WARS.
Obama is a fuktard.
But you all knew that.
dunce commented:
They were spared some direct insult if he had shown up. He has a long history of using his speeches to captive audiences to issue smears and slurs as he did at a state of the union speech to the supreme court justices. Ordinarily people pay respect to the occupant of the office even though they detest him as a person but like clinton, the behavior of obama has disgraced the office. Obama is a person decent people should simply avoid. He is a floater in the Washington toilet that we can soon flush away.
Radegunda commented:
I would find it insulting to have to sit and listen to Oblahblah pretending to care about Veterans.
befuddled commented:
Perhaps speaking to soldiers/veterans so close to the Muslim Holiday of 9/11 is haraam. Instead, Obama is preparing for 9/11 picture opportunity day with a flurry of activities that Van Jones swears will make his approval ratings rise among the commoners.
Bob Z commented:
Give Obama a break. He is still at the hurricane command center keeping a eye on the golfing forecast.
Ginger commented:
retire05 commented:
Ginger, why did Palin choose a lobbyist as her running mate for governor?
I do not know you tell me!
________________________________________________
Question: Why is Perry’s former chief of staff a lobbyist?
ocrick commented:
I missed the day the VFW became a Neocon tool and a bunch of Whiners… sad…
I know the fact Kadaffy was toppled without spilling a drop of American blood is driving the right CRAZY!
Sorry there will be no War Profits this time. Iraq and Vietnam are sick jokes.
ocrick commented:
Oh, by the way, Obama has done Much more for Vets than Chicken Hawk bush/dick ever did.
big L commented:
All Alinsky, all thetime. Reallyride the Ameican people. Use their mores and cusatomas against them. Make the middleclass mad. Obama wants some one to take a poke at hime or swing a fist at him, so he can call martial law or block the intenet or arrest people. More offensive behaviour to come from the Ruling Junta…
Blacque Jacques Shellacque commented:
The Obama Administration – alienating America one group at a time.
mamagriz68 commented:
#26 – The VFW members I know have no interest whatsoever in Ron Paul. You do know what that man has said about 9/11 and Iran, don’t you?
bg commented:
++
ocrick #40 August 29, 2011 at 11:10 pm
links please,
thankyouverymuch..
==
bg commented:
++
ocrick #40 August 29, 2011 at 11:10 pm
==
bg commented:
++
ocrick #40 August 29, 2011 at 11:10 pm
Where Are the Antiwar Protests?
==
Ginger commented:
bg…I think I have it all figured out! Next month Sarah and Glen Beck will be together in St. Louis. I think Sarah is running for president and Glen Beck is sponsoring her in a big way.
bg commented:
++
Rock #14 August 29, 2011 at 9:25 pm
[The second, more disgusting part of what NJ writes is this: they awarded Congressman John Adler with ‘Legislator of the Year’?? This was a joke, right? Wait, this is NJ. Why is Cong. Adler so despicable? I think the better question is, why would the VFW endorse/award him- he was recently linked to putting a fake TEA Party operative into the race between he and Jon Runyan. Again, Adler has NO prior military experience, is Democrat, and is accused of doing anything to maintain his position. Do we see a pattern emerging?
The National VFW says that the PAC has little to do with the ‘regular’ VFW, yet it’s members appear in the national magazine, they post the selections the PAC makes, and allow candidates to put in their print materials that they were ‘endorsed by the VFW’.
It’s very apparent that the VFW has no intention of ‘fixing’ this debacle anytime soon. We, as veterans, learned early that if your command has issues, you fix it right then, right there. You relieve people- you right your ship. To do otherwise, especially in times of conflict, imperils every member of the unit.
Burn and return your membership cards.
Your Duty, your Honor, you Country demands no less.]
oh wow..
==
Sandy commented:
Ginger #10 — Now he’s motor mouth Perry? What a pathetic comment!
Ginger commented:
Sandy…Ya think? Well it is your opinion and I do not give a hoot! hahaha
bg commented:
++
Ginger #47 August 30, 2011 at 12:04 am
i can only hope & pray so.. i mean, Perry said he wouldn’t enter the
race if Palin did.. needless to say she was taken aback when he up
& sort of took over the media propaganda machine, not to mention
proving, to me at least, that he is quite capable of stabbing others
in the back..
re: those:
Lobbyist forms two vets’ groups to push Perry candidacy
[The groups cannot legally coordinate with any Perry campaign, but could
work to boost such an effort. The Jobs for Vets Fund is a so-called "super
PAC" that could raise unlimited money to independently get out its message.
Shelley talked about his efforts the same day Politico reported another
super PAC, Jobs for Iowa, has an Iowa television buy promoting Perry
as "a conservative with proven leadership in tough times."
Denies knowledge
Perry's chief political consultant, Dave Carney, said by email the groups "are
not connected to us in any fashion nor do we support what all these folks
are doing. Their motives seem well-intended, but we don't really know."]
that’s about the 5th thing “Perry didn’t know about”..
time to start keeping an “i didn’t know the gun was loaded, but i’m
a 3 decades long career politician, so i’m bullet proof anyways” list..
==
bg commented:
++
ocrick #39 August 29, 2011 at 11:09 pm
imbecile..
==
Ginger commented:
bg…Perry also told his Texans that he would not run for president and would fullfill his full term! Motor mouth just like his bilderberg/one world order buddy the kenyan fraud. I bet Perry has a straight line to Soros and the white house. Perry is a deceiver and real soon more and more people will awaken to his lies and I have a feeling more and more dirt will come out about the fake!
Have you heard anything about the Bush’s are for Sarah Palin?
bg commented:
++
Ginger #53 August 30, 2011 at 12:42 am
re: [Have you heard anything about the Bush’s are for Sarah Palin?]
no, but i’m sure the same old same old lies aka: liberal
truths, will start flowing again soon enough.. pffffffffff!!
Sarah Palin Thanks George W Bush
==
bg commented:
++
speaking of Palin..
Obama ‘very tone deaf’ with vacation
[Regarding an issue that dominated much of the campaign conversation this week she complimented her former gubernatorial colleague and current presidential candidate Rick Perry for some of his criticism of the Federal Reserve. She was not specifically asked if he went too far in saying some of the actions of its chairman Ben Bernanke could be considered treasonous. She has criticized some of the Fed's actions in the past to prop up the economy.
"More power to Rick Perry for calling it
the way he saw it," Palin said Thursday.
She said she agreed with some analysts that President Obama elevated
Gov. Perry by responding to a question about the governor. The president
told CNN's Wolf Blitzer earlier this week, "I'll cut him some slack. He's only
been at it for a few days now."
The president referred to comments by Perry that some in
the military would have more respect for him than Mr. Obama.
Palin said Obama's advice to the candidate showed "arrogance."
"I wish President Obama would stay focused on what matters," she
said in the interview. "Quit picking on other people like Rick Perry."
She continued to remain coy about her own intentions on whether she
or will or won't enter the 2012 presidential sweepstakes, saying, "I am
still considering it."
And Palin said she is "still listening to the debate and the discourse in the
GOP line up right now and still looking for that candidate who I can put my
heart and soul behind to support. If I don't see that person here in short
order I would be willing to put my name forward in the name of service."]
go ahead Perry fans, keep ripping her to
shreds FOR NO (FITB) REASON).. gah!!
honestly is the best policy, and imho.. Sarah has more in her little
pinky than any other candidate’s had during their entire careers..
==
ocrick commented:
http://blog.chron.com/txpotomac/2009/02/huge-increase-in-veterans-benefits-in-obama-budget/
ocrick commented:
http://www.gibill.com/news/veterans-benefits-act-of-2010-signed-289.html
ocrick commented:
http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/nf09/nffeb09/nf022609-8.htm
Militant Conservative commented:
Most old veterans are Democrats. Obama has lost
The old guard, democrats have castrated themselves.
Obama is going down in flames come Nov. 2012.
Powder is dry
Old Dawg commented:
They can invite next for 2013 to speak a president that loves our military and America,
one who don’t look like they are watching a tennis game as they speak…..
Come on VFW, shout out to Sarah Palin is in order!!!!!!!!!!!
squeaky commented:
OT from free republic – ginning up the troops for the presidential election i guess.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/this-is-war-congressional-black-caucus-travels-us-cities-using-violent-rhetoric-declares-war-on-racist-tea-party-says-tea-party-wants-to-lynch-blacks-calls-for-bank-runs-civil-unrest-in-th/
Those weren't bran muffins, Brainiac... commented:
Those folks sending out waves of hate toward ANY GOP hopeful are not Conservatives. They’re using the enemy’s weapons. And they likely didn’t vote for the GOP candidate in the last General Election.
What was Reagan’s “Eleventh Commandment”?
Now, I’m really a Cain fan; but the GOP field is strong enough that nearly any of them could beat Obama, reverse Obama-care, and start getting our people back to work.
The petty bickering from “ginger” and a few other “moby” trolls is just more evidence of how worried the Marxists are about the 2012 election.
So stop worrying. Cast not stones, just ballots, and may the best candidate win!
daryl commented:
Testify #63! Call it like you see it!
And may the ‘great obama’ be unseated before a second term.
But I’m not sure they’re obama fans or just very politically challenged. They link to a lot of ‘he said, she said’ in their bashing but I have yet to hear any complaints against the incumbent.
Deanna commented:
Give me a break. The VFW got what it deserved. As has been posted, they supported Dems and other more Liberal candidates over Conservatives and even veterans like West. Now they’re whining because Obama threw them under the bus.
Ripped commented:
From Rick Perry’s speech: “I do not believe that America should fall subject to a foreign policy of military adventurism. We should only risk shedding American blood and spending American treasure when our vital interests are threatened”
OMG it sounds like he stole a page right out of Ron Paul’s play book. He must be an isolationist, quick brand him a kook!
Jerry C commented:
Usurper-in-Thief lying fraudulent POS
I cannot wait to see him being thrown alive into the Lake of Fire, just so you know.
Jerry C commented:
@ ocrick
You do realize that NObama cares nothing about the veterans nor any benefits he may “promise” them in the future. But since you have no clue, he’s trying to buy their votes. Got it? Once he gets the votes, his “promises” are worthless. Worthless.
Ginger commented:
Those weren’t bran muffins, Brainiac said:
The petty bickering from “ginger” and a few other “moby” trolls is just more evidence of how worried the Marxists are about the 2012 election.
___________________________________________________
How many names do you go by troll? I am no more a troll or petty then any one on this blog that gives their opinion. You just do not like it because this republican can see a fake republican and have no problem calling them out! Your Texan Perry is a fake. We have already got one fraud and liar in the white house we do not need another.
btw….Are you working out of the Texas capital building by chance? I never did get an answer when I ask why Perry’s former chief of staff is now a lobbyist.
Ginger commented:
btw #63 …. Perry is just being vetted do you have a problem with that?
retire05 commented:
Ginger, so you are upset because Perry’s former Chief of Staff became a lobbyist, but you don’t know why Palin chose a lobbyist as her running mate for Governor of Alaska? Let me see if I understand your line of thinking: you think that Perry should have some control over what his former Chief of Staff choose as a line of work AFTER he left Perry’s staff?
Let me make it quite clear to you; should Palin get in, and should she win the nomination, we will wind up with Obama for another four years.
jainphx commented:
Hold your ground Ginger! All it means is that you are affective in your arguments. We are talking about Obama and the VFW, and some have to inject questions like, why did so and so hire a lobbyist, Weak real weak, and then cry about spelling and typing. Ha!
Dan commented:
http://i55.tinypic.com/105bb5g.jpg
Perry calling Hillary Clinton’s healthcare work “commendable.”
Ginger commented:
retire05
I said that I do not know why Sarah hired a lobbyist. Give me a link and I will decide if it is a non issue.
Ginger commented:
jainphx…Thanks
I am sick of the double standard. Sarah and her family has been trashed and I am not allowed to vet this fast talker in Texas. What I have read about Perry scares the daylight out of me. So if they get their “jollies” bashing me then so be it! I backed down once and stopped posting because I gave my opinion and boy was I called names and I have been posting her for years now. I am NOT a troll! I am a old lady who loves my America and will be one out there to protect her if it comes to it!
btw…MC ….do you remember “Annie Oakly”? That is going to be me!!
retire05 commented:
Ginger, I have not called you any names, so stop the juvenile whining.
You seem to be squarely in Sarah Palin’s corner, so it stands to reason that, as a rational thinking person, you would have personally vetted her and would know why she made the decisions she did. Hence, my question to you.
Now, you say that Rick Perry scares the daylights out of you based on what you have read. So, what have you read, where is that information you have gleened come from, have you investigated to see if what is being said is actually factual? Whose are your sources? Are they credible?
I am willing to have a conversation with you about Palin and Perry, but plese, don’t insult me with black helicopter stuff.
Ginger commented:
retire05
Remember the name “flakey?” You do not think that calling me juvenile whining or black helicopter stuff is not insulting. So how and what is black helicopter stuff?
Let me see I respect and trust Michelle Bachmann, John Bolton, Mr. Cain. Any one of those I would gladly vote for. I get my sources by links other then that I do not pay much attention to some of the links as a lot are liberal rags!
This is a lot to do with my concern that Perry is not who he is trying to and succeeding for now to the people of Amarica who Perry is.
Trans-Texas Corridor
Gardisil…which is the one that bothers me the most.
ACORN
Al Gore
Big spending
Big Government
Saying he would not run for president and would fullfill his term.
His Islamic ties!
Much much more……
bg commented:
++
ocrick #57 August 30, 2011 at 3:24 am
thank you, still looking into it..
Bush vs. Obama Spending the Truth
[Obama spent approximately $535 billion more year-over-year then
Bush’s highest year of spending. Because of the continuing recession
and slowed GDP, the deficit increased by a staggering $960 billion in
1 year.
$794 billion was spent on military expenditures, more than in 2008 while
Bush was still president. That cost is almost a wash, but it is a surprising
number considering the anti-war stance Obama drove during his campaign.]
ih btw, cost goes up every year, one really
needs to, more or less, calculate via ratio..
[iow: what cost 10 bucks last week
may be a few dollars more this week]
and i know GWB treated the troops well via his budgets..
==
bg commented:
++
retire05 #76 August 30, 2011 at 10:21 am
re: [So, what have you read, where is that information you have
gleened come from, have you investigated to see if what is being
said is actually factual? Whose are your sources? Are they credible?]
should not Perry supporters be held to the same standards and
asked the same questions they dictate of non-Perry supporters??
and let me toss this back at you minus the insulting rhetoric:
will you vote for (fitb) should Perry not win the nomination??
==
bg commented:
++
just a wee example of a devout Of Means and Ends activist..
daryl #64 August 30, 2011 at 7:48 am
==
Ginger commented:
bg……..
SPR commented:
I’m not Obama fan, but he addressed the American Legion convention in Milwaukee this morning…might be why he couldn’t attend. Not making excuses, just stating the facts.
retire05 commented:
Ginger, I asked you for sources. You refused to give them. Saying you do not get them from liberal rags is not an answer, it is a dodge.
So, let’s take what you seem to think are issues:
Trans-Texas Corridor:
How familiar are you with David Stolle? Ever hear of him? Ever attend one of of his meetings? Do you know the first thing about the legislation that was passed in Texas or the SCOTUS case that prompted the “domain” legislation? How was Perry (since you lay it off on him) to force states north of Texas to build the corridor all the way up to Canada?
Gardisil………………..which is the one that bothers me the most:
What was the FDA’s ruling on Gardisil? What other states had already planned to put Gardisil on there required immunizastion lists? What was the wording of the EO that required the vaccination? What was the FDA’s data, at the time, on Gardisil?
ACORN:
What association do you think Perry had with ACORN? Where did you get any information you think you have from?
Al Gore:
Again, specifics. What about Al Gore?
Big spending:
be specific. How? What spending?
Big government:
Specifics.
Saying he would not run for president and would fulfill his term:
As opposed to Palin who actually quit in the middle of her term? Why the double standard?
His Islamic ties:
What ties? Give specifics. Generalities are not going to cut it with most rational thinking people.
And much, much more:
What more? Again, you offer me generalities, not specifics. That only makes you come off as someone who relies on taking points but who is weak on facts.
I am willing to debate you on each and every one of those taking poings, but you have to offer me more than just generalities.
Ginger commented:
retire 05
Go jump in a lake! I do not have to debate you! The links have been all over the place..I have most in my favorites. You will not change my mind nor will I change yours sooooo if Perry pulls off his scam then my vote will cancel yours in the primary and I said if Perry goes against the kenyan fraud I will vote for all the other as senator, congress, judges, school board, and other matters on my ballot. I hope there is a write in but if not I will draw a BIG X across the president/vice-president.
Cheers!
Ginger commented:
btw…Sarah was forced to resign as Governor of Alaska due to the constant bogus lawsuits from the marxix/socialist/communist thugs and YOU SIR DAM WELL KNOW IT! Fighting law suits is costly and takes away from other things in life!
STOP already! You liberals have worn out that topic about Sarah because we all know that Governor Sarah Palin is NOT a quitter!
retire05 commented:
Ginger #84, the fact that you are unwilling to give me specifics only proves that you have nothing but taking points but no facts. Thanks for proving that. But you should learn this; anyone who is secure in their opinions should be willing to discuss/debate them. You’re not.
#85 Yes, Palin quit. That was her choice. She was not required to quit. No one in Alaska was demanding her resignation. And I am fully aware that by the time she quit, she was $500,000.00 in debt over legal fees. So what? She wrote a very successful book that she could have written while as governor, and used, as she did, those book royalties to pay her debts.
Now, as to your favorite links; care to provide them? Or are you just going to continue to show that you are simply operating from an emotional, not logical, position?
AuntieMadder commented:
I guess I’m the only one who sees the warts on Palin, Perry, and Bachman, yet still likes and supports all three of them.
AuntieMadder commented:
@ Ginger: “I hope there is a write in but if not I will draw a BIG X across the president/vice-president.”
Then you’re a damned fool. Hold your breath like a toddler not getting her way and help keep that damned Kenyan in the White House for another four years. Yeah. That’s the smart thing to do…in dumb@$$ world.
bg commented:
++
SPR #82 August 30, 2011 at 12:27 pm
well there’s always a first time for everything, oh wait..
Obama would never pull a politically expedient stunt to
make himslef appear to be better than he is, would he??
nah, what the heck was i thinking.. /sarc/
==
retire05 commented:
AuntieMadder, there is NO perfect candidate. Not one of the choices can walk on water or turn water into wine. Even Washington and Jefferson had their faults; both were fiscally irresponsible with their own finances. Washington’s excuse was a bit more valid than was Jefferson’s as Washington spent 7 years at war are rarely went home during that time.
But the “true believers” will never see the warts on the person they support. Instead, they will continue to accept the falsehoods put out by those who have a dog in the hunt.
bg commented:
++
retire05 #90 August 30, 2011 at 1:44 pm
LOL, since when do your opinions = fact??
aah, got to admit (albeit a time restricted
cycle) you are quite the devoted disciple..
==
MamaGrizzly commented:
retire05: We all know you love Perry. Could you speak to us now regarding the Prophet Mohammad?
Who was he? What did he accomplish in the world? What is the duty of Islam? What should happen to Moslems who convert to another religion. Would you feel comfortable saying anything critical of Mohammad? Or curse Mohammad?
I also would like to hear from daryl on this, and workingclassartist.
——————————–
Perry is the next One Worlder, pro-Islam, change the Constitution phony-baloney “president” in line. The Obama administration actually could have sent ANYONE of standing to speak on it’s behalf, or President Obama could have gone. I’m sure they did not because it would “offend” the Moslems who are funding them and who the Administration is supporting. Enter Soros (again), enter the world Jihad (again). Perry has learned how to talk the talk. This is an absolute bedrock characteristic of Moslem countries, and it is admired if you can deceive your enemies. Perry is covered in red flags (read: crescent flags), and the conservatives should keep digging. His handlers have not had enough time to bury and buy the info yet, so do it now.
MamaGrizzly commented:
If Perry supporters:
retire05 / daryl / workingclass artist / and perhaps Ron
don’t start speaking in clear and concise terms on the dangers of Islam, well . . .
hiway280z commented:
He does not do our National Day of Prayer either
What he does do every year is give a big speech to and about the muslims when Ramadam starts and at the end invites the muslim leaders to the White House for a big celebration dinner. ah no other religion, especially Christians are allowed in the White House or on any Public land or building.
Like Michelle O said in a speech we meaning them, have to change History
hiway280z commented:
Obama is on Air Force One again. This time flew to St. Paul Mn. to give another teleprompter reading.
A.F.O. will be wore out by the time he gets thrown out of Washington
MamaGrizzly commented:
And just so those 3 don’t start spouting the same old and false arguments against me:
I have concerns about Perry.
Romney
Santorum
Cain
Bachmann
all have some issues, but would make good presidents.
I haven’t ever been all ga-ga over Palin, and at this point, I don’t think Palin can win because the media have turned her into a non-player. If she does enter, fine–it will make things more interesting if nothing else. I support her stance on most things, but wish she would take more steps to preserve the environment–pollution is the enemy of everybody.
The ABSOLUTE no-go on vetting Perry is extremely troubling. There is a lot out there re:Perry, and even going the Michelle Malkin’s website is a start.
bg commented:
++
Ripped #66 August 30, 2011 at 8:10 am
i’m certainly no RP fan, but that’s lol funny!!
==
MamaGrizzly commented:
#94 August 30, 2011 at 2:05 pm
hiway280z commented:
He does not do our National Day of Prayer either
What he does do every year is give a big speech to and about the muslims when Ramadam starts and at the end invites the muslim leaders to the White House for a big celebration dinner. ah no other religion, especially Christians are allowed in the White House or on any Public land or building.
Like Michelle O said in a speech we meaning them, have to change History
—————–
Good observation and comment.
I remember the Mao tree ornaments at Christmas at the White House too.
So many players behind the scenes.
Follow the money.
Follow the oil.
MamaGrizzly commented:
Still waiting on your comments on Islam, guys . . .
retire05 commented:
#92, MamaGrizzley
Who was Mohammed? He was a man who was thrown out of his own home town because of his radicalism. He became a war lord, after first trying for 13 years to covert others through peaceful means. He made his money by having his followers, basically pirates, attack trade caravans and sharing a portion of the spoils with his followers. But he was too cowardly to raid those caravans himself.
What did he accomplish? He conquered, through violence, large areas of the population. Not much else.
What happens to Muslims who convert to another faith? They are considered apostates and by dictate of Mohammed are to be put to the sword (killed).
Curse Mohommed? Pi$$ be upon him.
Which has to do with what?
kspatriot commented:
My hope is our 2-million VFW members make their voices heard at the polls next year. What better response can we provide than that? A one-way ticket to Kenya for the royal first family is the nicest goodbye gift we could give him.
bg commented:
++
Ginger..
far as i can tell..
the consensus of the opinionated have declared you to be “DAMNED IF
YOU DO & EVEN MORE DAMNED IF YOU DON’T”, sort of like being placed
on an America &/or Bush plateau, go figure.. /s/
==
Ginger commented:
bg…I know I am like a toddler holding my breath so I can get my way.
You should see me on the floor kicking my little heart out because I can’t or (will not) submit to their demands!
bg commented:
++
Ginger #103 August 30, 2011 at 2:34 pm
was recalling signing off with “Palin, Perry, Cain & West 4 of the best!!”
in several previous posts.. and the thought of “how many Perry heads
are going to implode” should there be a ‘Palin & Perry’ (or vise versa)
ticket at the end of the day..
==
Ginger commented:
bg… #104….Ya think? Palin & Perry I read that! Is Palin charming Perry and ready to clobber him? I can’t quite get my thoughts on her niceness.
Maybe I ought to send her some links about him. :0 (sarc off)
retire05 commented:
Oh, Ginger, please do send Rick Perry’s campaign your links.
I am sure they will appreciate filing them under “Laugh of the Day”.
But then, you can make the argument yourself, since you are so well versed on the issues you seem to have problems with. Nothing like arguing with someone who is stuck on talking points.
Ginger commented:
retire05 ….do you feel real big to bash every word I say! Why don’t you try SOB when you see my name? You are so immature!
Can’t you take a joke?
retire05 commented:
Nah, Ginger, I just figure eventually you will become mature enough to elaborate on your check list of things you have against Perry. You do remember listing them, don’t you? Your post #77?
But…………………………if you want to continue to show that you are no more than a simpleton who is incapable of actually expressing in more than one syllable words your objections, well, that is your decision.
bg commented:
++
Ginger #105 August 30, 2011 at 3:26 pm
lol & a newsflash for you:
PALIN is NICE..
btw, Perry was the one who more or less
stabbed her in the back, so go figure..
==
bg commented:
++
retire05 #108 August 30, 2011 at 4:03 pm
typical TW, always attack the POSTER vs the ISSUES..
gig yourself..
==
retire05 commented:
bg, I am not into your school yard tactics. If Ginger is not mature enough to defend herself, let HER speak up.
Maggie Hogan commented:
Ginger, don’t waste your time and energy debating a challanged “baby booming liberal”
. My political views haven’t changed since I registered as a Democrate in 1959. I was raising kids and paying a mortgage when he was still wetting his pants. I am now Tea Party, because my political views haven’t changed since 1959.
bg commented:
++
MamaGrizzly #98 August 30, 2011 at 2:12 pm
just a sample:
follow the money
follow the oil
follow the links
ie: Obama Gives Chrysler To Libya & Muammar Gaddafi
==
Maggie Hogan commented:
Well, she needed someone who has observed day to day administration of the government for almost 50 years, someone who doesn’t buy the spin because she know betters from personal observation. What I have observed during my life is that liberals want for themselves, not for the better good.
Valerie commented:
I was raised in Texas, and my parents just left after a nice visit, and I picked their brains a little. They don’t like Perry because he’s a Republican. My daddy still believes every nasty fantasy Howell Raines wrote about George Bush and Dick Cheney.
As far as I can tell, all the qualms anybody has found so far about Rick Perry have been aired, here. Anybody who wants to can find all the links, pro and con, among the comments, here. For me, the Pesky Truth series of articles are a fair approximation of what I’ve heard, both pro and con.
http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/2011/07/21/why-elect-rick-perry/
Here’s the part 2 of the comments about what the critics say, and part 1 is in easy reach if anybody wants to follow the links.
http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/seventeen-17-things-that-critics-are-saying-about-rick-perry-part-2/
According to my sources, the charge of being too chummy with Muslims has no traction, even with hard-core Texas democrats. Garnet won’t mention her by name, but I will say this about Michelle Malkin: no electable politician will ever satisfy her. Politicians are required to deal cordially with all kinds of people, and Michelle just doesn’t understand that fundamental requirement of high political office.
Further, it makes no sense to say that support for a guest worker program is the same thing as being “soft on illegal immigration.” A guest worker program by no means the equivalent to amnesty: it is a useful part of a sensible immigration policy that the Teddy Kennedy insisted be left out of our current immigration law. Now we have 30 years of bad public policy to clean up, and it will require some compromise. That does not mean, however, that the path to citizenship should include a step where a person violates our laws.
Denise Davies commented:
Goes to show us that Obama doesn’t give a hoot about what our veterans did for us during WW2, Korea, or Vietnam. I am so glad his days are so numbered and God willing we will have a new president on January 20th, 2013. Also I don’t like or trust motor mouth Perry, like Obama he believes in Open Borders so thank you but no thank you to Perry.
maraz commented:
Rick Perry’s camp defends 1993 HillaryCare praise – Rick Perry sent letter to Hillary in ’93 praising her HillaryCare efforts
http://dailycaller.com/2011/08/30/rick-perrys-camp-defends-1993-hillarycare-praise/
maraz commented:
And the left is trying hard to smear Bachmann…
She said at a recent appearance: “Who likes wet people? Yeah, that’s right. Because we have the G-d of the winds and the rain don’t we?” The leftist edited out the comment about wind and rain and had a headline that she is a racist and said “Who likes White People”
Website that edited Michele Bachmann video apologizes
http://www.hapblog.com/2011/08/website-that-edited-michele-bachmann.html
maraz commented:
Rick Perry and Islam – The last four years are a reminder that we could do worse than Bush II, but maybe we could do better. With Perry in the race, the two frontrunners, Romney and Perry will be clones of each other. Two aggressively business oriented governors with no real interest in protecting American manufacturing or resisting the Islamization of America. One of whom looks like a Tea Party friendly populist, but more in style than in substance. Perry may shoot a gun into the air, but his rhetoric is the same old Compassionate Conservatism. He may be more authentically Texan than Bush, but the substance of his ideas is the same. NAFTA, education for illegal aliens, and Islam is a great religion. Whatever we say and do, he may be the inevitable candidate. The man who merges the strongest points of Huckabee and Romney into one populist friendly package. Who sells a pro-business compassionate conservatism that comes off as a low pain alternative to Obama. But before that it might not be such a bad thing to pore over the details of his record in office. Perry is certainly an improvement on Obama. But in a race where Bachmann, Cain, Santorum, Palin and Gingrich have spoken out about the dangers of Islam– everyone is gathering to cheer a man who celebrates it. Is this what the struggle of the last 3 years comes down to? Did we go through all this just to put Bush era policies back into office?
http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2011/08/rick-perry-and-islam.html
maraz commented:
Perry is for America whenever in campaign mode… any other time? Not so much….
Think ObamaCare is bad? Rick “Open Borders” Perry wanted a bi-National plan that would include Mexico
http://thespeechatimeforchoosing.wordpress.com/2011/08/17/think-obamacare-is-bad-rick-open-borders-perry-wanted-a-bi-national-plan-that-would-include-mexico/
maraz commented:
Plumbing the rest of the Perry record
http://michellemalkin.com/2011/08/18/plumbing-the-rest-of-the-perry-record/
—
VIDEO: Vetting Rick Perry – Michelle Malkin – Fox & Friends – 8-18-11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCTv6f4yTa0
Ginger commented:
Hey retire05 …TAKE YOUR TRASHING ME AND GO STRAIGHT TO HELL YOU SOB!
Go read Valerie’s post I have been there all this time reading! All the proof that you are a scumbag! You have Perry the fraud up your a$$ so far you can open your mouth and we would see Perry looking out!
That creap garnett#92… I presume is the blog master is a scum ball just like you! You make me sick!
Ginger commented:
Thank You maraz for all the post and I do plan on reading all of them’
Retire05…You have been the school yard bully! You….you…you ^^%$@@$%&**^#
MamaGrizzly commented:
#100 August 30, 2011 at 2:16 pm
retire05 commented:
#92, MamaGrizzley
Who was Mohammed? He was a man who was thrown out of his own home town because of his radicalism. He became a war lord, after first trying for 13 years to covert others through peaceful means. He made his money by having his followers, basically pirates, attack trade caravans and sharing a portion of the spoils with his followers. But he was too cowardly to raid those caravans himself.
What did he accomplish? He conquered, through violence, large areas of the population. Not much else.
What happens to Muslims who convert to another faith? They are considered apostates and by dictate of Mohammed are to be put to the sword (killed).
Curse Mohommed? Pi$$ be upon him.
Which has to do with what?
————–
Okay.
Let me get you straight, retire05.
You said Mohammad the Prophet, originator of Islam was radical.
You said Mohammad the Prophet, originator of Islam was a warlord.
You said Mohammad the Prophet, originator of Islam was a leader of pirates.
You said Mohammad the Prophet, originator of Islam was too cowardly to attack caravans himself.
You said Mohammad the Prophet, originator of Islam conquered large areas of population through violence.
You said the Prophet, originator of Islam dictated that apostates be killed.
That’s fine.
Would you also say that Mohammed the Prophet, originator of Islam in addition to being a theif and a violent man, was a pedophile, a rapist, a sadist, a murderer, and a liar?
I’m interested in your answer.
Cursing Mohammad the Prophet, originator of Islam? Your answer could be interpreted a few different ways–just checking on that.
Thanks retire05.
MamaGrizzly commented:
maraz–thanks for your links–will research
retire05 commented:
I used to wonder how in the heck Obama ever got elected. Considering the falsehoods that I have seen about Governor Perry on this very site, much like the fabricated lies that were spewed about Sarah Palin, I now understand how we wound up with Barack Hussein Obama.
And I find it especially disturbing that many of these fabrications about Perry are coming from Palin supporters who should know better.
maraz, as to Michelle Malkin: when Malkin starts using Politico and the Washington Post (who started printing hit pieces on Rick Perry a full month before he announced his candidacy) I have to wonder if Malkin isn’t being snookered into believing the hype that can basically be tracked back to three sources.
Also, if you want creditibility, don’t link to a blog that is clearly in Sarah Palin’s corner and expect others, with open minds, to not accuse you, and the author of that blog, to be guilty of ulterior motives.
bg commented:
++
why don’t Texans like Perry??
another clip here, and more here (i think)..
==
retire05 commented:
#126, MamaGrizzley, yes, I view Mohammed as all those things you list. I also view Islam as a social/political cult cloaked in the mantilla of “religion.”
But what does my opinion of Mohammed, and Islam, have to do with the price of eggs? Or do I have a suspicion of where you are going with this?
retire05 commented:
bg, do you have an original thought in your head? Or is all you can do is link to youtube and other posts on this website?
maraz commented:
@ bg #129
Outstanding video… thanks… deserves a repost…
VIDEO: Why Texans don’t like Perry – Texas Governor says he’s a ‘Prophet’
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZG3LnEtvqQ
maraz commented:
@ retire05 #131
We must be really scaring you … huh?
Those pesky folks who keep posting articles on the truth just keep getting in the way of you communist who are hell bent on destroying America – huh?
The only defense you have against the truth is to name-call and ridicule. Go bury your head in your Alinsky book for radicals… we’re onto those tricks.
Ginger commented:
Hey…retire05…. Thanks for a wonderful day of learning first hand about marxism/commusim/socialist/pigs like you.
maraz commented:
@ retire05 # 128 writes the following:
Uh…. the first rule to any attempts to discrediting me is to know your audience. Claiming I’m in Sarah Palin’s corner is a Lib FAIL at your discrediting efforts. LMAO…
maraz commented:
@ Ginger #125 August 30, 2011 at 6:44 pm
You’re quite welcome… and thank you for your courage…
retire05 commented:
#134, Ginger, I offered you a chance to give specifics as to your problems with Perry. You refused to do that, and even went so far as to refuse to give your sources. If you are under the impression that gave you creditibilty, you are dead wrong.
Now, you resort to name calling. Marxist/socialist/pig? Please, you don’t even know what a Marxist is, much less call someone those names with any intellect.
But thanks for proving you suffer from analcranial disorder.
retire05 commented:
maraz, if you are not in Palin’s corner then you need to refrain from using links that are. Or do you not know the first rules of dabate?
And Ginger is couragous? Since when is calling people pigs been considered couragous? More like some left wing hack who has no ability to defend their own positions.
maraz commented:
@ retire05 # 138 who writes:
You’ve got your soul so filled with hate that you missed my original point. I consider it a great compliment that you think I’m in Palin’s corner. I have no idea which link you feel is in Palin’s corner… but I want to thank you for the unintended compliment and happen to think that you just strengthened my credibility… which is why I called your attempt to discredit me a BIG FAIL… please… my stomach hurts from laughing so hard at your attacks on me. LMAO… please attack me more… my ego is loving the claims that I’m Palin-esque… Thank you for the ultimate compliment.
retire05 commented:
mariz, thespeechatimeforchoosing is a Palin supporting website. Do you not even read your own reference material?
And don’t hurt your arm patting yourself on the back; I NEVER said you were Palinesque.
Invest in a reading comprehensionn course.
maraz commented:
@ retire05 # 138 who writes:
Also, do you know the first rules of spelling debate?
maraz commented:
@ retire05 # 141 and #138
First you should invest in a dictionary… than I’ll consider that comprehension course. LMAO You’re pretty funny… did you know that?
retire05 commented:
maraz, along with not ever making typos, can you also walk on water or change water into wine?
If you can change water into wine, I have a whole creek I would like you to work on.
retire05 commented:
Gee, maraz, no mention on how you linked to a Palin supporting website?
But we do seem to have something in common; my typing skills are equal to your mentality.
maraz commented:
@ retire05
In case you don’t have a dictionary handy… there’s only one “n” at the end of comprehension.
Ginger commented:
maraz.. Give this devil the freeze! There is no reasoning with the devil!
maraz commented:
@retire05 #144
Ooooh… looks like I hit a nerve… we’re reduced to schoolyard insults. Gee… (***sarc on)you’re really hurting my feelings (***sarc off). LOL
retire05 commented:
Ginger, perhaps you would like to respond to the list you yourself posted at #77?
Or are talking points all you have? That, and calling people you don’t even know pigs.
retire05 commented:
maraz, why would I want to hurt your feelings? I don’t know you well enough to dislike you. But then, on the other hand………………………………….
maraz commented:
@ Ginger… it’s like when my cats play with the mice before they eat them… LOL… it’s too easy. I cracking up laughing at this guy…
One more and I promise I’ll stop…
@ retire05 #144 who writes:
What a command of the language. Definition of Mentality: A habitual or characteristic mental attitude that determines how you will interpret and respond to situations
Did you mean to say IQ in that insult? I know IQ is such a hard complicated word to remember in lieu of the fancy-schmancy word like mentality.
maraz commented:
Ginger… apparently he wants to take you on since he’s having trouble discrediting me.
retire05 commented:
I’ll take the definition of mentality for $500.00n “a mental attitude that determines how you will intrepret and respond to situations.”
IQ determines your level of intellect.
Ginger commented:
maraz …. I am done with oink…oink Good night!
retire05 commented:
I don’t want to “take Ginger on.” I simply want her to give specifics to her list of her post #77.
She is unwilling to do that.
Wouldn’t you also like to her her explain her opposition by explaining the list?
retire05 commented:
Ginger, the little piggy that went wee, wee, wee all the way home.
bg commented:
++
re: retire05
But communists could not be wrong.
[Communism has been the greatest social engineering experiment we have ever seen. It failed utterly and in doing so it killed over 100,000,000 men, women, and children, not to mention the near 30,000,000 of its subjects that died in its often aggressive wars and the rebellions it provoked. But there is a larger lesson to be learned from this horrendous sacrifice to one ideology. That is that no one can be trusted with power. The more power the center has to impose the beliefs of an ideological or religious elite or impose the whims of a dictator, the more likely human lives are to be sacrificed. This is but one reason, but perhaps the most important one, for fostering liberal democracy.]
==
MamaGrizzly commented:
Thanks retire05.
But can you pen the same claims as I made, yourself, instead of just saying you agree with me?
I said: “Would you also say that Mohammed the Prophet, originator of Islam in addition to being a thief and a violent man, was a pedophile, a rapist, a sadist, a murderer, and a liar?”
Those who follow Mohammad will NOT claim, straight out that Mohammad was NOT A PROPHET, NOT A PROPHET OF GOD, and was instead a pedophile, rapist, sadist, murderer, and liar. They cannot, indeed must not, curse the name of their prophet or say derogatory things about him–even in order to deceive infidels. It is blasphemy to Islam, and to the Prophet.
So?
daryl? workingclassartist? Can you weigh in on this in your own words?
bg commented:
++
just a few of the too numerous to count “original
thoughts” that i’ve posted @ GP over the years..
“what the fascist left have been aiming for is to “equate” good with evil..
that’s the only way they can appease their conscience in the face of the
harsh reality they are trying to escape from because it does not fit in with
their ideological utopian matrix.. if there is no good vs evil, then all is good
even if [the] all is evil..” – bg
“for whatever reason people leave their homeland & come to America..
they need to leave their homeland behind & embrace America as their
homeland.. not bring their homeland from which they fled for whatever
reason with them to America & try to reestablish their homeland here..
this is America, not (fill in whatever homeland) here!! or go back from
whence they came if they were so happy there as to want to duplicate
it here.. go fight for your own homeland in your own country, i will fight
for my homeland in mine, namely America.. God Bless America, land of
the free, not the wanna be (fill in whatever country) here..” – bg
“i believe it’s just as hypocritical to allow evil to flourish in the name
of freedom as it is to quash freedom in the name of religion” – bg
one can lead retire05 et al to truth; but one
cannot make retire05 et al stop lying.. – bg
==
bg commented:
++
MamaGrizzly #157 August 30, 2011 at 8:21 pm
==
maraz commented:
kudos to bg #158 and MamaGrizzly #157
Absolutely on the same page with you both… evil does exist…
bg – this video is long… but I found it great fun to listen to it… and many great points. I thought of this link because of what you wrote… Evan Sayet makes many of the same points on equalizing good and evil…
Full Heritage Foundation: Evan Sayet: “How Modern Liberals Think”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c
retire05 commented:
MamaGrizzley, was Mohammed a pedophile? Yes, anyone who marries a 6 year old is a pedophile. Was he a murder? Perhaps indirectly. I don’t think he actually murdered anyone himself (that is like asking “Was Hitler a murderer?) but yes, he had people murdered both in the name of his “religion” and also had murdered a man whose wife Mohammed wanted to take for his own. Liar? Probably. Sadist? Yes.
Now, I don’t know where you are really going with this unless you think that I am possibly a Muslim. Believe me, I am as far from Muslim as any Christian can get.
I suggest you read the book, The Sword of The Prophet. It will give you the history of Mohammed, and Islam, and it quite disturbing.
bg commented:
++
maraz #160 August 30, 2011 at 8:40 pm
thank you, i have viewed that vid a few
times, but never made the connection..
i tend to post links via my comments, because the truth is, there’s not
much i could possibly state that i haven’t stated ad nauseum over the
past several years at minimum, not to mention most of GP’s posts have
morphed into ad nauseums as well..
listening to the John O’Neill story (again),
on Frontline via one of my local tv stations..
==
retire05 commented:
bg, what exactly is it you think I have lied about.
I don’t lie. I find lying to be a personal weakness. I also find lobbing false accusations as people to be a person weakness, one you seem to suffer from.
bg commented:
++
retire05 #163 August 30, 2011 at 8:54 pm
deja vu tw,
whatever..
==
bg commented:
++
re: #164 re: #163
oh yeah,
i’m fully expecting a regrouping, ergo, fresh onslaught of personal
attacks to commence whenever y’all have it worlked out, just try &
keep it classy..
==
maraz commented:
@retire05 #163
Do you work for the White House? Cause your command of the English language is somewhere on par with Obama without the teleprompter. It’s difficult to interpret what you’re saying half the time.
retire05 commented:
bg, why are you dodging my question? What have I lied about?
Or was that just a canard you threw out hoping I wouldn’t call you on it?
So, let’s have your answer; what have I lied about?
retire05 commented:
maraz, I am actually quite familiar with the King’s English. I am not a great typist.
But it seems that a lack of typing skills are, in your book, something inexcusable.
But, like most who have no answers and only links or talking points, you divert the topic which is Ginger’s post #77.
Mama Grizzly commented:
Ok retire05.
We will now see if daryl and workingclassartist hold your views about Islam, or not.
Most likely not.
————————–
About Perry: it’s still very early. Soros is still in play. The Moslem factor is very much a part of all of this.
N. ZUCKERMAN commented:
BIG DEAL!
I AM A VET OF FOREIGN WAR but see no reason–I no longer drink beer–to join up. What they expect may be just a bit too much. After all, he did say yesterday that he would not make deficit cuts that would hurt our vets!
Perry? that is the guy that a short time ago said Texas should leave the nation…now that is a real American, right?
daryl commented:
retire05
These old bats love ambushing and ganging up on someone back here in the archives .
They hide back here to compare notes, cogratulate each other and gloat over
their comment and reruns, click here, here, here, and scroll.
Strange how much they sound alike in their commenting. Could all be one lefty. Perry
sure scares the p*$$ out of all three them of them.
Sure like their homemade litmus tests too. Such as:
“We will now see if daryl and workingclassartist hold your views about Islam, or not.”
Want my view on islamists? I can’t speak for WorkingClass but…
I say give them each, (practicing moslems,islamists, muhahammadamadingdongs) three old doodlesocking bats like you three and lots of people’s problems would be solved.
daryl commented:
Read this and weep bj.
If you’re gonna tell it all about Perry, tell the WHOLE TRUTH and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
This is politically astute vetting bj, unlike your little backbiting links to your old comments and lefty sites
Rick Perry And Texas Job Numbers « Political Math
http://www.politicalmathblog.com/?p=1590
daryl commented:
bg listens to and links to a lot of lefty sources. the o’neal stuff referred to @ 162 is straight from PBS via WGBH in Boston, origin of tons of lefty television cranked out by the public broadcasting system funded at taxpayeer expence. Warn her of what she’s doing and it’s ridiculed or laughed off, then continued like it had never been mentioned.
avagreen commented:
Who is this Ginger chick? Reading her comments are like reading some kind of hate magazine propaganda. Sheesh!
So what if a former lobbyist works for Perry!
“Mike Toomey, who is now a lobbyist for the nation’s largest private prison firm. He was also a lobbyist for Texans for Lawsuit Reform, the political juggernaut that has poured millions into Perry’s campaigns and helped secure business-friendl”
OMG! He’s a business-friendly lobbyist who has help create TORT REFORM, the main ingredient in rising prices in every industry (including healthcare) from frivolous lawsuits!!!! What a crime!!! OMG!
What’s wrong with you?
avagreen commented:
Part of my quote didn’t get posted:
“He was also a lobbyist for Texans for Lawsuit Reform, the political juggernaut that has poured millions into Perry’s campaigns and helped secure business-friendly tort reform in the state. ”
This comes from…………Mother Jones, a liberal rag who of course is against anything that’s “friendly to business”. Are you in that crowd, Ginger? Strange for a conservative to gripe about something like this. ??
avagreen commented:
**thumbs up** to daryl.
You’ve added great insight to these comments. They must be lefties.
Plants to scare off votes from Perry. A good sign.
“old bats” eh?