Ron Paul: Guess Who’s Behind World Trade Center Bombing?… The Jews

Ron Paul suggested the Jews were behind the 1993 World Trade Center bombings.
The New Republic reported, via RedState:

One of the more insane claims in Ron Paul’s newsletters was that the Israelis were behind the WTC bombings in 1993:

Whether [the 1993 World Trade Center bombing] was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by the Islamic fundamentalists, matters little.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Paz

    Nice way of twisting his words. He suggested nothing. He referred to a Jewish friend with those comments. The Mossad ain’t saints either.. much like our CIA.

    You establishment faux conservatives are really threatened of Dr. Ron Paul. It’s actually quite funny.

  • zooomzooom

    RP can go hang out with the guy that pretty much offended the entire state of “corn pickers”.

    They appear to be much alike. Whiny, useless and will always be know as “Also Ran’s”

  • karen

    I love Ron Paul!

  • Damion

    Nice propaganda comrade how tight did ur slave masters pull ur strings to pucker such crap out of ur A..

  • A_Nonny_Mouse

    “… Whether [the 1993 World Trade Center bombing] was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects …”
    = = = = = =

    Nice way of putting the suspicion of Jooooos into people’s minds without he himself actually being recorded as SAYING such a thing…

    As I’ve said before: Mr. Ron Paul totally lost me when he said that the Bush Administration “reacted with glee” to the 9-11 attacks. This slug –aka “libertarian candidate”– needs to go swallow broken, rusty razor blades.

  • Infidel Task Force

    People who are considering Ron Paul as a viable candidate are truly among the ignorant. Paul is extremely far left and quite possibly dangerous to this country. Regardless whether he suggested it or not, he should never bring up something as serious as the bombings of the WTC being anything other then attacks by Islamists.
    Beware folks!!

  • Redlite

    What a Effing nut.

  • J Descartes

    I have always enjoyed simple minded ethnic humor. Ron Paul is a master of this. Comrades unite behind our fearless master cylinder. Let us all beam up to the mothership! If Paul states it is true who cannot deny it?
    Ignore those reactionary neo-cons who keep quoting our lord and master. Ignore Ron’s love of the mullah village. Ignore the lamentations of the usual suspects whose combined IQ is less than Michael Bellesiles (Descartes, Craig, JHP, and Paz). The truth shall out. Speak to the power. Idle mendacity is the way forward.

    Power to the Ronulans and Twinkie eaters!

  • J Descartes


  • Craig

    Listen you neocons, you are twisting everything. I believe you can’t read a text.

    Half of your country believes the Jews were behind that event and the other half believes it was an Islamist terrorist attack

    What Ron Paul said is this:

    Whether [the 1993 World Trade Center bombing] was a setup by the Israeli Mossad, as a Jewish friend of mine suspects, or was truly a retaliation by the Islamic fundamentalists, MATTERS LITTLE.

    “Matters Little” are the KEY WORDS here.

    Dr Paul was speaking on behalf of both halfs of the American people’s beliefs. I suggest you take a few lessons on how to decode a sentence.

  • Craig

    And note that it was a JEWISH friend who believed that.

  • Saint

    Ok, now this is just getting silly. The point Ron Paul was making (in this instance, at least) had nothing to do with finding the perpetrator behind the World Trade Center bombing (who his only point being that the government couldn’t be trusted on the issue; it has its own priorities). It had everything to do with warning people about the emerging dangers of city life, and the necessity to be armed and prepared in the event of wide-scale violence.

    This is just disingenuous.

  • J Descartes

    Ron Paul wins the mad Mullah Award.

  • Remco Kimber

    The folks in Iowa can’t be this gullible,

  • David


    You are missing the point and I suspect you performed very poorly in your GMATs and SATs. Your reading, verbal reasoning and critical thinking skills are very low

  • vityas

    It matters little that 3000 people were killed?
    Said by a doctor.
    Okey dokey.

  • J Descartes



    You’re on the mask Saint. He was really talking about the dangers of chewing gum on the streets and Lutheran terrorists at bake sales. He was warning the annointed about the dangers of 3D cinema.

    Learn to read monkey boy.

  • Craig

    Infidel, #6

    LOL…. and RE-LOL. Ron paul not conservative?


    In fact, Ron Paul is not only the most conservative candidate, he is OFFICIALLY THE MOST CONSERVATIVE MEMBER OF CONGRESS and more conservative than any senator or president, not only today but dating all the way back to 1937.

    Out of 3,320 individuals, Ron Paul ranks number 3,320 (number 1 being the most liberal) in a Common Space Scores tabulation by distinguished political scientist Dr Keith T. Poole. The scores are computed from all the roll calls cast in the House and Senate for the 1937 – 2002 period.

  • bg


    OT.. but definitely related:

    we did not listen, we’re not listening still..

    [… And The Deceptive

    And here’s where Resolution 16/18 gets tricky.

    Because who, exactly, arbitrates what is “incitement to imminent violence”? Violence by whom? If drawing a caricature of the Prophet incites violence by Islamic radicals to the tune of riots, arson, and murder, all sanctioned by the IOC itself – then drawing such a caricature (or writing a book like the Satanic Verses) will now constitute a criminal act. And that is exactly what the OIC was aiming for. It is also in direct violation of the principles of Western democracy – and the First Amendment. (Though it is crucial to note that any resolution passed by the General Assembly remains nonbinding, which makes you sort of wonder what the point of all this is, anyway.)

    Moreover, since many would claim that the persecution of blasphemers is mandated by their religion, conflicts emerge between guarantees of free expression and the guarantee of freedom of religion and the practice of one’s faith. In othr words: your free speech allows you to insult my prophet: my freedom of religion compels me to kill you for it.

    What was that about “incitement to violence”?

    Whose violence?

    This is how the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation plays “Gotcha.

    This is how the American government, however unwittingly, subsumes its own Constitution in deference ot the demands of the Islamic state.]


  • gus

    What boggles the rational mind is fvcking idiots like Craig really don’t see the lunacy.

    They try to disassociate Ron Paul from exactly what Ron Paul expressed. He expressed the choice between ISRAEL, THE JEWS/MOSSAD or the other possiblity being ISLAMIC…………………….RETALIATION as not mattering.

    Sorry idiots, Paul has BE-CLOWNED himself. AGAIN