Maybe this explains all of those extravagant vacations?

Is Michelle Obama busted?

It’s a good thing her last name is not Cain or this story would be making major headlines by now.
America’s Conservative News reported:

The Globe magazine just released a bombshell and is reporting that Michelle Obama is having a “steamy secret affair” with a Secret Service Agent. According to The Globe, rumors started to circulate that Obama may be having an affair after her recent admission to NBC’s Al Roker that she frequently “sneaks out” of the White House; and the ever increasing time she is spending away from the White House may be a cover to hide “a sizzling affair she’s carrying on with a Secret Service agent.”

According to The Globe’s anonymous source: “The rumors are that she’s getting it on with a Secret Service agent who is not part of her detail. … Her frequent outings away from the White House give her and him an opportunity to get together.” The source adds: “Something has been going on for a couple of months and there’s no question Barack is embarrassed about her increasingly frequent excursions away from him at the White House.”

The allegations are, of course, unsubstantiated and only time will tell if the allegations will fizzle or blow up into a major issuing in the upcoming presidential campaign. Typically, the media will not report unsubstantiated claims from anonymous sources, but the recent media feeding frenzy over unsubstantiated allegation against businessman Herman Cain, which literally sank his candidacy, leave the question open: will the media pursue, or even bother to investigate this story?

When it comes to the Mainstream Media, anything goes. That much is clear. But will the media apply the same standard to Obama as to Cain? Only time will tell.

Hat Tip Rachel

 

ADVERTISEMENT

1 2 3 … 10

`
  1. #1 December 10, 2011 at 9:03 pm

    MikeSilver commented:

    Thankful, its not a lesbian relationship. I couldn’t take that.

  2. #2 December 10, 2011 at 9:13 pm

    ruready? commented:

    Ask not what your President can do for you….

  3. #3 December 10, 2011 at 9:18 pm

    Remco Kimber commented:

    Could be those Clinton hand-me-downs, Vince Foster or Ron Brown,

  4. #4 December 10, 2011 at 9:18 pm

    Black Sabbath commented:

    Personally, I don’t believe a word of this.
    But why should that stop me from tearing the Obamas down the way they’ve taught me to do to their political enemies?

  5. #5 December 10, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    But will the media apply the same standard to Obama as to Cain?

    if there ever was a tick question, that has got to be it..

    ==

  6. #6 December 10, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    martha commented:

    1)who’d want her?
    2) that said, she never looks happy when she’s with obama ,but then she never looks happy antway. She impresses me as being one of those angry black women who are looking to pick a fight over the smallest perceived fight,see them on the bus or the supermarket all the time.

  7. #7 December 10, 2011 at 9:23 pm

    USMC Thomas commented:

    Ah, the humor ahead watching the MSM falling over each other to excoriate this report.

  8. #8 December 10, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    Firebird commented:

    Bunch of wild ones populate D. C. Cultural cesspool. Does anyone expect anything different? Sure be nice to have some decent folks governing every once in a while.

  9. #9 December 10, 2011 at 9:29 pm

    pamlinson commented:

    Even warthogs find mates somehow.

  11. #12 December 10, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    ar05075 commented:

    Larry Sinclair must be elated..

  13. #14 December 10, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    Odysseus commented:

    Horned President?

  15. #16 December 10, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    donh commented:

    I think the secret service agent is escorting Michelle to a private location where she can get it on with Opra Winfrey.

  16. #17 December 10, 2011 at 9:36 pm

    nah commented:

    I can’t stand FLOTUS and TOTUS.

    But I don’t believe a word of this either.

  17. #18 December 10, 2011 at 9:37 pm

    Mad Hatter commented:

    Alright everyone, let’s slow down just a moment, after all it’s ‘Globe Magazine’ as the source. They have as much credibility as MSNBC.

  18. #19 December 10, 2011 at 9:39 pm

    lyle commented:

    I doubt we’ll hear much more about it. Editors won’t assign anyone to it. Reporters won’t willingly report it. They can plausibly argue that it’s none of their business or ours.

    If pursued, it might do minor damage to a president already perceived as ineffectual, even… er, metrosexual. But the timing does not seem politically convenient for anybody.

    A sizzling affair would solve a mini-mystery I have wondered about. Over the past six months the First Lady’s choice in makeup has varied like Jekyll and Hyde. Sometimes she looks appropriate to her role, and sometimes she looks like a maneater on a hot date.

    (You know what I mean. You show up for dinner and the woman has batwing eyelashes and glossy wet-looking pink lipstick. She’s not looking for friendship.)

    Ultimately what matters is the incumbent’s record. The rest is diversion.

  19. #20 December 10, 2011 at 9:39 pm

    Ace commented:

    Say what you want about her, but who can blame her?
    She’s married to a degenerate.



1 2 3 … 10


`

© Copyright 2013, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk