Rush Limbaugh Posts Apology to 30 Year-Old Georgetown Activist


Rush said this earlier this week–
Sandra Fluke is going to be just fine. In fact, I would be surprised if it isn’t long before she runs for Congress, with the announcement ceremony with Pelosi and Steny Hoyer.

Tonight Rush Limbaugh posted this apology to 30 year-old activist Sandra Fluke.

For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.

I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious political times, we are discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress. I personally do not agree that American citizens should pay for these social activities. What happened to personal responsibility and accountability? Where do we draw the line? If this is accepted as the norm, what will follow? Will we be debating if taxpayers should pay for new sneakers for all students that are interested in running to keep fit?In my monologue, I posited that it is not our business whatsoever to know what is going on in anyone’s bedroom nor do I think it is a topic that should reach a Presidential level.

My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.

Rush is a class act. Maybe the left will apologize sometime for all of their outrageous attacks.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Tom in CA

    I have a friend who just broke up with his girlfriend. I wonder if she makes housecalls?

  • Tocoloro

    She is still a slute and a prostitute

  • AuntieMadder

    Atta-boys to Rush for doing the right thing.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    OT

    Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.

    The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”. The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.

    The journal’s editor, Prof Julian Savulescu, director of the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, said the article’s authors had received death threats since publishing the article. He said those who made abusive and threatening posts about the study were “fanatics opposed to the very values of a liberal society”.

    The article, entitled “After-birth abortion: Why should the baby live?”, was written by two of Prof Savulescu’s former associates, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.

    They argued: “The moral status of an infant is equivalent to that of a fetus in the sense that both lack those properties that justify the attribution of a right to life to an individual.”

    Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’ in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.

    “We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived of this existence represents a loss to her.”

    As such they argued it was “not possible to damage a newborn by preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person in the morally relevant sense”.

    The authors therefore concluded that “what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled”.

    They also argued that parents should be able to have the baby killed if it turned out to be disabled without their knowing before birth, for example citing that “only the 64 per cent of Down’s syndrome cases” in Europe are diagnosed by prenatal testing.

    Once such children were born there was “no choice for the parents but to keep the child”, they wrote.

    “To bring up such children might be an unbearable burden on the family and on society as a whole, when the state economically provides for their care.”

    However, they did not argue that some baby killings were more justifiable than others – their fundamental point was that, morally, there was no difference to abortion as already practised.

    They preferred to use the phrase “after-birth abortion” rather than “infanticide” to “emphasise that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus”. …..

    http://www.brutallyhonest.org/brutally_honest/2012/03/throwing-down-the-gauntlet.html

  • wtd
  • Tamminator

    Rush, you just let down Breitbart.
    Never back down to leftist propoganda.
    NEVER>

  • Ian

    NOOOOOOOO!

  • ebayer

    Huh?!?

  • Sarge

    What’s next on the liberal list? We keep apologizing, we keep losing.

  • DaMav

    She got far more than she deserved but Rush reminded the world that Conservatives have grace and honor

  • Ruready?

    Rush is trustworthy. “Don’t doubt me.”

  • MADgirl91

    Rush had to do it to make his comment “old news”.

  • When does Palin and her daughters get their apologies?The same people who are now crying about Rush’s remarks,had no problem when Palin and her young daughters where called far worst names than this Miss. Flute.

  • RedstateRed

    Aww, Rushbo. Say it ain’t so.

  • Militant Conservative

    She’s still a ho and a cheap trick.

    Just burying bad rubbish, even if it’s true.

    Liberals are human trash, they have no honor.

    Powder is dry

  • Sorry to Live in Illinois

    FYI….We just lost. It’s over. First Brietbart, and now this. A sad day to be a conservative.

    And Bill Maher – I DID cancel my sponsorship to HBO….because of you. I don’t miss it one bit.

  • She’s objectively a slut demanding others pay for her sexual activities. No apology was needed or called for here. She should be named and shamed, because she apparently has no shame.

    This entire controversy is an attempt to get people to forget how pissed they are at having the government health insurance takeover act rammed down their throats to begin with.

  • myohmy

    Cave in?

  • donh

    Rush went to far asking for sex tapes of Fluck making use of birth control….but look at how the government media complex has siezed upon this to take Rush down. They have been waiting and waiting for an opportunity like this to come. Rush has been shunned and ignored by the party for years until that one moment he really steps in it, and they come for his head…..but Obama NEVER goes to far. The Rino Democrat political class alliance against conservative religious free people is consolidating its power . Apology won’t save him. Effective critics of the New World DisOrder must be silenced !

  • chilipalmer

    I’m stunned that Rush did this. He had nothing to apologize for. The sole purpose of the left is to silence voices on the right and Rush just gave them a grand slam home run. This makes it almost impossible for the rest of us. The left has hundreds of thousands of people who work around the clock getting advertisers to quit conservative voices. They will always win because they have the money and numbers. Rush has said himself never apologize because it will get much worse for you. The GOP has to be thrilled about this too. They hate talk radio. With this apology, the left is now going to every advertiser at his local stations. This is how they got rid of Imus.

  • regularguy

    Class act out of Rush, but it still is infuriating that this 30 year old con artist can manage to get center stage before Congress to plead a ridiculous case for government to siphon the property of some to subsidize or finance the intimate behavior of others. All for the purpose of diverting attention away from the utter disaster that liberals are deliberately making of the economy. Liberals have no intention of giving an inch in making Obamacare a single-payer, single provider health care program at the expense of the free market and liberty.

  • jony101

    rush is no better than obama, he needs to be a man and stand for what he says. Now he is just an apologist just like obama.

  • juandos

    I imagine that Limbaugh’s phone was ringing off the hook from people who advertise on his show…

    I’m guessing Limbaugh (who wasn’t lying about his descriptions of the slut) had to cave and apologize…

  • Pingback: Rush Limbaugh Posts Apology to 30 Year-Old Georgetown Activist()

  • Hank

    Very bad move, Rush. She is a scumbag. Truth is the truth. RETRACT….

  • Carbon Pootprint

    Does this mean the “War on Women” is over and we can get back to talking about how the filth in New York and DC are raping the country and Obama and Holder aren’t sending anyone to jail for it?

  • Jim

    I’m hugely disappointed in Rush, he should have stood his ground against the FemiNazi’s.

  • thenabrd

    this makes me wonder just exactly what was in the package that caused the bomb squad to come to his house. i know he “explained” the circumstances on friday, but refused to say what was in the package, saying it was too disgusting or some such words to talk about on air. this apology may be for an entirely different reason than what they are reporting. remember this is the proglibtard main stream media. i’m sure on monday, he’ll “explain” things in the only way he can.

    sorry, i just find the timing of the bomb squad coming to his house for a package that ended up having a “i won’t talk about the contents on air” situation and this apology today more than a bit suspicious!!

  • Taqiyyotomist

    OT

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/sheriff-joes-posse-probable-cause-obama-certificate-a-fraud/

    Go there. Watch the first five short videos.

    America HAS BEEN HAD.

    Most of you knew this already, but the videos at this WND link will explain it to those who don’t believe it, in slow, easy-to-understand speech, as if Mr. Fred Rogers was explaining it on Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood.

    America HAS BEEN HAD. Bent over and Fluked. As it were.

  • Beef

    Maybe the left will apologize sometime for all of their outrageous attacks.

    Never. Owning the media means never having to say you’re sorry.

    Rush got played like a fiddle. The Obama campaign is calling the tune and all the Republicans are dancing to it.

    We need to savvy up and get in the game. Keep the focus on Obama’s failures and lies. He’s out there today taking credit for the increased domestic oil production that his administration has does everything in their power to suppress, and we are still being beat with a Fluke over contraception! Focus people!

  • TheManCalledBob

    I thought Rush Limbaugh,at least, would have the balls to call a slut a slut and leave it at that. Rush, if you read blogs, I’m just lettin’ you know I’m with ya,brother. First thing you’ve said that I actually strongly agree with,actually.

    We have to be free to make these types of comments, whether or not you agree with them. We live in a strange time where people are persecuted or punished for things they SAY. Popular speech, the most vapid and intellectually-devoid kind, is the only kind we allow aired in public anymore because everybody except for white men has a multi-million dollar lobby designed to retaliate against and harass anyone who crunches the eggshells a little too loudly when they tiptoe past with an innocent common-sense comment like “If you’re having so much sex you can’t afford it, you’re a slut.”.

    Someone needs to stand their ground. And we,the people, if we know what’s good for us, need to support that person vigorously.

  • bg

    ++

    [My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be
    humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms.
    Fluke for the insulting word choices.]

    that’s what i figured, anyone who knows RL knows it wasn’t meant to be taken “personally”, after all, like someone else previously stated, he is an “entertainer”..

    now what i want to know is, when are the leftists like Maher, Daily or Behar going to apologize to all whom they’ve intentionally insulted day in and day out over the years??

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    i’m thinking maybe the “wife” may have had some say in this..
    but who knows for certain. he could have received an offer he
    couldn’t refuse via Rahm-alama-ding-dong-town..

    ==

  • Matt

    A class act who was losing sponsors, lol. Absurdity with the absurd, ya. One of you rednecks called a woman close to me those names I’d knock out your one tooth.

  • bg
  • FurryGuy

    #34 March 3, 2012 at 9:52 pm
    a jackass brayed:

    So much drivel in so few words. Amazing how someone can be so filled with hate.

    One, do you have any proof that Rush is losing sponsors. Put up, or shut up. Opinion isn’t fact, period, and all you spewed was unsubstantiated opinion.

    Two, so typical of a liberal Leftist pansy-ass douchebag to threaten violence over mere words. Nothing new from people who accuse those who believe differently as being criminals, terrorists, demons, and devils without a shred of proof to back up the assertions.

  • a former dem

    I understand Carbonite’s CEO called this woman “courageous” and then dropped his ads from Rush’s show. I don’t care for Rush’s show, but I don’t care for this clear manipulation by the dems and the left on this whole issue.
    So, I urge anyone and everyone to drop Carbonite, there are other data storage PC services without santimous CEO who’ll have no problems running their ads on MSNBC where conservative women are called “sluts” all the time, and not a peep from these santimounous advertisers on the double standard.

  • Ladue Pundit

    Matt commented:
    “A class act who was losing sponsors, lol. Absurdity with the absurd, ya. One of you rednecks called a woman close to me those names I’d knock out your one tooth.”

    I hear the only sponsor Rush lost was a mattress company–how fitting.

    Matt, if there’s a woman close to you who goes in front of congress on national TV to demand insurance companies give her free contraceptives, you’re spending too much time in the gutter.

    Your president called the family of a terrorist and the family of a trollop to apologize. Brian Terry’s family, who lost him to Fast & Furious, never got a call from Obama and never will.

  • DPittelli

    Rush was an idiot, handing ammunition to his (and conservatism’s) enemies. He has also made this woman’s career, so ironically, she should be thanking him, and he should also be apologizing to all conservatives for his own-goal.

  • donh

    The Republican establishment is succeeding in their corrupt cram down of Rmoney…and in the process to once and for all move this party over to the dark side of tyranny they are taking down the AM radio voices ..

    Its one thing to have a bunch of weepy clowns like Boehner running the show…but these killer clowns only feign ineptitude at succeeding your conservtive agenda because their real skill is their cunning and ruthless ability to CRUSH people who won’t go along with the evil plans. …. subverting your sovereignty to New World Order socialism. Republicans can take down Rush in 3 days, but they never have any power to stop Obama…….>>> http://youtu.be/gd6rRsYnMWA

  • the $3000 that Flunk is referring to is the 3 year cost of “YAZ”, the most expensive contraception known to medical science. . . .why not the much cheaper generics we all are forced to take? what about just taking the regular “Pill” for about $15/month? Why not take advantage of IUD’s which are a one shot cost of $75. . .good for up to 7 years? Why not use the “sponge” for about $10/month?. . .Why not use spermicidal gels, foams, cremes, or even cheaper yet. . .FREE CONDOMS. . .AVAILABLE FOR THE ASKING AT UNIVERSITY DISPENSARIES, FREE CLINICS, AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD?. . .FREE, FREE, FREE, FREE. . . WHY try to force US, the TAX-PAYER to PAY for the MOST EXPENSIVE form of Birth Control? Are their Vaginas snobs too? get over yourself Sister. . .use the FREE Contraceptives readily available simply for the asking.

  • bg

    ++

    i personally believe it takes more balls to apologize than it is to insult..

    so to all those socialist “entertainers” who purposefully go out of
    their way to insult conservatives day after day, where are yours??

    ==

  • Pingback: Rush Limbaugh Posts Apology to 30 Year-Old Georgetown Activist | ()

  • Ladue Pundit

    Will, Will. This is not really about contraceptives. It’s about control. The majority of women vote Democrat and this is why; they are more like Sandra Fluke than Sarah Palin.

    These women think they’re “free.” They look at conservative Christian women and think they’re the ones being controlled. Look at the men who bolster feminists–Bill Clinton, the sex addict; Barack Obama, who called his grandchildren “punishments;” Scott Brown, who offered his daughter to the crowd on election night. These are the type of men who don’t respect women.

    The truth is, loose women are weak. If they haven’t had at least one abortion, or the clap, they have genital warts. Their bodies are their baggage. Single women on birth control for years on end is a health disaster–both mental and physical. These are not empowered women.

  • Rush just killed his 99.8% always right ratio because he was right about this whore, yeah I said it, she’s a whore because she bent over for the Democrat Party in abliging the Party for doing her bit for “women’s health” like Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Boxer claimed. No, Rush was wrong for apologizing, he had nothing to apologize for and the reason is either she’s so stupid that she can’t stoop to getting her birth control pills at Wal Mart, but instead goes to some pharmacy and pays full price for what she could get at Wal Mart for $9.00 a script. And what else does she attach this $3,000 dollar a year cost for birth control pills? Is she including going to the doctor to?

    None of any of that makes for anything because either she’s sick and needs birth control pills for what ails her, but she didn’t say that, she said “sex”, or she IS having so much sex that she’s running up that much of a bill doing something else because she could only take one pill a day, so she must be lieing about both things. So she’s a liar to!!

    I am shocked that Rush would ever apologize about anything he called anyone. I think there is something else to this so-called “apology” that we will get the scoop on come Monday. He can’t mean it because he did hit the nail on the head about her.

    Where in the hell did the Democrats dig this slut up from anyway?? Do they have catagories of different kinds of activists who they can call anytime to come give testimony? I don’t get how they can just make a phone call and all these people just show up. I really makes me angry that we don’t have that kind of thing, but maybe we do and we just don’t know it because we hardly ever get to use our people. Of course that’s crap. We don’t have people, the left does. Do you know why? Because like the Communist North Vietnamese, they had ther cause, we didn’t, we were in defensive positions with offensive operations from time to time.

    I think every person who can, who is a follower of Rush needs to call into somewhere, to somebody and tell them that, we don’t apologize!! We still say she’s a slut!! But, see we don’t count. Only somebody like a Rush Limbaugh counts, not the people of this nation who are on the side of the Constitution!!

  • Voice of Reason

    I heard Rush that day and he was making an excellent point on the subject, but, I’m sorry, he then did an Ed Schultz and/or Bill Maher. No matter how low the liberals/Democrat will go, we cannot let them prod us into acting like them because, as have pointed out, the media will use it to stir things up and tell the world how bad conservatives are. If a liberal does it, its not news, or not that big a deal or not reported with the same intensity. But when a Republican/conservative does it, they throw gasoline on the little spark and cry bloody murder. And we all know Rush apologized because his bossess told him to.

  • Timwi

    So why aren’t we organizing and calling Carbonite en masse for advertising on the Ed Schultz show? Did you know the CEO of Carbonite canceled advertising for Rush, but feels that Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingram a slut is perfectly fine? If you have Carbonite you might want to cancel it because the only name calling the CEO of Carbonite likes is left wing name calling.

  • Dien Cai Dau

    You go ahead and hold your breath and wait for the socialist liberals to apologize.
    Ill wait here and watch the smurf explosion when ya’ll do.

  • Occidental Tourist

    Folks,
    Come on, there is no evidence the woman is a
    “slut” or a “ho,” and how clealry can we denote what that is.

    Rush was doing what many specious pundits do: cast flimsy aspersions on someone who happens to disagree with you. Many people on both sides of the political landscape do, and it isn’t right at any time. While Rush could try to poke holes in her stance, he has nothing empirically upon which to base such a ridiculous epithet. It is juvenile to be quite frank.

    I understand that it is hard to have so much air time and be responsible all the time, but he clearly is reckless more than your average demagoguic bear.

    I offer this respectfully and with a consistent idealogical base— i similarly get upset when Maher makes fun of Rush’s girth, as if that has something to do with his inane right-wing chicanery.

    So, Militant Conservative, I guess you were a virgin when you got married?
    Congrats.

  • James

    Now when is obama going to apologize to the Catholic Church.

  • #4 Taqiyyotomist,

    If you know your Bible you know what it says about the end times. It says that it will be time when children are hated and murdered. Sure abortions have been going on since the 70’s legally, but back alley forever. But now the left is calling being pregnant, having a health problem. That’s where they get that crap about protecting women’s health, they’re talking about abortions being avoided by the issuence of birth control pills…..free! That way even more women will take advantage of them since they won’t have to spend any money on them, let alone a few bucks at Wal Mart. They could have them delivered or mailed to their homes or apartments by US mail or UPS. That way they wouldn’t have to suffer like this girl said she did when she found out that her insurance didn’t cover the cost of birth control pills, she said she was “so imbarrassed” when she had to leave without them.

    Ohhhh, booohooo! What a bunch of crap! I don’t have sympathy for leftist women’s libber’s who from what I remember about her type were holding a whole box of aspirin’s between their legs. You couldn’t get in there if you used dynamite!

  • And she looks the type to, a real tight bitc*, who wouldn’t let you touch her if you were covered in gold dust, and you know where. She looks like she’s frigid anyway.

  • #50 James,

    Oh but James, don’t you know that the left is always right? And if you’re right then you have nothing to apologize about. That’s why I’m saying that there’s got to be something else about Rush apologizing to this slut, protestitute.

  • Bubba

    Why apologize to this man hating bull dyke? Is it just me, or does she look like that she-beast Rosie O’Donnell?

    Someone should tell this SLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLUUUUUUUUUUUUT that you can’t get pregnant having strap on sex with plaid shirt wearing she-beasts. Why is she blowing her money on the pill???

  • lizzy84

    @#50

    Better still James, when is oBama going to apologize to me?

  • kato

    Limbaugh should have used an inoffensive term, like “trailer trash.” Except the useful idiot from Georgetown probably didn’t come from the working class.

    Even though she may be a working girl.

  • Johnny “Stanford” Davis

    S***** Fluke can thank Rush for launching her political career.

    Why does Rush like to help liberal losers so much? F***k was a nobody and then Rush made her famous.

  • Taqiyyotomist

    #51 Will

    Excellent comment, thank you.

    Except this: … they wouldn’t have to suffer like this girl said she did when she found out that her insurance didn’t cover the cost of birth control pills, she said she was “so imbarrassed” when she had to leave without them.

    It has been proven, by her own words, that she enrolled at Georgetown for the specific reason that they didn’t provide what she wanted in their health plan. She CHOSE to attend this particular university so that she could perform this deceitful “activism”, which activity is pretty much all anyone can DO with a “Gender Studies” degree.

  • lizzy84

    #56
    @kato commented.

    Exactly..it’s all about that one word, slut. The Left latched onto it to foment its typical false outrage because they don’t ever want to discuss the actual issue because they know they will lose the argument. They just want to shut you up.

  • Pingback: Rush Limbaugh Posts Apology to 30 Year-Old Georgetown Activist |()

  • Ladue Pundit

    Occidental Tourist commented:
    Folks,
    Come on, there is no evidence the woman is a
    “slut”
    ^^^^^^^^
    The evidence came out of her own mouth.

    She spends thousand$ on contraceptives. She’s not married. She brazenly demands free birth control. What else do you call a shameless, serial sex participant?

  • Tocoloro

    I propose a boycott of HBO due to the views of “pig” Bill Maher on cable.
    Lets cancel subscriptions on HBOnow!

  • #58 Taqiyyotomist,

    That’s right, I forgot about that point that was coming out about her, that she did enroll at Georgetown just for the specific reason that it didn’t cover contraception in the student insurance. What a bitc*! Only a bitc* would do something like that, but then again it’s Saul Alinsky Rules For Radicals, rule number whatever, “the end justifies the means” and whatever means you can use to justify the end is okay. That means that if you need to enroll at a expensive college, and what did she care anyway, the organization was probably paying for it from all the women’s libber contributions, if you have to go someplace like that to show that the rich, greedy, insurance companies don’t care about women’s needs, no matter what amount of sex she is having, then it’s a justified means to an end. And the end is bringing down the insurance companies, significantly altering their policy, or costing them a hell of a lot of money, then there you go.

  • Jeffery

    Yikes. Rush threw Jim and you guys under the bus in a hurry, didn’t he? I guess $50 million a year is just too much to risk.

  • Larry Rasczak

    Sandra Fluke is going to be fine? Heck I heard she has already been offered summer internship at Clinton Presidential Library!! Apparently she’s also gotten similar offers from the law firms of Former New York Governor Elliot Spitzer and Former Representative Anthony Weiner, John Edwards is said to be very anxious to discuss some ideas he has regarding a position for Fluke with his defense team, and Gary Hart has supposedly expressed interest in having Fluke work under him at his think tank. She’s also been offered a “free ride” at the John F. Kennedy School of Government in Massachusetts, AND the Ted Kennedy Oral History Project at the University of Virginia. Apparently the only Democratic politician that doesn’t want to hire her is Barney Frank.

  • Matt

    Rush must be really scared of the defamation lawsuit.

    Hell, he had one of his minions write an apology.

    Why doesn’t he say this on air? That is where he slandered her.

  • Pingback: Rush Limbaugh Posts Apology to 30… | BlogPings()

  • bg
  • jorgen

    There is no proof of her being a prostitute. She is a slut and she is a lying propagandist. No wonder Obama was proud of her.

  • JimmyT

    Rush was over the top on this one. I’m glad he apologized. BUT, I will also cancel my Carbonite subscription. If that company is willing to advertise on the left wing programs with all the nasty stuff they said about Palin and other conservatives, then their moral compass is not pointing in my direction.

  • Redwine

    #47 March 3, 2012 at 10:33 pm
    Timwi commented:

    So why aren’t we organizing and calling Carbonite en masse for advertising on the Ed Schultz show? Did you know the CEO of Carbonite canceled advertising for Rush, but feels that Ed Schultz calling Laura Ingram a slut is perfectly fine? If you have Carbonite you might want to cancel it because the only name calling the CEO of Carbonite likes is left wing name calling.

    Let’s call out the astounding hypocrisy of Carbonite’s CEO Friend: http://www.carbonite.com/en/about/contact-us

  • #46 I so agree with you. and better to get this out of the way.

  • Pingback: Rush Limbaugh Posts Apology to 30 Year-Old Georgetown Activist | Liberal Whoppers()

  • JIMBOSTER

    Well, Rush did the honorable thing. He was losing advertisers left and right, so he sold out as fast as he could.

  • wanumba

    I’m all for this. Now we can concentrate on the meat:

    Sandra Fluke, Leftist gender activist was organized over three years ago to enroll in Georgetown Uni, she says to challenge the school’s insurance plan, an absolutely perfect mesh with Obama’s public attack on the Catholic Church about a month ago.

    How much is she being paid? She has a scholarship? WHO pulled the strings to get that approved for her? Nancy Pelosi, one of the highest ranking Democratic Party officials has her back, Obama phones her.

    Just how long has this Democrat Party attack on the Catholic Church been in the planning?

  • Greg

    ATTENTION, FATALLY DELUSIONAL PEOPLE:

    1 – Taxpayers have not one penny to do with Georgetown University health care. It is a private school!!! Yeah. Let us try that one more time for the more hard-headed folk: GEORGETOWN IS A PRIVATE UNIVERSITY, NO TAXPAYER MONEY.

    2 – I cannot fathom why anyone should need to point this out in 2012, but it does not matter how much sex one has on the pill, the pill must be taken continuously everyday or IT DOES NOT WORK AT ALL.

    3 – These same insurance plans cover male erectile dysfunction pills, which are typically not actual medicine and are ONLY for sexual use. Not only that, but Rush has already admitted to using these pills, which are paid for by his insurance. Yes, Rush, the four-time husband with no children!!!! Just like Laura Ingraham, the 47-year-old woman with no children who has .

    4 – Birth control pills are not just birth control, they are also actual legit medicine for actual legit serious medical conditions. In fact, if you would have bothered to shut up and listen to someone else for 10 seconds, you would have realized by now that this is precisely what this woman talked about, as her roommate required surgery for one condition after she was unable to afford her MEDICINE.

    For crying out loud. It’s like no factual information can get through, because then you all would not get to stomp around like internet tough guys filled with furious anger based on the overt lies of a sad man who is paid over $50 million a year to lie to you. JOIN REALITY and show some self-respect for once, because if anybody, public or not, called your daughter or your sister or your whomever the names you life trolls persist in calling this woman, each and every one of you would revolt as if the world was ending.

    And what’s this? To treat other people fairly and properly, you need political compensation? WHAT??? One does not recoil from this sort of nonsense for gain, one does it because it’s right.

    Grow. Up.

  • No Man

    Liberty or Obama!

    Were Rush’s advertisers canceling?

    Okay, I cancel Limbaugh’s advertisers.

    Sell your stuff to some Obama-worshiping liar, not me.

    1. GU takes no US money, then why must GU pay for a morally objectionable act?

    2. You don’t need to have sex every day.

    3. “Candy’s dandy, but liquor’s quicker. Are there health insurance plans that buy cheap wine so I can loosen up my date?

    4. If BC pills are needed for a disease then it’s not a mortal sin.

    Greg, You is a Obama-worshiping moron. Nit wit!

  • Greg

    I in no way worship Obama, I respect women and women’s rights.

    And as I said already on #2, THE PILL MUST BE TAKEN EVERYDAY EVEN IF YOU NEVER HAVE SEX. How hard is this to comprehend? Are you really this thick?

    You are a useful idiot gone rogue now, solely for the purpose of fighting all reality.

    “OMG SHE WAS AN ACTIVIST, WHAT A HIDDEN DUPLICITOUS RUSE THEY PULLED!””

    Ummm… that was the very first thing she said in her statement. THE. VERY. FIRST. THING.

    “OMG RUSH SAID HE WOULD NEVER APOLOGIZE!!! HE LIED TO US!!!”

    Newsflash: All he has ever done is lie to you, especially on social issues, so you will vote for who his corporate masters want you to vote for, so they can pass legislation to cheat you dry financially.

    Grow. Up.

  • wanumba

    #76 March 4, 2012 at 5:24 am
    Greg commented:

    ATTENTION, FATALLY DELUSIONAL PEOPLE:

    1 – Taxpayers have not one penny to do with Georgetown University health care. It is a private school!!! Yeah. Let us try that one more time for the more hard-headed folk: GEORGETOWN IS A PRIVATE UNIVERSITY, NO TAXPAYER MONEY.

    ::::::::::::::::::::

    The Supreme Court ruled that private Hillsdale College if they received even ONE PENNY of a federal student LOAN or GRANT then Hillsdale HAD to comply with all federal regulations. Hillsdale then refused all federally-derived student loans and grants and students were directed to a 100% private student loan source for assistance.

    Does Georgetown accept federal student aid the loans and grants applied for by the individual students themselves?

    You are aware that OBAMACARE nationalized the student loan sector? A strange healthcare priority.

  • Greg

    Oh yeah… and while we’re at it, shall I post a list of how all your favorite Catholic blowhards on the issue like Santorum and Ingraham cherry pick which Catholic teachings they adhere to and which ones they speak out against?

    Nobody is doing a single thing to any religion. And even if they were, religion is not infallible.

    God is God. Religion is man-made for man’s purposes by man.

  • Greg

    @ wanumba:

    “The Supreme Court ruled that private Hillsdale College if they received even ONE PENNY of a federal student LOAN or GRANT then Hillsdale HAD to comply with all federal regulations. Hillsdale then refused all federally-derived student loans and grants and students were directed to a 100% private student loan source for assistance.”

    Aaaaaaaaand… ???

    The point is taxpayer money is not going to pay for her birth control, that is a flagrant lie.

    And ummmmmm, complying with the rules when you TAKE TAXPAYER MONEY is very simple – don’t take it and you can do whatever you want.

    Oh wait… churches already exist entirely tax-free and still do whatever they want.

  • Greg

    It’s like… do ANY OF YOU question ANYTHING you are told EVER?

    Would it hurt you to question something?

    Would it hurt you to think for yourself? To be fair and as super duper wonderful as you claim to be as religious people?

    Would it hurt anyone here to ACTUALLY follow the teachings of your religion?

    No…. instead you call women sluts and boo the golden rule.

    If God saw you coming down the street, he would duck into a shoe shop to hide. You embarrass and disgrace him.

  • Greg

    We are all made in God’s image… sheesh, IF ONLY.

    Disgraceful.

  • wanumba

    #78 March 4, 2012 at 6:51 am
    Greg commented:
    ewsflash: All he has ever done is lie to you, especially on social issues, so you will vote for who his corporate masters want you to vote for, so they can pass legislation to cheat you dry financially.

    ::::::::::::::::

    But excuse me, that is Sandra Fluke’s stated purpose.
    Only she didn’t use the words, “cheat you dry” but she should have.
    WHat she wants will cost the taxpayers billons upon billions, yet we have high unemployment and housing forclosures rising and rising, as Nancy Pelosi votes to block companies from opening, votes to close companies, making it worse and worse.

    Nancy Pelosi is a walking talking corporate master herself at a net worth of over $400 MILLION, and she is House Minority Leader, and votes in Congress, so she has far far far more power over our lives than Rush Limbaugh.

    So, it’s not that you are so offended at corporate masters, you just prefer CERTAIN corporate masters.

  • Greg

    “WHat she wants will cost the taxpayers billons upon billions… ”

    How much more factually oblivious can you be????/

    NO. IT. WILL. NOT.

    Sweet Moses!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Greg

    And I guarantee you I spend less to corporations than every single one of you. I shop independent and ride a bicycle and I could go on and on.

    Stop pretending and inventing “facts” and realize that you are being duped to the highest order by a premise that is so laughably false there are dozens of instantly squashing points to make on it.

    You are out to sea. Have the self-respect to notice. Cripes, I’m trying to HELP YOU.

    Can you not see the neon in your face? Are you that obedient to radio hosts?

    It’s utterly, utterly gobsmacking. I feel so sorry for you. And so does God. He is shaking his head at you.

  • Greg

    Or, gosh, just keep your blinders on and sit on the leash of charlatans and ignore the teachings you claim to hold ohhhh so dear and parrot glaringly obvious nonsense in the name of harming American woman.

    Whatever you think is best.

  • wanumba

    #82 March 4, 2012 at 6:59 am
    Greg commented:
    Would it hurt anyone here to ACTUALLY follow the teachings of your religion?
    :::::::::::::::::::::::

    What a good idea! Let’s see what it says:

    Let not those who gloat over me
    who are my enemies without cause;
    let not those who hate me without reason
    maliciously wink the eye.
    They who do not speak peaceably,
    but devise false accusations against those who live quietly in the land.
    They gape at me and say ‘Aha! Aha! With our own eyes we have seen it.”

    O LORD you have seen this; be not silent.
    Do not be far from me O LORD.
    Awake and rise to my defense!
    Contend for me, my GOD and LORD.
    Vindicate me in your righteousness,
    O LORD my GOD;
    let them not gloat over me.
    DO not let them think, “Aha, just what we wanted!”
    or say, “We have swallowed him up.”
    May all who gloat over my distress
    be put to shame and confusion
    May all those who exalt themselves over me
    be clothed in shame and disgrace.
    May those who delight in my vindication
    shout for joy and gladness’
    may they always say, “THe LORD be exalted,
    who delights in the well-being of his servant.
    May my tongue speak of your righteousness
    and of your praises all day long.

  • Georgetown Fluking & Glee Club

    I think it is you who is thick, Greg. If something is MANDATED, there is no CHOICE. Get it. If the insurance company has to pay for it, they pass that cost on to their pool of clients in PREMIUMS. If a company is “for profit”, they have to make a PROFIT in order to stay in BUSINESS. You can argue that insurance companies should be non profit, which I can respect. But to claim that the insurance companies are going to bear the cost without charging more in premiums is disingenuous. Even if Georgetown provided their own insurance, the others participating in the plan would have to pay more to cover the cost. TANSTAAFL.

  • wanumba

    #86 March 4, 2012 at 7:10 am
    Greg commented:

    And I guarantee you I spend less to corporations than every single one of you. I shop independent and ride a bicycle and I could go on and on.

    ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Stop pretending and inventing “facts”

    You have no idea how any one who reads this blog lives. Not a clue and you’re too bigoted to want to find out so you don’t have to disturb your self-righteous delusion with real facts.

  • Jeffery

    Rush Limbaugh says vile things for $50 million a year.

    He said a vile thing that upset many people yet inspired many others.

    The upset people contacted his sponsors, some of whom withdrew their support.

    Rush Limbaugh quickly apologized for his vile statements to keep his $50 million a year.

    The upset people won. Rush Limbaugh won. The sponsors won. But the inspired people were thrown under the bus.

    Rush Limbaugh does not support your cause. He supports his cause, which is counting his $50 million a year.

    Rush Limbaugh says vile things for $50 million a year.

    Please define prostitute.

  • that was easy

    @ Jeffery commented:

    Limbaugh was right to apologize.

    Do you think he meant it or does he really think Ms. Fluke is a slut and a prostitute?
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Jeffery,Jeffery,Jeffery,Jeffery,Jeffery,Jeffery (channeling Bill Cosby)

    She said what she said……. I believe her. She is a slut. and if ANYone is paying to support her, um, “problem” then yes, that would by definition, getting money for sex, make her a prostitute.

    I’d tell you to ask your wife or girlfriend if they think as monica lewinskys boyfriend so famously stated, what your definition of “is” is, but you more likely closer to mama being in her basement………ask her……

  • wanumba

    #91 March 4, 2012 at 7:58 am
    Jeffery commented:

    Rush Limbaugh says vile things for $50 million a year.

    He said a vile thing that upset many people yet inspired many others.
    ::::::::::::::::

    From the mouth of pious Jeffery:

    #5 March 3, 2012 at 12:53 pm
    Jeffery commented:

    Yikes, the former half-governor took almost two minutes to say “no comment”. But this movie is a big win for her as an attention-slut (or is it attention-prostitute)

    Jeffery: Sarah Palin: attention-slut attention prostitute

    WHo are YOU you hypocrite to accuse Rush of ANYTHING?

  • Shawn

    Rush, I thought you had more balls then this! Instead what we get is another cave-in to the left. OO I know we have to please our sponsers for the almighty buck. So sad. What is your next step an apology to obama.

  • Pingback: Limbaugh apologizes, but some critics not satified – Applesauce - Rockford, IL - Rockford Register Star()

  • Zim

    What Rush said was true but in the political climate the state controlled news media will take any word and twist it. This should be a warning to Mitt Romeny, Santorum or Newt. Watch what you say

  • Mitch Rapp

    Rush takes Apologizing 101a from Barack Hussein Obama

  • Babsy

    I’m disappointed that he offered an apology. Thoroughly disappointed.

  • Occidental Tourist

    Greg,

    Thank you for your salient and unimpeachable commentary— commentary supremely buttressed by facts. It seems my right wing friends cling to a flimsy windmill of a notion even when tilting at it proves that it is of paperweight.

    The main point I want to make is that sex is legal, ethical, and, in most eyes, moral, and those who think to the contrary are of the same theocratic stripe as those Islamofascistic Taliban they like to rail against. They don’t see that being anti-progressive woman is what the Taliban is all about. The villain has a hundred faces, Joseph Campbell would remind us.

    Keep up the good work.

    At some point, critical thinking weighs in and they see things are not as their Fox News hatchet men decree.

  • mackykam

    Can’t afford contraceptives? Learn to swallow!

    Can’t wait for Rush’s show where he will demand dems apologise to Sarah Palin.

    I just contacted Carbonite to tell them I won’t be renewing my business.

  • bg

    ++

    [My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be
    humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms.
    Fluke for the insulting word choices.]

    that’s what i figured, anyone who knows RL knows it wasn’t meant to be
    taken “personally”, after all, like someone else previously stated, he is an
    “entertainer”..

    now what i want to know is, when are leftists like Maher, Daily or
    Behar going to apologize to all whom they’ve intentionally insulted
    day in and day out over the years??

    i personally believe it takes more balls
    to apologize than it does to insult..

    so to all those socialist “entertainers” who purposefully go out of
    their way to insult conservatives day after day, where are yours??

    irony is, Rush is not all that political, factial perhpas, but not political..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    re: #100 March 4, 2012 at 9:17 am bg

    factial perhpas = factual perhaps

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    ht Meema

    “Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely
    between man and his God; that he owes account to none other
    for his faith or his worship; that the legislative powers of the
    government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate
    with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people
    which declared that their legislature should `make no law
    respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
    exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between
    church and State.”

    ==

  • wanumba

    #86 March 4, 2012 at 7:10 am
    Greg commented:

    And I guarantee you I spend less to corporations than every single one of you. I shop independent and ride a bicycle and I could go on and on
    ::::::::::::::::

    Ha ha ha

    Greg, you are on the INTERNET and you definitely did not mine, smelt, forge and mold a single part of your bike, produce a single element of the roads you ride it on, and everything that goes into the “shop independent, “building, staff, trucking, agricultural production, harvesting, trucking, electrical power, cable, wire, towers, trucking, transport, trucking, shipping, trains … did I mention transport ? And did you raise the cotton for your shirt on your piece of land, twist it together with your own little fingers, fashion a crochet needle out of a stick on the ground and crochet your coat and pants and underwear? Or did you mine the ore, smelt the metal in a mud stove you made and forge an axe and chew with your teeth an ax handle off the closest tree and then cut some wood and fashion it into a loom to WEAVE, after you spent ten months eating berries off the bushes, twisting enough thread to set up the weft and warp? How about your shoes or do you go barefoot 24/7 all seasons?

    If you were as low-corporate as you fancy yourself, you wouldn’t even be on-line. The internet sits atop the great economic interdepency pyramid of human corporate investment.

  • twolaneflash

    After submitting to castration, Rush is a eunuch guarding the Left’s harem.

  • Mandy

    You can call Carbonite 24/7 and get a live person. I did and I think a lot of people (including current customers) can call. Ask them why they drop Rush and continue with MSNBC. I was polite to the young man who answeres but let him know in no uncertain terms that they will never get my business because of their duplicity.

  • Jeffery

    #92
    So you think Rush revealed his true beliefs when he called the young woman a slut and a prostitute. So when he took it back he was lying to us all for money. He sacrificed his principles for money. I understand now.

    #93 wanumba
    With what part(s) of my analysis do you disagree?

    I think I presented a list of facts.

    My opinion is that Limbaugh crossed the line and was right to apologize to the young woman.

    Like Rush, I was using hyperbole to make a point. As I asked before, how does it make you feel when someone is unfairly mocked? For the record I would not label any woman a slut or a c**t. A prostitute is primarily defined as a woman who trades sex for money, but you, Rush and punditista know that. These words are used to demean and even subjugate women, much as “boy” and the N-word are used to demean and subjugate blacks.

    Limbaugh’s and Hoft’s (and others’) labeling of this young woman as a “loose” woman was meant to diminish her and her message, without addressing the message at all. By their definition any woman or man who as ever had sex outside marriage is a slut, and would include nearly every man and woman in the US (including many on this board calling her a slut). I suspect enough sponsors told Limbaugh that his comments were so far outside the mainstream that he finally had to backtrack or lose them. He could have chosen to stick by his heartfelt beliefs and lose money or give in and take the cash.

    Perhaps Jim Hoft and his loyal readers think it’s OK to demean and verbally abuse a young woman unfairly, but most Americans do not.

  • Kermit the Frog

    Apologize to this woman for comparing her to a slut and a prostitute?

    I would have apologized to the sluts and prostitutes for the unflattering comparison to the lazy money grubbing whore Fluke.

  • Kermit the Frog

    N-word are used to demean and subjugate blacks?

    Really? Your ‘n-word’ and ‘Ho’ are so commonly used by black entertainers (and not in a demeaning way, actually as a friendly greeting) that it doesn’t even register a concern among black activists.

    … now dare a white guy/gal call a black guy/gal what they already call each other, that will register a level of offense by by activists that is measured in the nuclear scale.

    Want a litmus test for a racist – someone who takes extreme offense when called something by ‘the other’ that the are OK with when called by ‘the same’.

  • bg

    ++

    Jeffery #106 March 4, 2012 at 10:12 am

    she “labeled” herself..

    ==

  • wanumba

    #106 March 4, 2012 at 10:12 am
    Jeffery commented:

    Perhaps Jim Hoft and his loyal readers think it’s OK to demean and verbally abuse a young woman unfairly, but most Americans do not.
    ::::::::::::

    Oh, don’t worry everyone, Jeffery don’t mean a single word he says about how one properly speaks to a woman:

    #5 March 3, 2012 at 12:53 pm
    Jeffery commented:

    Yikes, the former half-governor took almost two minutes to say “no comment”. But this movie is a big win for her as an attention-slut (or is it attention-prostitute)

    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Gads Jeffery, ya had us all going there for a while thinking you actually were having an ephiphany of good manners, and new-found godliness with all your grand speeches of what Rush should have done and how we all should behave.

    Looks like you can’t even follow your own pronouncements, you hypocrite.

  • wanumba

    #104 March 4, 2012 at 9:55 am
    twolaneflash commented:

    … guarding the Left’s harem

    :::::::::::::::::::::::

    Who needs to guard the likes of Fluke, Pelosi, Hillary, Bella Abzug, Rosie O’Donnell, Joy Behar, Whoopie Goldberg, Janet Napolitano, and Sandra Bernhart

    (warning: not SFW or children, hamsters or cattle)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=64SnLJ8qPM4

  • bg

    ++

    Sandra Kay Fluke (born April 17, 1981) is a Georgetown University law
    student, American feminist activist, and a former employee a nonprofit
    aiding victims of domestic violence. She was a proposed democratic
    witness
    to a Congressional hearing on contraception. She was denied
    the ability to testify before the hearing and subsequently testified
    before Democratic members of the House of Representatives.
    Rush
    Limbaugh then begin a controversy by commenting on her testimony.

    [..]

    On February 29, 2012, Rush Limbaugh caused an outcry by noting that Georgetown University law student Sandra Fluke’s claim of needing $3000 for birth control was several times the cost actually incurred by average women, or the cost (condoms) incurred by the average men; he speculated that to incur the cost she put forward would require her to be having sex several times a day, and describing her as a “slut”, “prostitute” and “round-heeled” while questioning whether her parents were proud of her on his radio show for supporting a federal contraception mandate for private insurance that included religiously-affiliated institutions.

    he didn’t describe her as being a slut, he described
    her testimony as befitting of a slut, prostitute, etc..

    ==

  • wanumba

    bg,
    You did link before .. who paid Fluke’s $240,000 Cornell degree and who is paying her – is law school three years? If so, $180,000 graduate degree?
    Who was on the scholarship committee that made the selection?

  • We always seem to cave to the left.

  • Jeffery

    wanumba,

    OK. By all means double down. Even your emotional leader RL has abandoned you. Hoft says RL did the right thing by apologizing.

    We now have evidence that you are intellectually too extreme for even Limbaugh and Hoft. Rush Limbaugh and Jim Hoft are not conservative enough for you. Don’t fret; StormFront is still accepting members.

  • wanumba

    #115 March 4, 2012 at 12:26 pm
    MustComment commented:

    We always seem to cave to the left.
    ::::::::::::::::::

    Are you sure?
    Would you have known about this Democrat theatre had Rush not made everyone sit up? The Left has had to run all over putting fires out and boot all other news aside to schedule poor-put-upon- little-girl interviews and act all morally concerned to do damage control. And that moral posturing has been a real strain on troll spirits, they wanting sooo bad to just let spew, but told by handlers that ‘no-no-no we have to play this as superior.’
    COUNT the swarm TROLLS who showed up here … wow, who knew it was that fragile a construct that it needed so much buttressing. It must have been devastating for Obama to need to get on the phone. More politically devastating than the Border Patrol agent who was murdered by FAST and FURIOUS weapons. Amazing.

    Now, go and find out the Left network that engineered Fluke’s fake testimony. Names, money.

  • Annoyed In Illinois

    To the man who says “Don’t doubt me”: “Way to go, Rush. When you hit the air tomorrow at 11 a.m. CST, I’ll be doing something other than listening to you. I stuck with you when you continually ripped public school teachers but this is it, buddy. You sold us and your a** out.”

    A decision has to be in Limbaugh’s mind. He either has to be totally above board and dispense with the sophomoric stuff (that’ll later be regretted) or never EVER apologize to the America-haters again.

  • wanumba

    #116 March 4, 2012 at 12:57 pm
    Jeffery commented:
    wanumba,

    OK. By all means double down
    ::::::::::::::::

    It’s not doubling down to call you for what you are. You gave speeches here and then did just what you sooo earnestly denounce.

    Instead of cleaning up YOUR act, you are going all white supremastist racist on innocent me. If you cannot control youself, then you cannot say a word against Rush. By the standards of the LEFT. No exceptions.

    I’m not a corporate rich middle aged dude with a radio station… as you sneered about Rush.

    I’m much poorer, I can’t afford the universities that Sandra Fluke can afford, I don’t know ANYONE of the level she hangs with – mega millionaire Nancy Pelosi – she wouldn’t even let her doorman open the back gate for me if I lost my kittycat in her yard, and we’re living in a very poor country that doesn’t get American radio, so your stereotype that people somehow need someone else to think for them is pretty self-serving, isn’t it?

    Is that normal for you – what you do, wait for people to tell what you to do, how to think?

    I mean, how’s Stormfront supposed to find me amongst 500 million Black People? Actually, that’s hilarous. I would LOVE to see them try,starting with their first look down the airplane steps at all the 6 foot 6 inch Africans waiting for them, “Welcome to Africa.”
    I’d be sitting there aside, and everyone would say, “What’s this?”
    and I would say, “It’s popcorn … and this is a lawn chair.”

  • wanumba

    #118 March 4, 2012 at 1:07 pm
    Annoyed In Illinois commented:

    To the man who says “Don’t doubt me”: “Way to go, Rush. When you hit the air tomorrow at 11 a.m. CST, I’ll be doing something other than listening to you. I stuck with you when you continually ripped public school teachers but this is it, buddy.
    :::::::::::::::::::::

    Public school teachers have completely destroyed education in this country, ruining the lives of millions of children. It isn’t actually salvageable.

    The culture of lying in education alone is sufficient reason to shut it down. Honest people run out by liars who hired more liars. Not salvageable.

  • Pingback: THE SUNDAY GRUDGE | PoliNation()

  • bg

    ++

    wanumba #114 March 4, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    good questions we all need honest answers to..

    however, i somehow doubt they will be, i mean, just take a good look
    at the president, they know who & what he is, yet they’ll protect his
    identity to the death of US.. *sigh*

    please scroll threads for much more, thank you..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    wanumba #114 March 4, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    just for fun:

    re: [who paid Fluke’s $240,000 Cornell degree]

    either Keith Olberman or Ann Coulter

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    March 2, 2012 by Angela Morabito

    Sandra Fluke Does Not Speak for Me

    [Sandra doesn’t even speak for all skanks! She only speaks for the skanks who don’t want to take responsibility for their choices. That’s a tiny group of people. Hey Sandra! How about next Saturday night, you come hang out with me and my gay boyfriends! Your hair will look fabulous and you’ll get to see great musical theatre! Oh, and odds of you getting pregnant? Zero percent.

    Even the oh-so-left HuffPo called Sandra out on her media sluttery: ”Fluke got the stage all to herself and was hailed as a hero by the crowd and Democratic lawmakers on the panel, all of whom rushed to appear on camera with her at the end. “Excuse me. I’d love to get a picture with our star,” Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) said as she pushed her way through the packed room to Fluke.” Star of what? Star of the bedroom sex tape? When did Georgetown Law start admitting Kardashians?

    Sandra, we might be on the same campus,
    but we are not on the same planet.
    ]

    Amen..

    ==

  • Jeffery

    #116

    wanumba,

    You win. I have no idea what you are talking about.

  • wanumba

    #122 March 4, 2012 at 1:38 pm
    bg commented:
    ++
    wanumba #114 March 4, 2012 at 12:07 pm

    good questions we all need honest answers to..
    :::::::::::::::::

    That’s right, bg.
    I’m sure you are offended as we are that Sandra Fluke has access to so much money so she could go to the most expensive universities in the nation. $240,000 for Cornell for a Bachelors in “Gender Studies”.
    I mean, everyone knows she could have gone to state school for the same thing at less than half the price. And we can all agree that she knows that’s an elite name that will get her high connected jobs with high pay. I actually resent that priviledge and connected swing she has to then land $56,000 a year Law School aid.

    The debt crisis and recession isn’t touching her at all. She’s really in an elite class in an expensive Ivory Tower existence that is so isolated from what we working class have to put up with.

    I mean, can you see my tears … I have friends who had to drop out of college – community college – because they couldn’t afford it. I have a girl friend who had to join the Air Force for five years so she could pay for a degree. She had no other choice. They make her live in a barracks and throw her out of bed at 5 am for running outisde before she’s allowed to eat breakfast. And, do you now how many women I know … ready for this … have to work at … McDonalds while they attend night classes. They cry at night washing out the milkshake machine at what their lives could have been had their union teachers actually taught them math instead of sucking down McDonalds super-sized diet cokes and chomping on fries in front of them in class.

  • Jeffery

    If any of you are actually interested in what Ms. Fluke said in her testimony, here is the transcript. It’s only a couple of pages.

    http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politics/statement-Congress-letterhead-2nd%20hearing.pdf

    Perhaps you will understand how Mr. Limbaugh breitbarted her. Then explain what in her testimony supports Mr. Limbaugh’s (and Hoft and several commenters) contention that this young woman is a slut.

  • wanumba

    #125 March 4, 2012 at 1:54 pm
    Jeffery commented:
    #116

    wanumba,

    You win.

    :::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Bien sur. Je suis premier gao.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RJMpeYwifEU

  • bg

    ++

    Jeffery #127 March 4, 2012 at 2:06 pm

    “unsworn Dems only testimony”

    aka: show time for Dhimmi slut lovers..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    correction re: #129 March 4, 2012 at 2:20 pm bg

    “unsworn Dems only self-descriptive testimony”

    ==

  • wanumba

    #127 March 4, 2012 at 2:06 pm
    Jeffery commented:

    If any of you are actually interested in what Ms. Fluke said in her testimony, here is the transcript.
    ::::::::::::

    Dang, that was posted here yesterday, where HAVE you been?

    My favorite part is where Fluke states her GAY FRIEND is worried that she may not be able to give her mother the GRANDCHILDREN her mother so pines for.

    Fluke got a little over enthusiastic trying to cover all the bases there, ya think?

    Maybe she should have majored in BIOLOGY instead of “Gender Studies.”
    You’d think a $240,000 Cornell degree had at least a basic biology 101 freshman distribution class requirement.

  • bg

    ++

    just in case re: #129/130

    re: unsworn = not under oath

    ==

  • Jim

    Much is being made of Rush Limbaugh’s calling Sandra Fluke a ‘slut’. Some have expressed outrage at Rush’s own checkered past, some Feminists the false worry that all birth control will be banned, others the politicization of this issue. I suspect the faux outrage from Feminists has much more to do with silencing the debate on their terms. After all, if Western Feminists were truly concerned about women’s rights there are plenty of real issues to get upset about eg honor killings, Female Genital Mutliation, Acid Attacks towards women, etc. Getting upset about whether the government pays for contraception isn’t the prime motivation behind the selective outrage. There is a subtext from the faux Feminist outrage which like the Gay Rights movement and Islam seeks to silence debate, confine free speech, and get men to not debate the subject all. I reference a conversation held last year about the ‘Slutwalks’ being held across Canada and elsewhere. Just as with the faux outrage v. Limbaugh, Feminists see an opportunity to end discussion of female sexuality by men, in this case the ability of men to declare who is and who isn’t a ‘slut’ and make themselves(Feminists) the primary arbiter of how female sexuality is judged leaving men unable to make judgements about female sexuality;

    “Lay down your arms.

    Brendan made an excellent point in the comments section of my Trapped in adulthood post:

    “The process of female reliance on peer group support and guidance will not be checked — it’s deep behavior, I think. The substance of the values of the peer group at present, however, are the” problem.

    This fits closely with a point my wife has often made; men have no idea how much their judgment of women impacts them. Women fear judgment from other women, especially those higher than them in the social hierarchy. However, even more than this they fear judgment from men. They don’t just fear judgment from men in the top of the male hierarchy, they fear judgment from any man who has the basic respect of other men (which is most men). Even women at the top of the female hierarchy fear the judgment of ordinary (respected by other men) men.

    This is a form of power almost all men have but fail to exercise for a number of reasons, but of critical importance is the fact that most have no idea the power even exists. Feminists however do understand this, which is why they spend so much of their energy working to ensure that neither men nor women feel comfortable judging bad behavior from women. They have been wildly successful here, but they will always be extremely vulnerable to men figuring this out.

    If you doubt this, consider the case of the slutwalks. Many (most?) have completely misunderstood what these are about. The stated point of the global demonstrations is to stop excusing rapists based on how women act or are dressed. However, note that there isn’t even a single case in the western world they can point to where a forcible rapist was let off or shown lenience because the woman he raped was a slut. If they had such an example, rest assured we would have heard all about it for months*.

    So what is the global slutwalk temper tantrum really about? One respected man judged women in a minor gathering. Note that the officer who made the comments isn’t high ranking; when the feminists howled he was reprimanded and forced to attend “further training”. Link: http://www.mizozo.com/weird/04/2011/04/toronto-s-first-slutwalk-to-protest-cop-michael-sa….html He didn’t even judge them in an overt way. The context of his statement acknowledged that there was such a thing as a slut, and that it isn’t a good thing to be one. Here are the exact words from a CBC article on the first slutwalk:

    “In January, Toronto Police Const. Michael Sanguinetti told a personal security class at York University that “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized.”

    This is what the global temper tantrum is all about. A respected man acknowledged the existence of sluts. To men this is a throwaway comment. To sluts, it is a scathing indictment. It burns their souls and demands comfort to make the pain go away. They need the shelter of other women, but even more so they need to find a way to stop men from saying or even thinking such things ever again:

    “Sanguinetti apologized for his comments, but his apology failed to satisfy walk organizer Sonya Barnett.”

    and;

    “It was evident that if you’re going to have a representative of the police force come out [and say that] then that kind of idea must be still running rampant within the force itself and that retraining really needs to happen to change that mentality,” she said.”

    “A statement on the event’s website(Link: http://www.slutwalktoronto.com/) says: “Toronto Police have perpetuated the myth and stereotype of the slut, and in doing so have failed us.”

    “Barnett said she wants to use the walk to reclaim the word and also demand that victim-shaming change.”

    Don’t be misdirected. This has nothing to do with an actual rape case. Oz Conservative quoted Bonald at Throne and Altar to make the same point in his post How do we explain the slutwalks (emphasis mine):

    The rape issue is a red herring. It has nothing to do with the real issue, which is the social legitimation of female promiscuity. These marches are not meant to intimidate potential rapists; they’re meant to intimidate social conservatives. The sluts are only tying together the issues of social disapproval and sexual violence as a rhetorical trick to cast themselves as victims even as they go on the attack…

    “The sluts are not victims; they are aggressors. Their victim is society itself. Their goal is social approval for female sexual promiscuity.”

    Most men don’t recognize this because the idea that a few words of mild unintended judgment from an ordinary cop would spark worldwide discomfort amongst sluts and their enablers is preposterous on its face. Why would avowed sluts fear being labeled as sluts? But the fact remains that it is true. They fear this instinctively. No matter how much they claim to have “taken back” the word, it still packs a punch to the gut that men simply can’t fathom. This is why Doomed Harlot is so intent on sheltering would be sluts by taking on the mantle of the term. Note however that even while she is doing this, she made it a point to inform us that she isn’t actually a slut. She tells us she has only kissed one other man than her husband in her life.

    Again, men don’t understand this; the women proclaiming to have “taken back” this word seem quite confident in their professed morality. How could an avowed slut fear being called a slut in our thoroughly libertine culture? It makes no sense, so men discard the idea without giving it further consideration. But don’t take my word for it, Roissy makes a sexual living by sluts. Part of what he knows is how to avoid triggering a slut’s slut shield. Yes, even sluts are terrified of being identified as sluts. As Roissy wrote in his post No You Don’t Sound Bothered At All (crass site warning):

    “Sluts know this is true deep in the crevices of their souls, which is why, despite (or because of) their indignant protestations and transparent sophistry to the contrary, they really do get bothered when called out.”

    If Roissy’s word isn’t good enough for you, then consider the words of sex positive feminist and slut-in-chief Jaclyn Friedman. Jacklyn pleaded with the feminist community for moral support by posting the depths of her dysfunctional sex life for all to see. Of course begging for support for her actions wouldn’t fit her imagined mantle of feminist heroine, so she had to pretend she was being brave for others:

    “I’m telling you this because juries still think women who even look like they might possibly be sluts are “asking for it.”…

    I’m telling you this because sluthood saved me, in a small but life-altering way, and I want it to be available to you if you ever think it could save you, too. Or if you want it for any other reason at all. And because even if you don’t ever want sluthood for yourself, you’re going to be called upon to support a slut. I’m telling you this because when that happens, I want you to say yes.”

    As you might recall, Susan Walsh instantly saw through this*(Link: http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2010/08/02/hookinguprealities/deconstructing-the-sluthood-of-jaclyn-friedman/), which earned her a denunciation from NOW.(Link: http://www.hookingupsmart.com/2010/08/04/hookinguprealities/i-earned-a-denunciation-from-now/)

    No matter how much formal power feminists wield, they are terrified of respected men judging them. They want nothing more than to convince you to voluntarily disarm yourself. Only a fool would do this.

    Don’t be a fool.

    *Note that even Jacklyn Friedman couldn’t find a legitimate case of a forcible rapist in the west being coddled because of the dress or actions of a slut. In her sentence above about women “asking for it” she is forced to link instead to a very strange corner case where one woman lifted the top of another. The author of the post she links to defines this as a “sexual assault”; feminists clearly have to dig deep on this one.”
    Link: http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/06/03/lay-down-your-arms/
    .
    As you can see, like the faux outrage vs. Rush Limbaugh, the outrage vs. the policeman was as much about silencing men who make judgements about sluts and women in general. Feminism seeks to take away the power and authority from men making a judgment about a women, in this case Rush v. Sandra Fluke. One can extend this debate silencing technique towards other groups, various Muslim groups will call all critics of Islam, Islamaphobes, harrass them, etc. Gay Rights groups will often call any question of the teaching of positive homosexuality in schools homophobic. The point is silencing debate and criticism. It is as ugly as those Muslim students who shouted down the Israeli ambassador at his speech at UC Irvine, thus depriving him of his right to free speech or speak at all. What Feminists are doing is taking away the power of language from men, and in Marxist fashion, using language to change power relationships between men and women making one a victim, the other the aggressor. Classic Marxist linguistic dialectics. So now, only women, specifically Feminists have the right and power to make judgements about women and women’s sexuality just as some leaders of certain identity groups are the only ones who can criticize that identity group. It’s all about controlling language and who uses that language, thus controlling the debate.
    .
    Don’t be misdirected, this is about control. Controlling the language and who gets to use it.

  • Spike

    I would not have apoligizes to that oink…she is what she is. After all did Billy clintoon apoligize to monica for placing a cigar in an inappropriate smoking position.Notice that as_hole has’nt opened his mouth!

  • wanumba

    BG
    Quick review: It’s not “testimony” but HERESAY, inadmissable in an actual court and Miss Fluke KNOWS that, being a Law Student and all.

    I think she’s playing Jeffery for a fool, making him run around trying to defend this. If he’d stop eatin’ estrogen-laced TOFU, dropped the bone-thinning diet sodas for beer, and started eating meat, his head would clear and he’d be mad at how these male-hatin’ females have been using him.

    Masai warriors only eat beef and milk mixed with blood and urine. No TOFU.

  • bg

    ++

    wanumba #126 March 4, 2012 at 1:57 pm

    one of my dear grandsons, who suffers from Aspergers, has no car,
    works two jobs, is still managing to take course via one of his State
    Colleges to better himself.. not to be supplied with free condoms &
    slutty college babes..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    re: #136 March 4, 2012 at 2:33 pm bg

    take course = take courses

    ==

  • wanumba

    #136 March 4, 2012 at 2:33 pm
    bg commented:
    wanumba #126 March 4, 2012 at 1:57 pm

    my dear grandson
    :::::::::::

    Guys like him quietly keep the world running. They never get honor and kudos, but they should!

  • Jeffery

    wamumbler

    Where in her non-testimony warrants the slut and prostitute claim?

  • Jeffery

    bj: Of course I don’t expect you to read.

    wamumbles: Heresay is not a word, but pretense is.

    Anyone: Can you please point to the sentences in the transcript where Ms. Fluke describes herself as a slut?

    Anyone: Why did your spiritual leader recant his description of her?

    Summary: Extremist conservatives call women with whom they disagree, sluts.

  • bg

    ++

    ht: Taqiyyotomist #4 March 3, 2012 at 8:25 pm

    Saturday, March 03, 2012

    Throwing down the gauntlet

    [Killing babies no different from abortion:

    Journal-of-medical-ethicsParents should be allowed to have their
    newborn babies killed because they are “morally irrelevant” and
    ending their lives is no different to abortion, a group of medical
    ethicists linked to Oxford University has argued.

    The article, published in the Journal of Medical Ethics, says newborn
    babies are not “actual persons” and do not have a “moral right to life”.
    The academics also argue that parents should be able to have their
    baby killed if it turns out to be disabled when it is born.]

    OMG.. 🙁

    and not that i ever doubted it, but they truly
    do intend to kill US off one way or another..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    Jeffery meet daryl, daryl meet Jeffery, oh wait..

    ==

  • Jeffery

    bj: Can YOU point to the part of the transcript where Ms. Fluke describes her own slutty behavior??

    Anybody?

    Maybe Rush recanted after he actually heard or read what she said, rather than what someone told him she said.

  • Jeffery

    Bueller?

  • bg

    ++

    re: #141 March 4, 2012 at 2:56 pm bg

    “people must be helped to help themselves.” Any plan or program that
    would make them “dependent upon doles and charities” is “paternalistic”
    and would not be “of any permanent value.” She included an essay (what
    she called a “program of public welfare,”) entitled “We Must Breed a Race
    of Thoroughbreds.”

    ~ Margaret Sanger

    “If the upper class is able to give it’s children, grandchildren more and more
    genetic advantages, they will move away form the people who are naturally
    born..”

    ~ Lee Silver

    ==

  • Ghost

    Once your Aura of Fearlessness is GONE it never returns
    -the wolves will gather to devour

  • wanumba

    #140 March 4, 2012 at 2:55 pm
    Jeffery commented:

    Summary: Extremist conservatives call women with whom they disagree, sluts.

    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Oh oh oh …… oh dear. me oh my …. what’s THIS:

    #5 March 3, 2012 at 12:53 pm
    Jeffery commented:
    Yikes, the former half-governor took almost two minutes to say “no comment”. But this movie is a big win for her as an attention-slut (or is it attention-prostitute)

    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

    Summary: Just like “Jeffery, Liberal Left Democrat”

    *psst* jeffery …. you are a Hypocrite. You do everything you claim you abhor. You cannot criticise Rush if you bitterly cling to the same usage of language. Every speech you make is NULL and VOID. Rush in fact has renounced it and has not uttered it since. Here it is day three and it’s STILL coming out of you?

    (and Jeffery… “heresay” is a PRECISE LEGAL term … so is “testimony” so is “oath” and “sworn in”)

  • Joanne

    It isn’t nice to call a slut a slut.

    A muslim could call her a slut, and they would just be exercising their religion freedom to say such things. It is bad enough a woman is sleeping around without having to pay for her not to get pregnant. What about women who do not sleep around and want others to pay for birth control – do they get a cheque in the mail to be fair in the distribution of wealth?

  • Jeffery

    I’ll take the extended silence to mean that Ms. Fluke did not admit to slut behavior, but Mr. Limbaugh breitbarted her and the troupe of flying monkeys followed suit. Mr. Limbaugh backed down leaving the troupe exposed.

    Pathetic show. Is it any wonder that decent Americans reject your notions.

  • wanumba

    OH, a good point has been made: it’s not spelled heresay, but hearsay, of course.

    Sandra Fluke was indulging in “hearsay” which is inadmissable in a proper court of law.

    HEARSAY EVIDENCE. The evidence of those who relate, not what they know themselves, but what they have heard from others.
    2. As a general rule, hearsay evidence of a fact is not admissible. If any fact is to be substantiated against a person, it ought to be proved in his presence by the testimony of a witness sworn or affirmed to speak the truth.

    Sandra Fluke did not present a single person to substantiate anything she claimed about them, no names, no people.

    http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Hearsay+evidence

  • Jeffery

    wamambo

    The word is “hearsay”. Heresay is not a word, regardless of how precise you say it is.

    Can you show me where in the transcript it proves that Ms. Fluke is a slut?

    Conservatives always resort to name-calling when trapped.

  • wanumba

    #149 March 4, 2012 at 3:31 pm
    Jeffery commented:

    I’ll take the extended silence to mean that
    ::::::::::::::::::::

    I’d be happy to repeat you are a 100% hypocrite, that Fluke claimed her gay friend was worried that she might not be able to produce grandkids for her sad mother, that Fluke did not actually give testimony, but unsworn hearsay, that Fluke claimed college women need $3,000 worth of contraceptives to just get by.

    Yes indeed, Fluke didn’t say SHE needed the contraceptives, but before CONGRESS she was CERTAIN that ALL the OTHER women on campus DID.

    Now, if SHE didn’t NEED them, on what basis of fact did Fluke make her CLAIM that everyone ELSE needed them? SHe didn’t even produce a questionnaire asking all these other unnamed women if they needed Fluke to tell the WHOLE WORLD they heartbreakingly NEEDED $3,000 worth of contraceptives to get thru graduate school.

    Silly us, until Sandra Fluke exposed the carnal campus, we all naively thought they were STUDYING, going to classes, playing sports.

  • wanumba

    Does one wonder if some of the Georgetown law students might file a class action suit against Sandra Fluke for slandering their reputations from Washington DC to Borneo?

  • bg

    ++

    Jeffery #151 March 4, 2012 at 3:37 pm

    hearsay

    hearsay rule

    you’re nothing more or less than an attention slut troll..

    ==

  • StrangernFiction

    Leftists are scum. One need never apologize to scum.

  • Jeffery

    bj: Hearsay is a word! Heresay is not. Please stop while you’re behind. I’m just trying to help you find your way.

    wahwah: So where did Ms. Fluke describe her own slut-like behavior?

    You’re done. Game. Set. Match.

  • Wingnut

    The lefties put a burning sack of dog poop on the front porch, lit it, rang the door bell, and ran. Rush stepped in it. The lefties wanted to change the subject from a completely anti-Constitutional edict from Obama to Republicans are mean and anti-women.

  • Jeffery

    We DO have issues in the country that our owners do not want us to address.

    Campaign finance. Control of our electoral process by the ultra wealthy is growing.

    We’re losing our middle class/ unemployment.

    Energy policy.

    Long term National debt.

    Continued health care reform.

    Long term climate change.

  • bg
  • bg

    ++

    Jeffery #158 March 4, 2012 at 4:42 pm

    just a sample:

    all part of the Depopulation via NWO controlled by Gaia..

    re: middle class..

    re: The T4 Programme

    ==

  • Tom in CA

    OK Greg, time to slip on the Berkenstocks and dirty black homemade socks and head down to the smelly local coffee shop and sip expresso and read the NYT.

    Your work here is done.

  • BurmaShave

    Now will the Democrats apologize for parading a strumpet before Congress to promote free sex?

    OF COURSE, NOT! And why should the Democrats apologize? They won. Promoting free sex. Further break up/down of the family. That IS their agenda, and essentially they got Rush Limbaugh to ratify it.

    “What happened to personal responsibility and accountability? Where do we draw the line?”

    Line? What line? Has anybody seen a gay pride parade? This is what the Democrats (and the Episcopalian Church and other similar mainline churches BTW) stands for. They may deny it, but that is all part of their denying responsibility for all the consequences of their liberalsm.

    That is what has happened to personal responsibility and accountability.

    Personal responsibility for the Democrats is when “the 1%” pays 99% taxes (but Democrats can cheat on this because they are virtuous). That’s it; every time you push on the liberals for personal responsibility there is nothing there but empty words. And if there is anything that liberals actually do accept responsibility for today, watch out for tomorrow.

  • wanumba

    Well, well well. Some students of Alinsky have been here:

    “Would it hurt you to think for yourself? To be fair and as super duper wonderful as you claim to be as religious people? Would it hurt anyone here to ACTUALLY follow the teachings of your religion?”

    It seemed very odd that athiest Lefties would be demanding religious folks to “follow their teachings” until we read THIS:

    “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1989 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one. ”

    (Horowitz Know the Networks)

  • Valerie

    Kirsten Powers lists a few other people that should be boycotted, if people are going to be honestly outraged about crude and slanderous language against women.

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/04/rush-limbaugh-s-apology-liberal-men-need-to-follow-suit.html

  • Greg

    Are you joking, wanumba? I had never even heard of Saul Alinsky until your lot starting parroting the utter joke that is Glenn Beck. I still have not read any of his work, nor do I desire to, nor do you understand his work, nor do you understand that your lot uses his tactics all the time.

    As for my political affiliation and religious status, you are just making things up. You have no earthly clue what either of my designations in these two categories is – you just pretend it’s what you want it to be in an imaginary culture war you can never win.

    This provision is not even new. The newer part of this is the provision ADDED that exempts churches. You are yet again being taken for an emotional blackmail ride, and apparently are totally fine with that. No, instead you get mad at the one telling you the truth, all to defend a crazy wealthy con man that laughs at you daily because no matter what bananas stuff he says, you take it as gospel without the slightest critical thought.

    Good luck with all that. I cannot imagine at this point that it will do much good, but I’m going to go pray for you. Enjoy your Sunday evening (if that’s even allowed).

  • Occidental Tourist

    For the record, calling someone an “attention slut” is much different than calling someone a “slut” in the way Rushtojudgement did, inasmuch as being a chocoholic is less grave than being an alcoholic. That almost was a nice Jon Stewart-type catch on Jeffrey by the righty foes herein; however, it doesn’t quite work.
    For the record, Palin IS an attention slut, but probably not one of the sexual variety. I believe Bill Maher is probably both an attention slut and a de facto sexual slut, but he would argue against, perhaps, only the former.
    Rush just lost his 7th adverstiser… couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

    I wish you guys, my Righty friends, would simply detach yourself while listening to Rush, whether by drinking lots of caffeine, or after fasting, or listening while upside down, and re-assess his lack of humanity.

  • mkurbo

    Here is why I have a major problem with Rush Limbaugh’s apology, and I’m adamant that he should not have apologized. Rather than allowing the MSM or the leftist liberals to drive their agenda by elevating this issue and Rush’s apology…

    ..where in context, were they on the following apologies:

    1. President Obama’s abhorrent apology on the Koran issue ?
    2. Likewise, an apology from Islamic community on 9/11 ?
    3. Eric Holder’s apology to Brian Terry’s family ?
    4. Obama’s apology for American exceptionalism to the world ?
    5. Obama’s apology for all the wasted billions on “green” scams ?
    6. Liberals apology for all those held captive by welfare ?
    7. Obama’s apology to the unemployed ?
    8. The EPA’s apology for destroying America’s business environment ?
    9. Liberalism’s apology for 40 years of failed social policies ?
    10. DOE apology for having absolutely no coherent energy policy ?
    11. Obama’s apology for lying about shove ready jobs ?
    12. Obama’s apology for growing the size of the useless Fed. Gov. ?
    13. DOJ apology for suing Arizona over not doing its own job ?
    14. Obama’s apology for running over the constitution ?
    15. Obama’s apology for selling America into socialism ?

    The radical liberal left socialists don’t ever apologize to Americans. It time to return the favor !

  • bg

    ++

    S ocialist
    L oons
    U pping
    T he
    S takes

    😀

  • bg

    ++

    Greg #165 March 4, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    Rules for Radicals

    “Obama learned his lesson well. I am proud to see that my father’s
    model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community
    organizing to affect the Democratic campaign in 2008. It is a fine tribute
    to Saul Alinsky as we approach his 100th birthday.”

    –Letter from L. DAVID ALINSKY, son of Neo-Marxist Saul Alinsky

    Obama helped fund ‘Alinsky Academy’: “The Woods Fund, a nonprofit
    on which Obama served as paid director from 1999 to December 2002,
    provided startup funding and later capital to the Midwest Academy….
    Obama sat on the Woods Fund board alongside William Ayers, founder
    of the Weather Underground domestic terrorist organization…. ‘Midwest
    describes itself as ‘one of the nation’s oldest and best-known schools
    for community organizations, citizen organizations and individuals
    committed to progressive social change.’… Midwest teaches Alinsky
    tactics of community organizing.”

    more links @ link..

    Barack Obama’s Rules For Revolution The Alinksy Model

    Obama repeatedly used the phrase
    “When the revolution comes….”

    ==

  • Greg

    Yes, I now understand who he is and what he wrote. Your links are purely psychotic, 100% typical of the kind of shrieking nonsense this blog specializes in – good grief.

  • Glenn

    Rush’s apology was not really an apology. He didn’t apologize for the major mis-characterization he made of Ms Fluke’s testimony. She never mentioned sex or her sex life once in all her testimony instead talking about the health benefits of birth control pills and yet he used that assumption to beat her for 3 days. It’s no wonder he’s losing advertisers (finally) to the misogynistic crap he calls his show. I hope it costs Rush and Clear Channel in the one place they understand, their pockets.

  • Dale Doelling

    Rush Limbaugh is nothing but a pathetic, impotent windbag!

  • ZL

    A “class act” is someone who treats those with opposing viewpoints with respect. He should also use truthful arguments to support his case. The Georgetown health insurance policy is mandatory and instituted by the university. It is paid for through each student’s tuition fees. It is not taxpayer funded, it is private insurance and Ms. Fluke pays premiums like everyone else. I would like to thank Mr.Limbaugh for helping to usher in four more years of Obama. Good job. Megga Dittos.

  • bg

    ++

    March 3, 2012

    GOP: Dems ‘played games’ over Sandra Fluke

    [When the hearing took place, Democrats proceeded to clobber Republicans.
    “Where are the women?” asked New York Rep. Carolyn Maloney as she
    looked at the all-male first panel for the hearing. (Two women testified in
    the hearing’s second panel, but Maloney and her fellow Democrats ignored that.)
    ]

    btW rino libs..

    IT’S NOT ABOUT CONTRACEPTION;

    IT’S ABOUT THE US CONSTITUTION..

    YOU KNOW – THAT ‘PIECE OF PAPER’ OBAMA IS DELIBERATELY BURNING
    FASTER THAN OUR DEAR TROOPS INADVERTENTLY BURNED A KORAN OR
    TWO..

    oh yeah, and it sure as hell ain’t about Rush..
    but you go right ahead and drink up suckers!!

    ==

  • bg
  • I have been exploring for a bit for any high-quality articles or weblog posts on this kind of house . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website. Reading this information So i am glad to show that I’ve a very excellent uncanny feeling I found out exactly what I needed. I most definitely will make sure to don?t disregard this site and provides it a look on a relentless basis.