Political Oddsmaker Says Obama Will Lose in a Landslide

Enough is enough.

(Michelle Obama’s Mirror)

A political oddsmaker says Barack Obama will lose the election this year to Mitt Romney in a landslide.
Wayne Allyn Root at Townhall reported:

As an oddsmaker with a pretty remarkable track record of picking political races, I play no favorites. I simply use common sense to call them as I see them. Back in late December I released my New Years Predictions. I predicted back then- before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman Cain to Newt- that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP nomination by a landslide. I also predicted that the Presidential race between Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.

Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why do most pollsters give Obama the edge?

First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad harbinger.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Pingback: Political Oddsmaker Says Obama Will Lose in a Landslide()

  • Pingback: Political Oddsmaker Says Obama Will Lose in a Landslide|PolitifreakPolitifreak()

  • bear

    He forgot the vast vote fraud and guaranteed popst-election legal b.s. promulgated (and run?) by the lefty-in-chief.

    IF romney wins, the signal goes out for the losers to start rioting.

    Oh, well.

  • bear



  • Sickofobama

    Jim Hoft:

    But you know and I know that Obama doesn’t plan on “winning” the legal way.

    With his latest EO to silence all communication, he will just halt the election all in the name of “NEVER LET A CRISIS GO WASTE.”

  • Bill Mitchell


    All of these polls showing Obama ahead also show him under 50%. The people who don’t like Obama REALLY REALLY don’t like him. Those who do like him (minorities and youth) are notoriously unreliable voters.

    And now, we have blacks including Morgan Freeman and a large group of black preachers throwing Obama under the bus. As election day nears, look for that to accelerate. The theme? “Obama was never really the first black President”

  • vityas

    At least 5 more months of xanax. I can’t see the possibility of relaxing until I can legitimately say President Romney.

  • Ella

    #3 Bear – all the more reason for every conservative to own a gun. If you don’t own one, go get one.

  • Alana

    From his lips to God’s ears.

  • http://astuteblogger.blogspot.com/ reliapundit


    voter fraud and incessant lies and smears about romney to depress gop/anti-obama turnout.

    they will try to do to mitt what they tried to do to bush – twice: smear him at the last moment with something like the drunk-driving/manslaughter charge or the TANG deferment.

    and it might probably have an anti-mormonism-is-a-cult spin.

    just u wait n c.

  • http://rightwingfringe.blogspot.com/ Aggie95

    and to add ….they don’t have to vote for Romney ….they just have to stay home …everything else being equal if obama’s turnout is 5 % less than 2008 ….obama loses

  • http://www.truthandcommonsense.com archer52

    Two things concern me about Obama. 1. More than fifty percent of families receive government assistance- a reason to keep the status quo (as in Europe) which means either Obama gets them or Romney convinces them that if he is elected, all things will remain the same.

    2. Fraud on an extreme scale. Soros did not fund the project that elected state officials into key positions, like secretary of state or elections supervisors, for nothing. The Left learned a valuable lesson from the 2000 race and have worked hard to take advantage of it. Already, in Ohio, Washington and one other state, the “Soros operatives” have made decisions that affected races and the winners.

    Plus, the military vote is now being managed by a Spanish owned firm. The ENTIRE military vote that is electronically collected will pass through a company that is owned by a firm in a nation teetering on financial collapse. You couldn’t set up a scenario like that in a book like mine or Clancy’s. It reeks of potential conspiracy.

    Imagine if suddenly the military votes shaded towards Obama in key states like Ohio or Penn. Obama would say the military likes him, we’d have anecdotal stories showing no way that is accurate, but if he wins, who does the investigation? Congress? And if it shown the votes were rigged (two years into his second term) and he would not have won, how would you fix it? Hell, Florida jailed an innocent man over a worry about blacks rioting in the street. How do you think milk-toast whiteys in Congress will react if they realized Obama cheated his way back in? They’ll cave, suffer him for four more years and justify it by saying they kept the Union intact.

    Obama’s strengths are his special interest groups including those getting money from the government, blacks, now some Hispanics, women who think with their emotions and not their heads, and any fraud his people can execute and get away with it. And the fear of racial unrest (so much for that post racial crap).

    This is not Reagan vs Carter. This is good guys vs “the end justifies the means” communist/socialist/fascist approach to winning.

    We’d had better vote early, often and repeatedly if we want to win.

    Hey, here’s an idea for a bumper sticker. “Cast a vote for your dead relatives, they wouldn’t have liked Obama either!”

  • Raymond

    November 6, 2012, its time to KICK OUT Obama for all the con games he’s pulled on America.
    I think the polictical oddsmaker does have something there with his common sense approach.
    Its true, anyone who voted for McCain will definitely NOT be voting for Obama.
    As corrupt as Obama is, VOTER FRAUD should be a huge concern. Get ready for some Obama voter fraud con games on election day in a state or states Obama needs to “win”. You can be sure Obama’s thugs already have it all planned out. They’ll scream racism and have all the typical Democrat race baiters on site, like Jackson, Sharpton and Eric Holder.

  • Militant conservative

    Been telling y’all this for over

    A year. Now since SCOTUS

    decision obama

  • Patty

    Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad harbinger.

    I do believe that Voters are out of touch now and then. I hope for a landslide but Obama Machine isn’t the ordinary Campaign or Administration. Holder and Axelrod may not be chummy great buds but their jobs are on the line, also.

    Lots to be considered in this election. Some democrats are foregoing the Convention. That seems to be part of Obama’s lack of leadership that is definitely a minus for support.

    The democrats in Washington are on board with his radical Ideology.

    Obama has become more extreme in his liberal thinking in the past 3 1/2 years and he has completely decided to ignore the Republican Congress wherever and whenever he can. That has been pretty much always. And yes, even democrats are disgusted with his partisanship. Lack of compromise is stressing them out.

    It truly boils down to will Americans be awake and will they research this time around. And if they ask themselves “are they better off today, then before Obama?” if yes, they will probably vote again for Obama but if no, independents will vote for Romney.

    Americans aren’t fully invested yet, nor have they rallied around Romney. They should be by now. So, predicting this election is nice but things can change from today and November.

    Obama leads in New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Michigan. Romney leads in North Carolina and Missouri. The race is a toss-up in Wisconsin, Iowa, Ohio, Virginia, Florida and Colorado. This needs to change quickly into Romney’s favor.

    And this will probably be the factor on who will win this elections: Economy Stupid.

    Krauthammer: If Romney Can’t Make Effective Argument On Economy, ‘He Doesn’t Deserve To Win’

  • Militant conservative

    Will lose in a landslide with

    2/3 majority in the house and

    60 seats in the senate.

    This will be a historic defeat.

    Democrats a minority party

    for more than 20 years.

    Powder is dry!!

  • Militant conservative

    Patty, damn your verbose and

    Not in touch and negative.

  • Michele

    I tend to think voter fraud is a lot easier in state and local elections than it is in a national election. Still, it won’t just be trying to elect Romney, but trying to elect national senate and congressional candidates who are conservative thinkers. And Holder is going to keep jumping up and down to be sure Texas will alllow voting without IDs, since that will help facilitate the fraud.

  • http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.ca Reaganite Republican

    You’re darn tootin he will

  • Amash

    Please let him be right!