Judge Napolitano was not pleased with the FBI’s behavior in regards to the Petraeus Scandal.

“These emails did not indicate criminal activity. These did not implicate national security. They were not a threat to David Petraeus the person or David Petraeus the Director of the CIA. Those are the FBI’s words. So the question is, what the heck were you doing listening to his emails? How did you get the right to listen to them? Did you have a search warrant and what did you tell the judge in order to sign the search warrant? And why did you disclose this publicly in order to dislodge this otherwise superb public servant?… I think they ran amok with General Petraeus’ life, his liberties and for that he’s out of a job and it’s wrong.”

Via Happening Now:

 

ADVERTISEMENT

1 2 3 4

`
  1. #2 November 13, 2012 at 11:56 am

    Bronson commented:

    It’s just sex

  2. #3 November 13, 2012 at 11:59 am

    snap boy commented:

    Not so fast, Judge. Broadwell had information she should not have had: that the CIA was holding prisoners in Benghazi at the annex. That information had to have come from Petraeus and should not have been told to his wife much less his mistress who saw fit to share the information with the world.

  3. #4 November 13, 2012 at 12:00 pm

    JimD commented:

    Translation:
    The FBI did the administration dirty work so the General could be thrown under the bus at a convenient time. But there is enough blow-back on the under-bussing that Nanny Jan is now being sent out to throw the FBI under the bus.

    Where’s the popcorn?

  4. #5 November 13, 2012 at 12:01 pm

    Patty commented:

    Salacious searches but what happened to the Slaughtered 4 American heroes. I mean, affairs happen but it is not every day that on 9/11/12 when they asked for HELP, THEY WERE DENIED 3 TIMES.

  5. #6 November 13, 2012 at 12:02 pm

    Patty commented:

    I want answers and so do the families of these four Americans.

  7. #8 November 13, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    Patty commented:

    #2 November 13, 2012 at 11:56 am
    Bronson commented:

    It’s just sex
    ~~~~~~~~~~

    Tell that to Holly.

  8. #9 November 13, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    JimD commented:

    My bad, I saw Napolitano and assumed the cabinet secretary.

  9. #10 November 13, 2012 at 12:09 pm

    PegLeg commented:

    Why were Petra and Gen. Allen involving themselves in the child custody case of Jill Kelley’s sister? Petra writes a letter to a judge on Sept. 22, 10 days after consulate killing! What the Hell! He doesn’t have better things to do with his time and efforts?

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/battle_john_allen_also_helped_jill_YjkEYUNY2INC4smBMEYqUI

  10. #11 November 13, 2012 at 12:11 pm

    Rhonda commented:

    Its quite clear the General is to be obama’s fall guy, the general didn’t agree to be the fall guy now his life and the lives of his loved ones are going to be trashed by obama’s media.

  11. #12 November 13, 2012 at 12:12 pm

    Patty commented:

    OT

    Obama Set To Crush American Business With Diabolical ‘Juggernaut’ Of Racial Discrimination Lawsuits

    http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/black-power-pin.jpg
    http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/mir-10113-720-500×359.jpg Pictures

    This is Obama’s real priorities.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Obama Set To Crush American Business With Diabolical ‘Juggernaut’ Of Racial Discrimination Lawsuits

    If your organization has a policy or practice that doesn’t benefit minorities equally, watch out: The Obama administration could sue you for racial discrimination under a dubious legal theory that many argue is unconstitutional.

    President Obama intends to close “persistent gaps” between whites and minorities in everything from credit scores and homeownership to test scores and graduation rates.

    His remedy — short of new affirmative-action legislation — is to sue financial companies, schools and employers based on “disparate impact” complaints — a stealthy way to achieve racial preferences, opposed 2 to 1 by Americans.

    Under this broad interpretation of civil-rights law, virtually any organization can be held liable for race bias if it maintains a policy that negatively impacts one racial group more than another — even if it has no racist motive and applies the policy evenly across all groups.

    http://patdollard.com/2012/11/obama-set-to-crush-american-business-with-diabolical-juggernaut-of-racial-discrimination-lawsuits/

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    There are laws already on the books for discrimination and as I remember Affirmative action, that didn’t work out to well, when uneducated and inexperienced minorities were hired for jobs they were unqualified for. Many were demoted and some were fired.

    I suppose he is reaching out to the Blacks who voted him back in. Mr. Toad’s wild ride.

  12. #13 November 13, 2012 at 12:13 pm

    American Woman commented:

    Hold on, People.

    The Benghazi compound has been repeatedly referred to as a consulate by US government officials and the US media.
    However, according to informed Middle East security officials, the building was not a consulate and at no point functioned as one.

    Arab security officials say that the compound in Benghazi served as a meeting place to coordinate aid for rebel-led insurgencies in Syria. They maintain that the compound fostered the recruitment of jihadists to target Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.

    The questions that must be answered:
    1. Was the US Benghazi compound used to coordinate US aid to insurgent rebel groups that include jihadists representing al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

    2. Was the US Government arming our enemies in the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda?

    3. Does the Obama Administration support the best interest of this country or is it supporting our enemies

  13. #14 November 13, 2012 at 12:15 pm

    democraps suck commented:

    It’s an omooslum world…get used to it because it will only get worse

  14. #15 November 13, 2012 at 12:17 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    Amen on that call Judge..

    ==

  15. #16 November 13, 2012 at 12:17 pm

    Sparty commented:

    It is called LEVERAGE. Chicago politics 101. Try getting anything out of him now on Benghazi- he is locked up tighter than a drum by Eric Holder and Valerie Jarrett, probably with threat of criminal charges if he talks.

  16. #17 November 13, 2012 at 12:18 pm

    brian commented:

    Uhh…when you take a position regarding the security of these United States you lose some rights. One of those rights happens to be your privacy to some extent. I can guarantee you that a situation like this can be used to compromise someone. Don’t take an important position like this if you aren’t going to stay clean.

  17. #18 November 13, 2012 at 12:23 pm

    American Woman commented:

    Moreover, Petraeus went amok with the life and liberties of our enlisted servicemen. Petraeus is responsible for rules of engagement tha favor Islamic Fascists and daily put the lives of our troops at risk in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    He kowtowed to Obama, and now he is Obama’s fall-guy. (Just desserts.)

  18. #19 November 13, 2012 at 12:28 pm

    PegLeg commented:

    #14

    I have trouble with directions! Which direction is Mecca?

  19. #20 November 13, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    dba_vagabond_trader commented:

    Right judge, I’m sure all this musical bedding had absolutely no effect on the professional decisions made by our CIA chief and the top general in A-stan. Nope, none at all.

    :roll: :roll:



1 2 3 4


`

© Copyright 2013, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk