Pelosi Hypocrisy: She Called FBI on Mark Foley But Gives Weiner a Pass

The worst Speaker in US History is also a hypocrite.

Back in 2006 Nancy Pelosi was leading the charge on the Foley email scandal. She said it was for the children.
Pelosi statement on the Foley investigation:

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi released the following statement today on news reports that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is opening a preliminary investigation of the sexually explicit e-mails Congressman Mark Foley sent an underage former House Page.

The FBI is rightly investigating former Republican Congressman Mark Foley?s reported internet stalking of an underage former House Page. Mr. Foley is outside the reach of the House Ethics Committee, however the required investigation into the cover up of Mr. Foley?s behavior by the Republican Leadership must quickly move forward.

The children who work as Pages in the Congress are Members special trust. Statements by the Republican Leadership indicate that they violated this trust when they were made aware of the internet stalking of an underage Page by Mr. Foley and covered it up for six months to a year.

Congress must not pass the buck on investigating this cover up. The children, their parents, the public, and our colleagues must be assured that such abhorrent behavior is not tolerated and will never happen again.

But, now she’s giving Rep. Weiner a pass.
The AP reported:

Amid increasing calls for Rep. Anthony Weiner to resign, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi says the decision should be up to the congressman and his New York constituents.

The former speaker said in San Francisco that she believes the decision should be made by “the individual member” and the people in his district.

Weiner, a seven-term Democrat, has admitted sending sexually explicit photos and messages over the Internet to a half dozen women over the past three years. Pelosi has asked the House Ethics Committee to investigate whether Weiner used any government resources.

Weiner told a newspaper Thursday he would not resign. At least nine House members and three senators said he should quit.

Two former Democratic Party chairmen also said he should resign.

What a horrible woman.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • jorgen

    Of course he can stay: he is a standard Dem: liar and sleasebag.

  • Robert

    “At least he wasn’t going out with little boys.”

    And here we have the bar set by none other than Charles Rangel,
    that other New York paragon of virtue and representative of his constituents.

  • Hank

    Rush is right: stay, Anthony, stay.

    The perfect posterboy for today’s Democratic Party: distainful of women, no ethics, no morales, holier than thou, etc etc.

  • No Man

    Hypocrisy is the least of the evils of the average lying, liberal wreckulator.

  • mg4us

    Of course Pelosi supports Weiner. . .just look at what she allows her husband to get away with.

    As the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree so does the Lies don’t fall far from the Sleaze.

    Time to vote all these RATS (the DemocRATS) out of office and take OUR country back!

  • JKB

    Ah, I see the difference. Foley’s incident involved same-sex individuals. Pelosi was just trying to save the country from those homosexuals. Congressmen sending pictures of their talliwhackers to women, well, that is how God intended it.

  • Carbon Pootprint

    Please Harry, Pelosi wrap yourselves around your Weiner. Hell make him the “head” of the Demonic Party!!!!

  • Sickofobama

    Just keep reminding everybody of the Weiner until election time.

    If you are a Commiecrat and voting for crap that has destroyed our nation you get a pass for being a pervert while your wife is pregnant.

    Typical of the Piglosi.

    Typical of the Republicans to keep their mouths shut.

  • Ron

    Nancy Pelosi; This is your typical liberal democrat. Under her leadership as house majority leader along with the Obama administration this country has lost it’s moral standing and has become a joke around the world. These people have no clue as to what’s coming on 2012, and are so stupid and inept that when they wake up after the election, they’ll be asking themselves “Huh, wha’ happened? Hillary is already about to jump ship. Keep up the good work Nancy.

  • mike191

    It must be the DNA and/or assh….gene in the dems.Forexample,Cathy Hochul of N.Y.-26,special election of shirtless Chris Lee,when asked about Mr. Weiner never said the word,resignation.Hypocrite is an understatement when refering to Pelosi and newcomer,Hochul.

  • Mark

    Nazi Piglosi must go!

  • toongoon

    HYPOCRISY = LIBERALISM

  • #1AMERICAN

    whatever is good for the dems…turn the other cheek…it’s a bunch of bull crap…Demo turds stand for; no morals, no ethics, no truth, crooks, tax cheats…feel free to keep adding on to the list

  • gus

    Libtards are dishonest. Period. They have no morals at all. Pelosi will rot in hell.

  • RedBeard

    Pelosi suffers from more than one debilitating condition. In addition to her “goes to 11” hypocrisy, she’s also ignorant, abrasive, dishonest, and stupid. In other words, a perfect candidate for Democrat Party leadership.

  • Sherry A

    I did not realize Pelosi was still head of the House of Representatives. I thought there was a Republican in charge now. Can’t he call for an investigation???

  • Ipso Facto

    Pelosi, Weiner, and their ilk are all trash. Whatever the heck happened to America I really don’t know, however, nearly everything I look at and find objectionable is attributable to the liberals or infested with them.

    Look at Hollywood with all the petty celebrities that are one more shallow than the other. Look at our educational system – shot to heck. Look at the visual arts with the ants crawling all over the Crucifix. Look at our inner cities with HS graduation rates at 50%. They don’t want to enforce immigration laws or prosecute foreign felons. They have ruined the real estate market by forcing banks to lend to sub-prime lenders. They want to have such strict environmental regulations that business in America comes to a halt. They want to spend us into national bankruptcy. I could list many more things, couldn’t I?

    Two things come to mind when I consider these people. First, we need to STOP being civil to them and we need to take it to them in the media by developing an EFFECTIVE message, put out by a conservative with GUTS – and the insipid GOP be damned. Second, we need to purge these scum from our government. From the lowest levels of local offices to national levels, these scum are the enemies of America – if we don’t rid them from our government they will bring this nation down.

    These liberals have no limits to their depravity. This can readily be seen when we look at how everything they want to do is accelerating our demise. How is it that they can’t see that what they want to do has never worked anywhere in history? When they have totally taken us down – how will they even benefit?

  • tommy mc donnell

    there are no morals or ethics in todays politics. a person’s party affiliation can excuse any behavior. its just like marxist russia.

  • She is also an idiot.

  • squeaky

    unless it’s been mentioned – didn’t we find that information on foley was held by the dems until the most opportune moment….thus the question of just what is more appalling – the purported crime or the willingness to sit on the information until you could use it to your advantage at a later date.
    http://sweetness-light.com/archive/house-panel-says-gop-didnt-violate-any-rules-on-foley

  • smarty

    Why do we care about her? She was house leader and called investigations on the GOP all the time.

    So where is gutless RINO Boehner? Too worried about civility, the high road, about keeping his golfing invites with Obama? There should be a house investigation with everything put into evidence. Any GOPer who does not support that is a flaming sissy unqualified to kiss Pelosi’s shoes.

  • Rachelle

    Pelosi is the official leader of the Weinercrats.

    Odd that two of the most odious members of the Weinercrat Party are named Weiner and Frank.

    Is Pelosi some sort of Italian name for a sausage or private part by any chance?

  • Valerie

    Pelosi wants it both ways. She wants to be on record agreeing that he’s a nasty piece of work, and she wants to keep the benefit of his vote.

    Thank you for calling her on it.

  • margaret

    dumb asses, foley was preying on male minors…while publicly opposing homosexuality and chairing a caucus for missing and exploited children…do you get it now?

  • Jack Elam

    Are you too stupid to tell the difference between pederasty and infidelity, or just such a terrible, terrible person that you’ll strike a patently false equivalancy about it just for the sake of scoring points against “the other side”? Which one? Because it’s one or the other and don’t pretend otherwise.

  • Chisum

    margaret,

    Seriously, are you that stupid? Remember when Weiner said this:

    QOTD: “Sadly, the Internet is the predator’s venue of choice today. We need to update our strategies and our laws to stop these offenders who are a mere click away from our children.” –Anthony Weiner

    And he is corresponding with a 16 year old WITHOUT her parents’ knowledge!

    YOU are the DUMBASS!

  • Jennifer

    As usual, you bozos seem to be having a problem wrapping your brain cell around the notion of “consent”. As in, the minor BOYS who Foley was stalking were not of legal age to meet the standard of “consenting adult.”

    Another difference: none of the women (note: WOMEN, not GIRLS) were ever in the same physical space as Rep. Weiner. Rep. Foley, on the other hand, was showing up at congressional pages’ place of lodging after hours.

    And of course, the other difference is that Foley’s skeevy actions were known and concealed by other members of his party for months (perhaps even over a year – it’s been a while now and I can’t be bothered to look it up), only coming to light after one of Foley’s minor stalkees complained about his actions. Weiner’s skeevy actions, on the other hand, were known only by the ADULT WOMEN with whom he was corresponding prior to Breitbart using those communications for further attention-seeking…and none of the correspondees have ever complained about his missives. In fact, the one correspondee we know of has already stated that you guys are nuts for getting so upset about this, because she’s not bothered by it.

    But other than that, yeah, they’re EXACTLY the same. I’m sure if you pin your election hopes on this, you can manage to convince the majority of the voting public that an individual who engaged in legal behavoir is a MUCH bigger problem than an entire party voting to do away with health care for old people.

    Good luck with that.

  • Jenny

    And wiener is posing as a happily married man…..

  • Em

    Nancy marched with Man/Boy Love NAMBLA members in a gay pride parade in San Fran several years ago. It was all over the news and iirc, Nancy was chastised by her fellow House members for her outreach to advocates of criminal behavior in search of re-election votes.
    Honestly, after years of watching the political scandals parade in the news, I think the whole government is based on suckees and suckors. Throwing in the incentive of trillions of dollars of taxpayer monies, unchecked power and media complicity makes it oh so cushy and seductive for these sociopaths. They think they’re gods, but they are really either suckees or suckors(suckers).

  • Jenny

    Actually the democrats haven’t been successful at spinning the republicans as trying to kill off old people. It’s the opposite… Death panels = Obamacare. Obama wants to kill off Old people. The conservatives want to fix Medicare. We know that the dens havent been successful in fixing the economy and cannot even pass a budget. The public associates the democrat party with ‘incompetence.’ the dem or machine didn’t help wiener and it’s not going to help the ovsma.

  • margaret

    jack, i am the kind of person who views pederasty as being much worse than infidelity. while i consider both to be wrong, preying on minor children is inexcusable…

    chisum, she was 17, was following him, nothing inappropriate was written, family knew. quote from article: “So, the family knew about the messages. There were only five of them. They acknowledge that the messages were “harmless.”

    with social media, many contacts are made…how many congresspeople are followed by young constituents…i bet there are alot! and initially, how would one know how old a follower or fan is?

    foley knew the young men…

  • Jack Elam

    “House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called for an ethics investigation.”

    Not good enough for you? I am so, SO surprised. Stupid or lying? Come clean for once in your life and maybe you won’t go straight to hell.

  • Jennifer

    Jenny – Oh, well I’m sure that will come as a comfort to Rep. Ryan, whose own constituents nearly tarred and feathered him at a town hall a month or so back, so “unsuccessful” have been the efforts to point out to old people that Republicans want them to go without health care.

    As for you, Em, why didn’t you post a link to this story about Pelosi marching with NAMBLA? My guess is it’s because you made it up. HINT: not every homosexual is a member of NAMBLA – in fact, the vast majority are not. Last time I checked (yes, I checked, thanks to the wild claims of morons like you), NAMBLA had a total of about 10 members in the entire US.

  • Chisum

    I don’t know where you are quoting from, margaret.

    But it is. I spent a lot of words trying to make this case: That even if he restrained himself enough to cross no criminal lines, the question must still be asked, “Then why is he bantering with children who have a romantic or even sexual interest in him in private, parents-don’t-know DMs?”

    And did the parents know? No, the parents did not know. I guess he forgot to get the parental permission slip.

    A member of the girl’s family who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect her identity characterized the messages as “harmless” but expressed concern that Mr. Weiner had communicated privately with the teenager, a high school junior.

    The family was aware that there had been exchanges between Mr. Weiner and the girl but assumed that all of their conversations had taken place on a public Twitter feed.

    This girl’s parents assumed that all of her communications with Weiner were occurring publicly.

    And since we know this correspondence went on for a while since he friended her, defriended her and then refriended her it is quite possible it began when she was 16. But you go ahead and try to polish that turd.

  • Jennifer

    About that NAMBLA conspiracy:

    “Media reports from 2006 have suggested that for practical purposes the group no longer exists and that it consists only of a web site maintained by a few enthusiasts.[23]”

    But I suppose Em has a crystal ball and was able to identify EVERY SINGLE one of those “entusiasts” marching with Pelosi.

    Seriously, what kind of person bases their opinion on things that they KNOW they’ve just MADE UP? The stupid kind, obviously.

  • Chisum

    A bit bit of the FACTS, margaret.

    He knew damn well she was in high school.

    By the way, he knew damn well he was talking to someone in high school. The New York Times article Aaron linked earlier has the following passage:

    The girl’s contact with Mr. Weiner started in early April, after her trip to Washington. The congressman spoke to her school group, and she began following him on Twitter, posting a public message saying how much she liked his speech.

    Two days later, Mr. Weiner began following her on Twitter. On her profile, she says she aspires to be president. In a private message he sent to her, he said: “How hip am I talking to a future president.”

    Delighted that she had heard directly from a congressman, the girl wrote a public post on her Twitter feed: “talking to Rep Weiner from New York right now! is my life real?”

    So, he gives a speech to a high school group. A high school junior praises the speech. And then he starts following her after that praise of his speech. And after he reads her profile, in which she says she wants to be president, and also talks about . . . marching band:

    I love LeBron James, marching band, and sleeping. Politics is my one true love, and I will be president.

  • shukov

    Just how in the hell did we ever end up with the likes of pelosi running our country? It is about damn time to stand back, shake your head a few times, and snap out of it. What kind of men let these deluded dingbats rule over them?

  • Jennifer

    Chisum – oh, so now it’s ILLEGAL for a member of Congress (as long as they’re a Democrat) to have a non-sexual conversation with a high-schooler?

    Seriously, were you dropped on your head as an infant?

  • Francesca

    What about Pelosi’s husband?

  • Chisum

    Weird Jennifer,

    How do you know they were non-sexual? Why did the police remove her computer and take it with them.

    No, nothing to see here.

    So now you wish to parse ‘illegal’? If this man , a 46 year old MARRIED man, was privately texting my underage daughter he would have more to fear then just the law.

    But I guess you would have no problem with it if it was your daughter?

    Keep telling people how stupid THEY are.

  • Chisum

    I suspect this explains Weird Jennifer’s curious comfort with Pervert Weiner’s Perversions:

    Democrats on Sex and Children

    http://www.mediaresearch.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2006/col20061012.asp

    And NAMBLA NO LONGER EXISTS…EXCEPT WHEN THEY MURDER LITTLE BOYS.

    But I’m the one that must have been dropped on my head!

  • margaret

    jack, why so angry? and bitter? and judgemental? of course an ethics investigation is going to be called for whenever such allegations are made and found to be true. i would be more concerned if she didn’t call for one.

    i am horrified and appalled whenever there is a sex scandal involving anyone…especially when they involve children and other vulnerable people. and i’m pretty sure i’m not going to hell because i can tell the difference between an pedophile and a philanderer.

    am i condoning weiner’s actions? no. i feel very sad for his wife and family…his sexual proclivities and lack of awareness or judgement have caused them an infinite amount of hurt and embarrassment. but the fact remains that his lewd correspondences were between him and adult women. foley, on the other hand was explicitly and graphically coercing minor males who were entrusted to him into fulfilling his sexual needs. i’m sure you can see the difference in the two situations.

    as far as my alleged stupidity, i am not the one who eats up everything jim hoft poops out..

  • Jennifer

    Chisum – you repeated a completely innocuous message as though it were proof of pedophilia and an outrage. And yes, I would have no problem with an underage daughter of mine carrying on an innocent, non-sexual online conversation with a mentor of any age or marital status. You’ve shown no evidence of anything else happening and the girl’s family and the girl herself have indicated nothing untoward happened. But since the person in question is a Democrat, you feel the need to conflate it into a crime.

    FWIW, I’m pretty sure that these days it’s fairly common for publically-known adults to have online communications with teenagers all the time, when they reply to correspondence and questions from kids. I suspect that most of those publically-known adults also have SEX with other adults, in some cases even sexually-charged online conversations with other adults, which by your metric should make them suspect. Next thing, you’ll be demanding that all kids be removed from the custody of their parents, because we know the parents have had sex.

    I suppose the reason you folks have such a hard time distinguishing between notions of “adult” and “underage” is that mentally, you’re all a bunch of children.

  • daryl

    margaret commented:
    “chisum, she was 17, was following him, nothing inappropriate was written, family knew. quote from article: “So, the family knew about the messages. There were only five of them. They acknowledge that the messages were “harmless.””

    Marge,
    You need to SOURCE IT, or sthu! Don’t come here spreading your lying, liberal sounding bs without unarguable proof when discussing Weiner.

    And Jennifer,

    If you only knew how your defending this pos sounds. Damn! Do you liberals have any sense of decorum or common decency at all?? You, like Pelosi, think he should just get a pass for this?

  • Mark

    #39 “What about Pelosi’s husband?”

    Nancy Pelosi is a horse’s ass. A friend of mine’s kids went to school with Pelosi’s kids in SF and he knows them socially. The hubby is apparently just an ordinary guy and a successful businessman. What he has to say about the Nazi Piglosi is unprintable. She is also clinically insane.

  • Jennifer

    daryl – if you only knew how childish you look for getting the vapors over a picture of a pair of occupied underpants. What’s next, congressional investigation of the Sears catalog? Condemnation of Olympic men’s swim events? For God’s sake, grow up.

  • margaret

    here’s where i got the information i quoted above:
    http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/weiner-admits-messaging-with-17-year-old-girl/

  • Jack Elam

    Nobody thinks Weiner should get a pass, especially not the woman who quite rightly sicced an ethics investigation on him. I’m prepared to accept that your insane belief that anyone has said that he should is the result of extreme stupidity on your part.

  • Chisum

    Well, there you go, daryl.

    WE are the unenlightened ones.

    Weird Jennifer is the one with the open mind. SHE would allow a 46 yo Married man complete access to her high school daughter and not have any concerns.

    See how CHILDISH we are.

    Keep talking, Weird Jennifer. You are doing a great job of beclowning yourself. Oh, and keep a match handy for all your strawmen.

  • Em

    Made it up, huh? Sorry, you’re wrong. Attacking me won’t change the truth, it just makes you look misguided and hostile. For the record, I don’t care what these people do among consenting adults because we’ve got bigger fish to fry, but when they prey on children they need to go to jail. As for your statement that there are ten members in this organization, what makes you think that these people would admit to their crimes by putting their names on a membership list that the FBI could accesss. You see that they published a book (probably for the benefit of those ten members) touting their victory over law enforcement, but I wouldn’t want to disabuse you of your naievete. These guys are out there acting alone or with another male. I had a run in with John Wayne Gacy in Chicago at a public event, so don’t tell me they have to be on official membership roster to be guilty of this sickness.

    http://www.mantecabulletin.com/archives/8094/
    “In 2001, San Francisco gay pride parade, Nancy Pelosi walked alongside the NAMBLA advocate, Harry Hay…”

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2001/06/22/DD115758.DTL#container
    Entry 30.1 on this parade list represents the man-boy love contingent. They are marching under the banner of their pedophile founder and not under NAMBLA.

    http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?paged=8
    Harry Hay wrote an endorsement of a NAMBLA book entitled, “A Witchhunt foiled: The FBI v. NAMBLA”

  • Chisum
  • daryl

    Thanks for the confirming my doubts about you liberals jennifer.

  • margaret

    daryl, you need to calm down and quit casting aspersions…because i don’t think like you, i am branded a ‘liberal.’ as if that is the epitome of evil…common decency? decorum?

    if you knew me at all (and i daresay knew anyone you try to disparage with the term ‘liberal’) you would know that i am chock full of common decency…i am an executive director at a non-profit foundation (with a board presided over one of the most right-leaning persons i have ever met in my life and who somehow overlooks my ‘liberalness’ and has implicit trust in my decency, decorum and abilities), church council chair person, am deeply involved in special olympics and student advisor to our high school’s key club. i have been happily married for 26 to the same man with nary a sex scandal to either of our names. wow, you’re right! all ‘liberals’ are horrible, twisted freaks!

    try to argue with actual words and thoughts that actually mean something…

  • margaret

    em said: but when they prey on children they need to go to jail.

    mark foley?

  • Jennifer

    daryl – oh, give it a rest. You had “doubts”? No, you didn’t. The “D” is all you need, in any situation, to label someone as a satanic pedophile who hates America. At least be honest about your binary thinking.

    As for you, Em, by your metric every member of the Republican party is a pedophile, because Mark Foley is. Do you see how stupid your reductive “reasoning” is? No, of course you don’t, because your single brain cell can’t hold on to or process more than one thought at a time. Therefore, since Hitler was a vegetarian, all vegetarians are Nazis who want to put people in concentration camps.

    Moron.

  • daryl

    Yeah and I’m CEO and COB of Calling Them The Way I See Them Inc.

  • Em

    Jennifer either doesn’t read or won’t acknowledge evidence when it is provided for her benefit.

  • margaret

    daryl, thanks for calling me a liar again…i’m being truthful and trying to help you see that not all people who aren’t you are not evil…i can see there is no use in trying. for some reason you would rather hang on to your misguided, self-righteous anger. i’m sorry that you are going to have such a miserable outlook on life…

    chisum, your patterico link seems to be a rant full of conjecture…it only proves to me that there is no definitive proof of anything except dirty talk between two adults and a 17 year old girl who, sadly, posts the same kind of trash that lots of teenage girls these days feel compelled to…

  • Chisum

    I guess they found something on that computer after all!

    Pelosi, Wasserman Schultz, Israel tell Weiner he should resign

    http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/11/pelosi-israel-tell-weiner-he-should-resign/

    How REDUCTIVE, UNENLIGHTENED AND NARROW MINDED of them!

    Bwahahahahahahaha!

  • daryl

    They cain’t hep it Chisum.
    Bad mouth their decorum and they become “church ladies” who don’t get upset over a “pair of occupied underpants” sent to underage girls.

  • Jennifer

    Em – what “evidence”, you DOLT?

    You started with a claim about Pelosi “marching under the NAMBLA banner” when then morphs into “Pelosi marched in a gay pride parade in which a guy who wrote a book about NAMBLA’s fight with the FBI also marched.”

    Where’s the evidence of ANYONE who was a MEMBER OF NAMBLA being in that parade? Not to mention that you idiots have been flogging NAMBLA for 15 years or more, when as noted, IT NO LONGER EXISTS.

    Look, idiot, I don’t doubt that there may have been one or more pervy individuals marching in that parade – people who would like to, or have, had sex with underage individuals. I could say the same about every GOP convention. So I suppose that makes all Republicans advocates of pedophilia, right? Because they shared the same air space with a pedophile and share some of the same political goals. So from here on out, calling all Republicans pedophiles is fair game. Right? I mean, these are YOUR rules I’m going by here, and we KNOW for a FACT that Rep. Foley was a pedophile who attended GOP conventions, so this means every other person in attendance was a pedophile or at the very least ENDORSES sex with underage individuals. Right?

    You moron.

  • Jennifer

    daryl – the woman who got the underpants pic was not underage, liar.

    See? You can’t make a cogent argument WITHOUT pulling stuff out of your rear end. An intelligent individual would recognize this as a clue that they don’t have an argument. But…you’re not intelligent, so you soldier on with even easier-to-identify lies and fabrications.

    And no, there is nothing obscene about a picture of a pair of occupied men’s underwear. Any more than the men’s underwear section of the Penney’s catalog is obscene. Men have penises; both adults and children know this, and up until now, no one ever suggested that a picture of a man wearing underwear was obscene. As I said before, grow up, Nancy-boy.

  • daryl

    Hey! One or both of you ladies should run for elective office. There’s thousands of voters out there who “think” the same as you two and would be more than willing to vote for you.
    But don’t expect to find votes here.
    I think you’ll find it more agreeable for “your way of thinking” over at DU, HuffPo, or maybe firedoglake.com.

  • Jennifer

    Chisum – see, this is the problem – you base everything on GUESSES.

    Nothing in that link about anything being found on a computer. Just another lie, as we’d expect from your ilk.

  • Em

    “Where’s the evidence of ANYONE who was a MEMBER OF NAMBLA being in that parade? Not to mention that you idiots have been flogging NAMBLA for 15 years or more, when as noted, IT NO LONGER EXISTS.”
    ***********************
    You didn’t read any of the links, did you, troll? Bet you’re a Kevin Jennings defender, too.

  • Jennifer

    daryl – you’re an innocent hothouse flower, obviously too pure for this sordid world in which it’s common knowledge that men have penises and women have ladybits, and that knowledge in and of itself is obscene and corrupting. The only solution I can see to your dilemma is for you to just go ahead and end it all.

  • margaret

    em, here’s some ‘evidence’ for you:
    http://mediamatters.org/research/200610080004

  • Chisum

    “Anthony’s inappropriate behavior has become an insurmountable distraction to the House and our work for the American people. With a heavy heart, I call on Anthony to resign. <

    DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ

    A DISTRACTION????

    BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Chisum

    Weird Jennifer,

    Read it and weep.

    Exclusive: Delaware Police Looking to Confirm Weiner Sent No Inappropriate Messages to Teen Girl

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/11/exclusive-delaware-police-looking-for-direct-messages-between-weiner-teen-girl/

  • Jennifer

    No, Em, I don’t waste my time reading lies from Brent Bozell. Only people who choose to be misinformed use him as a source. Congratulations on keeping yourself dumb and in the dark.

    As noted, you provided no evidence of any MEMBER OF NAMBLA being in that parade. And of course, your assumption is that Pelosi should have vetted every single one of the thousands who marched. Just like the GOP should vet everyone who attends a convention. But of course they don’t, because they just love pedophilia and endorse adults having sex with kids.

  • Swifty

    Democratic Leaders Say Rep. Weiner Must Resign
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/11/democratic-leaders-say-rep-weiner-must-resign/

    House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California says Weiner “needs help” and he should get some “without the pressures of being a member of Congress.”

  • Jennifer

    Chisum – most literate individuals would interpret “looking to confirm” as “nothing is proven.”

    I understand why you are flummoxed by this odd phrase.

  • Chisum

    #65 June 11, 2011 at 1:21 pm
    Jennifer commented:

    daryl – you’re an innocent hothouse flower, obviously too pure for this sordid world in which it’s common knowledge that men have penises and women have ladybits, and that knowledge in and of itself is obscene and corrupting. The only solution I can see to your dilemma is for you to just go ahead and end it all.

    ================================================

    It’s obvious that Weird Jennifer is here to, in a Weiner-like fashion, talk dirty.

    Eff off, troll!

  • Jennifer

    Chisum – you think use of the word “penis” is “talking dirty”?

    Like I said, you folks are mentally children.

  • daryl

    Like those J.C. Penny’s catalogues do we Jennifer? Something just so liberal looking about those Penny’s models.

  • Chisum

    So, Weird Jennifer, if I’m GUESSING AND LYING AND MAKING THINGS UP, why did Pelosi, et al just jump off the Weiner band wagon?

    They were all wrapped around The Weiner. What happened?

    Bwahahahahhahahaha!

  • SM-AZ

    http://www.drudgereport.com/

    The Dems reversed and say “Weiner must go.”

  • Jennifer

    Chisum – uh, because they’re POLITICIANS and can always be counted upon to distance themselves from any controversy?

    Just a wild guess there, based on watching how things work in the real world for 40+ years.

  • Jennifer

    Also, too: in point of fact, Pelosi has been calling for an ethics investigation since last Monday or Tuesday.

    So much for being “wrapped around the Weiner”, liar.

    Also, you shouldn’t use the word “Weiner;” it might damage daryl’s tender psyche.

  • daryl

    Hot house flower, jennifer?
    Nah. If I was a flower I’d rather think I’m a Texas bull-nettle. Get too close and you get the s**t stung out of yourself.

  • margaret

    daryl,

    i have no desire to run for public office. i like doing good right where i am at. i agree, however, that there are thousands of voters who think like jennifer and me…after all, there are thousands upon thousands of reasonable, decent, open-minded people who love their families, their god and fight injustice against the vulnerable and the exploited. that is a pretty horrible thing to be, isn’t it?

    as stupid as you think i am, i know very well there would be no votes for me on this site…lucky for me, that is not how voting for public office works. i would not wish to be associated with people who blindly follow jim hoft (who has screwed up so many time that he’s had to move his blogging action three times in one year), color every person who does not think exactly like them as evil monsters and are clearly void of any type of reasoning skills.

    i am able to accept people for who they are and don’t vote or quote the party line…and no, i’m not a ‘church lady’ who clutches her pearls when someone ‘badmouths their decorum.’ i was simply pointing out to you that you do not know me as a person and that there are good parts to me as well as your perceived evil-ness. you know what? i drink, i used to smoke (but gave it up so that i am here for my children), i tell bawdy jokes, i eat too much, and probably spend way too much time on the internet…so, i guess i’m pretty much like most people you know…i have friends who are staunch missouri synod lutherans and conservative republicans, which is totally opposite of me being a congregationalist and a democrat…but guess what? we’re all grown up enough that we actually get along! even when we have our political/religious debates…which can get pretty heated, yet usually end in laughter…we respect each other enough and realize that we are more the same than we’re different and that we each possess the good qualities we require in friends…politics and religion do not totally define us…

    being a jim hoft follower, i’m guessing you have no idea how that works…

  • Jack Elam

    If “penis” was a swearword, it’d be blocked by The Gateway Hypocrite’s swear filter thing that he seems to have. Grow. Up.

  • Chisum

    So much for being “wrapped around the Weiner”, liar.

    ===========================================
    Weird Jennifer the Troll,

    You sure are free with the names. And Wasserman-Schultz was wrapped around The Weiner all right.

    So, I acquit you of being a liar. You’re simply stupid.

    http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/2011/06/wasserman-schultz-on-weinergate-its.html

  • Jack Elam

    Daryl, you’re a daisy who thinks it’s a thistle. At best.

  • Jack Elam

    “Weird Jennifer the Troll,

    You sure are free with the names”

    I know you idiots are incapable of comprehending irony as an abstract concept, but even so, that’s special.

  • Chisum

    margaret,

    If you have such a problem with Jim Hoft then why are you here?

    You should head back over to MMfA. More your level.

    BTW, have you seen their traffic numbers?

    You should ask them about it. You’ll really feel special.

    Bwahahahaha.

  • Chisum

    Well Jack, if you bothered to read through the thread you would see that Weird Jennifer started the name calling. I’m just trying to keep up.

  • daryl

    Pelosi Galore done went and reversed herself. Stuck one of those bony fangers in the air, decided there was a bad moon ah rising and said
    hey!,hey!,ho!,ho!,
    that pervert Weiner
    Has got to go!!

