Obama Continues Attacks On Christian Church – Throws His Support Behind Gay Marriage (Video)

You knew this was coming. After Joe Biden came out and supported gay marriage (something that is against his Catholic faith), and then Arne Duncan, the Secretary of Education of all people, came out and endorsed gay marriage… You knew this was a planned strategy, promoted by Democrats and pushed by the liberal media, for Barack Obama to come out and support gay marriage too.

In an interview with ABC, Barack Obama just came out in support of gay marriage. He just threw MILLIONS of Christian Americans under the bus.

Personally, I don’t have a problem with gay relationships. I don’t have a problem with gay unions. I do have a problem with a president pushing a law on the people with the specific intent of punishing the Church and Christian Americans.

And, he wonders why federal inmate Keith Judd, with a ponytail down to his ass, nearly wooped him in West Virginia?

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • mg4us

    http://news.yahoo.com/obama-announces-his-support-for-same-sex-marriage.html

    Obama EMBRACES Gay Marriage. . .now if he would only be honest and come out of the closet and embrace his gay & bisexual lovers too. . .

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/07/25/mom-of-murdered-obama-gay-lover-speaks-up/

    just google Obama and gay lover

    Still waiting for real birth certificate and transcripts too

  • Pingback: Obama Continues Attacks On Christian Church – Throws His Support Behind Gay Marriage (Video)|PolitifreakPolitifreak()

  • guy

    This might just be the “straw that breaks the camels back”.

  • Lazy

    Awesome! The African Americans will turn out much less if you push that he is pro gay marriage. They are not! I realize now he is starting to speak his mind because he sees the writing on the wall about him not being re-elected. Then again maybe he is trying to run way behind Mitt so he can run as the underdog again. It won’t matter and it’s not because your white black, just like the guy who shot Treyvonne was white mexican, your policies suck and you are the blamer in chief.

  • Shawn

    I’m sorry, I dislike the man as much as the next person, but if he’s ‘punishing the Catholic Church’ then so be it. They’re actively trying to denying human beings equal rights. If they don’t want to marry a gay couple in their church, that’s fine. What they’re doing is blatant discrimination and I honestly can’t even imagine seeing it differently. Political gimmick or not, it’s the right position.

  • Running back to the democrat gay base would at least stem the inevitable attacks from them had he reaffirmed the truth that marriage is a hetrosexual affair. A short term presidential salvage job but a long term nosedive into an empty political pool.

    Thanks, Barack, for displaying your evolved election strategy. 😉

  • Facauwee Tribe

    I couldn’t care less about same-sex marriage, but I do care that my church may be sued for not performing the ceremony for gays. They sued eHarmony instead of creating eSodomy, or something similar.

    Start your own church, and have only same-sex marriages in it. Don’t force yourself on someone and expect them to respect you. It doesn’t work that way.

  • Objective Analysis

    Obama is a “Down Low” brother. He is gay. Any man that worries about Reggie Love as his personal assistant, crosses his legs like a woman and is soft as a fruitcake is G-A-Y. Gay, not metrosexual, but a flamming faggot.

    Moochele is just a front. I doubt he even had sex with her. He just gave his sperm to her and she had the two babies for him.

  • bg

    ++

    OT.. 🙂

    Rush Babes for America

    ==

  • Francesca

    #4: The man who shot Trayvon isn’t Mexican. His mother is from Peru.

  • It’s really a great and useful piece of info. I am happy that you shared this useful information with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.

  • Liz

    King of flip flopping. That’s what happens to your brain when you choose Joey Biden as your vice.

  • BuddyG

    Let’s see this for what it is; a pathetic attempt by 0bama to divert attention away from his record. Don’t take the bait. Remain concentrated on 0bamacare and the economy.

  • bg

    ++

    Political Expediency & a whole lot more they’ve deleted.. 🙁

    oh yeah, you do know that Biden’s remark
    was the bait on Obama’s hook so to speak..

    eat your heart out Willie.. gah!!

    ==

  • Texas_Treeroach

    Well, now he can invite anyone he wants to help pick out wallpaper and curtains for the White House bathrooms.

    (I think we all agree that Michelle never really had a critical eye for color, anyway.)

  • bg
  • MT Geoff

    The issue of marriage is one that perhaps states should put down. Perhaps states should only recognize civil unions for all and make marriage a personal and religious matter.
    I believe two things about homosexuality which our host may not share and some posters may not: that it is in the individuals’ nature and that is different rather than dirty in any way. I base that on the science I’ve read, which is shaky, and on my experience as an adult with people of many different kinds. I am also sure that some people engage in homosexual activity who really aren’t, and that some people live as heterosexuals who really aren’t. Put another way: some can pray the gay away, but others might find they have prayed the straight away.
    That makes it easy for me to accept marriage for people who are gay when others, disagreeing with my starting points, will not accept it. Every church must operate by its doctrine (putting aside things like human sacrifice) and must accept as married only those who meet the church’s doctrine. For Unitarians, that would include gay couples. For Catholics, that won’t. Right now a Unitarian church cannot perform a marriage for a gay couple that most states would recognize.
    But if all relationships under the law are unions, not marriages, and if all marriages belong to churches and not the state, the problem becomes less serious.
    A few posters here may recognize me as a flaming libertarian (not liberal) from Surberbia and these views will look familiar.

