Democrat Senator Mark Udall refused to answer the question on whether or not the US drones over Benghazi on 9-11 were armed or not. Udall was on FOX News Sunday this morning.

Retired Army Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said Saturday he has sources saying President Barack Obama was in the room at the White House watching the assault on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya unfold.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

1 2 3

`
  1. #1 October 28, 2012 at 10:13 am

    Jim commented:

    Dead Americans, lies and the cover-up, sound familiar, only no-one died in Watergate.

  2. #2 October 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    vityas commented:

    It makes me sick to my stomach.

  3. #3 October 28, 2012 at 10:27 am

    wtd commented:

    Sounds like Senator Mark Udall’s been briefed and is under orders to remain silent until the next [*winning ]benghazi narrative is developed and floated to test public response.

  4. #4 October 28, 2012 at 10:30 am

    archer52 commented:

    Ohhhhh baby, if that isn’t ducking I don’t know what is. It’s a wonder that man isn’t spitting out feathers and waddling out of the studio!

  5. #5 October 28, 2012 at 10:31 am

    robins111 commented:

    Weasel.

  6. #6 October 28, 2012 at 10:35 am

    Mac in NM commented:

    Once again. There is no lie a liberal will not tell.

  7. #7 October 28, 2012 at 10:41 am

    Sam Stone commented:

    And to think there are enough people who will still vote for this man!

  8. #8 October 28, 2012 at 10:43 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    armed or not, they were filming live via the white house..

    irony is they watched live film of real events while orchestrating
    a coverup via a Monty Python fick that nary a Muslim ever heard
    of, much less viewed..

    ==

  9. #10 October 28, 2012 at 10:48 am

    Oliver commented:

    Canada Free Press has several excellent articles on Benghazi. Here’s an excerpt from one of them:

    I believe that President Obama not only knew of that peril, but knew beforehand that the embassy would be attacked, because he facilitated the attack himself. After the contempt of Congress vote went against Attorney General Eric Holder in June, I believe that Obama determined that the Libya operation had become too much of a risk, and took steps to “make it go away.” ….

    I make this inference from a wealth of knowledge of Barack Obama as a person and a politician, from years of studying him, his methods and motives, and from individuals who know the man. I have stated quite plainly that I believe he is a sociopath and malignant narcissist, an opinion that has been publicly shared by credentialed professionals in the field of psychology. It is more than likely that Obama has engaged in such action before, and on more than one occasion.

    Full article here: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50626
    (and for the full series of articles, type BENGHAZI into the search box)

  10. #11 October 28, 2012 at 10:50 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    can’t help but point out yet again that Cairo protesters were wearing
    ANONYMOUS MASKS :ala: OCCUPY WALL STREET OBAMA-SOROS INC..

    tell me that wasn’t orchestrated ala the faux cartoon riots.. gah!!

    ==

  11. #12 October 28, 2012 at 10:55 am

    bg commented:

    ++

    Oliver #10 October 28, 2012 at 10:48 am

    thanks, they do great work, however,

    we know he knew..

    [Sources close to U.S. President Barack Obama's administration revealed that White House officials apparently received warnings that there were threats made to attack as many as seven U.S. missions in the Middle East, on the 11th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, as early as September 4. Sources also revealed that additional warnings were received a few days later, with similar information, but that all of the warnings were largely ignored by the administration. Normally when such warnings are received by the administration, the threat level is raised at U.S. installations around the world. At this point, there is no evidence that the Obama administration communicated the warnings with Consular officials in Libya or Egypt in advance of attacks that took place Monday in Benghazi, Libya and Cairo, Egypt, leaving the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and three other Americans dead, with eight others wounded, including some U.S. military personnel.]

    scroll for more..

    ==

  12. #13 October 28, 2012 at 10:57 am

    snap boy commented:

    If the drone was unarmed it’s pretty simple to say so; an unarmed drone can’t do any fighting.

  13. #14 October 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    Ella commented:

    #13 – if it was unarmed, the next logical question would be “why was it unarmed” and if it was indeed armed, the next question would be “why didn’t we use it”.

    I agree with a comment upthread that Udall was briefed and the administration is carefully floating the next little piece of crap information to see what the public reaction is going to be.

    Tomorrow, Monday, all hell is going to break loose about Benghazi because the news cycle pretty much slows down to a trickle over the weekend.

    Everybody call the alphabet soup news organizations tomorrow and flood the White House switchboard.

    Barack Obama, you POS, you owe us ANSWERS.

  14. #15 October 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    Sasja commented:

    Udall and the others sold their souls long ago to the evil religion now known as liberalism, which demands blood sacrifice through abortions.

  15. #16 October 28, 2012 at 11:09 am

    tommy mc donnell commented:

    call me after the election chris.

    you wonder why the country is in a mess with these kind of people running the government. unfortunately for us honesty and the democratic party will never meet.

  16. #17 October 28, 2012 at 11:18 am

    jb books commented:

    #5

    CRAP weasel – there, FIFY

    As a CO resident I can tell you this clown is a sh*tbag

  17. #18 October 28, 2012 at 11:21 am

    Sasja commented:

    How reliable is any information when it is given from those who lie as a matter of course?

  18. #19 October 28, 2012 at 11:27 am

    GotFreedom commented:

    . . .”The Senate Intelligence Committee has announced it will hold a closed hearing Nov. 15 into the circumstances surrounding the terrorist attack, including the intelligence and security situation there, and additional hearings will follow”. . .

    http://www.navytimes.com/news/2012/10/ap-secdef-panetta-lack-of-inf…

    Why is it a “CLOSED” meeting; is there something to hide; need to allow them all to coordinate their “stories”. . .don’t we have a right to know what happened. . .shouldn’t this hearing be out in the open for all of America to see/hear?

  19. #20 October 28, 2012 at 11:30 am

    ★FALCON★ commented:

    Obama Denied – Americans Died.



1 2 3


`

© Copyright 2013, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk