Marianne Gingrich Warned She Would Go on the Air and Undermine Newt… In 1995
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, January 21, 2012, 2:52 PM
For some reason, ABC forgot to mention this during their interview with Marianne Gingrich.
(Reuters)
Marianne Ginrich warned she would undermine Newt back in a 1995 interview.
Marooned in Marin reported:
A poster at FreeRepublic found this from a 1995 PBS show, “The Inner Quest of Newt Gingrich.” Very interesting comments from Marianne Gingrich, when they were married at the time.
But his greatest presidential stumbling block may be right under his nose. At home, Newt’s second wife, Marianne Ginther Gingrich, tells me she doesn’t see herself in the First Lady’s job. “Watching Hillary has just been a horrible experience,” commiserates Marianne. “Hillary sticking her neck out is not working.”
What happens if Newt runs?, I ask.
“He can’t do it without me,” she replies. “I told him if I’m not in agreement, fine, it’s easy” –she giggles at her naughtiness. “I just go on the air the next day, and I undermine everything…I don’t want him to be president and I don’t think he should be.”
More… The New York Post’s this morning reported that Marianne Gingrich once had an affair with a married man – a local boss for the United Auto Workers union, in fact? The Washington Post is said to have reported on this back in 1995.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rough Night… Obama Loses 36 Arkansas Counties to Unknown Democrat – Loses 67 Kentucky Counties to “Uncommitted”
Published May 23, 2012 at 4:57 am - 64 Comments
Gus commented:
Pay no ATTENTION to the TRUTH.
a former dem commented:
I find it strange that no one in the media has asked her a simple question, if you hate your ex0hubby so much, why keep the last name for close to 20 years?
valerie commented:
Meanwhile, the Washington Post admits it didn’t cover the election campaign of BO very well, and resolves to do better.
I suggest we hold them to their word.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-post-needs-to-spend-2012-scrutinizing-obamas-record/2012/01/20/gIQAVHcoEQ_print.html
PS. They keep assuming that everybody who has criticized their coverage is conservative, and that they use foul language. I have sent them an email disabusing them of this notion.
a former dem commented:
” the Washington Post admits it didn’t cover the election campaign of BO very well, and resolves to do better.”
LOL. ohh, look over there, Sarah Palin’s 50K wardrobe.
I agree, I cancelled my Post subcription in 2008, I’m more of a center right person, but what the Post does is pure propoganda. They aren’t going to change. I sent them an email, and then cancelled them. I can just listen to Jay carney to see what the Post will be reporting.
Liz commented:
Keep this drama king and his ongoing drama out of the White House. Give him a spot on Fox news, in media, where he belongs.
bg commented:
++
like i’ve been saying, OLD NEWS – NEW SPIN..
look, they took Cain out on baseless accusations, so, like i also warned,
now they’re tying to do it with Gingrich, but are failing miserably, and will
continue to unless the “conservative” bloggers help them put him down
like they did with Cain..
==
Mary commented:
Sad, sad woman. Maybe we now have another reason for the divorce.
BurmaShave commented:
This just one of a billion examples that divorce is hell.
And that picking a spouse for life is much serious than many people reckon.
Fionnagh commented:
I can’t imagine the driving force of my life for the past sixteen years being the day I’ll get to have revenge on my ex-husband. Worse than that is waiting sixteen years, only to find that my long-awaited revenge is actually having the opposite effect.
Go Newt:)
dfbaskwill commented:
It is amazing that we’ve never heard from any friends of Obama, any girlfriends, roommates, classmates, teachers, advisors, principals. We’ve never seen any transcripts from Kindergarten, grade school, middle school, high school, college, grad school, law school. We haven’t heard anything from any co-workers, underlings, students, employers. He’s only ever answered one question about Jeremiah Wright, and that was a non-answer. He’s only answered anything about Bill Ayers twice, which were non-answers which were proven false. An alleged mistress found a lucrative job she wasn’t qualified for in Martinique the very same week a journalist discovered her name. If one was to write a movie script for a movie about a Manchurian Candidate with this history, no one would accept it because it was unrealistic. Nice job, MSM, nice job.
crosspatch commented:
Newt cheated on his first wife with his second. Cheated on his second wife with his third. Both women were also part of the cheating and deception and are no better than he is. Saying that, this shows that Newt Gingrich has no problems in general with staging a deception when it is convenient for him to do so. While he may claim that he has changed and no longer cheats on his wife, and that may be the case, the underlying personality traits are not generally something that can be changed. He may not be engaging in that specific deception any longer (he might not need to, his current wife may be willing to “share”) but the general deceptive personality traits will still stand.
I can not believe a word Newt Gingrich says and have absolutely no confidence in his integrity. Conservatives threw him out as Speaker for a reason. The cheating on his wife isn’t so much the root of the problem, it is a symptom of a more general problem and I would be pretty interested in seeing that House ethics committee report on him, too.
I do not want this man as my President. I can’t trust him.
kato commented:
Gingrich is the GOP version of Clinton.
The word is that Gingrich’s GOP peers in Congress hate his guts. Several have already come out and said they would NOT endorse him.
And the California congressman who appears every Friday on Hugh Hewitt’s show (his name escapes me at the moment) dispelled some of Gingrich’s claim to being a conservative champion. According to this congressman’s telling, Gingrich was the father of earmarks, and much of the financial budget-balancing that Gingrich is now bragging about was the result of smoke-and-mirrors accounting.
Gingrich’s old partner, John Kasich, is now the governor of Ohio. So far, he has practiced the old-style crony capitalism of handing tax abatement to companies that have threatened to leave the state. No signs of real reform here, although if you listen to blowhard Kasich, you would think Ohio is leading the nation.
Gus commented:
Breitbart should run.
injunjoe commented:
vindictive much???
Redwine commented:
What a vindictive sourpuss.
gee! commented:
This was 17 years ago…………like i said before if mrs.ex hasn’t move on …………..she needs to seek professial help………..apparently the woman has a thing for married men ……….just sayin
Gus commented:
Let me see if I understand. She was cheating WITH NEWT when he was married.
And we are supposed to believe HER WORD?
Tjexcite commented:
If this topic is that old, Newt should have had a different answer than attack the media for asking. But that was his plan all the time. He needs to go down because even old it will not go away. The same question on day 1 will be asked on day 600.
Steven commented:
Allies of embattled GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich are coming to his defense against his ex-wife’s new and salacious charges, labeling Marianne as “unstable” and “unhinged.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2835302/posts
Ausonius commented:
For all of you Newt supporters, get use to this. This guy has made many enemies and this will be the norm. Whether it is ex’s, old girlfriends, fellow congressmen, business associates, there will be a steady flow of this kinda stuff through the whole election.
His negatives are, and have been, in the double digits: he is significantly disliked.
And many of you will blame everyone but yourselves when he looses, because so many of you were so easily impressed by his ability to speak.
Isn’t this the same Newt who:
-last year decried Paul Ryan’s reform plan as “right wing social engineering”
-last year was still defending the individual mandate in health care, a concept he was an early champion of
-a couple of years ago did a global warming commercial with Nancy Pelosi to show his support for curbing man-made global warming
-claims credit for the Reagan revolution (the same Reagan who only mentions him once in an autobiography, and that mention relating to a bad idea he had)
-claims credit for the 1994 election rout, even though most of the credit should go to a young fireball commentator named Rush Limbaugh (as well as the clinton’s overreach)
-advocates an immigration policy that could only be described as amnesty light
-nationally maintains a negative rating in the double digits (more people strongly dislike him rather than strongly approve of him)
His plan on attacking the media when they ask him a question he dislikes will only go so far, and will begin to annoy people. Today, I watched him accuse the Fox panel of bias, because they simply asked if he would release his ethics file. Eventually, that will lead to opinion of him tanking just like Romney’s stonewalling on his taxes. It makes you look like you have something to hide.
Amjean commented:
Ha! I agree with Granny! My sister uses the word to describe any despicable female and I used to be horrified when
she occasionally used it. Now, I just laugh. I believe Sex in the City used the phrase
“C you Next Tuesday”….and I never got the joke – that is until my younger sis clued me in.
Just look at her. She has waited all these years with only bitterness and revenge to keep her
company at night.
Seth commented:
Look at her face and her expression and they tell you all you need to know. She’s been storing up and carrying around this poison all these years–more than a decade–and now it turns out not to be that potent against Newt but, look what it has done to her.
Conservative to the Core commented:
Role models in the White House; how quaint!
Ausonius commented:
And to the matter of him paying $300,000 in fees to the ethics panel, are we to really believe that someone wholly innocent is forced to pay for fees incurred during an investigation?
You can dismiss that and the other stuff that is sure to follow on him, but Pelosi sat on that ethics board and if you think there won’t be a leaking of those documents if he becomes the nominee, then I think you are crazy. There was an exchange a couple of months ago where he responded to a reporter about Pelosi basically threatening to release that stuff and Newt’s response didn’t make me feel like we should be confident that there is nothing there.
bg commented:
++
ok, while i neither condone
nor condemn what he did..
i have to give him credit for not lashing out
against an obviously troubled for years ex..
==
Rose commented:
Whatever Marianne was or is, NEWT took up with HER when HE was a MARRIED MAN. And this method of lifestyle, of hooking up with Marianne did not END there with NEWT, WE DO NOT KNOW FOR A FACT THAT IT HAS YET ENDED.
Are we to take CALLISTA’S word for it that it has?
OBAMASLIE commented:
I think that Marianne has the typical “one who was dumped” syndrome and has not moved on in her life. The fact that it has been over 10 years since their divorce and she is still vindictive and bitter tells more about HER than it hurts Newt. I will be voting for Newt in the primary. The baggage is not an issue for me. Getting America back on track, which Newt will do, is. In my 64 years, I have NEVER seen or heard a more despicable person than Obama in our White House. And, I voted for him. To say I regret it is a monumental understatement. Obama, to me, is a lying con artist and a thug. He and his “people” are corrupt and I am sick and tired of having a lying Muslim Marxist as a president. His presidency has been a nightmare. He makes me sick and so does his hideous wife.
a former dem commented:
I agree with the comment, Newt can certainly fight back, but he will be the weaker of the candidates to go up against the marxist fraud in the WH. The whole going after the liberal lefty media will only work for so long….
The LSM will continue to protect their Messaih, and the focus needs to be put on soetero as much as possible, with newt, more focus will be on newt, rather than where it should be, barry soetero!
valerie commented:
#21 January 21, 2012 at 3:49 pm
Ausonius commented:
Well, I agree that Newt has big disapproval ratings, but not because of his policies so much as because his policies have been grossly mischaracterized.
Newt Gingrich on Education Reform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I34twrbPiiI&feature=relmfu
Rev. Al Sharpton on Education Reform
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8hKxBYTj8E
Newt Gingrich to Juan Williams: Americans want Paychecks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4c1-22w2G7M&feature=related
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/205557-gingrich-confronted-on-race-agrees-to-meet-with-sharpton
Sheila Jackson Lee
http://www.breitbart.tv/sheila-jackson-lee-newt-using-racist-codewords/
a former dem commented:
more and more I really think Soetero is going to get reelected. America is in so much trouble. I guess bitter clingers just hunker down, stock up on food and gold, as the country going further down the tubes.
bg commented:
++
Ausonius #25 January 21, 2012 at 3:54 pm
re: [And to the matter of him paying $300,000 in fees to the ethics
panel, are we to really believe that someone wholly innocent is
forced to pay for fees incurred during an investigation?]
yes, and here’s why..
“Newt Gingrich’s oh-so-controversial college course that he started
back in 1993 before he was Speaker. Remember how Democrats
denounced it?” Jackson began. “Tax fraud? Well, never mind. After a
three-and-a-half year examination, the Internal Revenue Service –
Bill Clinton’s IRS – has issued an official finding: no violation of tax
laws.”
is that not proof enough for you??
==
mpw280 commented:
Do reporters or editors do Due Diligence on stories or do they figure that they know and see all? The more stories you read about her the more she sounds like an absolute flake that most men would dump. The press not bothering to put out that she cleaned out the house and left Newt, then lived separate for 5 or 6 years then got back together, whereupon Newt figured he was better off without her make tell you that this was a hit job by partisan hacks dwelling in the press. Then end of this press in the pocket of the dems can’t come too soon, though I don’t know if it will.
Granny commented:
#29 January 21, 2012 at 3:57 pm
a former dem commented:
I agree with the comment, Newt can certainly fight back, but he will be the weaker of the candidates to go up against the marxist fraud in the WH. The whole going after the liberal lefty media will only work for so long….
______
A former Dem – and we are supposed to trust YOUR judgment just exactly why? You’ve already proven your judgement isn’t quite all that, though it is improving apparently since you append “former” to your status.
valerie commented:
#29 January 21, 2012 at 3:57 pm
a former dem commented:
If you think Mitt Romney is insulated from the kind of lying by Sheila Jackson Lee demonstrated in my post up above, you are mistaken.
Newt has certainly emboldened his competitors to speak up about distortions and such, but he is also still the best at making the case for the much-needed capitalist, conservative input we need to balance our national policy. Mitt has improved, and may yet shape up into an able advocate, but he hasn’t gotten there, yet.
a former dem commented:
hey LSM, where the hell are Soetero’s friends, where are his college records?? nice job covering up for your messaih!
a former dem commented:
“and we are supposed to trust YOUR judgment just exactly why? ”
Because of that reason alone. By means, nominate Newt, I’ll vote for him, many reagan dems I know will not. Nominate Sharron Angle as well, I’m sure that’ll work out well as well.
And of course any repub has an uphill battle — they will be listed as racists, sexist, homophobic, but the repub that puts the focus solely on Soetero is the best candidate. Newt has a lot of stuff that has to be defended, Mitt is more like tofu.
Looks like Newt may be the nominee, good luck to the repubs, because there are senate and house seats that will be harder to take back or defend.
newt likes to see himself as ronald reagan, he is not that by any stretch, Reagan was someone I voted for and campaigned for even as a dem, newt is no reagan.
Good luck to America. ABO.ABO.
Ausonius commented:
#11 crosspatch
You are not alone. Many of those supporting him will not consider his electability. And they will blame everyone but themselves when he looses.
I know many who will not enjoy voting for Romney, but will. They won’t, however, vote for a serial adulterer. They would rather have someone more conservative than Romney, such as Santorum (who has a more conservative record than Newt).
bg commented:
++
re: valerie #30 January 21, 2012 at 3:57 pm
ht squeaky:
Chicago conservative African Americans to support Newt Gingrich
[The Illinois African American Libertarian Alliance (IAALA) is home to hundreds of Chicago African American conservatives and has decided to endorse Newt Gingrich for the upcoming 2012 election. “Newt Gingrich represents the values of many conservatives—White, Latino, or Black. He is honest about who he is and is the perfect person to turn a falling country around,” says IAALA President David Lemar.]
more here & just so’s we know’s..
==
bigL commented:
But Newt knows the history of the world and that is what we need now.He can argue debate the Iranians from the Persian standpoint. We don’t just need a technocrat, we need someone with
world knowlege.
bg commented:
++
eh, why not..
Newt Gingrich
[NEWT GINGRICH: It was personally painful in the sense that you hated to be demonized, but you have to make a decision early on: Are you in the business to achieve change, or are you in the business to be popular? I thought my job was to be the executor of the American people's will on very specific things -- balance the budget, cut taxes, reform welfare, strengthen defense, modernize the House of Representatives.]
==
DaveinPhoenix commented:
Eight words say it all: “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned”. I’m positive that Newt is a human being and has some human shortcomings as did Bill Clinton who everyone seems to love. Don’t think Newt has lied to Congress or the American people about it. Three (or 4?) relatively balanced budgets under his belt and a whole lot of reform also…and a whole lot of scared s***less Republican elites and media wondering what the heck they do now. Love it. I’d vote for the man in a heartbeat despite his failings in life.
Granny commented:
#37 January 21, 2012 at 4:08 pm
a former dem commented:
“and we are supposed to trust YOUR judgment just exactly why? ”
Because of that reason alone. By means, nominate Newt, I’ll vote for him, many reagan dems I know will not. Nominate Sharron Angle as well, I’m sure that’ll work out well as well.
And of course any repub has an uphill battle — they will be listed as racists, sexist, homophobic, but the repub that puts the focus solely on Soetero is the best candidate. Newt has a lot of stuff that has to be defended, Mitt is more like tofu.
_______
Don’t kid yourself. There are substantial reasons that Mitt Romney has never again been elected to ANY elected office after his one term as Massachusetts governor. They just haven’t made the main stream media. Oh sure, some people will say that Newt is whatever he is so they won’t vote for him, but for every one of those there is at least one who will not vote for Romney because he is Mormon and a whole shooting match more who will not vote for Romney because a man who hides his money in off shore accounts in the Caymans and refuses to disclose his tax returns cannot be trusted with ours . . . .
bg commented:
++
“Let me say first of all, I don’t want to argue with you about the
analogy. I don’t want to bloody his nose, I want to knock him out.”
scroll thread for much more..
==
valerie commented:
http://biggovernment.com/fsalvato/2012/01/21/an-axelrod-esque-moment-for-gingrich/
More background about why we are even discussing this.
Please remember that my favored candidates were slandered about sexual matters. Given what we know is going to hit the Republican candidate, we need somebody who can turn an unfair attack to his advantage.
Further, I’ve got a soft spot for policy wonks. There’s no way in h3ll I’d date him, but I’d be glad to vote for him, if he is nominated.
dfbaskwill commented:
I’ll vote for a turkey sandwich rather than an unvetted Marxist. (Maybe not a ham sandwich. Wouldn’t want to make the Muslims mad.)
Little Orenthal commented:
How on earth is everyone missing the most shocking part of this interview? This sick, evil woman was caught in an FBI sting op, where she asked a weapons dealer for a $500k bribe for a guarantee that her husband the speaker would recommend their company for a huge arms deal.
These two are the worst type of human beings on the planet. Gingrich has no business in the Whitehouse. Unless it turns out to be Obama vs. Gingrich, I think we need to defeat Gingrich for the sake of sanity. He’s no good.
Check out her reaction to the question about this topic. She bursts out laughing that its a silly lie. Thats not a real reaction. That was planned. If I were accused of a crime such as this, I’d be so angry nobody could shut me up. I wouldn’t laugh. If you’ve been accused of anything at work or anywhere that wasn’t true, you wouldn’t laugh. trust me
These two should be locked up in an asylum. They are both sociopaths. 500k? what a detestable piece of trash
Ausonius commented:
#30 Valerie
Disliked because he was mischaracterized?
How about because of himself. Why does everyone have to be a victim? Because it turns attention away from themselves. He’s got problems because of him, not because of the mean media, ignorant repubs, or evil dems.
…but keep drinking the kool aid
Ausonius commented:
#32 bg
Yeah, keep twisting in order to justify your candidate. I’ll run with the notion that his ethics file probably is as damning as Mitt’s tax return.
You’re drinking kool aid, too.
valerie commented:
bg, thanks.
From you link, I wandered a bit:
After the debate, Hannity had Gingrich on to talk it over. They touched on a number is issues
Gingrich: Media wants to define GOP Candidates as “Unacceptable”
racist codewords discussed @ about 8 min.
Meanwhile, the obnoxious Bill Maher is still pushing the racist nonsense, but note that his panel acknowledges something interesting: Gingrich has some stroke with Democrats, just like Ronald Reagan.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/21/maher_on_why_tea_people_like_gingrich_mean_snarly_and_racist_like_them.html
valerie commented:
#50 January 21, 2012 at 4:49 pm
Ausonius commented:
There is none so blind, as he who will not see. We know what you’re up to. The links are really for those who are willing to educate themselves.
StrangernFiction commented:
The word is that Gingrich’s GOP peers in Congress hate his guts.
And this is a bad thing?
valerie commented:
#48 January 21, 2012 at 4:42 pm
Little Orenthal commented:
Oh, great. Gingrich’s ex-wife laughs at a stupid lie, so you think we’re supposed to swallow it whole. Does that mean we are also supposed to believe that Obama was born outside the United States, just because somebody said it?
We need better trolls.
#1AMERICAN commented:
Of course the demo-turd media &ock suckers wouldn’t say anything….fukkkk the scorned beeeotch
StrangernFiction commented:
#34 January 21, 2012 at 4:01 pm
Granny commented:
rathernot@cbs.tv commented:
Well this certainly demonstrates who she is and what she’s about. She has now undermined her once-potential role as an aggrieved “victim” by exposing herself as a dried-up harpie of a battle-axe.
This latest exposure with the giggling about undermining Newt undermines nobody but herself as a lost opportunity to be a sweet, delicate, “poor little me, I soldier on while he lives the high life” abandoned heart. The ’95 PBS interview needs to go viral.
Kato @ 13, you’re speaking of Congressman Tom Campbell. He’s a squishy, unreliable moderate. Other than that edification, you really need to get a grip.
Little Orenthal commented:
@ #55
Troll? haha I want the detestable scumbag of a President who is sabotaging our economy to be defeated at all costs. Its cost me personally bigtime. If we have Gingrich running against him, O’dip$hit will win. That cannot happen.
Gingrich is a horrible human being. Along with all his ex wives. The FBI doesn’t ‘make stuff up’ about sting ops. She asked for a 500k bribe and her husband was in on it. You want such a scumbag in the whitehouse?
Troll? ha. Look in the mirror. You are blind to your love of a sociopath
valerie commented:
More about what we really should be talking about:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/01/21/make_crony_capitalism_the_issue_in_2012.html
“You’ve got to stop the spread of crony capitalism. (Obama) gives General Motors to the UAW. He takes $500 million and sticks it into Solyndra. He stacks the labor stooges on the NLRB so they can say no to Boeing and take care of their friends in the labor movement. … He has to bow to the most extreme members of the environmental movement. He turns down the Keystone pipeline, which would bring energy and jobs to America.
“My view is capitalism works. Free enterprise works. … There’s nothing wrong with profit, by the way. That profit went to pension funds, to charities. It went to a wide array of institutions. … And by the way, as enterprises become more profitable, they can hire more people. I’m someone who believes in free enterprise. I think Adam Smith was right. And I’m gonna stand and defend capitalism across this country, throughout this campaign. I know we’re going to get hit hard from President Obama, but we’re gonna stuff it down his throat and point out that it is capitalism and freedom that makes America strong.”
“We need to restore the values that made America the hope of the Earth. … (President Obama) has made it almost impossible for our private sector to reboot. … I will defeat Barack Obama and keep America as it’s always been, the shining (city) on a hill.”
*************
Those quotes were from Mitt Romney, Thursday night. I understand why people label it “crony capitalism,” but to me, the actions described are governmental malpractice or mismanagement, and not capitalism, at all.
valerie commented:
#59 January 21, 2012 at 5:06 pm
Little Orenthal commented:
Troll. You. Otherwise, you’d click on the links and learn something.
exceller commented:
her big reveal results in a surge for Newt and a big comeback. go back into your hole marianne, your info was just not very important afterall. buh bye.
its clear why Newt had to dump you.
bg commented:
++
valerie #52 January 21, 2012 at 4:54 pm
sorry, just couldn’t listen to more than a few seconds
of their pitiful self agrandizing pompASS plutterings..
same goes for Ausonius Alinsky wanna be garblings.. (shiver)
==
Rhoda R commented:
We saw what the media was capable of with Herman Cain. Do you really think that Mitt has the bottom to defend against that? He hasn’t been at all effective against the much milder primary attacks.
Redlite commented:
10 a big ditto to you. I couldn’t have said it better.
bg commented:
++
valerie #60 January 21, 2012 at 5:08 pm
sorry, just had coma-0ny and my mind is elsewhere..
but your post reminded me of this gem that chews
up their hypocrisy at spits it right back in their face..
==
bg commented:
++
re: #67 January 21, 2012 at 5:44 pm bg
coma-0ny = company
==
Ron? commented:
Notice how the media tries to portray us on the right as moral hypocrits? Their perception of us is that we are a bunch of puritins or quakers. Life is what it is and I’m sad to say that the nuclear family may become a thing of the past. However, we need to let these prissy elitist pressers keep playing this hand. Their ignorence of the right (Mostly everyday Americans)will be their downfall. They lost the Moral High Ground with BillyBoy. Can’t wait to see the debate between Newt and Toonces. How much do you want to bet that Toonces handlers will come up with some sort of world crisis or national emergency. Newt will wipe the floor with Toonces in a national debate and send him home crying to Michelle. Watch out; as the end of the Obama Shamelot Hopet/Changey Pipedream approaches they will become desperate and the gloves will come off.
Nanna commented:
I want someone who will almost slap Obama’s mouth shut in a debate. someone that will have the guts to tell him exactly what the world thinks. I want someone that will destroy Iran and stand up for Israel, that will put Palestine in their place. And all of this without a stutter, not an I-I-I, not an er- er-. Not a whiney bag that wants to constantly tell you how wonderful he is while at the same time putting down everyone else.
Someone that will put in good Supreme judges when the time comes SOON.
I want someone that can admit mistakes, and move on.
And people that doesn’t matter too much if we don’t fight to get the Senate, along with the House. Because Harry Reid will fight everything our Republican president does.
GOOOO NEWT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
retire05 commented:
Let me see if I understand all the Newt apologists correctly: you slam his ex wife, and say vile things about her, because she had an affair with a married man that she eventually married, but you excuse the man she had the affair with?
You ignore that he quit the job of being third in line for the office of the President over ethics charges that you say he was innocent of although he paid the fine?
Now, tell me which one of your rocket scientists would give up such a powerful position and pay such a high fine for things you were innocent of? Yeah, tell me again how people give up powerful positions when they are accused of wrong doing and don’t even bother to fight back and defend their innocense.
And I’ll sell you some ocean front property in Phoenix.
retire05 commented:
#70, Nanna, while you may love the red meat Newt is throwing your way by attacking the left wing press, that tactic is NOT going to work with independents. He is only going to come off as hateful and angry. And do you think that kind of tactic is going to work with the nutcase in Iran?
He can’t win without the indies. In other words, he can win against Obama. Sad, but true.
bg commented:
++
retire05 #71 January 21, 2012 at 6:04 pm
what?? you think your hero Perry is (gasp) wrong for
not backing up the Obama Axelrod smear strategy??
/s/
==
luckyone commented:
Unhinged is as unhinged does. Sounds kind of like Fatal Attraction.
Molon Labe commented:
#73
BG
Watch it BG you are dealing with the same kind of personality as the ex Mrs. Gringrich. She is still projecting. A troll is a troll, is a troll.
Molon Labe commented:
Poor, bitter woman whose life id dedicated to revenge. Sad. But all too common.
Larkin commented:
Dear Marianne,
In your vain attempt at revenge, you’ve humiliated yourself. You could have let sleeping dogs lie, but…nooooo.
Now, every time people see your sad-sack face in that interview, they will judge you…one way or the other.
And you brought it on yourself.
l.
S. Wolf commented:
What a raddled bitter shrew, she won’t be First Lady. Poor thang.
bg commented:
++
S. Wolf #77 January 21, 2012 at 7:23 pm
and funny, but i don’t feel sorry for her, you
know what they say, lie down with dogs..
==
bg commented:
++
“vengeance is mine sayeth the lord”
Amen!!
==
bg commented:
++
#74 January 21, 2012 at 6:49 pm
Molon Labe commented:
#73
BG
huh??
that wasn’t me..
==
Mama Grizzly commented:
Ausonious: I don’t think Romney was being vague on when he’ll release his taxes. If you listen again you will see that. Otherwise good post. People forget.
And in polling Obama is way above Newt. Not so with Romney.
Mama Grizzly commented:
If Newt wins, then the First Lady will be the intern. This is like Clinton divorcing Hilary and marrying his intern.
And that says what about her in most people’s minds?
I don’t think we need all this drama.
Better to promote someone solid.
FurryGuy commented:
And in polling Romney was supposed to be THE winner in SC, Newt was to have been behind Ron Paul in votes.
And lookie here, it didn’t happen. Polls that didn’t get it right?!? Wow.
For that matter, Santorum was supposed to have been the bottom of the heap in Iowa, and now he’s the actual winner.
The only poll that counts is the actual election. All else is propaganda.
bg commented:
++
‘Moving on to Florida and Beyond’
loved the “one of the key issues is the growing anti-
religious bigotry of our elites” @ 13:45.. woot Newt!!
[of course the sound is low, gah!!]
==
Callie369 commented:
dfbaskwill………The reason you have never heard of any kind girlfriend of Dumbama’s is because he was gay. That is up until the time he decided to run for office. Then he married Moocherella. Just a facade!!!!! They had their requisite kids, and probably haven’t had sex since she got pregnant with the last kid. Even a non-gay wouldn’t want to go to bed with that gorilla-faced lard-butt!!!!
Ausonius commented:
bg #63
Alinsky?
I can’t say your name calling suprises me whatsoever.
BTW: I saw an ad for the position of bimbo eruption specialist position, just contact Newt’s office. Judging by the way I see phony conservatives sound amazingly like the clinton folks (i’m guessing you were probably a democrat follower at that time, so you’ll remember it) tearing down anyone who takes a shot at Newt. I figure that would be a nice fit for you.
You can know this: if you get Newt as a nominee, and he looses enough of the base due to serial infidelity, then you can also know that you helped elect barry for four more years.
Ausonius commented:
retire05 #70:
Very good point.
Trying to communicate logic to bg, valerie, etc., is very much like trying to have a coherent conversation with a paulbot. But your point was a strong effort.
I’m starting to wonder if Newt isn’t being backed by alot of the same establishment sorts that have desperately desired to rid the Republican brand of social conservatives for decades. They know that if they can get him the nomination, then the standard, in terms of personal conduct, will have effectively be lowered to something around the clinton standard.
Shawn commented:
Like I said before the Demorats will stoop to no low to smear a person. As for the house ethics chages against Newt they mean nothing. What about Rengal and Waters and their charges? Get real and destory the left before they destory us.
Beachluver commented:
I mean really……..who could blame Newt? This is one fugly ugly skank!!!!!! But then again can someone tell me if Calista’s hair MOVES?