Cardinal Dolan: NY Times Does Not Have Reputation of Fair & Accurate Reporting Regarding the Church

Cardinal Timothy Dolan lashed out at The New York Times after mass on Sunday. The former New York archbishop told reporters that was no “payoff” to pedophile priests as the Old Gray Lady reported.
The New York Post reported:

Timothy Cardinal Dolan yesterday blasted a report that he authorized payments to pedophile priests — and said no such payments are being made to New York clerics.

Dolan, while serving as Milwaukee archbishop in 2003, agreed to pay multiple accused pedophile priests $20,000 in exchange for their agreeing to leave the priesthood, according to documents cited by The New York Times.

Joseph Zwilling, Dolan’s New York Archdiocese spokesman, told The Post last week that there was no “payoff” to pedophile priests — only “charity.”

“The New York Times does not have a reputation for fair and accurate reporting when it comes to this issue,” Dolan said yesterday after Mass at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in Midtown. “So, to respond to charges like that — that are groundless and scurrilous — in my book it’s useless and counterproductive.”

Yesterday, Dolan denied that similar payments were being made in the New York Archdiocese, which includes about 400 parishes in Manhattan, The Bronx, Staten Island, and seven suburban counties.

“No, thank God. Cardinal Egan did a splendid job — that’s all taken care of,” said Dolan, referring to his predecessor, Edward Cardinal Egan.

Dolan didn’t say whether similar payments to abusive Archdiocese of New York priests were made in the past.

Of course, anyone who’s paying attention understands the latest attack by the NY Times on the Catholic Church is payback for their suit against the Obama Administration’s HHS mandate.
It’s not like they’re fooling anyone.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • J. Knight

    Uh, hate to break the news to you, Cardinal, but the NYTs doesn’t have a reputation of fair and accurate reporting on anything. It’s not just the Church.

  • mg4us

    #1 J. Knight

    Couldn’t agree more. . .

    NYT. . not reporters but repeaters. . repeating the WH talking points and leftist agenda. . .

    Plus, there is a lot of “news” that they refuse to print or cover. . .

    That is why their readership is declining as is the net worth of their company.

  • BurmaShave

    I nominate this for the understatement of the year.

  • Fuquay Steve

    NYT reporters and editors are pompous, intolerant, arrogant and that is being mild.

  • Jeff

    There is no lie. Documents clearly state the payments were intended for priests accused of pedophilia to leave the priesthood. Calling it “charity” does not change the intent of the action. The spokesperson for the archdiocese CONFIRMED THIS IS TRUE.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/31/us/cardinal-authorized-payments-to-abusers.html

    Read the report yourself and then ask yourself why you would want to take the word of a man that helped disguise decades of sex abuse and provided verifiable payments to make rapists ‘go away’.

  • kathteach

    Our former Milwaukee Wisconsin Cardinal Dolan now speaks for all of us – a true rock star.

    The next Pope – an American guy with Midwestern roots like Dolan? He comes from St. Louis – Jim should love that 🙂

    He is definitely a guy to watch – a true American hero. And I mean totally American.

  • Jeff

    Here is the website for the Archdiocese of Milwaukee to respond to inaccurate statements made in news reports:

    http://www.archmil.org/ArchMil/Offnav/media-corrections.htm

    If the following quote from the NY Times article confirming the payouts is not true, why wouldn’t the archdiocese have published a statement saying they were misquoted or the reporter lied?

    ***“It was a way to provide an incentive to go the voluntary route and make it happen quickly, and ultimately cost less,” said Jerry Topczewski, the spokesman for the archdiocese. “Their cooperation made the process a lot more expeditious.”****

    No retraction from the archdiocese on this statement.

    It’s a sad reality but Cardinal Dolan is clearly lying and, perhaps more unfortunately, he’s trying to use conservative anger at the NY Times to cover up what he’s done. He’s trying to take advantage of all of you and you shouldn’t let him.

  • Paul

    So, if I understand this correctly, Jeff is upset because the Archdiocese of Milwaukee did everything they could to get these guys out of the priesthood as quickly as possible? Cardinal, then Archbishop, Dolan was handed an ugly problem created by his predecessor, and he cleaned it up as quickly as possible. Of course, the NYT is much gentler with the Cardinal’s predecessor. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/15weakland.html?pagewanted=all

  • Pingback: Cardinal Dolan: NY Times Does Not Have Reputation of Fair & Accurate Reporting Regarding the Church|PolitifreakPolitifreak()

  • MT Geoff

    H’m. The Roman Catholic Church, especially in America, has kneaded its own communion wafers and now they must find a way to swallow them.
    The Church has supported nearly all left-wing ideas that look at all like charity or “social justice”. The Church has been pleased to see “charity” compelled by law (historically, this is a continuation of the Church’s right to claim tithes, or at least comparable to it). The Church has liked Medicare and Medicaid as funding sources for the Church’s genuinely compassionate health-care missions. The Church likes the idea of public funding finding a path to Church schools, which are excellent schools. The Church has, tacitly at least, embraced the idea that the government can stand in for God in the concept of all we have being a gift from others.
    Now the Church fnds out there’s a lot more to the package. When the Church becomes the partner of the state, they often interfere with each other and citizens are often the real losers. And when the Church pushes back against the soft tyranny the leaders have helped to form, they find another of the soft tyranny’s agents acting against them.
    The NY Times operates on its agenda and its agenda is only sometimes compatible with that of the Roman Catholic Church. That said, there’s some truth to Jeff’s comment at #5: the settlements have an air of expedition, not charity, about them. I like the Roman Catholic Church much better than I like the NY Times but I’ve got a few bones to pick with each of them about how they encourage meddling by the government in things that are best left to individuals.

  • ahem

    Rights once lost are almost impossible to re-gain. If you believe in the First Amendment, stand with the Catholic Church. Let the Obama regime know you don’t want the Left to criminalize Christianity and establish a state religion!

    Stand Up for Religious Freedom Rally on Friday, June 8 at noon local time.

    Locations.

  • J. Knight

    Jeff, you are rightly upset, but the point is about the sorry state of journalism at the NYTs. That the Catholic Church is finally learning what we conservatives know is progress of a sort. The Church has plenty to atone for, that’s for sure.

  • Pingback: Cardinal Dolan: NY Times Does Not Have Reputation of Fair & Accurate Reporting Regarding the Church()

  • Pingback: Cardinal Dolan: NY Times Does Not Have Reputation of Fair & Accurate Reporting Regarding the Church | Born Conservative()

  • Rachelle

    Is the New York Times still being published?

    Who knew?

    Can’t last long.

  • bg

    ++

    surely he doth jest.. /s/

    scroll thread for much more..

    this thread for much more as well..

    thank you..

    ==

  • Noovuss

    I guess the very progressive Catholic Church has fallen out of love with Obungle and the NYT.
    But don’t fear, as soon as this little lovers spat is over the church will return to backing every hair brained communist program that comes down the road. Just like they have for the last 50 years.
    Move along, nothing to see here.

  • Noovuss

    Ahem@

    So let me get this right.
    I’m to stand up for the church so they don’t lose any rights, because those rights are almost impossible to get back? Hahahahahahahahahaha….
    I wonder if they will help me get back my property rights, you know redistribution to the poor.
    The progressive church worked very hard to remove those rights from me with the help of communist politicians that they supported for election. I’m thinking of sitting this one out to teach the progressive Catholic Church a badly needed lesson. They are sort of late to the dance on all of this, nothing cries better than a crocodile.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    The one thing I’m curious about is if Cardinal Dolan at one time thought that the Catholic church and the NYT were members of the same team…

  • American Woman

    That’s ok, Cardinal, sad to say the NY Times doesn’t Have a Reputation of fair & accurate reporting about anything. (Who buys this rag?)

  • bg

    ++

    re: #16 June 4, 2012 at 6:48 pm bg

    not only that, but..

    [Under Sharia law, the clothes you wear, music you listen to, and television you watch would all be censored. Behavior in public is legally restricted and controlled. And Sharia is the ideal social system for those that preach Radical Islam. Sharia is an Arabic term referring to a legal framework to regulate public and private aspects of life based upon specific Islamic teachings. Sharia is an intolerant system that threatens the western ideals of “liberty and justice for all”. Sharia views non-Muslims as second class citizens, sanctions inequality between men and women, prescribes cruel and unusual punishments for crimes, and promotes a restrictive business environment that strangles the freedoms of capitalism.]

    btw, that was just a sample.. 🙁

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    re: #21 June 4, 2012 at 8:02 pm bg

    Islam have a lot in common with communism, not to mention BLT..

    [After all, their knowledge was scientific, based on historical materialism, an understanding of the dialectical process in nature and human society, and a materialist (and thus realistic) view of nature. Marx has shown empirically where society has been and why, and he and his interpreters proved that it was destined for a communist end. No one could prevent this, but only stand in the way and delay it at the cost of more human misery. Those who disagreed with this world view and even with some of the proper interpretations of Marx and Lenin were, without a scintilla of doubt, wrong. After all, did not Marx or Lenin or Stalin or Mao say that. . . . In other words, communism was like a fanatical religion. It had its revealed text and chief interpreters. It had its priests and their ritualistic prose with all the answers. It had a heaven, and the proper behavior to reach it. It had its appeal to faith. And it had its crusade against nonbelievers.

    What made this secular religion so utterly lethal was its seizure of all the state’s instrument of force and coercion and their immediate use to destroy or control all independent sources of power, such as the church, the professions, private businesses, schools, and, of course, the family.]

    if you read my links regularly, then you know the Islamist ideology is in
    sync with Marxist ideology, actually they’re so close i may have it bass
    ackwards.. /s/

    ==

  • Patty

    Obama has cause this Chaos, we need to end it come NOVEMBER. We have had enough. Time to renew America and enjoy life, freedom and liberty once again.

  • Patty

    I love Cardinal Dolan, truthful and precise and ALWAYS HAS A SMILE WHEN HE SPEAKS.

  • J

    In the USA, the strongest anti-abortion advocate, and the most effective, was Cardinal Law. MA took him down by activating their pedophile/homosexual priest scandal. Seems like they are trying this out on Cardinal Dolan.

  • bg

    ++

    OT..

    June 3, 2012

    Dr. Qanta Ahmed: Debunking the Fallacy of Muslim Victimhood

    [Mauro: Do you feel that groups like CAIR (Council on American Islamic
    Relations) and ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) are helping your cause?

    Ahmed: I have no contact with these groups and can only draw conclusions based on the public record, which would indicate their sympathies are very much with the Islamist camp. If anything, these organizations seek to drown out the complex, heterogeneous and multifaceted community of Muslims in America because their goal is to promote a unified sense of disadvantage and debasement of Muslim Americans, when, in fact, demographic data points in exactly the opposite direction. Muslims in America are more economically mobile than anywhere else in the world, making it very hard to equate this reality with a fantasy of a disadvantaged, marginalized American minority.]

    not the first, won’t be the last, just one of many Muslim voices being
    silenced by the OA/MSM et al, but who would listening anyways?? 🙁

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    June 4, 2012

    Court: Christians can be ordered to violate beliefs

    [A ruling from Judge Tim L. Garcia in the New Mexico Court of Appeals
    says states can require Christians to violate their faith in order to do
    business, affirming a penalty of nearly $7,000 for a photographer who
    efused to take pictures at a lesbian “commitment” ceremony in the
    state where same-sex “marriage” was illegal.]

    so that mean Muslims are being forced to photograph homosexual
    clientele as well, oh wait, they have safe zones and exemptions..

    go back to sleep America, someone will wake
    you up soon enough, oh yeah, 5 times a day,
    ergo, alarms will be as extinct as freedom.. /s/

    ==

  • Pingback: Cardinal Dolan: NY Times Does Not Have Reputation of Fair & Accurate Reporting Regarding the Church | Liberal Whoppers()

  • Pingback: Catholic Caucus()

  • gwhh

    WOW. We are finally getting some church leader with backbone!!

  • lisag

    Send this to my priest in Santa Rosa Ca who praised the NYT in a homily and reads it everyday. How can people only see what they want to when they are supposed to be living the TRUTH.

  • bg

    ++

    in the US: the “church” has been just as infiltrated
    by Marxists, as our “government” has by Islamists..

    ==

  • Joseph D’Hippolito

    It’s amazing how many people are in denial. Jeff is absolutely right. Neither the Milwaukee nor New York archdioceses have issues statements criticizing the Times’ story.

    Paul, the church has procedures for laicizing priests. Dolan acted arbitrarily by doing what he did. Besides, if these priests are known molesters, then why aren’t they in jail?

    I don’t like Pres. Obama any more than any of you but he didn’t start this mess. Neither did the New York Times. This garbage goes back at least to 1049, when St. Peter Damian wrote “Liber Gomorrahianus,” which detailed the activities of pederast priests. He challenged the sitting pope to rectify the situation. That pope backed down under pressure from Vatican bureaucrats.

    If Dolan believes he has been wronged, let him file a libel suit.

    The Catholic Church never will take responsibility for the actions of its priests willingly unless its members stop “blaming the messengers” and making excuses for the corruption that has pervaded the upper reaches of leadership for centuries.

  • bg

    ++

    Joseph D’Hippolito #33 June 5, 2012 at 7:46 pm

    btw, seems to me the repetitive charges are decades old,
    when was the last time a priest was accused of abuse??

    ==

  • Joseph D’Hippolito

    bg, corruption can come in many forms — sexual, financial, whatever. The point is that, for far too long, bishops have acted by fiat w/o regard for Canon Law. Here’s a comment from one of Mark Shea’s audience:

    “If a priest does not agree to be laicized, Canon 1425 of canon law provides that he can only be laicized by a three-judge ecclesiatical tribunal. And he can appeal the case to Rome. No bishop has the power on his own to laicize a priest who is unwilling to be laicized.”

    Did Rome know what Dolan did and, if so, did Rome approve? That’s a very serious question.

    Moreover, do you realize what kind of a bind Dolan put every single American diocese in? If a priest doesn’t want to be laicized, all he has to do is demand blackmail and claim that Dolan did it in Milwaukee out of “charity.”

    Really, bg, how stupid can Catholics be?

  • Jennifer

    If anyone is being “scurrilous” and “useless and counterproductive” it is Cardinal Dolan. The NYT is only reporting news! Please explain the difference between a payout and charity? If the mob gives money to someone in the hopes of persuading them not to testify, is THAT an act of charity? Just because the news the NYT reports doesn’t fit with the agenda of the Catholic church does not make that news incorrect. Dolan’s over-agressive defensiveness strikes me as unchristian in the extreme. If you let a pedophile free (with 20K now to spend) to victimize other innocent children, do not expect the NYT to report that as good news! Shame on you Cardinal Dolan and shame on others who support him. The attack on the NYT is misplaced and frankly ridiculous.