Jonathan Gross 
On October 1, 2026, the Archivist of the United States quietly signed an agreement with a private Dallas Museum that keeps the clearest, highest-resolution versions of the Zapruder film locked away from the American people.
On June 11, 2026, I filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia against Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche in his official capacity.
The choice of US Attorney General is the most consequential personnel decision President Trump can make right now.
A 2021 memo highlights the selective enforcement and weaponization of the DOJ/FBI.
by Jonathan Gross People have been asking for my thoughts on the DOJ’s newly announced Anti-Weaponization Fund.
There is an ongoing case in Michigan that should terrify everyone.
In a recent case, Lee v. Poudre School District R-1, Colorado parents Jonathan and Erin Lee, along with Nicolas and Linnaea Jurich, sued their school district, alleging it groomed their daughters into the LGBTQ cult through secretive Gender and Sexualities Alliance (GSA) meetings.
President Barack Obama, a former constitutional law professor, masterfully manipulated the judicial system to advance his progressive agenda, most notably in United States v. Windsor (570 U.S. 744, 2013). This landmark Supreme Court case struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), paving the way for same-sex marriage nationwide, a right later codified in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015).
The harrowing case of Justin Longworth unveils a disturbing reality within federal prisons, revealing systemic abuse and legal failures that demand urgent bipartisan reform. This crisis calls for accountability and action to protect vulnerable inmates.
A recently uncovered document reveals that only 56 officers reported minor injuries during the January 6 protests, challenging the government’s portrayal of an insurrection. This filing raises critical questions about transparency and accountability.
As the government intensifies efforts to conceal the truth about January 6, Ryan Zink’s fight for transparency raises critical questions about justice and accountability. Uncover the implications of this ongoing battle.
Ryan Zink’s recent court victory has lifted a protective order, potentially exposing over 8 million files related to January 6. The DOJ’s swift response raises critical questions about transparency and accountability in this contentious case.
