Barack Obama Pushed ‘Redistribution’ at Historic Socialists Meeting in 1996

Can we call him a socialist now???
Barack Obama headlined a Democrat Socialists of America town hall meeting in Chicago in 1996. Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is a democratic socialist and social-democratic organization in the United States formed in 1982 by leftist groups and former members of socialist and communist parties of the Old Left.
Buzzfeed reported:

Barack Obama pushed wealth redistribution in his speech at the socialist’s meeting.
Trevor Loudon dug up this Chicago DSA report on the socialist town hall event.

”Barack Obama observed that Martin Luther King’s March on Washington in the 1960s wasn’t simply about civil rights but “demanded jobs as well”.

One of the themes that has emerged in Barack Obama’s campaign is “what does it take to create productive communities”, not just consumptive communities. It is an issue that joins some of the best instincts of the conservatives with the better instincts of the left.”‘

‘Obama felt the state government has three constructive roles to play.’

‘The first is “human capital development”. By this he meant public education, welfare reform, and a “workforce preparation strategy”. Public education requires equality in funding. It’s not that “money is the only solution to public education’s problems but it’s a start toward a solution… A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training. While Barack Obama did not use this term, it sounded very much like the “social wage” approach used by many social democratic labor parties.

‘The state government “can also play a role in redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs. As Barack Obama noted, when someone gets paid $10 million to eliminate 4,000 jobs, the voters in his district know this is an issue of power not economics. The government can use as tools labor law reform, public works and contracts.””

I think it’s fair to say that anyone who talks about redistribution at a national socialists meeting can be considered a socialist.
But, that’s just me.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Patty

    Oh, to go back in time when the campaign of 08 was in full swing. Don’t you wish that Media and Journalists did their [email protected] jobs?

    Did Blo, smoked pot, part of the Socialist movement, Wright, Davis, Ayers and so on.

    We faced a Historical Meltdown, and who do you call? Who does America believe will change and turn things around. Pot Head, Cocaine user, Socialist, Radical, a person who truly believes that the rich have too much and they should pay more taxes and they ARE THE BAD ONES. This guy is telling Catholics universities to pay for Contraception?

    Promotes Gay Marriage. This GUY? Are we all nuts?

  • a former dem

    and the lame Barry worshipping media of ABC, NBC, See-BS, NPR, Wash Post, NYT still tell us he’s a capitalist.

    Silly rabbits, lies are for demonRats, not independent voters, who have figured out the media is fully in the tank for Barry, and have been from day 1.

  • bg


    Déjà vu is Déjà vu is Déjà vu..


  • Patty

    2008, do you realize that this was just 7 years after one of the worse attacks on American Soil. Besides the native Americans, Pearl Harbor, the 911 attacks a time when we all came together.

    I am not express good from that day but good after that day.
    Heroes, families trying to put their lives back together, President saying we are strong and we will find out who did this. Children, Women and men, every color and greed died.

    We stuck together as we have always done, time and time before in Tragedy. It made me stronger and more hopeful.

    Now, I fear for my country, I am afraid of what Obama is doing. You can ask anyone and they will tell you the same thing.

    We lost love ones fighting for our freedoms. Now, we realizes that these wars are getting us now where and money has gone after bad. But we would never dream now, that this nation under Obama is becoming Socialized. All the death and carnage, parents losing their sons and daughters and to compound things, Obama is a Socialists.

    Mosque at Ground Zero, Capitalism is Bad, Gays can Marry, these are the important issues of the day? This will help our struggling economy.This will secure our nation?

    We have certainly come a long way since 9/11 and I never thought in my wildest dreams, we have a Socialist as President, Apologizes for our defending our nation and the world, and oh, my God, he says he isn’t finished, his job isn’t done, yet.

    Who are we and will we denied those who came together that Day and shortly after, Freedom, Faith and yes, Capitalism. Will we chose that path, I hope not.

  • pink tie Republican

    The Pakalolo Kid is taking Memorial Day off.

  • Patty

    And for those who live by the Rules For Radicals, Obama isn’t doing a thing wrong, not at all.

    Chaos and confusing, notice he doesn’t speak to the issue that are important but he speaks of a nation that in his mind will be so very very much better and people will all have the same and the wealthy, job creators will not.

    Problem is first Obama won’t talk about his failure as a President. Oh, no, but Social issues as the word says. More socialist propaganda and who is getting richer Obama and his friends who are involved in Bain and other companies. Book deals and Movies and making money, and yes, this is all a part of, wait for it, CAPITALISM.

    All his donors and Hollywood elites have capitalized of American money. Who with even an 8th education can’t see that Obama is a Hypocrite, liar and Attacks the Romney when people who work in close Connect in his own administration are Capitalists.

  • Big Mac

    Do socialists redistribute their coke and pot to everyone? We should ask Barry. What about cigs? Will he share them with smokers in his Socialist Utopia?
    So many questions!
    I think we will all get a Chevy Volt too!
    (But batteries are not included.)

  • Patty


    Big Mac

    There was news report on a Black guy, living in the Black section of the city, shot and kill another black for a pack of cigarettes. I didn’t believe this report but it was true.

    So, spread the cigs. Here, they will shoot you for them.

  • Patty
  • Patty


    Obama: ‘I’m the twoosh master’

    Move over, Ashton Kutcher — President Barack Obama is the new “master Tweeter.” In an exchange at the end of this week’s White House West Wing Week video, Obama jokingly refers to himself as the “twoosh master” after crafting a perfect 140-character tweet. Obama became the first sitting president to hold a Twitter question and answer session Thursday after a campaign event in Des Moines, Iowa. During the session, he responded to a question from @jwarner180 on alternative energy sources using each of Twitter’s 140 allowed characters, which he’s told in the video is called a “twoosh,” or “Twitter swoosh.”…

  • Multitude

    Welcome to full out post-Leninist communitarianism focused on ends-equalization (rather than source/opportunity equalization) through an all-powerful, benevolent, activist and protectionist multicultural, cradle-to-grave sovereign.

    One name ensures Obama cannot run from his past now — not Ayers, Wright or Marshall-Davis — but a fictional name of Barack’s choosing: Julia.

    Indeed, Barack’s own “first a tragedy, then a farce” simulacra of Leninist theory has represented the radical dreams into a cartoon character that confesses and sustains his extremist ideological views. This is no longer history, “youthful optimism,” “choom induced philosophical haze,” or any other past he can distance from. It lives here and is the core focus of his second term agenda as expressed by the Julia centerpiece. Consider the tenants of early Barack Obama and present-day War on Independent Women Obamunist Julitarianism:

    1. State Controlled Communitarian Human Capital Development

    Young Barack: ‘The first is “human capital development”.
    Obamunist Julitarianism: “Julia is enrolled in a head start program to help her get ready for school. Because of steps President Obama has taken to improve programs like this one, Julia joins thousands of students across the country who will start kindergarten ready to learn and succeed.” “Their new college- and career-ready standards mean Julia can take classes she needs to do well.” “Julia’s son Zachary starts kindergarten. The public schools in their neighborhood have better facilities and great teachers because of President Obama’s investments in education and programs like Race to the Top.”

    2. Immersive biopower and comprehensive biopolitical control of the State’s subjects.

    Young Barack: “A true welfare system would provide for medical care, child care and job training.
    Obamunist Julitarianism: “Julia decides to have a child. Throughout her pregnancy, she benefits from maternal checkups, prenatal care and free screenings under health care reform.”

    3. End-state radical egalitarianism and coercive redistribution for social control and perceptual equality.

    Young Barack: ‘‘The state government “can also play a role in redistribution, the allocation of wages and jobs.’
    Obamunist Julitarianism: “Because of steps like the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, Julia is one of the millions of women across the country who know she’ll be able to stand up for her rights to equal pay.”

    Barack Obama has not ideologically changed since his young radical days other than he now is within grasp of completely ‘evolving’ and ‘progressing’ the United States to a post-Leninist Communitarian state, achieving the dream promised by Progressives for more than one-hundred years: Communism without a single bullet being fired during the revolution.

  • Obviously what is going to have to happen is, we are going to have to remove some so-called “freedoms” that have been perverted by the left that actually are in the Constitution. It is where and how they took control of our society, our culture, our traditions, and our government. What they do is legal, but it’s subversive, perverse, and anti-American. In that case what we have to do is by Constitutional Amendment declare that people who are part of the evil that has nearly taken over our nation is no longer legal, and make it illegal to take it to court as well so that these subversive organizations do not have any recourse to get back their right to exist. Then outlaw the ideology as a poison that subverts and destroys the Constitutional foundation of our country. No taking them to court to try to prove they are bad people who do mean harm to our nation and our lifestyles as Americans, forget that. Outlaw them altogether. That way we can send the cops into their offices, their homes, their rallies, their gatherings, their marches, their protests, and all other forms of exposure, and then go after their representatives in our government and arrest them for treason. Get rid of them all. Revoke their citizenship and deport them to Russia where they will be happy ever after.

    That is the only way to deal with this problem of Communists trying to take over our country. And they have been at it for a hundred years since Lenin began his takeover of Russia and the Bolshevic Revolution. We must make subversion against the law, and it is not a form of Speech protected under the 1st Amendment either. The ideology cannot exist. It must be pushed outside of the nation and make it like we thought it was when I was in school back in the 50’s and 60’s when we thought it was all in Russia and not here. We were lied to very badly by having that information denied us when our teachers knew damn well that we were being taken over and our government had been in bed with the Communists since the Revolution in Russia left millions starving and dieing and we sent Lenin millions of dollars for food and medicine. Unbeknowce to us he used it to feed his army and to kill all the people. 20 million died at the end, but he survived. Gee, I wonder how? We had a right to know that these bastards were already here working to undermind our very life.

  • I hate Obama because he is a Communist. I hate those who allowed him to become President which includes any and all Republican’s, Democrats, their followers and all liberals who knew Obama was a Communist but believed that getting him in office was the best way to make America the kind of country that they believed it should become. This includes the news media, and no excuse will be accepted for going along with them when they knew Communists were taking over the country. I am left with no alternative but hate, because liberalism has tried to convince me for many years that it’s not Communists, that was silly, it’s just we want the ideology of America to stand for fairness and equality. I’ve tried to tell them that none of their way was needed because it was all in the Constitution already. Their position is, their way will make it better than our forefathers forgot to put in there. My position is I haven’t seen or heard of anyone who was smart enough, or as smart or smarter than our forefathers, and were able to know what was left out of our Constitution that they would have discovered. Like Obama said that he believes the Supreme Court did go far enough in giving rights and freedoms where he saw was more needed than our forefathers did. Yeah, right. He’s not smarter than our forefathers and will not ever be. It’s a trick. The left has always disagreed that by allowing our Constitution to be applied to our society without being hindered by Democrat watering down that the people would never go back to being a Democrat ever again. That’s just the problem, I think the left know that’s true and they don’t want that to happen.

    So this is war, and has been for a long, long time. It’s just more American people need to wake up to the fact that it is war and not just the left trying to make America a better nation. What was wrong with it when they started to undo it back in the 50’s and 60’s? Nothing, that’s just it. It was their idea of what America should be that was wrong, not the way our Constitution had made it.

  • Kissmygrits

    I’ll bet prezzy fiscally responsible felt right at home in front of that group. Maybe he was just trying to be prezzy for all of America.

  • BurmaShave

    @#1 Patty commented:

    Oh, to go back in time when the campaign of 08 was in full swing. Don’t you wish that Media and Journalists did their [email protected] jobs?


    Once you recognize that the proper name for the “MSM” is the “DNC media,” you realize that the miscreants did do their jobs, which is to distort the news, and deceive the public, in the service of promoting the Democratic Party and Socialism in general.

    That is what they do, all the time. I would not be the least bit surprised that back in 2008 the DNC media knew all about this and a whole lot more, which we have not found out about yet. We know for sure that the LA Times has for four years hidden from public view Obama celebrating with a Palestinian terrorist and his odious Muslim friends some years before hand.

    I keep telling everybody the real treacherous traitors here are the DNC media. Sure Obama is bad; he is their Frankenstein. But the real villains in our country are the lying conniving DNC media.

  • Patty

    I suppose with the Wars beginning to end. We should focus just a little more (sarc) actually, these days we must focus a bunch on the War right here at home.

    Socialists focus on Communist takeover of it people. Yes, a people are equal, so long as Government controls them. Apparently, this inactive president when it comes to America being free just isn’t his interpretation that America believes in.

    So, this president focuses on Social Issues. Things that in the past and even present have no importance in the bigger problems we are facing, Serious problems.

    Gays, Contraception, Mandated Healthcare, Attacks on Women, Church, GOP and our Constitution.

    Tea party and 2010 elections, that devastated the left socialist. Occupiers were in their favor. The sheep who played into the Socialist plan and George Soros created a name for the capitalists 1%. This was exactly what this Socialist wanted the Occupiers to protest and it all feel into place.

    Forget our debt, military, jobs, economy and National Security. Obama who is a true Capitalist himself, his now attacking Capitalism, Why, because he believes the mean bankers who he get donations from, are the problem and Romney is being attack because he was a business man who ACTUALLY created job. Think about this, the direction Obama is taking us is Communism. Full control over our health and other freedoms and then, What is next? We must not allow Obama a second term, he is devastating a real disaster in the making is coming and will be worse.

  • Patty

    #15 May 26, 2012 at 12:44 pm
    BurmaShave commented:

    There is a word of your post that I haven’t type here before. Yes, they knew who Obama was and they are all Socialists, too.

    They fit the name, perfectly. My point is, look what happen in 7 years after 9/11. All those who have fought and died. And now, I hope the Media and all the slime, projectile vomit lovers of Obama are Happy Now.

  • Patty

    There isn’t a word in your post


  • Pingback: Figures. Barack Obama Pushed Redistribution at Historic Democrat Socialists of America Town Hall Meeting | Born Conservative()

  • As far as some people thinking that Communists have the right to say what they represent as well as people who believe that our Constitution is the way America should be, is a 1st Amendment right that should be protected. I’m saying the yes anyone who holds a controversial ideology as Communists do have the right to speak about their beliefs. But if it’s a ideology that preaches the destruction of our way of life, I’m saying that such a belief cannot be allowed to be placed on equal footing in our society as a counter way of life that would be better, because it’s not. And it’s not a subject that should be allowed to be aired in society as equal to the dominant ideology, American exceptionalism, Constitutionality, Constitutional Reublicanism, those kinds of things that are what America is supposed to be. And if you go to any other country you will get the hell stomped out of you if you go there and start preaching against that countries accepted and believed way of life.

    The only reason why Communism is able to take over in those countries is they concentrate on telling that ideology to the people of those countries who are discontented with their life, the disinfranchised, malcontents, and people who want something for nothing. And there are plenty of those people in every country. Everyone wants more, and that is what Communist concentrate on and that is giving people more without them having to work for what they want. Human’s are lazy, and if Communists can get some human’s to work with them for more rights and make it sound like the govenment is denying those rights from them and others, then you’ve got a movement. And before you know it those people get representatives elected to the government where they make alot of noise all time about issues of “equal rights” for their followers. And it goes from there until the whole government gives in and before long that country is Communists.

    They take advantage of people’s ignorance of the very thing that enumerates the rights that they have and that is their countries laws. Like America, the people didn’t know what rights they had according to the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence which is where the Bill of Rights is, people are ignorant of what exactly their rights are. Communists take advantage of that ignorance and tell people that they are keeping other people from having the same rights as they do. When people hear that they feel bad and allow the Communists to convince them to give up some of their rights so these ficticious people can have more rights than they actually do have.

    Will those people who give up some of their rights ever look up what their rights really are? Probably not. They will just go along with the people who sound like they know what they are talking about. That is most American’s. People don’t think, “I think I should look up what this guy is telling me my rights are.” We should want to know the truth.

  • Toa

    Sure hope the squishy, “nice” Conservative pundits don’t have hysterical cardiac arrests over this article.
    I get so sick of hearing them tell us that Obama is just “misguided”.

  • By now it’s just real difficult to prove to people of America that our nation is better off being under the Constitution. Since people don’t really know what part of their life is being protected by and given the reason for being an American. We’re not European. We’re not Russian or Chinese. We’re not Mexican or South American. We’re not Canadian’s. We’re American’s. But the ploy that Communists are using is, “It really doesn’t matter what you call yourself, we’re all citizen’s of the world.” No we’re not, we’re American’s. We come from someplace, a country, and grouping of people who all want to live under a certain way. They decided to place a boundery around themselves so as to unite the people even more and provide protection for them and give the people rights between each other and freedoms that only we have. Then we decided to not let in just anyone, but people who would be an asset to our people, our nation. Then we started calling ourselves a name and that name was the name we gave our nation and that was American’s from the nation of America. That means something to everyone and we became proud of who we are. We began doing business with other countries, as American’s. And we did alot of business with people who treated us right, that means we made a good deal with them and paid for what we bought at a low price. We did even more business with them and other countries wanted in on the profits. And in a very general way that is how America became a great nation. Everybody had a good share of the profits that was being made and they were able to live better than they once did.

    But along came these other people who claimed that even though it was good here, it could be alot better, but our government was holding certain people back. What the truth was, was those people didn’t care about doing more for themself and were lazy. These people who told them that the reason why they don’t have more is because the other people hated them to. So now these lazy people have two reason’s why they don’t have a better life. And those people who told those lazy people that not only those two things were against them, the third reason they couldn’t have more was because the way the country was put together was wrong and needed to be changed. And before you know it you have a movement that begins to whittle away at the way the country was put together to begin with when people of like mindedness wanted to but a boundary around them so that they could be united in their chosen way of life.

  • lizzy84

    Cripes..doesn’t this just say it all?:
    Communists Caught Altering History to Protect Obama

    *via Nice Deb @ NZblog

    Have the commies ever endorsed any other president? This is what oBama voters wanted in 2008. This is what we’ve got..dumba$$ voters. Ronald Reagan has got to be rolling over in his grave.

  • That is why “multiculturalism” is so wrong. It robs our people of the reason for being proud of being an American when we’re told that we aren’t better off than anyone else just because we’re American’s. That is a lie. And the reason why it’s a lie is because we are better off than anyone else and it’s because we decided that we were going to be. We don’t want to live like other people in other countries. We want to have a better life for ourselves, and help other people in our country to have a better life for themselves as well. What’s wrong with that? People who claim that we aren’t better than other countries want us to drop being proud of who we are. They don’t want us to be proud of who we are, and they want us to start thinking of what our being proud of who we are does to the feelings of people in other countries. That is also a lie. We should not be concerned about how our being proud of who we are is affecting the feelings of people in other countries. That is nonsense. But people who want us to be more “sensitive” about who other people are in other countries may not want to know about how our country is, should be something we should think about more than we think about who we are. That is also nonsense, because it violates human nature to have something that we feel part of and that stimulates us to want to work towards having a better life for ourselves. And if we can do that here in this country, then why not be proud of it?

    Anyone who says that thinking about how life in this country is better than life is for other people in some other country is something wrong, then they don’t have this nations best interest at heart. And if that is who they are then they are a threat to our nations security and prosperity. They need to be gotten rid of. Not allowed to stay in this country so they can continue to attack how we feel about this country. That is what is wrong, not giving these people special rights because we are confused about what harm is to this country?

    We have to understand that doing nothing to people who want to harm this country without it being seen, are just as much a threat to our security as the Muslims who flew the planes into the Twin Towers on 9-11, no less. Just because they don’t use weapons you can see doesn’t mean they are dangerous. And it’s not because our country is weak that these kinds of people seem to have it easy when it is taking over the country. Part of it is because we aren’t the kind of people who go around suspecting people of being a threat to us all the time. That is the attitude we find in other countries where the people there are suspicious of strangers, and are rude to people they don’t know. American’s aren’t like that. And because we are accomodating we can be taken advantage of more easily. And we have a history of people doing that to us. But we used to have the right to protect ourselves and take retrobution against those who we found to have taken advantage of our goodwill, and hospitality. We used to be able to “tar and feather” them and run their butts out of town “on a rail”, and that is a fence crossmember called a “rail”, it’s just a long board, whatever. But the point is we used to be free to protect ourselves against people who were trying to take advantage of us.

    But we have very lazy people in this country who are distrusting of people right here in America, and if they were told the truth by these people, they would not be believed. And that is the people who Communists go after.

  • Patty

    Obama is acting like a socialist and is preaching that others who have worked hard, own businesses make a great deal of money are bad. While he is making more money every day and how, through capitalizing, partners with businesses and political donors every day. And with our money we hired and work hared for. I just don’t get how Americans are buying what he saying.

    He is part of the 1% so are many in Washington. What Hypocrisy and he is diverting the real issue….Our Debt our Money, our future and our children’s futures.

  • Patty

    OT Should we be worried?

    Warning signs for Obama on path to electoral votes

    If the election were today, Obama would likely win 247 electoral votes to Romney’s 206, according to an Associated Press analysis of polls, ad spending and key developments in states, along with interviews with more than a dozen Republican and Democratic strategists both inside and outside of the two campaigns.

    Seven states, offering a combined 85 electoral votes, are viewed as too close to give either candidate a meaningful advantage: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Ohio and Virginia.

    “As of today, the advantage still lies with the president, but there is a long and hard road ahead in this election,” said Tad Devine, who was a top strategist to Democratic presidential candidates Al Gore and John Kerry but isn’t directly involved in this year’s race.

    If Romney wins all the states Republican John McCain carried in 2008 plus North Carolina, as trends today suggest he would, he would still need 64 electoral votes to hit the magic number. That would require him to win a majority of the states that are up for grabs.

  • Patty

    {…}———{..} more to OT #26

  • dba…vagabond trader

    But don’t dare call him a commie. Nope, no evidence of that.


  • Multitude

    WillofLa #24: I profoundly disagree. Multiculturalism is a core tenant in American society and has been expressed as such since our Constitutional formation (and realistically well before). Locke and Mill, key influences to our Constitutional Republic’s grounding, were profoundly concerned with the beginnings of the concept of multiculturalism (though by no means being as broadly inclusive as we would possibly expect today). They essentially asked, how do individuals of different cultures live in a community without being left to use force to kill or violently intimidate and subject another? Mill even wrote about what we should do if an individual visits from another culture; who’s law prevails, theirs, ours?

    Instead of multiculturalism being the problem, it’s the fact that post-Leninists are hiding behind it as a mask, concealing their raw ambitions at totalizing power and control. They’ve realized that communitarian multiculturalism (wiki Walzer and Taylor for details) is actually the secret sauce in progressive revolution without violence. It gives them total state power without bloodshed and battles in the street. We all come willingly, looking for the presents of redistribution and the promise of equal treatment under their multicultural ruse.

    This is why it’s technically incorrect to call Obama a communist. Communists actually worked, sweat, shed blood in their violent revolution. Obama is too lazy for that. He wants the outcome without work, waking up at 10, golfing, partying, eating junk food and hanging out with rock stars and celebrities while a totalizing state merely arrives. He’s ordered out for delivery and the progressives and welfare 51% are more than happy to bring him and his backers their totalitarian state.

    Multiculturalism is an objective of numerous other political theories and is quite instrumental in right-wing libertarianism and left-wing liberalism 1 (Habermas) without the effectuality of totalitarianism state control. Without multiculturalism, you’re more likely to find a different form of progressive ideology on the left — monocultural fascism — as well as a theological communitarianism on the right (think of “White Pride” church-going people in the 1950s South), neither of which would be societies you’d hopefully want to associate with.

  • bg



    “for whatever reason people leave their homeland & come to America..
    they need to leave their homeland behind & embrace America as their
    homeland.. not bring their homeland from which they fled for whatever
    reason with them to America & try to reestablish their homeland here..
    this is America, not (fill in whatever homeland here)!! or go back from
    whence they came if they were so happy there as to want to duplicate
    it here.. go fight for your own homeland in your own country, i will fight
    for my homeland in mine, namely America.. God Bless America, land of
    the free, not the wanna be (fill in whatever country here)..” – bg


  • I’ve got some typo’s in my last post. I say, “Just because they don’t use weapons you (can) see…” should be “(can’t) see…”. And in that same sentence, “…doesn’t mean they (are) should be (aren’t)…dangerous.”

    I do everything I can to catch these errors and sometimes I slip.

    But back to the subject:
    What we have to do is start being very specific about our accusations against Obama when we are trying to vet him further to the American people. Not only his associations are dangerous and subversive against this nation and our way of life, his accusations are racially specific. He isn’t just using the “race card” when he’s pointing out something wrong about how banks do their business, in that some on the radio are saying he’s embarked on the Marxist “class warfare”, it goes beyond that. He is indicating how the banks do their business is “harming what Blacks want out of their lives and are keeping them from having those dreams come true”.

    This was the whole point behind ACORN’s effort to put Blacks inside of banks and start raising a bunch of hell claiming that the banks were “Red Lining” Black applications for houses.

    I thought that the so-called “Fair Housing Act” put a stop to anything a bank would or could do to keep a unemployed Black from getting a house, but apparently not. The Fair Housing Act was what violates White people’s right to dispose of their private property in any way they see fit. If they don’t want to sell their house to a Black then there shouldn’t be anykind of law that forces them to do that, sell to a Black rather than another White. This is a violation of people’s right to private property. And the liberals wanted Blacks to have just as nice a house as White people had. Well, obviously that’s not the way for Blacks to get a nice house in a decent neighborhood. What they needed to do was to work, save up the money, and when they have what they need, they can go out and buy a house. But here’s where the sticky part is. Do they buy or have a house built in their own neighborhood because it’s Black, and historically Blacks want to live with other Blacks just like everyone else does, or do they move out of their neighborhood and find a house in a White neighborhood where home values are higher, there’s no crime, better schools because White people put more money into their neighborhood schools, more businesses, churches, hospitals, sidewalks, better streets, better utilities, and just a all around better environment to live and if be, raise their kids. And all that sounds fine until you look at reality.

    Most all Blacks who move into a White neighborhood don’t have the attitude of the Black that I described in the above paragraph. Mostly they are either associated with criminal elements from the ghetto, or they are criminals themselves and are using the law to get into a White neighborhood where they would be protected by law, and rob the damn place blind! I’ve seen it over and over again. And then while they are there, the word gets out that pickin’s are good and that attracts more criminal Blacks who also use the law to get into the White neighborhood and be protected from being screwtinized to closely. And the next thing you know they are dealing crack from the house and that brings in all kinds of criminal elements from other Black neighborhoods and others that dope causes to create crime where at one time there once were. Then that brings in the police and shootouts. Then White people start moving out if they weren’t already moving out, and the next thing is the previously nice White neighborhood is a combat zone of delapadated houses, tore up streets, broken down cars in the front yard, and trash all over the place.

    Do you actually think Blacks would move into a White neighborhood with the attitude they are going to take care of their property so not to have the neighborhood go to the dogs? Not hardly. There’s just something about Blacks who move into White neighborhoods that excludes those who make the move in order to preserve that neighborhood. Obviously they want to get out of the ghetto, and that’s fine, but they also must have acquired the attitude that they want to be better people as well. And not so much that White people are better, it’s what societal rules they follow makes for a better person. And, yes, I am saying that not following the societal rules that White people follow will make you less than acceptable to the rest of society. That is a proven fact, that if you don’t want to follow the societal rules that make you a better person then your choice is to be like other people in our society that are not acceptable to the rest of society.

    That is the whole reason for following a set or rules that make you a better person than examples of other people aren’t as good who don’t follow a better set of rules for themselves. This is the way you make a good society and that is you come up with a set of rules for everyone to follow so that everyone turns out to be similar to each other with similar goals in life. Everyone is different, and our societal rules take that into account by telling you HOW to follow the rules, but just set the rules and everyone in their own way does what they do to follow them. And their lives manifest the societal rules in that person own way that is similar to everyone else’s lives.

  • since he is a socialist he preached concentration of wealth not redistribution. thats from the millions of workers that toiled to earn that wealth to the hundreds of politicans that get it by confiscation.