  • bg

    ++

    mg4us #1 May 9, 2012 at 2:43 pm

    thank you..

    re: bg #14 & #16

    same source w/out video..

    ==

  • Shah Shaw

    Obama was never fooling anyone but people who do not support gay marriage.

    His move is just to get gays motivated like last time
    He was always signalling gay groups in private , thats why gays all went for him the first time

    The effects of his “coming out” will be millions of people who were fooled will have to reconsider their support for him

    Ironincally, Obama took years to “evolve” and once he did , he took the same postion that Dick Cheney has long had.

  • Sarah

    This entire issue is a distraction. The enemy is lapping at the shore and has infiltrated our society on all levels. We are in debt beyond belief and the economy is a mess. It’s time to triage priorities and this topic just ain’t one of them, no matter what side of issue one stands on.

  • MT Geoff

    Regarding His Hopeful Changeness and his position on gay marriage: based on Obama’s history, I can believe he’s more interested in harming conventional society than he is in fostering liberty. Very little of his agenda has been about liberty.

  • Harrington

    “Personally, I don’t have a problem with gay relationships. I don’t have a problem with gay unions. I do have a problem with a president pushing a law on the people with the specific intent of punishing the Church and Christian Americans.”

    Two rather large problems here.

    First, gay people should be allowed to marry just like any other American who is of age, and telling them that they should only be allowed to join together in some mealy-mouthed “civil union” is nothing less than prejudice masked as some pretense at morality.

    Second, allowing same-sex marriage is not “punishing” Christians, Catholics or anybody. It simply gives a certain segment of the American population their Constitutional rights that have been denied for too long. If that wasn’t true then how come the latest Pew Poll shows that 52% of Catholics support same-sex marriage?

    Nobody is being attacked by the campaign to legalize same-sex marriage. Except maybe bigots.

    And here I thought conservatives wanted to get government out of our lives…

  • Pingback: Obama Continues Attacks On Christian Church – Throws His … | Church()

  • Prokop

    Is the premise that most gay people wanting to get married are Christian clergy? Otherwise, why you feel more targetted by this than San Francisco does is just baffling.

    You know that Hindus get married without any reference to the Jesus, bible or your feelings and this has no effect on your life, right? Like the anal sex, it doesn’t really have anything to do with your chuch except for the part where you want it to be all about you.

  • bg

    ++

    MT Geoff #17 May 9, 2012 at 3:14 pm

    re: [The issue of marriage is one that perhaps states should put down.
    Perhaps states should only recognize civil unions for all and make marriage
    a personal and religious matter.]

    i’ve always been for that, heck, their divorce rate is more or less on
    par with heterosexuals.. which is one of their bass ackwards reasons
    for allowing them to get married i the first place, go figure..

    ==

  • Paul in N. AL

    The only thing this idiot cares about is shoring up his liberal base.

  • SeniorD

    Meh, the White House Pandering Poseur in Chief and his Socialist Sycophants create a ‘news story’. Is there any thinking adult out there that doesn’t recognize this is simply another safe attack on American ‘Values’ during a Campaign Year? The Pink Triangle Posse would never leave the Demodonk Corral.

  • Tim in Cali

    Obama comes out of the closet..Tingles challenges him to a pillow fight

  • karen

    Where are the jobs? Stop bombarding us with your thoughts on gay marriage and WORK ON OUR ECONOMY.

  • Tim in Cali

    If he really cared about the gay marriage issue,why did he wait till after the N.C. vote? It’s a dog and pony show ,to get the media off last nights “shellacking ” and divert attention away from his miserable record…tick tock Barry,the clock is ticking

  • Luddite

    Again this has nothing to do with redefining marriage. Something like single digits actually opt for it when it goes through. You can see what happens when they push this through with it in Massachusetts where they ram it down private businesses and religious organizations.

  • skutch

    Classic misdirection. First contraception. Now this. Next it will be some fish endangered by oil drilling. Clearly planned and executed by the White House per strategy. Now nobody will be talking about the economy, taxes, deficit, wars, or health care debacles for the next week or so. Count on some “social policy” controversy like this being tossed out by Obama’s campaign every few weeks until the election.

  • Lazy

    Francesca #10 sorry about that I meant The White Hispanic George Zimmerman. I was poking fun of the media and how they say he is a White Hispanic but they never say Obama is a White Black person.

  • Sasja

    He may try to divert attention away from his wrecking ball agenda, but it won’t work. Those of us on the opposing side will have some fun with whatever new diversion is tried, but we do not let it interfere with our job to run his skinny butt out of Washington.
    And ridding Washington of the RINOs and dhims who are impediments to returning our Republic to its Constitutional restraints.

  • Nelle

    We all know what marriage is, because in our Judeo-Christian tradition as well as in most others, it has several thousand years of history. We know it is not 2 men or 2 women, never has been, but now we’re being told that this is the way it’s going to be. Well, not in our eyes, not in our hearts. We can’t redefine marriage or accept aberrant forms, because God defined it, when he instituted it.
    So yes, take the authority to perform marriages away from the government, and let the churches perform it as they see fit. Let the government conduct civil unions for all, and stay out of church business. It’s the only way we’ll be able to settle this.
    Obama, the great uniter, surely understands this. That’s probably what he’ll propose next. Right?

  • Andreas K.

    Non issue. Instead listen to his speech… He says the military is fighting on HIS behalf.

  • BuddyG

    #22 Harrington,
    Do you also believe that polygamists have Constitutional rights?
    Should there be any boundaries regarding legal marriage?

  • NitneLiun

    This isn’t an assault on the Church or religion. We don’t live in a theocracy.

  • Multitude

    Great news from Obama! I’m sure all the mosques are going to get right on this gay marriage thing. Imagine the fun we’ll have forcing Islam to make a minor tweak on not prohibiting homosexuality. After all, they’re so open to lesser things like Winnie the Pooh books being on the same bookshelf with the Koran, and the horrifying thought that a Koran might be dropped on the ground and dirtied.

    I’m sure gay marriage will go over just well. Then again, Obama says so, thus it must not ever be challenged by a court. Islam will just have to change.

  • Sasja

    I do not support gay marriage, never will. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Homosexuals live a perverted lifestyle. One I can never sanction.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    This is mostly an intent to generate some enthusiasm from his gay constituency but also to distract the public.

    Pay no attention to the lousy economy, the double-digit unemployment (the government number is BS), the smothering regulation, and the strangling national debt, all incurred on Obie’s watch.

  • SpideyTerry

    I’m sure liberals will weep with joy over this. Me? I’m laughing over how Obama will twist his statements in the coming months in order to appease black voters who traditionally don’t support gay marriage.

  • L.E. Liesner

    Everything is guy does, does not make sense. Yesterday the citizens of North Carolina voted overwhelmingly against same sex marriages and up pops the devil and endorses same sex marriage. I wonder if his next “Executive Order” will reflect this decision. I also wonder, if those people that continually tell us how smart this guy is are mistaking intelligence for insanity.

  • George

    #22
    Marriage is not a Constitutional right.
    Everybody that doesn’t support homosexuals getting “married” are bigots.
    I would call them traditionalist.

  • George

    Obummer just lost North Carolina for sure.

  • MT Geoff

    Howdy BuddyG re #37:
    My personal opinion is that any combination of legal adults, all willing participants, should be able to live as they choose and to register the relationship legally. This would make all parties of a plural marriage equally responsible for debts, child care, one another’s healthcare decisions, etc.
    Plural marriage has a longer history than one-man-one-woman marriage and it’s the norm in the Old Testament.
    Children can’t provide knowing consent and this has been an issue with some polygamy groups — a tendency to involve teen girls who are too young to make good decisions about how they wish to spend their lives. Some such groups are also highly insular, limiting the opportunity for children to see other relationships and evaluate if they would be happier in a single marriage. That’s a different can of worms.

  • Like some here this is just a distaction from the real issues …most of us alreadly knew that he was for it, before he was against it when he refuse to defend DOMA…..

  • BuddyG

    #46 MT Geoff
    Your response goes to show why legalizing gay marriage is a bad idea. Once the boundaries are moved, there’s no telling where it will go. And marriage will become meaningless.

  • Michael

    @ # 12 – Only Republicans can flip flop. Democrats evolve.

    oBama would support beastiality if he thought it would get him more votes from PETA

  • Sasja

    Although a majority of Blacks do not support gay marriage, they’ll vote for him anyway. As with all libs, this is just pandering to a particular group for their support.

    I wonder how his “Shout Out” promotion is going?

    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/05/08/obama-now-raffling-off-shout-outs-for-campaign-donations/

  • Pingback: Obama Continues Attacks On Christian Church – Throws His Support Behind Gay Marriage (Video) | Born Conservative()

  • Prejudice against homosexuals is stronger among the old than the young. It is stronger among the poorly educated than among the well-educated. This means it’s on the way out. Y’all are on the losing side of history on this one, and I think you understand.

  • rduke305

    Totally scripted. Take a look at the interview….he darts his eyes down every 5-10 seconds and is obviously reading. Once Joe jumped it, he had no choice….he could no longer play the middle, as he would like…ie, being all things to all people. As in all things, the One does only which is best for him electorally. ABC is journalistically complicit and dishonest in presenting this as some sort of spontaneous interview. Shame on him for injecting service people and his own children into his statement. Evolving…my a*s! BTW…I have no problem with same sex unions, the issue of “marriage” is up to the states, but spinning it politically is beneath the office. Wondering what Vegas odds are for Slo Jo coming back as VP pick after this debacle.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Every time I call up Yahoo to check my mail, I see a picture of this Commie, like the above, right in front of my face. Has anyone in the media stopped to think that they might be overdoing the exposure?

  • Indiana

    Our President was just “outed” by his own VP. hahahahahahahaha……aaaaaahhhhhhh! Game over!

  • 48#Once the boundaries are moved, there’s no telling where it will go. And marriage will become meaningless….Spot on …….. very good point……..what comes next sisters or brothers marrying or fathers and daughters,mothers and sons .this is sick twisted road we’re heading down……..

  • bg

    ++

    i am not, nor was i ever a Mama’s boy

    i am not, nor was i ever a Homosexual

    i am not, nor was i ever a Muslim..

    i am not, nor was i ever a Marxist..

    etc, etc, etc..

