Gateway Pundit Gets Results: WaPo’s Ignatius Admits Source Who Cleared Hillary in Email Scandal – Is Clinton Adviser

After one week of silence by the Washington Post and columnist David Ignatius, the Post has finally published a half-hearted disclosure that the key source in his column last Friday, Jeffrey Smith, who cleared Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing in her email scandal has ties to Clinton.

David Ignatius via YouTube

The disclosure was appended to the end of Ignatius’ column published this Friday. However, it was not added to the offending column and does not disclose deeper, long-standing ties to the Clintons.

“In my Aug. 28 column, “ The Clinton non-scandal ,” I cited the view of attorney Jeffrey Smith that there may not be any prosecutable criminal case in the apparently improper handling of classified material by Hillary Clinton and her aides. I should have noted that Smith was an adviser to Clinton’s 2008 campaign, in addition to being a former CIA general counsel.”

As The Gateway Pundit reported last week, Jeffrey Smith’s ties to the Clintons go back to at least 1992.

Smith headed up President Bill Clinton’s transition team at the Defense Department in 1992-1993, chaired a Clinton administration national security commission in 1993 and was appointed in 1995 by the Clinton administration to be general counsel of the CIA.

Smith was reported to be a ‘close’ national security adviser of Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign.

Ignatius’ failure to disclose Smith’s ties to Clinton was first noted in a comment at Free Republic by maggief.

Tom Blumer at Newsbusters and James Taranto at the Wall Street Journal also reported on Ignatius’ glaring failure of journalism ethics.

Several efforts in the past week to elicit comments and a corrections were not responded to by senior Post editors. The incomplete notice by Ignatius is the only acknowledgment of wrongdoing by the Post.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Mark

    We said it is true, so believe it, peasants!

  • lamb4usa

    I’m shocked that a reporter at the WaPo would lie about something. I put as much faith in them as the NYT. Sarc out.

  • ridgerunner

    All we need to know between now and the election is that the powers that be hate Donald Trump.

  • formwiz

    Where’s Gomer Pyle when you need him?

  • saturn

    One would have thought that the takeover by the Amazon boss would have changed WaPo, but they are still nothing but a bunch of socialist agitators.

  • cavt

    Typical and predictable action by the MSM–

  • Yabba_Dabba

    Hurrah! GatewayPundit!

    You exposed Ignatius and his propaganda dirt-bag-ery. Fantastic!!!

  • thatindividual

    Way to go Gateway! Keep ’em honest! Pack of thieves and traitors!

  • thatindividual

    We will prevail, because they don’t want what we will be serving as an appetizer if we don’t.

  • thatindividual

    Shows you how deep the contempt for us really goes. He tried to Grueber us.

  • tommy mc donnell

    the state of integrity in present day journalism.

  • Tara True
  • americansforall

    It’s about time fro another hysterical Fanny Davis “defense ” of Shill’s e-mail scandal..

  • Paul

    Don’t you love Lanny…he smiles and tells the biggest whoppers

  • Brett

    This guy is a POS slimebag TRAITOR.

  • ohio granny

    Not surprising that lying media hacks would lie for the criminal Shillary. Crooks and liars have to hang together don’t you know?

  • nadadhimmi

    WAPO and NYT are propaganda organs for the Democrat Party, and have been for decades.