  • Pingback: Figures. Barack Obama Pushed ‘Redistribution’ at Historic Socialists Meeting in 1996 | Liberal Whoppers()

  • Pingback: Figures. Barack Obama Pushed 'Redistribution' at Historic Socialists … |™()

  • Rhonda

    How is all of this “new” information was ignored by the lame stream media but ALSO the REPUBLICAN PARTY, john mccain where were you and Ms Wallace and Steve “scumbag” schmidt? Sarah truly was a modern day Paul Revere.

  • aprilnovember811

    This would be the same DSA that the dear Gov. of Hawaii, belongs to.

  • Linda

    #30 May 26, 2012 at 2:53 pm
    bg “for whatever reason people leave their homeland & come to America..
    they need to leave their homeland behind & embrace America as their
    homeland.. not bring their homeland from which they fled for whatever
    reason with them to America & try to reestablish their homeland here..
    this is America, not (fill in whatever homeland here)!! or go back from
    whence they came if they were so happy there as to want to duplicate
    it here.. go fight for your own homeland in your own country, i will fight
    for my homeland in mine, namely America.. God Bless America, land of
    the free, not the wanna be (fill in whatever country here)..” – bg

    bg I agree wholeheartedly with you…they can move in BUT they need to respect our beliefs and laws! The sad thing is that when certain muslims move in they are not happy and grateful to be allowed into this country, they want to come in and TAKE OVER!

  • Linda

    #26 May 26, 2012 at 2:17 pm
    Patty commented:
    If the election were today, Obama would likely win 247 electoral votes to Romney’s 206, according to an Associated Press analysis of polls…

    I don’t trust most polls anymore…Obama keeps sinking himself everyday so I wonder if they are trying to make Obama “look” like he has a good chance of winning in case they can cheat at the polls and have Obama win, GOD FORBID, AGAIN, I SAY GOD FORBID!!! Because when Obama has campaigned very few supporters are showing up! 🙂 Thank God; Answer to prayer!

  • Limousine Barry

    I am speaking for the Democratic Socialist of America. We need to take money from the working and give it to the non-working. It’s that simple.

    It’s a circle. If we take money from the Taxpayer and give it to the welfare people… like my aunt Zeituni, there will be more welfare recipients. Hence, there will be more need for bureaucrats like me to server the welfare recipients. It’s the circle of politics!

    Government has three roles in my wealth redistribution program. One, it should take money from the Taxpayer and give it to the Black Panther Party – they keep the voters in line. Two, it should take money from the Taxpayer and give it to Professor Bill Ayers – he is good with explosive change. Three, it should take money from the Taxpayer and give it to me. I need re-election money!

    My dope dealer is waiting out side with a big bag of weed. He can’t say around long… the police might spot him. And he needs his money and I need my dope. I cannot answer any more questions. Good day.

  • bg


    Linda #37 May 26, 2012 at 6:32 pm

    as far as i’m concerned, they already have..

    Islamists are influencing Obama policy, Sharia is accepted in courts, Ground Zero Mosque is open, National Prayer Day is taboo, etc.. 🙁

    more links..


  • atticcellar

    Woodrow Wilson > IRS and FED > Great Depression > Pearl Harbor + Nazi Germany > Prescott Bush > Operation Paperclip > CIA > George Bush > 911 > Too Big to Fail Bankster Crisis > Barack Huesien Obama > The plan is working just as planned on Jekyell Island… The end game is here folks.. BE PREPARED!

  • Indiana

    Our psychopath in chief recreates himself every morning when he gets up. Muslim one day, Christian the next. Born in Kenya one day, in Hawaii the next. Hates equity firms one day, plays equity contributor the next. Someone is writing Obama’s lines….and he’s just reading them. He’s not got a clue as to who he is, or what he stands for. He’s a figment of his own imagination. He’s the airheaded cheerleader on the side of the football field that wants to take credit for the team win away from the players and coaches…..or hysterically blame the referees or the weather for the loss. He’s starting to resemble Anna Nichole Smith, dilusional, addicted to enablers he’s surrounded himself with, believing the smoke that his hangerson are blowing up his ass.

  • Pingback: 1996 AD: Obama Event Sponsored by Socialist Group – John Malcolm()

  • Sickofobama

    #11: Great read. Where did you get your stuff? I need to pass it onto to some libtards.

  • Patty

    OT sort of:

    Obama Should Blame Himself, Not The Court

    Sometime in the next month, the United States Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of Obama’s individual mandate, the provision forcing everyone in the United States to buy health insurance. Based on how badly this provision was defeated in the oral arguments, it will likely be struck down as unconstitutional. If the law’s most popular provision, the ban on excluding pre-existing conditions, is also struck down, Obama has nobody to blame but himself. Obama campaigned against the individual mandate. In fact, it’s the issue he won the nomination on. Obama said four years ago: “The main difference between… READ MORE:

    In the same them of his socialization of our health

  • Patty


    On this Memorial Day, WHY THIS REACTION?

    Effete: affected, overrefined, and ineffectual; see “Chris Hayes.” OK, I appended the name of the MSNBC host to the dictionary definition. But if ever you wanted to see the human embodiment of the adjective in action, have a look at the video from his MSNBC show this morning of the too-refined-by-half Hayes explaining why he is “uncomfortable” in calling America’s fallen military members “heroes.”

    Hayes is worried that doing so is “rhetorically proximate” to justifications for more war. Oh, the rhetorical proximity! View the video after the jump.

    please read on and watch video

    Read more:

    Chris Hayes: I’m ‘Uncomfortable’ Calling Fallen Military ‘Heroes’

    Read more:

  • Patty

    In Dispraise of Communitarianism

    Communitarians are a diverse group of philosophers and social and political activists who believe that the purpose of society is to uphold and sustain community life. If there is any unity in communitarian thought, it comes from its opposition to classical liberalism’s claim that attaining and maintaining freedom and justice should be the central and primary concern of the political order. Communitarians oppose the strict application of abstract and universal rules to persons who vary widely in their personal and social characteristics and circumstances in favor of personal justice and a legal framework that consists of particular laws and outcome-based justice being applied to specific persons or groups.

    Communitarians argue that man basically is not a rights-bearing, property-seeking, individual, but rather is a social being who can only thrive in stable associations and communities. They state that the individual is a construction or invention that appeared late in human history, preceded by the community, without which he cannot exist. They are convinced that liberal public philosophy is destroying the social underpinnings of the “good society” and lament that most modern men fail to acknowledge the existence of, and the obligation to seek, a comprehensive common good that transcends one’s personal interests. They are united by their common fear that the realization that we are bound by shared purposes, values, traditions, and obligations is being replaced with an atomistic, Hobbesian individualism that upholds individual rights at the expense of camaraderie, social cohesion, and the pursuit of the common good. Communitarians complain that modern society has become a place of uncaring individualism, social disintegration, and amoral relativism where men elevate their personal interests above the common good.

    Their conclusion tends to be that a return to past forms of community is both possible and morally desirable. Preferring to look backward, they reason that if we can find virtue in the past, then its attainment in the future would then be deemed possible. Heartened by this possibility, they enthusiastically promote an effort to restore the notion of responsibility and to establish a balance between both rights and responsibility and individual and community.
    Read on:

  • Patty

    The Redistribution President

    Tyranny comes in many forms. This President dresses as Robin Hood and confiscates that which isn’t his to shore up a constituency. When will people wake up to the fact that liberals have enslaved us to its wants and desires. They want to spend, they tax. They want an entitlement, they tax. They need a political scapegoat, they pin it on the rich. When 47% of our country does not pay a dime in tax, liberals continue to confiscate the fruits of the wealthy’s labor through the tax code.

    Liberals are buying a constituency through enslavement of income earners and dependency of the poor/uneducated. This immoral treatment of the American people is downright pathetic.

  • Pingback: Obama Pushed ‘Redistribution’ at Historic Socialists Meeting in 1996 |

  • GP Fan

    #11 May 26, 2012 at 11:47 am, Multitude

    That was one great post! That should be a front page article somewhere!


    communist/liar/socialist/marxist/—stand-up and vote this fraud out, 2012 can’t come soon enough,

  • Patty


    Incumbent Presidents enter a reelection campaign with a number of distinct advantages. The command a bully pulpit, able to make news and usually dictate the issues the public is discussing. They can use the levers of power to direct federal spending and initiatives to certain parts of the country. They can generally attract far more campaign donors, giving them the ability to out-spend their opponent. And, more importantly, they’ve already built the coalitions and alliances necessary for victory. If they are Democrats, they have the added bonus of a compliant media who will deflect criticism and cast negative attention on their opponent. And yet, Obama is very likely to lose in November. [..]

    READ More

  • A.Men

    puppet obama has his strings pulled by Soros. Dumb crack-head will be thrown out of the White House 2012!

  • Militant Conservative

    Patty Obama has a huge problem.

    We are living his polcies and 88 million are out

    Of work. He’s A proven liar and just plain

    unqualified for the position. Affirmative

    action hire indeed. NOTUS!

  • snap boy

    What it takes to “create a productive community” is to require that all members of the group produce rather than live off the work of others.

  • Pingback: Yes, it is » Cold Fury()

  • Pingback: 1001 Reasons to Vote Against Barack Obama – Part VI()

  • Pingback: JB Williams — Obama in a Word, Unsustainable « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL()

  • Pingback: Creator of Barack Obama & Founder of Socialist New Party– Joel Rogers | The Busy Post()