Texas Gun Store Bans Socialists & Obama Supporters in Radio Ad: “You Have Already Proven You Cannot Make a Knowledgeable & Prudent Decision Under the Law” (Video)
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, October 29, 2011, 2:50 PM
A Texas gun trainer released an ad this week for his handgun training class. He bans liberals from the class saying:
“If you are a socialist liberal and/or voted for the current campaigner in chief, please do not take this class. You have already proven that you cannot make a knowledgeable and prudent decision under the law.”
Agreed.
The ad also bans non-Christian Arabs and Muslims from taking the class.
Hat Tip Marvin
Yahoo reported:
A radio ad for a handgun training class that bars Muslims and Obama voters has sparked an investigation in Texas.
“We will attempt to teach you all the necessary information you need to obtain your [Concealed Handgun License],” the ad says. Then towards the end, it adds: “If you are a socialist liberal and/or voted for the current campaigner in chief, please do not take this class. You have already proven that you cannot make a knowledgeable and prudent decision under the law.”
And then: “If you are a non-Christian Arab or Muslim, I will not teach you the class with no shame; I am Crockett Keller, thank you, and God bless America.”
The ad ran for six days on KHLB, Mason’s local station. It’s also been heard tens of thousands of times on Youtube.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
YouTube Pulls Video of Trayvon Martin at Fight Club… But They Can’t Hide It Forever – Here It Is Again
Published May 22, 2012 at 5:04 am - 81 Comments
Jim commented:
Good!
RedBeard commented:
I saw that the other day. Can’t disagree with any of it.
Libtards lie commented:
Heard about this last night and thought it was great. To bad I do not live in Texas, or I would make sure to purchase my next firearm at this man’s business.
regularguy commented:
If muslims want to own a gun, let them truthfully convert to Christianity. They’d be welcome aboard to freedom from a tyrannical, oppressive ideology. Liberals, too.
I don’t see where any investigation should take place. The man is free to refuse to instruct very possibly irresponsible or dangerous gun owners. Actually, he’s morally obligated to avoid doing so.
ar05075 commented:
Outstanding.!!!!
vityas commented:
It’s still a free country. These are his decisions.
Incoming! Lawsuits being prepared as we speak!
WillofLa commented:
He forgot one more group, “illegal Mexican alien” should not apply for this class primarily because they will have to pass a FBI background check and that would expose them to the authorities. But the liberals might try to force him to allow anyone because if his business is open to the public and anyone can apply, he might have to take liberals and Muslims regardless of whether or not they would use his training to kill innocent American’s or for liberals, they would use his training to kill conservatives, Christian’s, and/or Republican’s, or anyone who opposes the Occupier’s, card carrying Socialists, Communists, or Nazi’s(who are already carrying AR-15′s) might want to have a concealed carry permit in case the cops take their AR-15′s away from them.
This man is opening up a whole can of worms, but under the Constitution is allowed to “exclude” anyone from taking this class, but since it’s open to the public he may be forced to take in anyone. What he might have to do is close his gun training as open to the public, and reopen as a private membership only gun club. That way if you have to be a member of the gun club he has the right to exclude anyone. BUT, since liberals have passed laws that say discremination against women from “Men’s Club’s” is against the law now and men’s club’s have to allow women into their clubs, also women used to be excluded from coming into football teams locker rooms where men are naked. But now women are allowed to come in there and interview football players while naked men are walking around letting it all hang out, you know?
Liberals love this kind of stuff especially since it’s something that violates the laws they created in order to make everything “equal” !! The Fair Housing Act which takes the right of a property owner to sell his property to anyone he wants to was taken away from them by that Act. And many more rights that American’s used to have to do as they saw fit, cannot anymore because liberals have taken all those rights away. Those rights have been enumerated by the Constitution. Liberals hate our Constitution by saying it didn’t “go far enough” when our forefathers wrote it. Of course they never foresaw a time when American’s ALLOWED liberals to take over the country either!!!
Lightwave commented:
Would that more firearms instructors, restaurants, coffee shop owners, jewelry stores, pawn shops, pet stores, booksellers, pizza places, corner stores, grocers, and small business owners decided to do the same.
We outnumber them. If we refused to serve them, they’d have no choice but to live with our rules.
MrGoodWench commented:
“If you are a non-Christian Arab or Muslim, I will not teach you the class with no shame;
+++
Guess then them moozies and arabs will have to get their guns and training from
Department of Jihad …just like the mexican cartels do
Practical Jane commented:
Saw this on The5 and like good little RINOs they all said this guy was over the top. They’re wrong. This man is absolutley right.
Thanks GWP for airing this in proper context.
sceniccityred commented:
Love it! You go my friend! For now, this is still America, you own this
business, and you can teach or refuse to teach anyone you choose.
If you don’t want to take money from any group of people or individuals,
that is your right.
We love this and back you 1,000%!! Keep up the great work. If I lived
in Texas, I would be giving you some business! I hope you have to
open another bank account to contain the money you will make!
Wheeze commented:
don’t forget the occupiers….
George commented:
Freedom of speech. I just love the Texan style!
bg commented:
++
LOL & YEEHAW!!
==
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
What a racist bigot. The part about liberals is fine–that’s not a race or ethnic group but rather a behaivorial factor. But Muslims? They have the same civil rights as anyone else. It’s as if he thinks there is something inferior about Muslims, but he didn’t even explain. Hell, I’d like to see him ban Christians, then there’d be a post on Gateway Pundit alleging “discrimination” rather then supporting him like he usually supports discrimination (in this case, for example).
gosh! commented:
This is one-man whom not afraid to take the enemy on………………face to face……..maybe in his spare time he could teach the republican leadership a thing or two about addressing their democrats friends……….in congress…..
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Homeland security wouldn’t require an Islamist to have to take a gun safety class, it would be insensitive.
Joelwee1028 commented:
@#15:
It’s his business; he can do what he wants. If Muslims want to learn how to shoot, they can take their business elsewhere.
I agree with #7: He should have included illegal aliens.
Dionisia commented:
I know Crockett Keller, and he one of the nicest man I’ve ever met…he comes from a great family that contributes to the communities in Central Texas…we agree with him 100%
Nanna commented:
This man is a much better patriot than the head of our own Justice Department !
MrGoodWench commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
What a racist bigot. The part about liberals is fine–that’s not a race or ethnic group but rather a behaivorial factor. But Muslims? They have the same civil rights as anyone else.
+++++
Muslims already have their own place , which EXCLUDES non-muslims,
it is called islamberg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uRRihHAL-o
Muslims also have many other exclusive camps
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2187404/posts
they don’t need any more help , they have more than 35 sites already
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Johnny, Johnny, Johnny:
You don’t know much about islamists do you? You ought to get an education or you will find yourself a slave or dead. Oh, and don’t get your training from an Islamist, they have this little thing called taqiyya. Start there and be enlightened.
RKflorida commented:
#15 Johnny… Where did you get the racism from? Arab? Muslim? They are not races. As for being a bigot, I think not, as being against the enemy is not bigotry. Liberals ARE incompetent but he doesn’t deny them taking the class. He asks them not to.
Jesusland commented:
I don’t know what they teach these geniuses at Stanford these days, but Islam is no more a race than Leftism or Obama voting is.
zaire67 commented:
The political affiliations is a valid point. But religious affiliations falls way outside legal bounds. So I assume he asks people their religious affiliations before accepting their money. This man obviously is ignorant of the Constitutional 1st Amendment or Article 1, Section 6 of the Texas Constitution. I hope he has a large legal fund, because he will and should be sued out of business.
Studious Citizen commented:
Johnny Davis doesn’t understand the definition of the word “race”.
Retard. Islam isn’t a race, its a theopolitical construct used to oppress and intimidate people into total submission. There’s a reason why they’re required to answer the call to prayer 5 times a day…its to keep them in line and stop them from thinking for themselves.
Hobbitually conservative commented:
zaire67,
The obama administration is ignorant of the first amendment, does that bother you too? or just this small business owner?
patman commented:
Made my afternoon!!!!!!
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #16 Gosh!
Enemy? He said he was banning Muslims! You think Muslims are the “enemy”? Excuse me, but that is kind of a bigoted racist statement. I can see where terrorists are the enemy, but Muslims most certainly aren’t. Being a Muslim just means that you believe in a different religion than Christians. I bet you’re going to be saying that Jews are the enemy next, because they don’t believe in Christianity.
Furthermore, he also said that liberals were the “enemy.” True, libs are a metaphorical enemy in the political battle, but they most certainly aren’t enemies in the same way that terrorists are, trying to kill us. Actually Barack O’Liar even pretended that Republicans were the “enemy” when he spoke to Latinos, and he got skewered by the conservative blogs for that.
Lenore commented:
Off topic.
Global warming in CT 10-29-11.
http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b357/centra/10-29-11/resize_image_114611889.jpg
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: @#18 Joel:
It’s his business and it’s a racist business. (And, actually, there are laws preventing certain kinds of discrimination at private businesses. The Civil Rights Act for example. Maybe you disagree with the principle behind that law, but anyway, he can’t do what he wants with his business if it isn’t legal and expect to stay in business long.)
catwoman368 commented:
#15 johnny, meet a real man in Mr Keller. He speaks his mind and is up front in what he thinks. No lying liars like obama and those who support him. It is Mr Kellers business and he has every right to refuse service to any he so chooses. You dont like it, tough get the hell out of Texas if you are fortunate enough to live in this great state. We need more men like Mr Keller.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #22 Hobbitually conservative:
A “conservative” telling me to take a cultural sensitivity and education class on Islam? Oh, that’s funny. No, I’m not going to waste my time taking a politically correct class about a religion that I do not follow.
It’s ironic that you would want me to take an education of Islam when I already know more about it than any of the commenters here, most of whom are proud of their ignorance about such liberal/minority interest groups. It’s always that kind of commenter who trashes universities for being smarter and more elite than they are.
Here, I can tell you what Islam is: It’s a religion that doesn’t believe in Christianity and instead believes in other stuff. Now obviously if you are a racist, like many of the commenters and like Jim, you would hate Muslims for not believing in Christianity, but you know there are different religions out there, and Christianity could in fact end up being just as wrong theologically as Islam.
Son of Walden commented:
If he is doing CCW firearms instruction, he is acting as an agent of the state. He is in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments as well as the Civil Rights Act.
Kate commented:
Liberalism is a mental disorder so naturally those with such a condition shouldn’t be armed.
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Islam is not simply a religion, it is a complete culture which controls every part of your being and submission to every tenet. Christians are not commanded to force their religion on others, nor are Jews. Muslims on the other hand are to dominate all others. For that reason islam cannot co-exist with any other religion, assuming that Islam were just a religion.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #4:
Really? You want to restrict gun ownership to Christians?
I though conservatives believed in the Constitution? Where is you support for freedom and freedom of religion?
Do you want to establish an Islamic Republic of Iran-style theocratic government like Iran has going for it? That’s what your comment suggests, saying that the Constitution’s most basic rights, like the Right to Bear Arms, don’t apply to people who don’t believe in any religion but one religion.
Son of Walden commented:
#37 Johnny, these folks don’t listen to reason. Nor do they seek knowledge. Really despicable people. But they are a blast to troll. Very little effort is even required. Also, the bannings on this site don’t stick (probably because Jim is a syphilitic mongoloid pig-rapist).
Happy trolling.
Woo! Cards!
Clutch commented:
#29 every time you use “racist” in context with Muslims, (what race is Muslim?) you just reenforce your ignornance and you have done that twice now. I recommend that you pick up your keyboard and smack yourself over the head until it breaks (head or keyboard whichever comes first), either way we will no longer have to read your idiocy. Please comply. Do it for the children.
Cutlers bad knee commented:
The Libs all get fired up when a conservative starts to play the same game as they have over the last 3 years.
Now if we could get the GOP to get off their dead a$$e$ and fire up like Mr Keller this country would be on the road to greatness once again.
Political correctness is something Mr Keller has little of…..Well done Mr Keller…..
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Johnny,
Cocky son of gun aren’t ya? I didn’t say take “sensitivity classes”. I said to “learn” about Islam.
I don’t believe you know much about Islam at all.
MrGoodWench commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
Enemy? He said he was banning Muslims! You think Muslims are the “enemy”? Excuse me, but that is kind of a bigoted racist statement.
+++
You have proof that muslims are NOT the enemy ?
Do you find the followers of the step-by-step kafir-killing manual called koran , to be racists and bigoted ?
Gus commented:
You do understand why sissy boys like Johnboy “douchebag” Davis supports MUZZTARDS.
He supports muzztards, because muzztards hate America.
Johnny the Douchebag Davis, has never fit in, and because Johny the “tard” Davis isn’t happy being a flop in life, he hates America. That is the liberal way.
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Mr. Keller is taking a step toward saving us from the fate that Europe has given in to. We need a million more just like him.
Dedicated Moonbat commented:
I think johnnie is of the misunderstanding that anyone that disagrees with him/her/it is racist, regardless of the actual situation. Must be an avid MSNBC viewer. Hey johnnie, have you seen Kweefie on CurrentTV.
0lds One commented:
Gyorgy Schwartz , the kid nazi kapo and his hireling atmedia mutters have sure picked a p— poor troll with johnny. Who said money buys value. Johnny boy is failing to deliver anything more than childish sounding foolery. He really nneds to return to his mommy’s basement and his fantasies.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #7
(Crazy moonbat who must have done LSD at an Occupy Wall Street protest.)
Liberals who will kill conservatives? When was the last time you heard of a liberal killing a conservative because of their political persuasion? You couldn’t come up with but a few small examples, if any. You know, you sound like a liberal Media Matters loon. Those guys kept trying to say that conservatives were trying to kill liberals. “Violent Tea Partiers.” “Second Amendment Solution.” “Glenn Beck is Dangerous.” etc. You are doing nothing but indulging in the Media Matters propaganda of saying one side is going to kill the other through violence.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #46 Dedicated Moonbat
There are many bigots here saying that Muslims shouldn’t be allowed to have civil rights such as owning guns and saying that they wouldn’t allow Muslims to take a gun training class. That is, by definition, bigotry. I mean if you don’t want to be a racist bigot, I suppose you could support the rights of Muslim-Americans to own guns and have the Constitution apply to them, but to do that, you would have to change your position, and many of the commenters are to racist and scared of Muslim-Americans (read: AMERICANS) that they would rather be a racist bigot.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #44 Gus
Gus said that he doesn’t support Muslim-Americans. Being that Gus hates Americans is Gus an anti-American? Seems Gateway Pundits posts about Occupy Wall Street have attracted a lot of Occupy Wall Street protesters lately, and Gus is just another one of the un-American OWS supporters to have slithered in and commented.
MikeLawson commented:
In another thread ya’ll were all up in arms saying OWS folks are law breakers, yet this man’s ad is absolutely against Texas law for instructors in firearm training licensed by the state. A little selective thinking there, isn’t it? And for the record, don’t ever get so cocky as to assume that we FELLOW AMERICANS who vote Democratic are unarmed, unwilling to shoot, don’t know how to use a firearm, etc. We’ll defend our country against Fascists just as you say you’ll defend it against so-called socialists. BTW, the cold war is over.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #43 JOHNNY “LIBTARD” DAVIS JUNIOR
Johnny Jr, do you support this racist bigot who wants to ban Muslims from his gun class? If so, you sir are a racist. Are you proud of being a racist?
Texas_Treeroach commented:
Some folks seem to question (or are offended by) Crockett’s ad. We don’t much care about all that down here.
We’ve seen the handwriting on the wall for a long time. Most gun shops in Texas display a beautifully framed color photo of Our President behind the counter, with a brass plate below that boldly reads: “Salesman of the Year — Second Year Running.” Yes Sir — Nobody can sell firearms better than Barak Obama!
I’m proud of Crockett’s position — You just know he’s asking for it, from all sorts of liberal directions. But the great thing is that there are so many of us who will support him (in any way that’s necessary) to make sure he conducts his business the way he sees fit (and that he is successful at it).
If there are those who don’t like the way Crockett does business, then they don’t have to buy from him. There’s more than plenty who will step in to take up the slack.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #39
Jim’s readers are now advocating violence! Once again, it appears his blog is being taken over by Occupy Wall Street trash.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: Texas Cockroach
I love the way you talk. It’s so cute.
Well, we don’t much care for racism and bigotry down here.
We don’t care for it generally, so you as an individual can’t have a part in it.
Kind of a communist socialistic way of speaking.
MrGoodWench commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
, and Gus is just another one of the un-American OWS supporters to have slithered in and commented.
++++
HAHAHAHHHAAAHHHHAAAAHAAAAAAHHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
progressoverpeace commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
Johnny Jr, do you support this racist bigot who wants to ban Muslims from his gun class? If so, you sir are a racist.
islam isn’t a race, you blithering idiot. It isn’t even a religion. It’s a political ideology – a violent, aggressive, expansionist political ideology that is set in direct opposition to Western civilization and everything we hold dear. There is nothing wrong with keeping muslims or liberals out of private classes. The instructor doesn’t wish to impart his knowldge to them. Tough.
And, if you don’t know what the words “race” or “racist” mean, then stop trying to use them. Don’t worry. You’ll be able to make yourself look like a moron in other ways.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
I don’t get it: Is Obama the gun salesman of the year because violent conservatives want to murder him or because stupid conservatives think they won’t be able to buy guns after Obama bans them?
Being that he’s been in office for three years and people are apparently purchasing firearms in record numbers, he obviously hasn’t banned them.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #58 ProgressOverPeace
The reason the guy is a racist bigot is because he doesn’t want to associate with people on the basis of their religion and ethnicity rather than because of their personality and beliefs. I mean if there is some terrorist out there, obviously you shouldn’t associate with him, but he said he just didn’t want any Muslims taking his class. He said he would ban all Muslims regardless of their beliefs.
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Johnny,
When you talk is your nose higher than your ears and do you exhaust a lot of breath with your words? You might be an elitist. But you are really only a troll trying to get a rise of true americans. I pity you.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Back in 2009 I saw a lot of conservatives saying we should help support Iranians seek freedom from the dictatorial regime that is currently oppressing them, but now I see that many people here don’t like Muslims and think that Islam is a violent religion that should be denied basic rights. Yet most Iranians are Muslims. Why were you guys supporting helping Muslims back in 2009? Anyone can answer that?
For that matter, a lot of conservatives also supported helping Muslims seek freedom from Saddam in Iraq. Weird.
MrGoodWench commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
Being that he’s been in office for three years and people are apparently purchasing firearms in record numbers, he obviously hasn’t banned them.
++++
That is because his gunwalking and gunrunning got busted !
Why do you think he started Fast n Furious ?
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
If you think I’m elite, thanks for the compliment. In my conservative value system, we reward success. I take pride in my being as successful as I can, but if you like being stuck at the bottom and not working to make yourself better and having class envy against anyone who is more educated and earning more than you and higher in society fine with me. You’d fit right in at Zuccati Park with the other people who are protesting against the elites of society.
Um, no, I really don’t want to get a rise out of Muslim-Americans. Seems the people who want to ban Muslim-Americans from taking classes and doing business are the real ones trying to get a rise out of Americans.
gosh! commented:
Muslims devotion to islam forbids them from ever making true friends with Christians or jews…………..The Koran tells them so in…………Al Mai’da 5:51 “O ye who believe! take not the jews and Christians for your friends and protectors: …………….i’m sure you knew this johnny davis………..
progressoverpeace commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
The reason the guy is a racist bigot is because he doesn’t want to associate with people on the basis of their religion and ethnicity rather than because of their personality and beliefs.
Is Englisn not your mother tongue? He SPECIFICALLY did NOT ban anyone on ethnicity – do you really not understand what the phrase “non-Christian arabs” describes? It is not about ethnicity for him. Of course, that means nothing to an idiot like you who just loves to scream “RAAAAACIIIIIST!!!” every two minutes.
I don’t want muslims (or liberals) taking his class, either.
lol commented:
now if he dissed the jews or catholic religious symbols the left would be right on board with him.
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Well we made his day, Johnny was the center of attention.
He should get a dog name it Hussain and hope it doesn’t kill him.
Valerie commented:
Actually, anybody that doesn’t know how avoid making their own religious, or political orientation an issue in a purely commercial transaction, really is to stupid to be trusted with a gun.
MrGoodWench commented:
Remember this ?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTxXUufI3jA
Valerie commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis gets his tighty-whities all in a wad over a silly radio commercial, but he lets an incident like this pass without comment: Egyptian Cleric Calls to Wipe Out Israel and Blow Up the Dimona Nuclear Plant (Video)
So, a radio commercial threatening to ban people from bringing up something they have no reason to talk about in the first place is a F’n Big Deal, but an actual call to murder people is ok?
Yeah, I got it.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Some idiot thinks that a dog named Huessein would kill someone just because it has a Muslim name. First of all, dogs can’t even comprehend the fact that Hussein is a Muslim name, nor could they comprehend the idea of religion or anything, but more importantly, Muslims aren’t inherently violent, only terrorists are, anymore than Jews are inherently greedy bankers, only greedy bankers are. You sound like a Nazi.
Barack Obama, for example, is named Huessein. Has he murdered anyone? I suppose you could argue he has murdered bin Laden or Anwar Al-Aliki, Muslim terrorists, but that would require a liberal unhinged viewpoint.
CenterRight commented:
Too bad Crockett and his like weren’t pilot instructors at certain places around the country in 2000-2001.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: ProgressOverPeace
You either chose not to read my full responses or are incapable. I said he wants to ban people based on “ethnicity or religion.” First of all, Islam is a religion in and of itself. Secondly, by banning all Muslims, he is effectively banning a majority of the Arab and Middle Eastern populations (which are ethnicities). Again, he isn’t making his decision based on whether the people are fundamentalist and hateful, but just simply because of their religion. That would be like banning Christians, which would also be a bigoted thing to do. Under his standards, Timmothy McVeigh would be allowed to take his course, because he isn’t Muslim, but any number of peaceful Muslims, such as M. Zuhdi Jasser whom you have watch on Fox News, wouldn’t.
raybojabo commented:
Davy Crocket, “Since you have chosen to elect a man with a timber toe to succeed me, you may all go to hell and I will go to Texas.”
John Wayne as Davy Crocket, from The Alamo 1960
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-a7KPmOnok
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Johnny, you make a racist accusation out of every comment. What a loser. Oops, was that racist?
Ecosse commented:
Pure awesomeness.
Hobbitually conservative commented:
Johnny’s stuck on liberal talking points. He hears no evil, sees no evil, speaks no evil where his progressive comrades are concerned.
Best of all he thinks he might convert the good Americans here to his way of thinking, and become good dhimmies.
Obamas regulation destroy jobs commented:
Finally an American standing up his GOD given rights!! Just like that Catholic Church were Muslims were offended by the Christian cross? Well get out!!!! Go back to IRAN or goto a Muslim school!!!! I am sick of the attacks from lefty’s and liberal communists!! They are horrible terrible people and they dare call themselves Americans????? Obama, Holder did this and I want them out of the white house NOW!! And take your little dog too! Obama has started this CLASS war fare turning us against American against American—its the Stalin, MAO theology-
progressoverpeace commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
You either chose not to read my full responses or are incapable. I said he wants to ban people based on “ethnicity or religion.” First of all, Islam is a religion in and of itself.
I read your response. I already told you that islam is not a religion. You can claim that it is all you want, but the fact of the matter is that islam demands the power of state, everywhere, and that makes it a political ideology. Period.
Of course, there are many more details to this, but you’d have to know something about islam to understand them, and it’s pretty clear that you know f^ck-all about islam. Ataturk understood islam and its fundamental political nature better than you ever possibly could and he understood that islam is aggressively political and will drag any society that allows it into the stone age.
As to your weird:
Secondly, by banning all Muslims, he is effectively banning a majority of the Arab and Middle Eastern populations (which are ethnicities
You have no clue WTF you are talking about. You are an idiot of stupendous proportions – almost Barky-like … speaking of which, Barky just happened to be raised in the largest muslim nation in the world, and it ain’t arab or middle eastern (though it was/is firmly third world and backward). The second biggest ain’t arab or in the middle east, either, but none of these little facts mean much to you.
Most arabs are muslims. True. islam is a serious threat to the West (aside from being generally retarded and violent). True. Most arabs will suffer that islam has made itself a threat to the West. True. Tough. You like islam. Go pick a nation. They’ve got 57 of them.
The Underground Conservative commented:
Islam is more than a religion. It is a complete legal, social and political structure. It is incompatible with Western-style democracy. It also refuses to assimilate into any nation/culture but seeks its own identity.
Islam is as big a threat to our freedom as Nazism and fascism were in the World War II era and Soviet-style communism during the Cold War.
Hobbitually conservative commented:
The reason democrats like Islamists so much is because they are misogynists who need to overpower their enemies and keep them down. They are incapable of intelligent debate to reach a common cause.
It was the same people who started keeping slaves in the first place. We fought the civil war because these people refused to give up human slavery. When that failed they started the Ku Klux Klan and made sure that if blacks were going to be free they were going to treated as slaves. Democrats failed to stop the civil rights movement so they decided to pull them on board causing LBJ to say “I’ll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.”
Anybody stupid enough to believe their crap is dangerous and should not have access to a gun. Go Mr. Keller.
YourMaster commented:
don’t think 0bama and holder want to try lawsuits against him
think it over some…. this guy runs a business…. this business has workers…
if the business were forced to close…. that’s another 1000 or more workers out of the job
by effectively punishing him… he would be doing more damaging to his chances in a 2012 election ….and right now, that is something he can’t afford to do.
what with the wealthy not giving any campaign donations to democrats because of the OWS protests. and the Jews in major high electorate states like Florida, New York, and Penn. turned off by the Democrats now rampant anti-israel & jewish hate rhetoric
…democrats want to give another reason for the voters to hate …by pissing off Texans?
….this isn’t what I would call a winning strategy: aggrevate everyone and they team up against you.
our marxist in chief and his advisors seem to be f-idiots… they are peeving off US citizen’s with OWS… and the only people they are winning over to their side are the Anti-americans (like the Iranians… who don’t even live or vote in this country.)
0bama just hates America…. there’s almost no mistaking it when you see a standing president fund an orchestrated protest against the American system of Capitalism and the Wealthy.
MrGoodWench commented:
YourMaster commented:
don’t think 0bama and holder want to try lawsuits against him
think it over some…. this guy runs a business…. this business has workers…
if the business were forced to close…. that’s another 1000 or more workers out of the job
++++
Gibson Guitars
Matt commented:
I’m pretty sure this violates Texas law. Hope they shut him down.
Patty commented:
He has the right to do this. I just wonder who will bring a lawsuit.
Possibly the same person who is suing the Catholic university of America saying crosses offend Muslims
or the guy who says the Pledge of Alliance against is Atheist belief because to the words under God.
or Muslims wanted to build a Mosques near ground zero.
9-11 is remembered and clear in our mind. As is Ft. Hood, underwear Bomber and over 3,000 lives lost at WTC, Pentagon and flight 93. To our troops who have died and are injured who didn’t die so Muslims and God haters could rule the day and make this nation something it is not. Enough! And this guy believes it. He is finished with the liberal mentality of trying to change our nation. This nation will stay strong and get stronger after the Obama’s have been elected out of the White House.
Patty commented:
Crockett Keller Under Investigation? Crockett Keller Ad Brings Heat Video
October 29, 2011
By Maggie
You can feel it in the air. The State of Texas is gearing up to take down one of their own, and there is no telling what U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder will unleash on Texan, Crockett Keller. Keller is a realtor and he and his wife own a gun dealership. He teaches Concealed Carry for licensing. He has/had a radio ad in his local area advertising his class, and said he would not teach Socialist Liberals who voted for Obama or Muslims. And he cited what the law requires of him – teach only those who can make ” knowledgeable” and “prudent” decisions. See a video interview with Keller below.
YOU KNEW THIS WOULD HAPPEN, HE WAS ASKING FOR IT AND THE ATTACK DOGS OF OBAMA ARE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT
Patty commented:
http://www.maggiesnotebook.com/2011/10/crockett-keller-under-investigation-crockett-keller-ad-brings-heat-video/
Edouard commented:
It does not violate Texas law.
Ever hear of the old saying, “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone” ?
It’s Mr Keller’s perfect right and his own plain free choice, and those of us who are rational and sane are in full common-sense support of his free choice.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #87 Patty
What makes you think so? Doesn’t the Civil Rights Act include restrictions on discrimination? Does it apply to religious discrimination, I wonder?
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Wait, isn’t it Democrat women who are always bitching (literally) about the Republican-led “war on women?” Just wondering. Trying to keep my political stereotypes straight.
Edouard commented:
#91
It is Mr Keller’s private business. Within his private business, he can refuse service to anyone, whenever or wherever he chooses. He can stand there like a statue and not do anything, in other words, if he prefers not to serve someone. This is true for any private business.
No one can compel me by law to give service within my own business, up and until I have accepted compensation for that service.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #80 progressoverpeace
I had made two points: 1.) Islam is a religion. That one is undeniable, and so it stands as true. 2.) He is banning a majority of the Arab and Middle Eastern populations. You yourself admitted that a majority of said populations are Muslim. Ipso fact, he is making a decision to ban races and ethnicities entirely on their race, ethnicity and religion and not on their character. I guess I’m going to be talking to a rock here, because I know the GOP voted against Martin Luther King Day being a national holiday, but here I go: People should be judged by the content of their character, not by their race or religion. Why not just say all evil Muslims are banned? He could say that. Instead he bans all good Muslims and evil Muslims.
To educate you about religion: Religion involves belief in a God and a set of moral laws coming from said God and a philosophy about life, etc. Muslims just believe in Allah and follow the teachings of the Quran rather than the Bible, so yes, it is a religion, but it is a different religion.
I realize some commentators might be angry that I referenced the GOP allegedly voting against making MLK Day a holiday. They might tell me that Abe Lincoln was a Republican or that the Republican Party voted for the Civil Rights Act or even that Martin Luther King Jr. himself was a Republican. All well and good, but if you do support his ideas, then you would agree that this racist bigoted business owner is a bigot for looking at Muslims based on their religion and not on the content of their character.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #93
No, he can’t. It is illegal. For example, he can’t refuse service to people based on their race. That is codified into law based on the Republican-supported Civil Rights Act. If you have a problem with that, take it up with the Republican Party that voted for the act, and join the socialist Democrats.
Edouard commented:
#94
As of now you’ve been trolling for four straight hours, man. Clearly you have no life. All you’re doing is wasting pixels with your disingenuousness, your equivocation, your hair-splitting and your sophistry.
Your hypervigilant bigotry — against conservatives who disdain your “thinking”, and who do not share your character disorders — is profound and is showing all over the place, like a guy out in public who doesn’t know his fly is unzipped.
You’re a laughingstock, but there are still hours left in the day so keep it right up, champ.
Edouard commented:
#95
In fact you are mistaken. People here have been at pains to explain to you that “Arab” and “Moslem” are not “races”. This is not a matter of racism, actually.
If you have beliefs that are offensive to him, he is within his rights to offend you right back and say, “Get out of here.”
“Offense” is not the same as legal “harm”. It falls within his free speech rights.
Therefore this is not in fact a racist issue. Like I said, he can stand there like a statue and do nothing within his own legal business. If he accepts no payment from you, and tells you that he will not accept payment from you, you are S.O.L. and there are plenty of lawyers who will take his case.
S. Wolf commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis #91
He can teach anyone he chooses and its not ‘discrimination’, its choice.
Good for Keller, he is a 100% American and Texan and has decided he will teach gun handling only to Americans and Texans, not to America hating leftists and Mohammedans.
zaire67 commented:
Yeah, the best way to defend bad behavior by the childish response, “Well, They do it too.”
Edouard commented:
Notice also that Mr Keller was clear to say that he will not teach “NON-Christian Arabs”.
As everyone knows, there are plenty of Christian Arabs, and those, Mr Keller is evidently happy to teach.
Such a qualification again emphasizes that there is nothing “racist” about his choice of whom he will not do business with.
This is solely an issue of rejecting beliefs that are offensive to him.
Such rejection absolutely falls into the category of Mr. Keller’s free speech, which again, being an American citizen, he may exercise as his perfect right.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #96
Bigtory? You might have missed the fact that I have been calling out bigotry. I am actually OPPOSED to this man who wants to ban Muslims from taking his gun class.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Re: #98
The man is obviously racist and bigoted for banning Muslims from taking his gun class irrelevant to what their character and beliefs are.
If you are offended by me pointing it out, so be it, but the issue here is never about who offended who: It has been about whether this man is a racist bigot for banning Muslims. Apparently most people here don’t know what “bigot” means.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Actually, he can’t discriminate against people based on race. I mentioned the Civil Rights Act earlier, but apparently you aren’t familiar with it? It is an act passed by Republicans, against Democrat opposition, that bans people from not providing business service to people that they don’t want to, if that refusal is deemed to be caused by the person’s race or religion. In this case, he wants to ban people based on religion, so he is technically in violation of the Civil Rights Act. I wasn’t even alive when the act passed, and I certainly wasn’t a member of Congress, so don’t blame me, blame the Republican Party. I’m simply telling you that it is the law of the land, and there are a lot of other laws of the land that some people disagree with that are stupid. It’s not my fault.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
First of all, Mr. Keller made it explicit that he was being racist and bigoted towards Muslims, most of whom are of Arab descent. (You still haven’t addressed the bigotry charge, and racism is contained in his refusal to serve Muslims. (Side point: Religion isn’t a belief in the same way that anarchism or Islamofascism is a belief. Religion has always been contained as a provision in protections against discrimination, such as the Civil Rights Act, which he violated. It is just something about your background and what God you believe in, and some people aren’t even very active in practicing it.)
Secondly, Mr. Keller has no legal right to discriminate against Muslims in this way. The Republican-passed Civil Rights Act bans discrimination on the basis or religion in the course of running a private business.
Babsy commented:
Of course he’s a laughingstock. But you’re missing the greater point. He’s a lib. Libs care about PEOPLE. It’s their way of life. He’s here to edumacate all us unenlightened, gun-totin’, knuckle draggers. You know, to bring us to his level……(roll eyes!)
alec commented:
Yo Johnny,
You are part of the problem. People like you PC a$$es have gotten this country in a big F’n mess. Go mind your own business and stay out of others business.
Robert commented:
Notice that Johnny “the Tard” Davis does not address the points of Islam’s incompatibility with Western values, nor the fact that it compels domination over all other religions, nor the fact that it also compels political domination worldwide.
Robert commented:
Because Islam is so all-encompassing in its tenets, going far beyond the separation of church and state that is understood in the West, Mr. Keller could justifiably argue that it is a competing political ideology and thus deserves no protection under the “Republican-passed Civil Rights Act”.
Robert commented:
Let them sue. This could begin the legal classification of Islam as a competing political ideology that does not deserve legal protections under American law.
Matt commented:
#112
He can argue anything he wants. But Islam is a recognized religion and he would lose.
I don’t know Texas law but several states have laws about nondiscrimination when providing services.
He is a certified as an instructor by the State of Texas. They should take his certification away.
Doesn’t everybody have the right to bear arms in the US?
Matt commented:
#113
What makes you think competing political ideologies don’t have protection under US law. It is called free speech.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
No, he said he would exclude Muslim-Americans, who are 100% American. Ironically, he didn’t mention he would exclude illegal immigrants, who are 0% American. (It would be weird to wonder if anyone could be 50% American, but I suppose probably not, because you would either be an American, or you wouldn’t.)
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Umm… How exactly would that happen? Do you think Christianity should be excluded from protection under the Civil Rights Act, because you think it is a political ideology?
As it is, Muslims can either chose to be liberal or conservative. They can’t chose to follow the “Muslim” political persuasion, because… there isn’t one. What exactly is the Muslim position on the Bush tax cuts? Please answer.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
What exact “incompatibility”?
Muslims go to the mosque to pray just like Christians go to church to pray. Then when they get home they can live whatever life they want irrelevant from the mosque. Their religion is just about their belief in God. You haven’t mentioned anything about believing in Allah that would preclude them from doing other everyday life activities in America.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
Truly I’m not a lib. Why else would I care about freedom and the Constitution?
But you’re right that I do care about people, only because I’m a conservative. I don’t want to see people oppressed in a dictatorship or murdered in the womb like a lib does. Conservatives and pro-lifers are the ultimate care-ers about people. If you don’t care about people, I feel very sad for you.
Johnny "Stanford" Davis commented:
#110:
I haven’t put this country in a mess. I support people not being discriminated against and I oppose the genocide of Jews. People who support discrimination and support the ideology of hatred of people of a different religion which, as Glenn Beck mentioned, ultimately leads to genocide, are the ones who are putting this country in a mess.
progressoverpeace commented:
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
First of all, Mr. Keller made it explicit that he was being racist and bigoted towards Muslims, most of whom are of Arab descent.
Incorrect, as usual. You don’t know much of anything, do you? Most muslims are NOT arabs. The number of muslims in Indonesia and India are together more than all the arabs (muslim and non) on Earth.
Get a brain.
Robert commented:
#114 #115 Matt
The issue is not whether everyone has the right to bear arms. The issue is (apparently would be) whether a different person can be forced by law to train and support that right in persons he deems to be unworthy.
Would you just as vehemently demand that Keller be forced to support militant white supremacists advocating overthrow of the system?
And could I infer that you might view Islam as a competing political ideology?
Robert commented:
#118
And here we have it. You have no knowledge about the fact that Islam mandates political and religious domination over the entire world. It is written in the Koran.
Whether Moslems in the West currently go about their business during the week is irrelevant. As soon as the numbers become sufficient, extremists start operating and they begin agitating for Islamic rule according the the tenets of the Koran. And as they are able, they become more violent and more demanding, until we see regular militant protests just like the one reported two posts up here on Gateway Pundit.
Don’t think that won’t happen here in America. It already has in contexts where it is perceived that it will be tolerated, such as vocal demonstrations on college campuses, in requiring prayer time and a company-supplied (paid for) location 5 times daily at work, and innumerable other instances.
Matt commented:
#114
He can’t be forced to train anybody, but the state that certifies you to train can take away that certification if you refuse to train certain groups of individuals based on religious or racial discrimination which is contrary to the law.
I don’t care if Islam is a competing political ideology. Even if it is I don’t see it as a threat to our current political ideology. But I do know that it is a religion.
Robert commented:
“Their religion is just about their belief in God.”
This statement is not true. Not at all. The evidence is everywhere, from the examples I have mentioned, to religious theocracies taking over in the Middle East, to Christians being forced out of several countries including Egypt.
Islam is a totalitarian political ideology.
Robert commented:
#124 Matt
I don’t care if Islam is a competing political ideology. Even if it is I don’t see it as a threat to our current political ideology. But I do know that it is a religion.
I don’t see Islam as a threat here in America. It certainly does seem to be so elsewhere.
And, if you ignore the possibilities that have become reality elsewhere, then the threat may become real here at a time that it is too late to counter.
Islam is very vigorously challenging the power structures in Europe and England, even though they are significantly outnumbered.
By viewing Islam as only a religion, you allow yourself to ignore the possibility of the threat.
Robert commented:
He can’t be forced to train anybody, but the state that certifies you to train can take away that certification if you refuse to train certain groups of individuals based on religious or racial discrimination which is contrary to the law.\
How is this NOT forcing you to train anybody?
By saying you can go do something else for a living?
Matt commented:
#126
By denying others their rights and discriminating against them you do more damage to the US than Islam does.
Are we supposed to have different classes of citizens in the US?
Matt commented:
#127
It is not forcing to train anybody because he can quit and do something else for a living. His refusing to train people based on their religion or their race is clearly against federal law and possibly against Texas law. He has no right to break the law.
UpChuck.Liberals commented:
He should give the MoosLoons free lessons on how to be a suicide bomber, if the pass the test they graduate. They must put on the vest and successfully detonate it to pass.
Robert commented:
By denying others their rights and discriminating against them you do more damage to the US than Islam does.
How so?
Which is more damaging? Allowing someone to discriminate, or using the power of the state to force compulsion?
Don’t forget, these militant miscreants that you are defending are free to go elsewhere to get their guns and training. And, under our federal system (remember that?…) , other states may have laws that are more favorable to the future terrorists’ goals.
Robert commented:
#129 Matt
It is not forcing to train anybody because he can quit and do something else for a living.
It would do “less damage to the US” in the aggregate if they simply went elsewhere for their training, rather than have government forcing a citizen to do something he does not want to do.
Patty commented:
Crockett Keller Under Investigation? Crockett Keller Ad Brings Heat Video
October 29, 2011
By Maggie
You can feel it in the air. The State of Texas is gearing up to take down one of their own, and there is no telling what U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder will unleash on Texan, Crockett Keller. Keller is a realtor and he and his wife own a gun dealership. He teaches Concealed Carry for licensing. He has/had a radio ad in his local area advertising his class, and said he would not teach Socialist Liberals who voted for Obama or Muslims. And he cited what the law requires of him – teach only those who can make ” knowledgeable” and “prudent” decisions. See a video interview with Keller below.
YOU KNEW THIS WOULD HAPPEN, HE WAS ASKING FOR IT AND THE ATTACK DOGS OF OBAMA ARE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT
again, he has a right to do this. unless sued! AND IN THIS DAY AND AGE WHERE EVERYONE SUES FOR ANYTHING…HE MORE THAN LIKELY IS GOING TO BE. AND PERSONALLY, HOPE HE DOESN’T BECAUSE THE MUSLIMS ARE RUNNING OVER OUR LAWS, THE ATHEIST HATE ANYTHING REFERRING TO GOD, CROSSES ARE ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK.
So, more power to him if can hold is own and lawyer up. A good one. Want to see if he is justified. And sounds like he has read into the law.
Patty commented:
#133 and this time read my post.
Johnny
#91 October 29, 2011 at 7:25 pm
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
Re: #87 Patty
What makes you think so? Doesn’t the Civil Rights Act include restrictions on discrimination? Does it apply to religious discrimination, I wonder?
Patty commented:
Crockett is tired of the Constitution and our Flag being stepped on. Our rights are exploited and abuse and our freedoms are coming soon to follow.
For instance, Obama has past a law that mandates we must buy health insurance. THAT IS A NO NO under the Constitution. And for Fast and Furious and the guilty Holder whose only objection was to pass assault weapon ban. Got two Americans killed and 100”s of others in Mexico.
Flag and crosses are being discriminated against. YES, I SAID DISCRIMINATED AND SO IS GOD.
So, kudos to Crockett Keller for being a Man and doing what he feels is the best response.
Airports who had follow Keller’s ideas would not have trained Muslims to fly planes. And then there may not have been a 9-11.
Patty commented:
Yes, it all sounds rather silly but compared to what the Liberals are doing to our country that is worse.
Matt commented:
#132
Again, they are not forcing him to do anything. He went to them and requested to be certified. If he can’t follow the rules than they not only have the right to decertify him, they have an obligation.
Molon Labe commented:
The government has no right to force anyone to service anything or anyone. It has no right to interfere in contracts. But it has done so and does so under the name of “civil” rights. So you must rent to queers even if they are diseased and your religion says such behavior is damning. It says you must serve anyone regardless, so the smelly, half naked druggie must be allowed to eat anywhere, regardless of the offense it causes other dinners and patrons.
Good for this man. The government needs to back off. Who wants to go to any establishment that doesn’t want you?
Molon Labe commented:
John Davis:
Yopu are a dolt and a dcon man. You wave the Constitution about yet are so ignorant you may have forgotten that it preserves the rights and liberties of Ebnglishman. The Constitution does not require anyone to be served, the government does by trampling the Constitution, much as you do. In the same fashion there is absolutly no basis in the Constitution to require anyone be serviced, if so please show me where in the Constitution this is required.
But your ignorance might be justified but not the twisting of meanings and what is clearly constitutional and what is not. If an individual rrefuses to provide a service to an individual because of his race,creed or color I would like to know where this is required in the constitution. Indeed the founding fathers specifically prohibited the government from using such standards but not individuals. If you bothered to read the Federalist Papers you’d realize this.
When you use the word Standford in your name is this the place where you were or are imprisoned or does it refer to a mental health facility for those with such extreme delusions as you cultivate?
It must be difficult to have to escape from your restraints each morning, and I’m sure the effects of those medications must take their toll on you. This explains your reckless desregard of the truth and fact in your comments.
You have my sympathy, but reality will not be denied, even if you continue. But you do provide us a great amount of entertainment. Its like a dancing monkey lecturing us on the Constitution as he tries to play the accordian very badly. Most amusing.
Molon Labe commented:
#137
Matt:
You are yet another individual that worships at the altar of the government. Exactly why does the government have the right to mandate who ytou do business with? You are exactly the type of person one would expect to find manning the ovens because the government said it was the correct thing to do.
Molon Labe commented:
To o Commissars Johnny and Matt:
We have a Constitutional duty to string up those officials who made the US Government the preferred arms dealer to drug cartels. We have the duty to string up those government officials who sought to discredit the 2nd Amendment and attempt to go “under the radar” to halt the ownership of firear4ms.
We have the duty to end the corruption, the abuse of the government to intimidate and abuse the private citizen, before we turn into a nation of commissars like you.
I spend years overseas and have seen the result of idiots who know the cost of everything and the value of nothing and seen what they have wrought. You spew about rights but know and care nothing about responsibility or honesty.
BS61 commented:
#10 October 29, 2011 at 3:28 pm
Practical Jane commented:
Saw this on The5 and like good little RINOs they all said this guy was over the top.
Thanks for watching what I cannot stomach! I really like Greg, but Beckell is there so forget it!
BS61 commented:
#59 October 29, 2011 at 5:11 pm
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
Being that he’s been in office for three years and people are apparently purchasing firearms in record numbers, he obviously hasn’t banned them.
People are purchasing guns because they see our Marxist-in-Chief stripping away our freedom 24/7 along with his stupid Czars.
Wake up! I’m a former Dem, who at least woke up to the fact that progressives are not the same as Dems!
Molon Labe commented:
#91
Are you referring to the Civil Rights Act that prohibits descrimination? Can you cite me where? If it does so can you explain racial quotas and affirmative action to us?
Ah but the law is living meaning whatever you want it to isn’t it? That’s why the Constitution is irrelevant to people like you.
BS61 commented:
#118 October 29, 2011 at 9:10 pm
Johnny “Stanford” Davis commented:
…does not address the points of Islam’s incompatibility with Western values…
What exact “incompatibility”?
Muslims go to the mosque to pray just like Christians go to church to pray.
Mosques radicalize people sometimes.
Please read a little at jihadwatch or atlasshrugs2000 to educate yourself.
BS61 commented:
#123 October 29, 2011 at 9:34 pm
Robert commented:
#118
And here we have it. You have no knowledge about the fact that Islam mandates political and religious domination over the entire world. It is written in the Koran.
Exactly Robert! Even Thomas Jefferson launched the first maritime war agaist the muslims and didn’t understand why they hated us – hence the Thomas Jefferson Koran.
RedBeard commented:
1. After reading all these comments, it bears repeating: Liberalism is a mental disorder.
2. Crockett Keller is absolutely within his rights to air that commercial, legally and morally. Of course the knee-jerk idiots on the left will try to pillory him, but that doesn’t make him any less right.
3. If the “good” Muslims and their touchy-feely defenders want things to change, they need to stop blaming the rest of us, look inward, and first clean up their own fetid house. Respect is earned.
DeeDee commented:
Actually Johnny Boy, it is neither racism nor bigotry, but the word you are looking for is xenophobia. Regardless it is a private business, it does not receive federal funds, therefore he is in his right to deny service. How many times have you seen the sign in stores, restaurants “shirts and shoes required”?
neo commented:
“Would that more firearms instructors, restaurants, coffee shop owners, jewelry stores, pawn shops, pet stores, booksellers, pizza places, corner stores, grocers, and small business owners decided to do the same.
We outnumber them. If we refused to serve them, they’d have no choice but to live with our rules.”
This is a great idea! #8 lightwave… your right, if everyone refused to sell them anything, then they would just go away.. slimey evil liberals.. maybe get a bunch of good christian conservatives elected next year, and we can pass laws to make liberals illegal, then we can really deal with them properly..
on the other hand, Lightwave, this was tried before, and it didnt really turn out well for your buddy hitler.. go back and listen to some more glen beck, he is saying the LIBERALS are nazi’s not the Good CONservatives
Molon Labe commented:
#151
Neo is right just look at any socialist paradise to understand what a true liberal paradise is like. State control never works there Neo and denial of personal liberty is key to the Leftist mentality.
Liberalism is a disease.
Jim commented:
For the life of me, I can’t understand, if they don’t like America, leave!!As far as guns are concerned, If every law abiding, qualified citizen was required to carry a gun, there would be a lot less crime. Granted, it’s not the perfect answer, but it works. A small town I know of has all it people carry guns. No crime in the last twenty years!!
BWW commented:
He can use them all for targets!
Foster Mangate commented:
Wow. I came upon this site purely by accident, but I’m amazed at what I found. It’s like I turned over a rock and found the creepy, right-wing insects of America all hiding there, living in fear of the great totalitarian Muslim hordes.
What a bunch of retards.
Tim commented:
It will be interesting to see what this developes in to. I believe that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 has some verbiage that says that it only applies to businesses and institutions that have 15 or more employees…but this is about service, not employment discrimination.
Personally, I think that Keller is correct. You can call it bigotry, you can call it racisim, you can call it intolerance, call it what you like, but he is doing the right thing. He is taking a stand and making a statement of what he believes in. It looks to me like the silent majority is beginning to stir, and I hope that they all get active and make a stand like Mr. Keller is doing.
I’m tired of all the BS too. I have had enough of politics, political correctness, liberals, extreme religions, lobbyists, greedy wealthy people and the likes.
Time to take back our country.
TISHA commented:
AMERICA IS A PLACE FOR FREEDOM INCLUDING FREE SPEECH BUT JUST BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY ANYTHING YOU WANT DOES NOT MEAN YOU SHOULD SAY SUCH IGNORANCE. WHO PEOPLE VOTE FOR HAS NO REFLECTION ON THEIR MENTAL CAPABILITY. THE PRESIDENT IS ONE PART OF OUR GOVERNMENT SYSYTEM WHICH IS HONESTLY ONLY A SMALL PART WHILE CONGRESS SEEMS TO HAVE ALL THE POWER.
MUSLIMS ARE PEOPLE WHO DECIDED THE BASE THEIR PRINCIPLES OF LIFE ON THE RELIGION THAT THEY CHOOSE, THEIR RELIGION DOES NOT ADVOCATE KILLING AND IT IS COMPLETLY WRONG TO MAKE THAT JUDGEMENT ABOUT THEM. THINK BEFORE YOU SPEAK and BEFORE YOU THINK MAKE SURE YOU HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE TO SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS INSTEAD OF SPEAKING FROM IGNORANCE AND HATRED
TISHA commented:
TRUE THERE IS A LOT OF VIOLENCE GOING ON IN AMERICA WHICH ALWAYS GOES BACK TO SOME ISLAMIC GROUP BUT ITS VERY IMPORTANT TO REALIZE THAT EVERY MUSLIM DOES NOT SEE THE WORLD LIKE THIS AND THE PEOPLE WHO COMMITS THESE CRIME ARE TRYING TO HIDE BEHIND A RELIGION THAT THEY ARE ABUSING FOR THEIR OWN PERSONAL GAIN.
EVERYONE IS NOT THE SAME AND WE SHOULDNT SEE PEOPLE AS ONER UNIT BECAUSE OF THEIR RACE OR RELIGION