Rupert Murdoch ATTACKED at Hearing!
A young leftist just attacked Rupert Murdoch at the hearing.

Live Feed Here.

Murdoch Attacked—
His wife does a nice job slapping the attacker.

The Guardian reported:

4.58pm: The BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg thinks it’s a bandage on the young man’s face – Nick Robinson says it is shaving foam and the young man hit Rupert Murdoch with it.

4.57pm: The suspect looks like he has a substance like white paint on his face.

My colleague Jackie Ashley tells Twitter: “Wendi [Murdoch's wife] can throw quite a punch.”

4.56pm: The BBC says the young man has been handcuffed. Sky showed the footage again – it seemed to be an attack from Rupert Murdoch’s left.

4.55pm: A young man in a checked shirt has been detained by police.

4.54pm: Someone has just tried to attack Rupert Murdoch. His wife Wendi seemed to slap the person.

UPDATE: The attacker is a UK Uncut activist.
JonnieMarbles is his twitter account.

Ace has video of Jonnie Marbles.
Yup. He’s your typical violent leftist nut.

Michelle Malkin has more thoughts on today’s hearing.

UPDATE: The attacker is a climate camp idiot.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. Go hire some more liberals for Fox News to make yourself feel better.

  2. Murdock’s wife went after the culprit. Wendy Murdock is a great lady. Murdock’s son however, did nothing.

  3. This is an FYI post:

    if you use disqus to post responses to other websites, it seems that disqus is purging anyone with conservative views. That includes sites like RealClearPolitics and American Thinker.

    So be forewarned. If you post anything that some liberal may object to, you will find yourself in the netherland of responses telling you that you are blocked but given no reason. I just lost access to five of my favorite conservative sites.

    It has started.

  4. Wow, go girl!

  5. I hope Murdock’s wife knocked the little toad into next week. If the government isn’t going to protect people from vicious little marxists, then it’s time to take it to them.

  6. I wonder if the attack was paid by a Soros-linked organization.

  7. Nice Security. Try to get that close to your favorite Rock band or Pop Singer, and you’ll find yourself in a wheel chair permanently. My Mother is from Britain, I was just there. I saw our future.

  8. Says “it seemed to be an attack from Rupert Murdoch’s left”. Literally and figuratively.

  9. Redwine, I don’t know what happened. I don’t post anything vile, although I do stand up to the radical left wing. It happened during a RealClearPolitics article about Rick Perry I was posting on. The worst I possibly said was that some guy who was calling Perry a bunch of names was that he was a liar.

    I fully expect the powers that be to start trying to shut down conservatives. Hell, half the conservative bloggers I read have been hacked in the last three months, shutting their websites down. Jim Hoft is pretty clear about pointing out the machinations of the left and the extremes they will go to to shut down dissent. I hope he is prepared for what is coming. This is the first site I hit every morning.

  10. Which one of these Communist MPs let the POS slip inside?

  11. Rupert, you need to hire new body guards. If they had been doing their jobs, that twit wouldn’t have gotten within a foot of you.
    And GO WENDY!

  12. The fascist Left is using this scandal to lynch the lone dissenting right-wing voice in the media.

  13. With the disgraceful state of law-enforcement within the U.K., I suppose that charges of assault will be lodged against Mrs. Murdoch for simply attempting to defend her husband.

  14. #5 Who operates discus? I’ve experienced some problems but am unaware of the details. If they are blocking comments, please forward details, using a new email address, to all bloggers using that service. We must fight back.

  15. FaceBook announced that it would no longer let people use the website to promote TEA Parties. Now disqus is blocking people.

    The left seems to be in full blown panic mode. Stop the free speech of conservatives. Attack! Attack! Attack! Maybe there was something to the DoD announcing it would monitor the internet. Against who? Conservatives that are looking to give Obama the boot in November, 2012?

  16. tombee, I tried to find out some information on disqus, but all I got was a way to sign up.

    Now read my previous post about how the DoD was going to monitor the internet. For what? Conservative comments?

  17. THE BOBBIE WAS THE LAST ONE TO ENTER THE FRAY…

  18. How did that attacker get into that meeting to begin with?

    So a guy can just walk into a building with a pie plate full of foam and roam around the building?

    No guards posted outside the door?

    This was an inside job.
    Murdoch is being set up.

  19. The news said the guy is some comedian.

  20. Mr. Murdoch you married well and your wife is my new hero of the day.

  21. If someone attacks you, beat them to a pulp, then see if it is a pie.

  22. His wife was the only man in the crowd?

  23. Would it be beyond reason to think that Murdoch had this done to gain a little “Poor old man” sympathy. He is a clever old coot, don’t you know.

  24. The shaving cream thrower was a comedian named Jonnie Marbles.

  25. #22 July 19, 2011 at 11:49 am
    motionview commented:

    If someone attacks you, beat them to a pulp, then see if it is a pie.

    If you are armed, use your weapon. In a place like that, you’re probably unarmed, so stab them with your ballpoint pen. You have to assume the stuff you’re being attacked with is toxic.

    #23 July 19, 2011 at 11:51 am
    Trialdog commented:

    His wife was the only man in the crowd?

    She was the closest, and was doing such a good job, no one wanted to foul her. :-D

  26. The deletion of conservative comment is well under way at places like SFGate, the comment site for stories in the San Francisco Chronicle. If you manage to tromp enough leftist toes with inarguable facts instead of the illogical rants favored by brainwashed masses of Bay Area socialists, instead of deleting the single comment, you become an unperson just like in “1984″. Your online identity and ALL your past posts go up in smoke in the memory hole of some leftist editor; you never existed, therefore your arguments will forever be invalid. No matter if your writings got complimented even by leftists, you’re a goner. If the socialist Democrats ever manage to completely swallow government, look forward to this becoming the standard operating procedure in all their sympathetic media.

  27. ++

    if Murdock were an Islamist, it wouldn’t have happened.. /s/

    ==

  28. I thought UK Uncut was a group against circumcision like those fruitcakes in San Francisco.

  29. ++

    FYI: the MURDOCKS played a large role in the
    SELECTION of OBAMA as US PREZ
    , go figure..

    [Even though his daughter Elisabeth and her husband, high-flying P.R.
    man Matthew Freud, have been raising money for Obama in Notting Hill,
    in London, where they live, and his wife has been attending fund-raisers
    for Obama in Los Angeles with David Geffen, this is a leap for Murdoch.]

    more in your face irony.. *sigh*

    ==

  30. When someone does this do Barack Ofukktard, the LEFT won’t be laughing.

  31. Maybe when the British cops are done with their tea they can watch the damn door.

  32. If I had Rupert Murdock’s money, Jonnie Marbles’ “marble bag” would be hanging from the rear view mirror of my Bentley whithin 48 hours. Now that would be funny.

  33. Clearly the left didn’t think they were getting the press this reserved in America so they set this up to catch the attention of American media.

    It worked, of course. It’s now front page center MSNBC. It’s now suitable material for the American media and they can now begin leveraging Murdoch to cut the balls off Fox.

  34. How do these people continue to gain access to such proceedings? Often, the answer is that their idealogical counterparts within Parliament, within Congress, etc., provide them with entry in the furtherence of common goals. Everyone knows this – most of the players (both inside and out) are known to law enforcement. And yet, on and on it goes – with no one ever to answer for it.

  35. I’ll say it again, one of these days they’re going to pull this on the wrong person or persons.

    And then it’s ON.

  36. How hard is it to take apen and put this gu’s eye out. Then he’d be funnier as the “One-eyed Jack Marbles…”

  37. I believe that what the bible states, that in the last days people will think they are doing God a service to attack us (Christians) and and whoever is not a liberal.

  38. This guy came with a “pie” and Murdoch’s wife attacked with her fist. Both were equally pointless, the same as this posting by Hoft – yet is typical of his framing technique.

  39. ++

    AL #42

    hmmm, a little cheesy with that whine, oh wait..

    ==

  40. 200 points to the best haiku of “Airhead Spewing”.

  41. House of Commons. Post IRA attacks, etc., has some of the tightest security in the world. This guy was waved through security by people who knew what he was going to do. It was a government pie thrown by a government contractor.

  42. Get with the program people, I said BOTH actions were pointless……..they advance nothing. However, I distinctly recall a recent post from your digital savior Hoft where he lauded members of the Modern American Right throwing bottles at a man that was exercising his Right to freedom of expression. Granted, it was a flag burning and not a particular freedom that I would exercise, but still a protected freedom. So bottles are fine but smearing a pie in the face of a man that is likely an international criminal is heresy? Please………

  43. We call you “Airhead” for a reason.

    Let me guess, you failed logic class and passed erecting strawmen arguments with flying colors.

  44. No Chisum, you call me “Airhead” because you lack the ability to speak unless you do so within the framing of the Right. That, and you rely on childish antics and predictable machinations. This is why your rhetoric, Hoft’s rhetoric, and that of you ideological kindred is so easily picked apart.

  45. AL: Murdoch has already fired everyone involved in this and closed the newspaper where they worked. It is highly unlikely that he personally approved the phone hacking.

    This is not about Rupert Murdoch himself. What’s on display here is a partisan kangaroo court designed to shut down news sources that are not reliable giovernment mouthpieces. They want to go after Fox News here in the US. The public humiliation with a pie throwing is part of the operation. It was all arranged.

    If they can do this to him, they can do it to you or any one of us.

  46. Airhead,

    You are projecting…again.

    Let me ask you something. If you perceived someone was attacking a loved one, would it be pointless to reflexively try to stop them?

    And if so, would that act be ideologically right or left?

  47. Isn’t it funny the difference between the wife’s reaction and that of the son. Also the reaction of the lady in pink

  48. Also: I wish Mrs. Murdoch had not been blocked and had broken the seedy little bastard’s nose. That would be fair and balanced.

  49. Oh no that violent Tea Party has invaded Britain, sarc off.

  50. The UK has JAULs, too.

    J.A.U.L. (pronounced “jowl”): Just Another Unhinged Leftie.
    d(^_^)b
    http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/
    “Because the Only Good Progressive is a Failed Progressive”

  51. What happened to Obama’s civility?

  52. Well well. MUrdoch gets a taste of his own medicine, except in his case it is a literal “smear” of shaving cream!
    Of course Murdoch regularly hacks phones and computers in the US…the FBI and DOJ are revisiting this case:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/18/business/media/for-news-corporation-troubles-that-money-cant-dispel.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&sq=Floorgraphics&st=nyt&scp=1
    Where is the moral outrage, GPer’s?
    Pass the popcorn….

  53. Chism: Please define “Strawman” and give exaples in the post on this thread by Airon for the class.

  54. seen elsewhere on the net:
    “It is as if Orville Redenbacher had framed News Corp. in his own self-interest…
    There’s a conspiracy theory for ya’ “

  55. Spewer,

    Let me guess, you’re a frustrated spinster schoolmarm, right?

    If not, you’re giving a great imitation of one.

    (Btw, I think it’s sweet of you to come running to Airhead’s defense.)

  56. Of course Chis, you will not define ” strawman” in context because you are just throwing that out there knowing most posters here do not understand it. Of course you CANNOT because Airon DID NOT use a “Strawman” argument. Go get your GED and come back and try to impress me with some other big words…

  57. Someone needs to do this to Obama when he’s up there lying. Throw a shoe at him or a pie in his ugly Muslim face.

  58. Spewer,

    May I suggest that if you want a definition or any information that you seek it for yourself.

    You have a habit of demanding that people here do your research for you.

    Yet you intimate that I’M dumb.

    Go find another sandbox.

  59. Be it noted ConcreteBlue supports physical assault.

    Check.

  60. ++

    re: #45

    aah, it’s been a few years, so i’m a bit out of practice, but..

    here ya go Chisum
    “Airhead Spewing” all day long
    what liberals do

    ==

  61. ++

    eh, why not..

    re: #33

    Barry & Rupert
    electioneer fundraising
    friends not enemies

    ==

  62. ++

    re: #66

    Airon Later
    being uneducated
    schools out evermore

    ==

  63. ++

    eh, whatever..

    Airon Later
    genius he declare himself
    forgets evidence

    ==

  64. Gateway Pundit
    Intelligence Deficit
    When CHism Posts Here

  65. “You have a habit of demanding that people here do your research for you.”
    No, Chis, I have a habit of making people prove they know what they are talking about. You have a habit of proving you don’t.

  66. OH, LOOK! nOW hOFT IS DELETING MY POSTS! free speech! free speech!FREE SPEECH! FREE SPEECH! FREE SPEECH!

  67. Wow. Jim Must be having trouble with the site. I keep seeing posts appear and disappear.

  68. Let it be noted Jimg is a moron.

  69. People who think that a pie in the face is a legitimate political protest ought to get a wicked punch in the face, and I’m talking about plenty of blood about the nose and mouth, and plenty of stitches. And I hope it hurts like hell for a long time.

  70. ++

    #47

    it goes 5 – 7 – 5 (no rhymes)..

    not 4 – 7 (rhymes) – 5.. :D

    but hey, nice try..

    ==

  71. ++

    oops re: #69 & #70

    i was pronouncing airon – air-iron, sorry
    about that (at least they didn’t rhyme)..

    so just add al to Airon Later, as in al Qaeda.. :D

    meet Airon Later & concreteblue et too strawman..

    ==

  72. okay, gus, that’s noyt fair..

  73. ++

    oops.. made my own Haiku errors..

    explained it in a post, but it appears to be missing.. *sigh*

    ==

  74. ++

    GOP Contenders : July 17, 2011

    [Palin hasn't announced yet, but she's certainly included..]

    ==

  75. Maybe Murdoch ought to rethink that policy to protect Obama on the birth certificate issue.

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk