Liz Cheney called Barack Obama’s latest talking points “ludicrous” today on FOX News Sunday. Cheney also hammered Obama on his foreign policy,

“Obama is about to snatch defeat from victory in Iraq… The only reason his failed foreign policy is not being covered is because his performance on the economy is so abysmal.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. #1 December 11, 2011 at 10:33 am

    Patty commented:

    She is correct. And Obama has completely alienated the Troops and it will be a mix of voters who will see it this way. I believe that we had to see Victory in Iraq and hope that it will be one of the most important reasons that the voters will not vote for Obama. He has cut the military to the bone and he believes that other nations should handle things for themselves. He wants the military budget to prop up his spending on more of his nothing and dreadful proposals that are failures and this is on the back of the troops who are coming home and every American who want to feel secure.

    Muslims and other groups are taking over worse than ever in other nations and this is another failure of Obama. Alienation and complete discourse. Americans don’t feel that we can afford reducing our military. It could take years to rebuild not just our forces but our pride. And Obama is completely at fault for this too.

  2. #2 December 11, 2011 at 11:38 am

    chuck in st paul commented:

    His handlers want to create the same exit debacle they did for Viet Nam. This will “prove” that Bush’s War was illegitimate.

    It will also “prove” the US military is a failed institution and that only smart people (sic) like them sitting around the UN or some exotic (and expensive) retreat using nuanced negotiations can solve the world’s problems. Of course they’ll need to be paid top money because they’re so important.

  3. #3 December 11, 2011 at 11:48 am

    James commented:

    If obama and the liberals had their way, we wouldn’t have gooten bin laden. obama was against the harsh interrogation techniques which helped lead us to bin laden. So obama criticises

  4. #4 December 11, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    Lady Mondegreen commented:

    I would love to have a moratorium on any comments from anyone named Cheney. This bimbo’s only qualification is her name, and that’s pretty badly tarnished.

  5. #5 December 11, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    mcc commented:

    Now watch Rick Santorum give it to Candy and, thankfully, cut her off:

    CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Let me try to button this up just by saying a couple things. First, I know the President has in fact imposed some tougher sanctions and has in fact said nothing is off the table when it comes to Iran and its nuclear capabilities, but I have to…

    RICK SANTORUM: Candy, hold on. Hold on. Stop, Candy. That’s just not true. Ask Robert Menendez and ask all the folks in the United States Senate who want to impose the real sanction that will make a difference on Iran and the President has opposed it. Now that’s just a fact. He also has recognized the state of Syria, called Assad a reformer, has continued to have an embassy there when in fact this is a real thug that is a real threat to the state of Israel and to the stability of the region.

    And again here’s the interesting link. It is a client state of Iran. The greatest area he’s appeased is Iran which is the greatest threat, and here he is recognizing Assad, setting up an ambassadorship with a client state of Iran who is a great funder of Hezbollah, a threat to Israel and the region. You go to Egypt. Again, he supported the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists as it turns out into overthrowing an ally in Egypt. There is a consistent pattern of contingencies that have come up under this administration where he has opposed the freedom fighters and has gone with the radical Islamists. That is a problem for the security of Israel and our country.

    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/12/11/rick-santorum-schools-candy-crowley-obamas-appeasement#ixzz1gFlsrysV

  8. #8 December 11, 2011 at 1:37 pm

    Stuart commented:

    Obama snatching defeat from the jaws of victory? Hardly, just the opposite.
    That wouldn’t be the way he would see it.
    You have to remember whose side he is really on.
    Its not incompetence. It’s deliberate.
    By now I can come to no other conclusion.

  9. #9 December 11, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    cutlers bad thumb commented:

    You want to have some good “lovin” with her don’t you #4…If that fails there is always Elana Kagan, although she (it) is a bit more manly.
    To bad for you that Moochie likes men…….And evidently more than one……

  11. #11 December 11, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    bg commented:

    ++

    Lady Mondegreen #4 December 11, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    Cheney

    Clinton / Gore

    Obama

    ==

  12. #12 December 11, 2011 at 2:45 pm

    dunce commented:

    I would not use the word snatch but rather “fashion”.

  13. #14 December 11, 2011 at 8:50 pm

    Molon Labe commented:

    Watch what the Indonesian, Muslim, Communist, queer will do once the public kicks him out of the WH. I intend to be at the next inaugeration. I’m trying to figure out what the best song to learn would be. How about Hit the Road Jack?

  14. #16 December 13, 2011 at 7:17 am

    lol wut commented:

    Um, the Bush administration negotiated the withdrawal from Iraq in 2008. The agreement explicitly states: “All the United States Forces shall withdraw from all Iraqi territory no later than December 31, 2011.” Iraq would have had to agree to to change this date. They also refused to grant immunity to any troops remaining after this date, which is a condition that the Pentagon found to be unacceptable.

    lol facts? what are those??!/1 Obama is a socialist!!111 Failed foreign policy!11

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk