It’s an Obama world.
Rush Limbaugh went off on Barack Obama’s shocking drone policy on his show. Rush wondered out loud,

“Does this mean that Nixon coulda taken out Bill Ayers? Does this mean that Richard Nixon could have taken out the New Black Panther Party?”

This was classic Rush Limbaugh.
Via Greta Van Susteren:

Transcript from the Rush Limbaugh website:

If this provision had been in place back in the seventies, does this mean that Nixon could have assassinated the Weathermen? Does this mean that Nixon coulda taken out Bill Ayers? Does this mean that Richard Nixon could have taken out the New Black Panther Party? It doesn’t mean that? Well, “…’senior operational leaders’ of al-Qaida or ‘an associated force’ — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the US.

“The 16-page memo, a copy of which was obtained by NBC News,” which means the administration gave it to ‘em, “provides new details about the legal reasoning behind one of the Obama administration’s most secretive and controversial polices: its dramatically increased use of drone strikes against al-Qaida suspects abroad, including those aimed at American citizens.”

Remember all the grief that George Bush got for warrantless wiretaps on phone calls? Do you remember that? I remember when Bush was president, the American left was literally having conniption fits.

Does that mean Nixon coulda killed Bill Ayers? It does mean that. Bill Ayers or the Weathermen. He had an active plot against the US, bombed the Pentagon. If Nixon had assumed the kind of power that Obama’s assuming, he could have sent a commando team out to wipe out Bill Ayers. You can’t kill rogue leaders. No, you cannot. By law, we cannot assassinate foreign leaders. We can now kill Americans, as long as we say they are related to Al-Qaeda somehow. And that link isn’t too tough. Al-Qaeda hates America. All you have to do is hate America and it could be said that you are an associated force.

Remember all of the anger that the left had over waterboarding. And look at this now. I think I have this right. Constitutional scholar Barack Obama is demanding the right to kill American citizens without making his case to a judge, as long as he thinks the American in question is in an upper tier of operations of Al-Qaeda or a related group. But he can’t waterboard the guy. You can kill him, but we can’t waterboard him. We can kill the son of a…, but we can’t torture him. Have I got this right? I think I do. I thought you should know.

 

 

Disable Refresh for 30 Days

Cookies and JavaScript must be enabled for your setting to be saved.

1 2 3

`
  1. Can we still do the naked pyramid thing…?

  2. Exactly what I was thinking. With an Obamaite ‘torture’ that doesn’t do physical damage or cause death is a horrible violation of the constitution. But ‘drone attacking’ that does cause physical damage and death is constitutional and ethical. How does anyone with half a brain buy into this dribble.

  3. Does this mean that Nixon coulda taken out Bill Ayers?

    When did Ayers move to Yemen?

  4. And the left is backing him up on this! They have no problem giving this President despotic murderous powers but heaven forbid if Bush had this power. Just incredible!

  5. Cops kill suspects without a judge every day. What is your point?

  6. ++

    Obama Drone Policy Means You Can Kill a
    Terrorist You Just Can’t Waterboard Him

    that should be put on a SILVER plated plaque with GOLD
    lettering, framed in PLATINUM, and presented to GWB..

    ==

  7. More whinging from the uber right.

    They were for it before they were against it. Cuz uncle limpb@llz sed so.

  8. ++

    lincolns widow #8 February 6, 2013 at 11:00 pm

    speak for yourself..

    ==

  9. Someone let lincoln’s harpy out of her cage again.

  10. Exactly what I was thinking. With an Obamaite ‘torture’ that doesn’t do physical damage or cause death is a horrible violation of the constitution. But ‘drone attacking’ that does cause physical damage and death is constitutional and ethical.
    It’s called war. You can shoot and kill the enemy in the field of battle, but once they become prisoners of war, there are certain rules regarding the treatment of same. And torture is banned, even if it does not leave permanent physical damage.

    How does anyone with half a brain buy into this dribble.
    Couldn’t say. But to those of us with a whole brain, it makes perfect sense.

  11. They’d all be cheering if the ft hood massacre suspect had his derriere droned.

    He’s a natural born us citizen but they forget that fact.

  12. “Notice: A new and improved commenting system is on the way! Old comments will no longer be accessible after the change.”

    Thanks, shadow, lincoln’s regurgitation, jharping-on-about-everything and the rest of you trolling lefturds. Good job.

  13. @shadow

    Good thing that Soros has let loose with a new pile of money so that you can continue to attempt to insert your lefty dribble (and whatever other waste products you produce in mommy’s basement) on the comments sections of the cybersphere.

    I think it’s time to go upstairs and see if mommie has washed your change of undies!

  14. Thanks, shadow, lincoln’s regurgitation, jharping-on-about-everything and the rest of you trolling lefturds. Good job.

    We’re not the ones cloning screen names.

  15. For some, the childishness neverends.

  16. Dark, dark days indeed my friends.

  17. re: “Rush Limbaugh: Obama Drone Policy Means You Can Kill a Terrorist You Just Can’t Waterboard Him”

    The nice thing about this observation is that we don’t have to worry about he Loony Left crying about terrorists being waterboarded (or incarcerated in Gitmo either). Just kill ‘em and get it over with.



1 2 3


`

© Copyright 2014, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved. B
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions