Mark Levin Slams Obama on Hannity (Video)
Posted by Jim Hoft on Friday, February 10, 2012, 7:35 AM
Best selling author and conservative radio host Mark Levin slammed Barack Obama on Hannity’s show last night on FOX News.
The Right Scoop has the transcript:
This isn’t about women. It’s not about contraception. This is about a president of the United States who has no respect for the Constitution, no respect for the First Amendment, and also has no respect for people of faith – and I’m not trying to be controversial, but there’s no balancing involved here.
I didn’t know we were having a problem getting contraceptives in this country. I mean they fund Planned Parenthood who hands out this stuff like candy. So there’s really no problem in this country with access. What he’s trying to do is break down that line between church and state in reverse and it’s contemptible!
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rough Night… Obama Loses 36 Arkansas Counties to Unknown Democrat – Loses 67 Kentucky Counties to “Uncommitted”
Published May 23, 2012 at 4:57 am - 69 Comments
Militant Conservative commented:
Agreed Levin, Obama is evil.
Joe Blow commented:
Just remember, no matter what Obama says he is not a Christian. I don’t know what he is exactly but I don’t believe it is Christian. Anything he and his groupies can do to get rid of God and Christ. Remember, he “knows” more than the founding fathers and the Constitution.
Bitter Clinger commented:
Contemptible is the right word. How many of us is Obama and his goons willing to throw in jail so his jack booted thugs can take over the country and “transform” it into The One’s own vision? what happens to a country in which the government doesn’t follow its own laws? Do the people who own the country have an obligation to throw if off and form their own government which is lawful and respectful of its citizens? Yes, contemptible is correct and very dangerous. Big sis, know you’re watching.
Mick commented:
Do not let anyone fool you. That day of the Lord will not come until the turning away from God happens and the Man of Evil, who is on his way to hell, appears. HE WILL BE AGAINST AND PUT HIMSELF ABOVE EVERY SO-CALLED GOD OR ANYTHING THAT PEOPLE WORSHIP. AND THAT MAN OF EVIL will go into God’s Temple and sit there and say that HE IS GOD.
2 Thessalonians 2:3-4
Hmmm, I think we have a candidate!
Bustr commented:
It is as if Obama is forcing nuns to repair gas station bathroom condom machines that aren’t even broken. Pure arrogance and malice without any added value of any sort.
donh commented:
I think the real story is Levin’s bold and forward endorsement of Rick Santorum and his attacks on Romney’s fascist record.
bg commented:
++
Crony Capitalism: definition
January 20, 2012
Crony Capitalism: vid/trans
Crony Capitalism: excerpts
[The largest banks are actually bigger than they were when he took
office. And earned more in the first two-and-a-half years of his term
than they did during the entire eight years of the Bush administration.]
scroll down for more excerpts..
The Enrich US Party.. /s/
[Democrats beat the market by 73 basis points per month, compared
to 18 for Republicans. That’s a rout anyway you look at it. Senators
fare even better than house members.]
‘ a tyranny of the elite’
==
Jerry C commented:
@ #4 Mick
Bing!
bg commented:
++
ht S. Wolf
Mark Levin defends Newt Gingrich Jan 26, 2012
[“So what’s going on here?” Levin said. “I’ll tell you what’s going on here. There’s an effort to clear the path right now for Romney. I guarantee you if Santorum was considered a threat, they’d be pulling out quotes from him and twisting them and turning them, and turning him into a pretzel, too. If they thought Ron Paul was a threat … they’d be turning him into a pretzel, too. Romney pulled the same thing with Fred Thompson. He pulled the same thing with Rudy Giuliani. Ladies and gentlemen, if you are conservative, if you are tea party activists, you’ve got to step back and say, ‘What the hell is going on here?’ All these commercials aimed at destroying opponents, not in communicating facts, not in advancing our principles, not focused on Obama, who’s the problem, but turning people into monsters.”]
==
#1AMERICAN commented:
just another example of a POS mooslum that hates this country…you wait and see if the POS gets another 4 years…he will try and institute sharia law…then we can watch a civil war unfold
David Kramer commented:
What CHRISTIAN would tell a Church to break their vows? NONE!
Obama is a marxist through and through. He was either brought in to bring us to our knees and implement communism or he was brought in to make us wake up to the marxists in our midst.
I personally did not vote for McCain for one reason only, I did not see much difference.
Could we have had an awakening like this if McCain won? We would have been all pissed because that arse would have done 95% of what Obama has done. It is time to realize that the RINOs are about as conservative as Obama.
Romney cannot win the nomination!
pink tie Republican commented:
It is all about power.
Tyranny's Bane commented:
AMEN!
Taqiyyotomist commented:
OT
Haaretz is reporting that Assad may be about to use chemical weapons.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/middle-east/assad-forces-mull-use-of-chemical-weapons-in-homs-opposition-says-1.411954
lizzy84 commented:
Watch live: Rick Santorum’s speech at CPAC
http://thehill.com/video/campaign/209931-watch-live-rick-santorums-speech-at-cpac-
Zim commented:
Levin is 100% right. Obama is the target and must not get a second term.
aprilnovember811 commented:
Love Mark. Zero is on a scorched earth campaign now. He knows he’s toast, and he’s in hurry to do as much damage as possible. He’s working with the Weathermen and the Muslim Brotherhood. He’s put the Muslim Brotherhood into DHS and the State Dept. We’re not safe, not only because of him, but because of those who allow this to happen. The damage was avoidable if only we could have seen proof of his origins. This guy isn’t American, in birth or otherwise.
“I Lived Under Hitler and Stalin: They Promised Socialism … But Gave Us Tyranny”
July 14th, 2011
By Dr. Harold Pease
http://www.libertyunderfire.org/2011/07/“i-lived-under-hitler-and-stalin-they-promised-socialism-…-but-gave-us-tyranny”/
StrangernFiction commented:
OT
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/rasmussen-tracking-obama-with-ten-point-lead-over
A ten point lead over Romney. Hmmmm, we anti-Romney types have been very bad. Very bad indeed. /s
Mr. Electable. What a joke. And if you’re wondering where Santorum is, he’s down six points less than Mr. Electable. How about we avoid the statist this time, huh?
David Kramer commented:
Thanks Tyranny’s Bane, love your moniker.
One other thing to say on this, Levin is frelling great.
Whoever is the nominee, the INSTANT they win the Presidency, they will implement real conservatives or we march to the capital. They cannot get away with lying to us again. Hell even Obama lied 95% of the time to get elected. A lot of what he stated I wanted. Transparency, corruption eliminated, justice, and a few other things. We give him credit for following through with some of the Bush policies and condemn him for taking Bush’s spending and other components to an exponential path.
It is time we do not allow them to deviate from conservatism! They cannot and must not take us to the path of ruin.
Redlite commented:
Not sure what religion he is No 2? He was raised Muslim in Indonesia. He has said that the most beautiful sound in the world is the Muslim Call to Prayer. He sat in that G-damn America Church for 20 years. And as president goes to one Baptist church or another for a photo op. What about the bow that he took in front of the King of Saudi Arabia? Who is viewed as the head muslim.
No one who is a Christian would force another Christian to act against their conscience.
Thank you Levin for calling a spade a spade. He is evil. Just look at all of the destruction that has occurred in the country in the last 3 1/2 yrs. No decent sane president could have brought so much harm to the country in such a short period.
Erik commented:
What I have to wonder is that since they want insurance to pay for contraceptions for women, shouldn’t they also push for insurance paying for condoms? If this is supposed to be health related, condoms would actually be a better thing to fund, as “preemptive care”.
The whole idea of contraception paid for by insurance is ridiculous. You might as well force insurance to pay for food or clothes… Makes as much sense
tadcf commented:
So, what else is new? By the way, Levin looks like he just came off a big drunk.
DavidC commented:
I just wish these radio talk show hosts would have enough integrity to NOT LIE about Romney. He was seduced by global warming hysteria some years ago and got over it. He is NOT in favor of Cap and Trade. Supporting TARP is a tough call. Anyone who knows the subject matter involved would not dismiss TARP so casually. The stakes were enormous. It is way to easy to sit in a radio chair, or from the side lines (like Santorum) and attack. Romney is a brilliant business man. He understood the stakes and why TARP had to be undertaken. Give him credit for manning up and having the character to speak the truth on the subject.
Hoser commented:
Come on guys, wasn’t it Obama that once echoed the line that “religion is the opiate of the masses”?
We should all view this as his personal war on drugs.
Not to take the spot light away from the “bitter clingers” when it comes to guns.Sure, Fast and Furious was a bust but damn people, he is going to still make a run at taking them away.
How the Hell is this man suppose to rule over us if we have all these people running around hopped up on opiates with guns in their hands?
Ausonius commented:
“By their fruits ye shall know them.”
Perhaps it would not be an unreasonable proposition to say the there is no evidence that this man embraces Christianity.
Oh, he might state he does (sometimes), but point to policies that show an ounce of respect to Christianity.
He claims we aren’t a Christian nation.
He makes fun of people who he associates with the Bible (bitter clingers).
He has contempt for the right of conscience.
He props up religions such as humanism and Islam
Virtually every social policy he takes is counter to orthodox (genuine) Christianity.
He has supported (and facilitated) the overthrow of most of the moderate middle east countries that allowed Christian tollerance.
He supports those who have zero tollerance for Christianity.
He behaves in the way Machiavelli suggested a ruler should behave regarding portraying themselves as Christian in public while privately embracing all sorts of ruthless behavior to magnify and expand one’s own power and control.
I submit he is a neopagan atheist who sees genuine Christianity as an impediment to the elevation of himself and/or his ideology.
Ausonius commented:
Oh, yes, and then there is his adherence to the concept of “collective salvation.”
Anyone who is familiar with the Bible will recognize that the this notion is utterly foreign to actual Biblical teaching on salvation, which is always and everywhere an INDIVIDUAL experience, not a group experience.
I do believe the Bible teaches a concept of national blessing:
“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sins, and will heal their land.” II Chronicles 7:14
But this is exactly opposite on every point to the sort of teachings that “collective salvation” proponents teach. Their is no call for humility, prayer, seeking, and especially turning (from their wicked ways), which are prerequisite to the healing God will provide.
In fact, most of these frauds teach moral liberalism that repudiates the call for living in a set way.
Gary commented:
As far as prasing Santorum, makes sense. Santorum is a pretty conservative guy compared to the others.
As far as bashing Romney, so what. As far as I know, Levin is very good friends with Rush and Rush supported Romney in the 2008 campaign.
BTW, it isn’t like either Giuliani or Thompson had particularly conservative records.
The problem for conservatives is we keep crying out for a strong conservative voice to represent us, but then we all get divided over 5 different guys, none of whom are outstandingly conservative, and then we end up with a moderate as our candidate.
2012 Romney (likely)
2008 McCain
2004 Bush 43
2000 Bush 43
1996 Dole
1992 Bush 41
1988 Bush 41
(skip Reagan)
1976 Ford
1972 Nixon
1968 Nixon
(skip Goldwater, though we almost got Rockefeller for whom Newt was a state chair)
1960 Nixon
1956 Eisenhower
1952 Eisenhower
1948 Dewey
OK that’s every election year since WWII ended, and with the exception of Goldwater and Reagan, we’ve had a moderate candidate.
As far as win/loss it’s about 50/50. But as far as advancing ideology, the Dems have been putting up liberals almost every race since Woodrow Wilson, and when they win, they advance the ball quite a ways down the field. When the Republicans win, we almost always have a moderate, and we rarely get things moved back the other direction.
So in conclusion, where was Mark Levin’s endorsement of a conservative candidate like Bachmann or Santorum when it might have made a difference? He has no room to praise or bash anybody now. Romney is almost certain to be the nominee and we’ll all have the job of promoting him over Obama. So why start in on him now?
Yeah I know Santorum’s having a moment in the sun, but there’s a mountain of money against him and mainly for that one reason, it won’t last.
Hate to say it, but I’m thinking 3rd party (after this election of course). That’s the only way we can stop the GOP establishment from handing us our candidates every single time.
lsufan commented:
Gotta love Mark Levin..i agree with him 99% of the time..but…first glance at the video..I could’a swore he was he was someone from pelosi’s SF district..LOL..next time Mark, get a pro to do your makeup..or use none at all!!
Alana commented:
Thanks for posting this, as I missed it.
jb commented:
Sometimes the truth does sound like nails on a chalkboard!
Ausonius commented:
#24 Erik:
They’ve already covered the food and clothing through food stamps and welfare, not to mention now cell phones are subsidized. Next will be cars (pray you don’t get hit by one though ’cause it won’t be insured), and then perhaps more necessities such as lcd tv’s (which pelosi no doubt would tout as efficient stimulus spending, and obama would ensure could only come from his prized donors)
And one cannot forget the story last week that apparently casinos are direct recipients of welfare subsidies, because it would be racist to dissallow those on welfare to not spend some of their welfare $ at casinos.
Gary commented:
Sorry I’m having trouble being succinct today, but the problem with the Republican party is that it has too many Republicans in it.
Rush’s philosophy is that we inhabit the corpse of the GOP and make it our own conservative party. The problem with that strategy is that we don’t have the 1000 years that it would take to eliminate what are actually Democrat transfers out of the party.
We need a whole new party with a few very clear and non-negotiable positions, and we need to keep out anybody who doesn’t take an oath to uphold those values. That way, we could put up conservative candidates in congressional races all over the country and not have them blasted out of the race in high-dollar GOP primaries.
For people worried that it would result in splits that give the DEMs the victory, I think in a lot of congressional districts it would do the opposite. The DEMS would still get their 30+% base votes, and the conservative candidate would be fighting the Republican candidate for the 70% that don’t automatically vote Dem. People respond to a clearly-articulated conservative message (as Santorum’s current bump demonstrates). If we had candidates like that in a party that didn’t have to make it past million-dollar GOP candidates in the primaries, a lot of them would get elected. Eventually it would take hold, and there would be defections from the GOP by conservatives who feel abandoned by the party.
Thoughts?
Freddie Sykes commented:
We have been fooled into having the wrong debate. The debate should be whether certain medical services are so essential to civilization that they are a “right” and therefore must be offered without any individual cost. To force benefits to be without co-pays means that their costs will be absorbed by other policyholders thru higher insurance premiums. Obama has already won this debate by our framing it as an issue of separation of church and state.
Let me repose the question: Should homosexuals and celibates be forced to pay higher premiums in order that breeders can go thru their silly rituals without fear of any consequences?
Having children is essential to the future but what is so special about not having children that we all must chip in for the cost?
no dice commented:
matt commented:
levin’s voice is like nails on a chalkboard.
geez matt with all the garbage that dims have produced and wrecked our economy this is the best you can do? back to the drawing board bud and give it another try. oh is it you are a dim?
i can’t stand to look at obama and his “large” wife. or hear them but i freely admit it and then have a long list of very important reasons for it. you might try adding a little more. ty
paul52 commented:
Mark needs to come outta the bunker more often. NO BS from Levin.
bg commented:
++
re: #9 February 10, 2012 at 8:36 am bg
1998 ACU Ratings: Gingrich 100%, Paul 88%, Santorum 84%
just the facts..
==
FurryGuy commented:
So you much prefer being lulled into a stupor by the prevarications of a smarmy snake-oil salesman whose only intent is enriching himself by running a massive con game. M’ok.
Incoherent Fredrick commented:
I’m a dumb@$$ and seemingly have no clue about who is framing the debate over separation of church and state. Even though “a wall of separation between church and state” is nowhere in the constitution, but is derived from a letter Thomas Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists regarding a STATE sponsored religion, I’m rather too lazy to even google it.
Rather than be informed, I feel the need to insult people with words like “breeder” to make it seem as though I have some sort of morally superior position on an issue I know nothing about. As I was told in my youth, “empty barrels make the most noise”, but I’m oblivious as to the meaning of metaphors. Thanks for reading my inane drivel—it’s all I got!
bg commented:
++
Incoherent Fredrick #43 February 10, 2012 at 12:29 pm
believe we know that, however, and albeit way more intricately
complex than that, sounds like you’re agreeing with Obama’s..
COVENANT FOR A NEW AMERICA
how dumbed down are we??
verily..
==
bg commented:
++
re: #44 February 10, 2012 at 1:26 pm bg
bit more here & here..
==
dba...vagabond trader commented:
From the mind of an authentic Constitutional scholar. Everything Ubama does is an affront to our liberty. Everything.
FurryGuy commented:
If Barry was soooooooo successful in framing the debate then why is the administration in hyper-drive trying to dial back and ‘splain just what the hell he meant. I’d hardly call spinning on this massive scale a success.
bg commented:
++
re: #47 February 10, 2012 at 2:12 pm
dba…vagabond trade
feel compelled to add:
and don’t think for one iota of a second that he doesn’t know that..
[Critical theory is thus able to develop a sharp, subtle, and derogatory account of modern consciousness which undermines much we believe by showing us the influences which have moulded our beliefs. These influences are contrasted with rationality and with the conditions for rational argument that would allow what Habermas calls the ‘ideal speech act’. Critical theory has therefore had a considerable influence, often indirect, on such ‘counter-culture’ movements as feminism and the green movement because it allows them to point to the structure and irrational origins of our ‘patriarchal’ or ‘industrial’ thought.]
much more here, in connecting links, and threads..
==
wtd commented:
#40 bg
Consider then,
Corruption at the ACU
Molon Labe commented:
Matt’s reasoning is like nails on a chalkboard. It assaults the very fabric of sanity. Matt just go away and copy down some names in the cementary to register as new dhimmierat voters.
I’ve always believed that you tell the caliber of a man by both his friends and his enemies. With Matt as an enemy Levin stands head and shouldersw above most talk show pundits.
Molon Labe commented:
#50
Outstanding link regarding how corrupt the ACU ratings have become. This is very valuable and I would everyone to read this to see how political agents of influence are operating.
I’ve always found the ratings of certain “conservatives” very questionable. Ron Paul more conservative than Santorum? In a pigs eye.
Molon Labe commented:
#37
Nice to see how queers think. Why should “breeders” pay for AIDs treatments? Celebates? Catholic priests have made their positions known on this attack on liberty and freedom by the queer alliance.
lizzy84 commented:
Watch live: Newt Gingrich speaks at CPAC 2012
http://thehill.com/video/campaign/210039-watch-live-newt-gingrich-speaks-at-cpac-2012
Martin T commented:
Obama regime = soft tyranny
Obamas regulation destroy jobs commented:
He doesn’t need the two parties. He has the democrats and his executive orders…he is a DICTATOR..true & true now he is giving away our gulf shores..stopped our drilling and buying our OWN oil from Brazil–this man is a traitor and has committed treason.These thugs Jarret, Axelrod, and DOJ staff Holder are disgusting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He is dictating that YOU will use green cars, YOU will eat low fat foods, YOU will give free abortions, YOU will remove all words of GOD, YOU will teach your kids about trans, bi-s, homo’s and YOU will be a liberal!!!!!!!! YOU will raise grain 4x so ALL meat goes sky high! YOU will make truckers take 4 breaks so all goods go sky high! YOU will shut down 100% tests in school and have PASS/FAIL, YOU will shut down ALL oil drilling, YOU will shut down Science and teach muslims instead, YOU will SUE any state that enforces LEGAL immigration, YOU will shut down coal mines!! YOU will defend IRAN, YOU will take the flash mob beatings, YOU will do what we the WH tells YOU! YOU are not free and the constitution is trash.
bg commented:
++
wtd #50 February 10, 2012 at 2:50 pm
way too much to sift through.. *sigh*
don’t think these (via human events)
are that much more or less reliable..
and/but should be easy enough
to check out via other sources..
oh btw, did you listen to this??
the reason i ask is, Levin also, more or less,
backs up Gingricjh’s conservative record..
==
bg commented:
++
re: #57 February 10, 2012 at 3:53 pm bg
bit more here (scroll for more, or not, your choice)..
==
bg commented:
++
October 27, 2011
The Patriot’s 2012 GOP Candidate Ratings
Newt Gingrich — Patriot Rating: 6
Ron Paul — Patriot Rating: 4
Mitt Romney — Patriot Rating: 4
Rick Santorum — Patriot Rating: 6
will keep searching for more..
==
Obama's elixir & Cool Aid commented:
#56
40,000 Mexicans do not believe Obama’s despotic politics are “soft.” No man has done more t0o subvert the liberties and freedoms of the USA than this creature.
The politburo really would appreciate it if Barrack would re double his efforts.
bg commented:
++
re: #59 February 10, 2012 at 4:07 pm bg
via Conservapedia
Presidential Election 2012
[Mitt Romney
Preferred by RINOs and heavily favored by the Establishment; has business experience and was a Republican governor of a Democratic state who cut taxes and the deficit. Big money backs Romney in a big way, enabling him to benefit from millions of dollars in negative ads against his opponent Newt Gingrich. Mitt came in second in Iowa, first in New Hampshire, a distant second in South Carolina, and first in Florida. Has received endorsements from moderate-to-liberal Republicans, such as Bob Dole, John McCain, Kelly Ayotte, John Thune, Jon Huntsman, Chris Christie,[7] Dan Quayle, Nikki Haley and Tim Pawlenty.
[..]
Newt Gingrich
The pro-life candidate most opposed by liberals, due to his political effectiveness in accomplishing conservative goals. Newt is the only contender who stands up to liberals and to the lamestream media. His debate performances have earned him a reputation as the Republican most capable of winning debates against Obama. Newt had the early backing of Fox News before John McCain backed Mitt Romney instead, which caused Fox News to switch sides. Newt has by far the strongest record of achievements of any candidate, including passing conservative legislation that included welfare reform, DOMA, the Solomon Amendment, and even term limits. Newt also had the courage to shut down the government. His story of overcoming being orphaned is inspirational. Has been endorsed by conservatives such as Fred Thompson, Rick Perry, Michael Reagan, and Herman Cain.]
[..]
Rick Santorum
Outspoken supporter of conservative values as a senator, well-
received by evangelicals, strongly conservative across the board.
[..]
Ron Paul
Terrific on economic issues, can raise the money needed to win; people may look to an anti-war Republican; Won the CPAC Poll. Appeals to many social liberals. Runs pro-life ads while Romney says little about the issue. Also, Obama’s support in polls is lowest when Paul is his opponent.]
==
Patty commented:
U.S. Constitution is being step on every day as long as Obama is the president. Yet, polls show Obama beats every republican candidate. Are they polling a bunch of morons or is this the new America.
bg commented:
++
Patty #62 February 10, 2012 at 5:59 pm
polls are rigged, even when your guy is on top..
unless of course your guy is their guy, you know..
the one who mysteriously wins in the end.. /sarc/
==
Obama's elixir & Cool Aid commented:
#62 Patty
It isn’t who votes that counts, it is who counts the votes.-Stalin
Questionman commented:
Just when I thought the racist right couldn’t get any sick and disgusting, they keep proving my both right and wrong! Especially (excluding Matt) all of these pukes swallow the words of this scumbag Neo-Nazi Racist!
I don’t get it, birth control wasn’t a big deal in America 20 years ago… why is it now?
There’s been a backlash by conservatives, some religious, some not. Progress is made in this country by taking 2 steps forward, and then forced 1 step back. It amazes me that the religious groups think it is immoral to use birth control and that these Republicans, who are supposed to be about personal liberty, think that this is ok! Women have the right to CHOOSE whether they want to start a family or not. Every time I hear one of the Repubs speak, I realize how much I dislike them (except RP)
The President arrived at a solution that satisfied all direct parties to the controversy. It is a compromise (if you even want to call it that) that gives up nothing—women will still be able to make their own decisions on birth control without having to run it past a bureaucrat, politician, or church official. It’s about choice and women are still the ones who get to make that choice. The GOP would like to take that choice away from women. President Obama, to his credit, didn’t let them.
I have lived under 13 U.S. presidents, and I can say without hesitation that George W. Bush is the worst president of my lifetime, and he may well be the worst ever. One would have to go all the way back to James Buchanan to find a president of equal incompetence.
The last thing America needs is another “businessman” like Bush. He had (whether he earned it or not) an MBA, for gosh sakes, and he was the worst president ever.
Show me anywhere in the world where Obama is a Marxist. “There is none”
Only in the mind of the “conservative” scum bags is our President a Marxist.
This is the thing with conservatives. They don’t know the first thing about Marx or his writings, yet they label everyone a “Marxist” like the term actually means something.
Anyone thinking that Obama is Anti-American needs to cover themselves up and brace for reality, soon.
I wish you were joking but we all know that you are not and that GOP would be willing to do anything including destroying the country to keep Obama from a second term. Just look at what they did with the debt ceiling fiasco. The right held out held out held out saying they weren’t going to vote yes until their demands were meet. Well those demands were never meet the US credit rating took a hit. The only good thing from that was the American people knew who to blame the GOP.
How can you even think President Obama is evil? That’s easy, because they are hate-filled racists! The scumbags here Believes anyone that does not look like him is Evil. Spoken like a racist and a refugee from the fact challenged Fox News.
As for Obama being socialist or communist or far left. Name what he’s done that is socialist, communist, or far left. Easy NONEWHATSOEVER!
Obama reacted the right way, and considered a thoughtful compromise to those who got their panties in a bunch over this non-issue.
And no, Obama ISN’T a Muslim, Communist, Marxist, or leftist extremist.
He has governed more to the center, than the last 4 POTUS’s.
But who says that Obama wants to be a dictator – other than less than reliable sources as Limbaugh, Beck, and Fox Noise?
Also, where in the Bible does it say “thou shalt not have contraception”?
How about him being a dictator. Would you like to have a dictator? Bush Jr said we should have one, and he should be that one. Did you like that? I can’t imagine anything worse that a dictator. Obama is not a dictator; he just finally got aggressive after the pugs killed all things he wanted to do.
It’s obvious why scumbags like you want him jailed Not for treason he never committed – or bribery he never did – or high crimes and misdemeanors he has never done!- not for any real impeachable offense – but only because the President is black! their only disgusting reason! It’s so obvious!
Despite the incessant screams of “Traitor!” coming from the Right, Obama hasn’t actually committed treason You can’t impeach President Obama because he has not committed a high crime or misdemeanor, they only crime he committed was being black and they hate that! That’s why they create bogus charges of crimes!
I’ll come out and say it. Anyone who calls Obama a “Clear and Present Danger to this country” is, without doubt, a fact-challenged racist. THAT is a fact! I noticed I remember past President’s doing stuff like this, but why is it Anti-American when President Obama does it? Racism or Double Standards, It’s one of the two.
Oh, and by the way, check this out:
http://blogcritics.org/politics/article/surprise-surprise-most-catholics-support-obamas/
But you repeat these ridiculous lies anyway, because you can’t say the real reason you hate Obama: THEY CAN’T STAND A BLACK MAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
FenelonSpoke commented:
Questionman every thread giving his racist dog whistles. Yaaaaaaawn!!
So What commented:
In the WH? Cain check West check..damn how racist am I
bg commented:
++
Newt Gingrich’s Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Allen West CPAC 2012 Full Speech
Allen West visits Bloggers Row at CPAC
==
Gary commented:
Molon Labe#51
Then why are you planning on voting for Obama?
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/romney-shuts-down-hecklers-at-maine-town-hall-event-video/
(comment 14)
True colors shine through. I love it.
Molon labe likes to challenge everybody else’s conservatism and call names like it was the schoolyard, but here you have it in his own words.
He won’t simply stay home in protest on election day, making it one vote easier for Obama to win, but rather will proactively go out and vote Obama (to spite Romney apparently!).
Molon Labe your conservative creds are revoked. Please stop posting on this conservative blog.
But since I know you won’t, I’ll be posting this brilliant punditry of yours every time you post until I stop seeing your idiotic username.