Figures. Big Sis Warned Us About Suspicious Men in Hoodies!

It figures.
Trayvon Martin was reportedly targeted by community watchman George Zimmerman because he was wearing a hoodie.

So how did Zimmerman ever get the idea that someone in a hoodie might be suspicious?
From the Obama Administration, of course.

Last March Homeland Security released the controversial video, “If You See Something, Say Something (TM)”.
In the video the bad guys planting bombs… wear hoodies.

Hat Tip Ed

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • ebayer

    Good job Ed!

  • bg


    excellent 911 tape recording

    ht Patty

    Evidence that Trayvon Martin Doubled Back


  • Joanne

    A forsensic expert is stating that the calls for help heard on the 911 call were not Zimmerman’s.

  • bigkahuna

    I always knew that Skank was a racist lipstick wearing pig…. Typical Obama adminsitration official. Racist, tax cheat, socialist, commie, race baitor, thief, scumbag, secretive, liar, slimeball. I think that covers most of them but Im sure I missed a few

    Not to mention they have Moochelle the Leech in chief .

  • el polacko

    as more evidence of how this story is media-driven, this whole hoodie meme originated with geraldo’s much-maligned yet accurate observation that skulking about, dressed like a thug, has the potential to attract trouble. it was after this comment that, suddenly, the clothing description made in zimmerman’s 911 call became an ‘issue’. the idiots marching around, and appearing on the floor of congress, in the hoodies are responding to geraldo rivera, not george zimmerman.

  • proof

    Yes, but were they carrying Skittles?

  • bigkahuna

    Sorry Barry is Leech in Chief.

    Moochelle is the First Leech !

  • Pingback: Big Sis Warned Us About Suspicious Men in Hoodies!()

  • lizzy84

    Denninger on the case:

    { }
    As I have repeatedly said in the Martin/Zimmerman case, and will continue to, there is one, and only one, issue with regard to whether Mr. Zimmerman should be charged and prosecuted.

    It does not matter whether Zimmerman called the cops 47 times in the last year.
    It does not matter if Zimmerman is or not a racist.
    It does not matter if Martin is or is not a thug.
    It does not matter if the two of them had words.
    It does not matter who pursued who (and check the timeline on this one; it’s interesting.)
    It does not matter if Martin was challenged by Zimmerman.
    It does not even matter if they got into a fistfight over their words.

    What matters is this, and only this:

    At the time Zimmerman shot Martin, was he or was he not pinned on the ground and being repeatedly assaulted by Martin such that he had a reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily injury?

    If the answer is “Yes” then the shoot is good and everything else is immaterial.

    If the answer is “No” then, and only then, can one look at any of the above otherwise-immaterial factors, as the shooting is not justified.

    It appears that while in this specific case the people may not yet be waking up, in the general case they already have, and are rejecting the faux “news” that the media invents and tries to use to attempt to disarm the people and deprive them of their unalienable rights, just as was done in Germany prior to Kristallnacht.

    Spot on, sir!

    more here:

  • Monkey Wrench


    I mostly agree with you. But I have one question.

    What if some guy who is wearing a gun on his hip comes up and picks a fight with you? He’s bigger than you and thinks he can take you without the gun. You try to avoid the fight, but he doesn’t let you and he even throws the first punch. Then it turns out that you are a better fighter and you get the best of him. At what point is the guy with the gun allowed to shoot you?

  • bg
  • bg


    Monkey Wrench #10 April 1, 2012 at 3:29 pm

    just listen to the unedited 911 tape..

    also note he never says f’ing coons either..

    damn media (fitb)..


  • Rock

    Monkey Wrench #10

    OK, now your the guy on the bottom whats your solution. Also understand it pretty obvious at this point Pravda version of events have been edited to fit the narrative.

  • Rock

    Big Sis Warned Us About Suspicious Men in Hoodies!

    Someone quick, tell Sharpton big Sis is a Raciest.

  • Pingback: Figures. Big Sis Warned Us About Suspicious Men in Hoodies! | Born Conservative()

  • lizzy84

    Monkey Wrench–

    .. I believe that most States provide that a person who is the initial aggressor in an altercation may not avail themselves of a self defense argument. Under the scenario you posit, since the person with the gun started the fight, use of the gun is unjustified, even if he’s losing.The problem is, of course, determining factually, who is the initial aggressor.

  • bg


    re: #11 April 1, 2012 at 3:50 pm bg

    Second witness confirms Trayvon was attacker

    [In addition, an eyewitness, 13-year-old Austin Brown, told
    police he saw a man fitting Zimmerman’s description lying
    on the grass moaning and crying for help
    just seconds before
    he heard the gunshot that killed Martin.]


  • Monkey Wrench

    Yeah, bg.

    I saw that website you posted on the other thread. Lots of good info. Good stuff.

    I don’t have an opinion on whether Zimmerman committed a crime. The prosecutor and/or grand jury will decide if he should be charged. If he’s charged, a jury will decide if he’s guilty.

    And for the record, I think Sharpton and Jackson are contemptible. At this point Zimmerman is an innocent man. He hasn’t even been charged with a crime, but they’ve already concluded that he is guilty. That’s wrong and they should be ashamed of themselves.

    And what is worse, they are exciting the local population to feel like a great injustice is taking place. If someone gets hurt, they bear some of the responsibility. They probably aren’t legally responsible, but they are morally responsible.

  • Rock

    lizzy84 #16

    True, on all points, unfortunately the media is doing everything possible to muddy the waters and contaminate the jury pool.

  • wanumba

    With NBC presenting a false account of the dispatcher conversation, this was deliberately misleading the public in a way that is harmful and prejudicial against Zimmerman.

    ABC overlaid their logo over Zimmerman’s head to confound viewing his head for possible evidence of wounds.

    I hope Zimmerman takes these filthy liars, and he rest of the lynch-media gang to court. They are trying to get him killed by mob.