    ==

  • el polacko

    there’s nothing anti-christian about believing in equal treatment under the law for all citizens.
    calling obama’s comments an “attack” is inflammatory nonsense.
    not that it should matter, but the fact is that most gay folks in this country identify as christian… the two are not mutually exclusive.

  • FurryGuy

    Barry got backed into the corner by his doofus VP and now is going to reap the whirlwind of his coming down off of the fence where he was so damned eager to perch. So far all he has done is polarize and piss off BOTH sides of the debate by coming out for Gay Marriage and yet saying it is a State’s Rights issue.

    Talk about discharging both barrels of an elephant gun to brush off the gnat on the end of your nose.

  • bg
  • bg

    ++

    FurryGuy #59 May 9, 2012 at 4:41 pm

    i respectfully disagree..

    Barry sent Biden out to test the reaction, ergo, how he would respond..

    ==

  • bigkahuna

    Gay people can marry anyone they want….of the opposite sex.

    If they want to live with and have legal contracts with their partners etc Go for it.

    If they dont like it tough. Marriage is defined as between a man and a women. Next they will want to marry, dogs, cats , camels or sheep.

  • greenfairie

    Obama’s plan is to be a hard-left culture warrior because he cannot run on his craptacular record. This will only help squeeze more bux from rich gays and Hollyweirdos who obsess over the issue. Or to dupe stupid kids who think they have to support gay issues because they like the characters on “Glee.”

    There are many reasons why I oppose gay marriage. Even if you don’t care about the issue, compare with Gandhi’s peaceful marches or MLK’s moral appeals with the “I hope you all f’n die” threats, lies, hatred, and online mobs in the name of “equality.” Give those mice the cookie and you will not like what comes next.

  • Adam

    Why is he talking about this with unemployment so high, record numbers of Americans dropping out of the work force, and $16 trillion of debt? Is gay marriage really the issue the country should be focusing on right now? Are there not much more pressing issues staring us in the face? I couldn’t care less about gay marriage personally, as long as, as another commentor noted, churches aren’t forced by lawsuits to perform marriage ceremonies for gay couples.

  • FurryGuy

    #64 May 9, 2012 at 4:56 pm
    Adam commented:

    Why is he talking about this with unemployment so high, record numbers of Americans dropping out of the work force, and $16 trillion of debt?

    If Barry were to actually talk about his now extant lower than dismal record, his electoral loss would make Reagan’s 1980 and 1984 wins look like razor-thin close races.

  • MT Geoff

    #62 by bigkahuna: I’m afraid that’s an old and useless argument. People who are homosexual do not wish to marry someone of the opposite sex and saying they have that right is offering them something useless. It’s like telling me I have the right to play golf — I don’t happen to like it and the “right” is of no benefit to me. Notice I’m not trying to stop anyone else from playing golf.
    #48/#56: very few people choose to live as homosexuals, very few choose incest as a way of life, very few choose polygamy. Those few are not doing any harm to those who wish to have a mainstream marriage. The real threats to marriage are what they’ve always been: adultery, divorce, job before spouse, self before marriage, meanness to one another. Even when these threats don’t actually lead to divorce, they can lead to empty marriages. Does anyone believe that Jack and Jackie Kennedy or Ted and Ethel Kennedy were happy or had real marriages?

  • CT

    Obama is one desperate ***** that will say or do anything to get re-elected and that’s only what we currently know about him. Re-elect Obama, bend over and grab your ankles has new meaning.

  • USMC Thomas

    I will be so gay in November to cast my vote against SØBama.

  • This is the worst American attack on traditional biblical values since the Virginia colony outlawed the stoning of promiscuous widows!

  • Mad Hatter

    To the children from the Daily Kook site that has made their way over to the adult forum,

    Gay marriage is a political weapon in an attempt to mainstream a perverted lifestyle.

    This is also another way for the radical left to attempt to hijack and redefine traditional marriage. The radical left hijacked the word gay which use to mean happy, joyful, and applied it to their personal lifestyle. They also hijacked the rainbow sign, which represents something that’s naturally beautiful, and is now ‘their flag’ for their personal lifestyle.

    We’re not going to let them hijack the long standing tradition of marriage so they can twist it, and redefine it in their image.

    This country doesn’t evolve around what 3% of the population thinks they’re entitled to.

    P.S.

    Check under the Bill of Rights, and the 1964 Civil Rights Act and show me the documentation where gay marriage is a right.

    God Bless North Carolina. =)

  • James R. Olson

    Ah, yes, many metric tons of stupid at Gateway Pundit The christian church can’t die fast enough for patriotic Americans like yours truly. I hope the prez outlaws all churches.

  • Mad Hatter

    #71,

    Outlaw all churches huh? I see you’re following the steps of Stalin. Your parents must be proud of you.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    #13 BuddyG …nails it.
    Let’s see this for what it is; a pathetic attempt by 0bama to divert attention away from his record. Don’t take the bait. Remain concentrated on 0bamacare and the economy.

    #20 Sarah …nails it again.
    This entire issue is a distraction. The enemy is lapping at the shore and has infiltrated our society on all levels. We are in debt beyond belief and the economy is a mess. It’s time to triage priorities and this topic just ain’t one of them, no matter what side of issue one stands on.

    #27 Senior D …continues what seems to be a trend of nailing it.
    Meh, the White House Pandering Poseur in Chief and his Socialist Sycophants create a ‘news story’.

    #29 karen …nails it, and then misses the point that Obama IS “working on” our economy, and that his Communist masters are quite pleased with him, and that this is one of the many reasons that distractions are needed.
    Where are the jobs? Stop bombarding us with your thoughts on gay marriage and WORK ON OUR ECONOMY.

    #30 Tim in Cali …nails it like he’s in the Secret Service, and it is a Colombian hooker.
    It’s a dog and pony show ,to get the media off last nights “shellacking ” and divert attention away from his miserable record…tick tock Barry,the clock is ticking

    #32 skutch …is nailing it so furiously that a nice house seems to be taking shape.
    Classic misdirection. First contraception. Now this. Next it will be some fish endangered by oil drilling. Clearly planned and executed by the White House per strategy. Now nobody will be talking about the economy, taxes, deficit, wars, or health care debacles for the next week or so. Count on some “social policy” controversy like this being tossed out by Obama’s campaign every few weeks until the election.

    Oh, but there’s more — and “misdirection” is the nail. (Or the Colombian hooker, say…)

    😀

  • Sasja

    #71’s problem is not really with any church, but with God. A subject he can take up with our Lord when his number is called.

  • MT Geoff

    #70: Mad Hatter, the US Constitution omits all mention of marriage, or the right to locate in the state you choose, or the right to pick one’s job, or a number of rights we all take for granted.
    There are obnoxious people campaigning for gay rights and they annoy me also. Then there are people, gay or straight, who thoughtfully believe that people should live as they choose as long as they are not harming others. I’m one and I’m a libertarian conservative, a long shot from being a KosKid or a HuffPo friend.
    I would argue against, and vote against, any measure that required any church to recognize or perform a marriage outside of the church’s doctrines. I would argue for, and vote for, a measure that permits a church to recognize a marriage that meets its doctrines, even if that marriage is outside of Judaeo-Christian doctrine. My only concern is harm to those who can’t give consent, like child brides.
    #71: James, I would take that remark for sarcasm. I am opposed to some teachings of every church I’m aware of and I support the rights of all of them to teach and worship as they believe — always excepting real harm to real people, of course.

  • bigL

    Wedding Photoghraphers can’t turn down a gay wedding. The Cheiurch based adoptioon agencies can’t offer baby to hetero couples first. All these thing arediscrimination and suits will abound.
    In UK the religious adoption agencies, specifically the romans Catholic ones have CLOSED…Shut their
    doors.

    Also if Sharia gets established asthey lefties would like, all thesse couples men-men or women women will have registered with the county or state. Then they can be rounded up easy-peasey for a date with a crane…Go and register. Laugh all you want. Think Oh sure , tha twon’t happen.Why not live your life away from govt..

  • Taqiyyotomist

    #72 Mad Hatter

    James R. Olson knows, if he can see like we can, that what he suggests is likely, that a Stalin-on-Steroids regime is probably going to “evolve” (as it were) in this nation:

    That comment, coupled with his real name, is nothing but a Job Application.

    The Evil Leftists want it, badly. Mao X10. The Stupid Leftists have no clue about the evils of Communism. They just believe whatever the Evil Left tells them.

    I’m thinking Mr. Olson is one that wants it badly. Mass graves and all that, for the disloyal-to-the-Almighty-State. If not? Then he’s just a Stupid Leftist and is truly ignorant regarding the Great Leap Forward, the Holodomor, or, indeed, the Holocaust, because his teachers have only told him lies or nothing at all about any of them.

  • overthehillbill

    As soon as DOMA is repealed nationwide I’m going to marry my house, my van, my pick-up
    truck and my dog and have them all put on my health insurance and all repairs will be
    covered by free obamacare!!!!! Yipee for me!!!!!!!!

  • sybilll

    Say hello to President Romney. Ann might as well start measuring the drapes.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    #34 Sasja …nails it, though I’m not set on that last part — for many reasons, among them that “he” is not doing anything, and that it is not “his” agenda, and that the American people are indeed stupid and easily led.
    He may try to divert attention away from his wrecking ball agenda, but it won’t work.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    #76 BigL

    Wedding Photoghraphers can’t turn down a gay wedding. The Cheiurch based adoptioon agencies can’t offer baby to hetero couples first. All these thing arediscrimination and suits will abound.
    In UK the religious adoption agencies, specifically the romans Catholic ones have CLOSED…Shut their
    doors.

    Can there be any doubt, in those who know the history of tyranny, what is coming?

  • Bwaney Fwanks is thanking Stymie as we all write these messages, OOOPS I just urped up a little thinking about that…..

  • Taqiyyotomist

    If I woke up tomorrow morning and walked outside, and everything was in black and white, I wouldn’t really be shocked. I’d just nod and say, “yep.”

    FORWARD. To 1934 (Germany). To 1959 (China). To 1933 (Ukraine).

  • Taqiyyotomist

    This time it’ll be in full-m’fin’-color! HD! 3-D! 1080p!

    Oh, and the other “technology” of murdering many tens of millions for the good of the State has undoubtedly improved just as much as has television.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    Who knows? Maybe the state will kill off 40 million Christians and tell the rest it was the rapture! The rest would BELIEVE IT.

    “Hey wow! All those Godbag Christians disappeared! They must have been right! What should I do?! I know! TO THE TELEVISION!”

  • Pingback: President Obama’s Endorsement of Gay Marriage | Black Write & Read()

  • Pingback: Obama Continues Attacks On Christian Church – Throws His Support Behind Gay Marriage (Video)()

  • Path

    Shawn – I’m sorry that I didn’t see your post earlier. Please understand that the Catholic church will never – I say that again NEVER agree to “marriage” between members of the same sex. It’s not about being politicaly correct, it’s not about hurting people, it’s not about Obama – it is about the bible and what Jesus has taught us.

    My neighbor Paul was gay from birth – it’s not always a choice but just who you are. I love/d Paul but that still doesn’t mean that the Catholic church has to accept his lifestyle. I don’t care about your lifestyle – I have friends and relatives who are gay and God bless them. However, this does not mean that I condone their behavior – nor should the Catholic Church. God’s law is God’s law.

    Marriage is between one man and one woman – it is intended for the procreation of the species. If you want a political union, I support you but it is not and will never be “marriage.”

    God bless.

  • bg

    ++

    #71 May 9, 2012 at 5:29 pm
    James R. Olson

    Mosques included, right??

    oh, and not to worry if he does, as there will be more than ample
    to worship in their stead, trust me, you will again give freedom
    of religion another thought
    ..

    you will be too busy enjoying the power serfdom affords you, just think,
    no more wondering or worrying, your lot being decided and provided for
    you.. /O’sarc/

    [But communists could not be wrong. After all, their knowledge was scientific, based on historical materialism, an understanding of the dialectical process in nature and human society, and a materialist (and thus realistic) view of nature. Marx has shown empirically where society has been and why, and he and his interpreters proved that it was destined for a communist end. No one could prevent this, but only stand in the way and delay it at the cost of more human misery. Those who disagreed with this world view and even with some of the proper interpretations of Marx and Lenin were, without a scintilla of doubt, wrong. After all, did not Marx or Lenin or Stalin or Mao say that. . . . In other words, communism was like a fanatical religion. It had its revealed text and chief interpreters. It had its priests and their ritualistic prose with all the answers. It had a heaven, and the proper behavior to reach it. It had its appeal to faith. And it had its crusade against nonbelievers.

    What made this secular religion so utterly lethal was its seizure of all the state’s instrument of force and coercion and their immediate use to destroy or control all independent sources of power, such as the church, the professions, private businesses, schools, and, of course, the family.]

    ==

  • Lady Mondegreen

    Like him or hate him, Obama is a sly politician, and he would not do this unless he saw (or thought he saw) an advantage in it. He probably thinks he can use it to make Romney and conservatives (and I do not believe that Romney is a conservative) appear inconsistent and mean-spirited, and he may correct. Don’t underestimate him.

  • brian

    the primary role of government is the eradication of evil, both foreign and domestic, providing tranquility and liberty for its citizens. That means government must have a moral base. The vastly sucessful nations of history have a judeo christian morality. In these societies homosexuality is condemned as unnatural and immoral. Acceptance of homosexuality as a moral norm results very quickly in general lawlesses becoming the moral norm. No thanks.

  • Stephen E. Morgan

    Just the act of the usurper marrying the first sow moochelle, is proof that he’s all for same sex marriage..

  • bg

    ++

    re: #89 May 9, 2012 at 7:12 pm bg

    you will NEVER again give freedom of religion another thought..

    ==

  • jeff

    hatred and bigotry are what you embrace. it’s idiotic. why don’t you turn off the 700 club and think for your self.

  • Pingback: Obama Continues Attacks On Christian Church – Throws His Support Behind Gay Marriage (Video) | Liberal Whoppers()

  • lizzy84

    el polacko commented:
    “There’s nothing anti-christian about believing in equal treatment under the law for all citizens.calling obama’s comments an “attack” is inflammatory nonsense.”

    I don’t think so,el polacko and I’ll tell you why. If you believe sodomy and homosexuality are good, you may call yourself a Christian, but you haven’t read God’s Word. If you have and want to call God a liar, go ahead. He is your ultimate Judge, not man.
    I know that’s hard to believe after 50+ years of progressive schools, progressive government etc, etc, but it doesn’t change the fact that you can’t take the Truth out of God’s people.
    You can only try to take it by man-made laws which is exactly what oBama would love to see happen.

  • tommy mc donnell

    i don’t approve of gay marriage, i think it is an attack on the traditional family. i think marriage should be between a man and a woman. the idea of marriage was to santify the family unit. i wonder why gays think they will thrive in a society with a weak family. if they really think a weak family unit is a good thing they should all move to inner-city america. get to see what a no-family society is really like. gays have been around for thousands of years and have survived for all that time without getting married. now all of a sudden if they can’t get married their sky is going to fall. the discrimination charge is as bogus as can be too. two straight men can’t get married, nor two straight women. they will now however and for the same reason as the left pushes for gay marriage, spousal benefits. a way to put more people on the dole.

  • Flintstone F.

    #52

    We’re on the right side of principle and morality. The wielding of government power and beating your fellow American over the head with it, so that you can get what you want, is wrong. Co-opting an entire portion of our society and labeling them “community” and pushing their lifestyle as mainstream is social engineering and is also wrong.

    You are being used for someone else’s gain. And contrary to your conclusion, I think liberalism is in it’s death throes, while conservatism is gaining momentum (which means more people using logic and reason. That’s a good thing).

    Read the Pledge Of Allegiance and understand those words (people behind the gay marriage movement either don’t understand them or don’t care about them). Vote for the USA, not just U.

  • bg
  • EBL
  • Jd

    Not sure how this is throwing anyone under the bus.

    But I’m pretty sure this is one of his greatest flip flops ever

  • Valerie

    #5 May 9, 2012 at 2:52 pm
    Shawn commented:

    This country started polling consistently in favor of civil unions for gays for quite some time in nearly all states

    http://www.pewforum.org/Gay-Marriage-and-Homosexuality/Majority-Continues-To-Support-Civil-Unions.aspx

    but there is resistance to calling it marriage. This has been the subject of many, many polls once the obvious compromise was uncovered, and the “gay activists” rejected that option.

    It sound like somebody really wants to continue to be a victim, rather than securing real rights. Perhaps the rights are less important to them than the fundraising potential.

  • Patty

    OT but talks about Obama, also.

    Michelle Obama: Another Example of Her Moral Turpitude

    http://mychal-massie.com/premium/michelle-obama-another-example-of-her-moral-turpitude/

    Decay of America, we cannot allow it to happen for another four more years.

  • Pingback: Obama Continues Attacks On Christian Church – Throws His … | ChristianBias.com()

  • Patty

    Actually I am rather surprised, not by the fact that he supports gay marriage, his alleged opposition was the most transparent lie in contemporary politics, but by the fact that he announced his switch in positions now. As the thumping that gay marriage took in North Carolina yesterday indicates, gay marriage is not popular in swing states crucial in November. Additionally, his support ensures that there will be a plank in the Democrat platform calling for gay marriage throughout the nation and that this will become a major issue in the fall. I assume that Obama and his advisors think that this will excite his base, but this makes zero political sense to me. Homosexual activists are most powerful in deep blue states that Obama has in the bag. They are relatively weak on the ground in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania where this election is going to be decided.

    This move either comes from extreme arrogance on the part of Team Obama, assuming that they can’t lose no matter what they do, or they have been following the better polls as closely as I have, realize that things will be grim in the fall, and decided that their one hope is to play to their base. I vote for arrogance myself.

    http://the-american-catholic.com/2012/05/09/surprise-barack-obama-now-supports-gay-marriage/#comment-113252

  • Patty

    Every day this administration is bringing up social issues. They are obviously trying to take us of the real problems this administration has accumulated and the lies Biden is telling the Rabbis in a conference today about Iran.

    Bush put things in place for this administration and they have followed many of the policies of the last administration. Yet, they are actually blaming him, what a lack of moral ethics and the lies of this administration. From a deb of 16 trillion to Obama’s racking a whopping 5 trillion. Solyndras, Holder and Fast and Furious, GSA, Secret Service and our freedoms.

    War on Women, Church and every person’s individual independence, this administration is shattering. They are running scared and in fear of losing this upcoming election.

    Romney’s feelings on Gay Marriage is that he believes marriage is between one man and one women. (STATED CLEARLY DURING THE DEBATES AND NOW, THIS IS “HIS” VIEW AND IT IS LEFT TO THE STATES TO DECIDE. period)

    I can only hope that from now until the elections Romney focuses on DEBT, JOBS AND THIS HORRIBLE ECONOMY. And with strength and firmness never deviate from this.

    Morally and Ethically Obama is trying to decay our integrity, intelligence and moral values every day.

  • Patty

    Will Gay Marriage Endorsement Mean Campaign Dollars for Obama?

    This afternoon President Obama endorsed the concept of same-sex marriage, definitively stating his views for the first time in office.

    The impact on his campaign coffers won’t be seen for weeks. Some gay rights activists had vowed not to donate to Obama or the super PAC supporting him, Priorities USA, because they felt he hadn’t come through on issues they cared about.

    Yet Obama’s fundraising from those affiliated with gay and lesbian rights interest groups hasn’t dragged as much as such comments would imply. Just two years ago, OpenSecrets.org data showed that overall campaign contributions from gay and lesbian rights interest groups had steeply declined to 16-year low, in part because of disappointment many in the LGBT community felt over Obama’s lack of follow-through on campaign promises he made in 2008.

    But even though the president has brought in just $41,950 from this group so far in this election cycle, he’s actually ahead of the $29,200 he’d raised at the same point (15 months in) in the 2008 campaign. His 2008 total from PACs or individuals in the gay and lesbian rights grouping jumped to $136,000 by the end of that campaign, though — the bulk of Obama’s money from the interest group didn’t come until the general election was in full swing. Mitt Romney, by contrast, has raised just $2,500 from the gay rights community this election cycle (though that’s a slight improvement above his 2008 pace, where by this point he had received just $2,300). {…}

    Read more. http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2012/05/will-gay-marriage-endorsement-mean-campaign-dollars-for-obama.html

  • Al Redwood

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/09/obama-same-sex-marriage-should-be-legal#comments

    That he is a Gay, Communist grifter the Gays know, a modern day Caligula light, after buying for him the presidency they are tired from promises and want a tangible result, fearing his second term is in flames they want an advance on their original payments, and he knows that they know that he is Gay. It does not take a genius to figure it out, because many of his bundlers, appointees, friends and close associates , going back to Occidental College, Columbia University, his trip to Pakistan are mainly associated with sex perverts. With the help of the Unions and the Chicago Left these organized crime Alinsky style mob-methods have been in use since 2007 . More than 5 persons died in the process of the 2008 election cycle, two gay men he had an affair with in Chicago, (choir boys who sing no more) 2 persons of the Electoral College, one Gay, Catholic author, one passport office clerk, wasted in his own car, as well two persons associated with Breitbarts demise that are gone ( the last person who saw him and the Coroner-RIP). Therefore, the gays know that they could be targeted and perhaps they are making their case now? If he does not deliver he could be OUTED. The Gays played this ugly game on the pages of the dailies during the hot 80’s during the AIDS crisis, naming public officials, rich players, and celebrities who did not answer the call, by publicly shaming them. It is a forced hand. He is subject to blackmail. For not being honest with the public about who he is, where he came from and his true proclivities he has to accommodate the gay extortionists, the Hollywood celebrities, the fringe lunatic lefty “Anarchists” of which many are flaming queens, and assorted molesters of various indulgences, this is simply a case of new age alien Caligula pressed against the wall with a sharp knife close to his gay neck while he is evolving.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Man these MSM Obie fellaters are going at it full-bore. One of the local 11:00 news progs call this a “historic announcement”. Of course, with the station being here in the SF Bay Area, there are probably some gay viewers to have to keep happy.

    In any event, pay no attention, people, to the lousy economy, the double-digit unemployment (the government number is BS), the smothering regulation, and the strangling national debt, all courtesy of Team Obama.

    But he supports gay marriage! Everyone celebrate!!!

  • BARACK OBAMA: A PROPHYLACTIC IN COURAGE

    After Obama summoned the courage to kill bin Laden in the greatest military enterprise in half a millennium what bold and daring thing was left for him to do but to come out of the closet on same sex marriage? Undoubtedly this unprecedented, history making, move by the President will send the economy soaring, win over the undecideds (change even some Republican votes) and carry him across the electoral finish line miles ahead of homophobic bigoted Mitt-that is, only if Ohio and Florida secede from the Union before November 6th………..

    Click my name to continue article

  • Pingback: *POP* | Southern Beale()

  • Jimmy Jim

    #97

    i don’t approve of gay marriage, i think it is an attack on the traditional family. i think marriage should be between a man and a woman. the idea of marriage was to santify the family unit. i wonder why gays think they will thrive in a society with a weak family. if they really think a weak family unit is a good thing they should all move to inner-city america. get to see what a no-family society is really like. gays have been around for thousands of years and have survived for all that time without getting married. now all of a sudden if they can’t get married their sky is going to fall. the discrimination charge is as bogus as can be too. two straight men can’t get married, nor two straight women. they will now however and for the same reason as the left pushes for gay marriage, spousal benefits. a way to put more people on the dole.

    I don’t understand how gay marriage is an attack on traditional marriage. Does the fact that other people get to be happy make you less happy? Does the thought of other people getting the right to enjoy the benefits of a legal marriage make your rights less enjoyable? Weak families are not caused by gay people, there are millions of weak heterosexual relationships.

    Gay people don’t want to get married in a hateful place like your church, that’s not what this is about. They just want the same rights that any other couple can have.

    And when you say that gays have been around for thousands of years and have been just fine without these rights, maybe talk to a woman or a black person about how they felt about being second class citizens in our society.

    Separation of church and state. Equal rights for all.

  • Saul A

    If they are truly committed to this, then Obama and the Democrats need to boycott North Carolina. Let them live by their words. Change the convention site now. Heh, heh.

  • S

    I find it entirely ironic that he feels that Marriage(a christian ideology) should allow same-sex marriages. But yet pushes the agenda of seperation of church and state with the Obamacare methodology of Catholic churches providing contraception. I for one have no problem with same-sex couples, not my place to judge ones sexual preferences. But the fact that they want to call it marriage; which is a union of a man and woman in the eyes of God. So why don’t we call it what it really is, a civil union/domestic partnership.

  • I’m a somewhat moderate progressive and trust me, even I can’t stand our SCOAMF president Obama.

    Marriage should be between a man and a woman, which is what Obama said before he felt he had to cave to pressure from Ed Rendell and, he says, his daughters, and do his ‘gay for pay’ act.

    Disgusting. I wish we could primary him.

  • Pingback: Obama’s Announcement and What It Means for “Liberal” Christians | [D]mergent()

  • Pingback: Obama’s Announcement and What It Means for “Liberal” Christians | [D]mergent « The Company of the Eudaimon()

  • Pingback: Given the state of the conservative brain trust, believe me, Bristol Palin is an UPGRADE. « Music, Life, Love, and Rage()