    Sorry jennifer!!
    BwaaaaaHaaaaaaaHaaaaaaaHaHaHaHa

  • Em

    Now the argument is that Nancy, a San Francisco political insider and powerbroker, has or had no knowledge of whom Harry Hay was and why marching with him could give the misimpression that she was okay with his views. Brent Bozell is not credible, though.

    Thank you for the link, Margaret. I may disagree with what Mediamatters posits, but will read it anyway since you took the time to post it. As for another poster here, her abusive comments are unnecessary and childish.

  • margaret

    technically, jorgen started the (mis-spelled) name calling with the very first post, which of course was followed by more name calling…also, i called you all dumb asses before jennifer even chimed in, so there’s that.

    why am i here? you know how when you see a car accident and you don’t want to look, but you can’t help it? or you watch ‘reality’ tv knowing full well that it’s not real and that it should be an embarrassment to everyone involved with it?

    yeah, this site is kind of like that…

  • daryl

    Why Jack Elam, you gotch-eyed old freak! Thought you was dead, I did!
    Hey wait a minute. You are dead! Bet your still votin’ fer them damned liberals too ain’t ya?

  • Chisum

    margaret,

    And yet you link to MMfA. Truly, you are special.

  • Chisum

    daryl,

    Good one!

  • margaret

    see, em…the beauty of civil discourse is that it allows two opposing sides to discuss and compare. of course you are going to link to right leaning sites and publications…and i’m not…this is how we learn…not by blindly following ‘your side’ without even considering that there may, in fact, be another side to the story.

  • Chisum

    margaret,

    If you are truly interested in advancing “your side” you might try linking to a credible site.

  • margaret


    #92 June 11, 2011 at 1:56 pm
    Chisum commented:

    margaret,

    And yet you link to MMfA. Truly, you are special.

    and yet you link to fox news, legal insurrection and patterico…and that proves what? and please, don’t toss around the epithet ‘special.’ my daughter has cerebral palsy and is mildly retarded, so therefore, ‘special’ needs…mocking the developmentally disabled is juvenile, appalling and just plain wrong.

  • Chisum

    margaret,

    Nice try. Special has more than one definition. As I indicated in my reference to MMfA’s readership, ‘special’ meant unique.

    But you go ahead and try to spin it otherwise.

    (Obviously you know you are losing the argument when you are reduced to such tactics.)

  • margaret

    chisum, can you tell me where you were referring to mmfa’s readership? nothing in the comment i cited had anything to do with readership nor uniqueness (and i am not aware that people who read mmfa every so often were unique) and fairly dripped with sarcasm…which, in my experience teamed with the word ‘special’ usually means the one referred to is not mentally up to par…i have been accused of being a little too reactionary to mockery of the disabled, and if this is indeed the case, you have my apologies for mis-interpreting what you wrote…

  • daryl

    Never expected nor wanted your bio margeret.
    But if you really feel that way about Hoft maybe you shouldn’t frequent the site.
    I was taught not to force my opinion on anyone, call them morons, or in any way become so fractious to the point there’s no way out of contentious differences. Pity you didn’t recieve some of that yourself.
    I was also taught that if you can’t take it don’t dish it out, but that’s another story.

  • Chisum

    Nah, there’s nothing wrong with The Weiner. Nothing at all!

    At the same time, two senior Democratic officials said on Saturday that Mr. Weiner was planning to check himself into a treatment center.

    Oh, and margaret, I’m linking to the NY Times. I hope that’s acceptable to you.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/nyregion/pelosi-calls-on-weiner-to-resign.html?emc=na

  • Chisum

    margaret, you dishonest piece of garbage!

    Here you go:

    #86 June 11, 2011 at 1:47 pm
    Chisum commented:

    margaret,

    If you have such a problem with Jim Hoft then why are you here?

    You should head back over to MMfA. More your level.

    BTW, have you seen their traffic numbers?

    You should ask them about it. You’ll really feel special.

    Bwahahahaha.

    You missed the phrase “traffic numbers” but picked right up on ‘special’, didn’t you?

    Did I mention you were a DISHONEST PIECE OF GARBAGE?

  • margaret

    (Obviously you know you are losing the argument when you are reduced to such tactics.)

    and no…obviously i am the mother of a special needs child and get really, really pissy when people like her are disparaged by people who are comfortable with doing so.

    also, there is no argument on my part…i simply state that i find a proven pedophile to be much worse than an insecure, egomaniacal philanderer with bad judgement. i also state that i find the fact that people cannot see the difference between the two situation is mindboggling…

    so, i’m good here…and i’ve wasted way too much time here when i really should be at work getting the things done that i didn’t this week because i was too busy attending a conference where i was learning more tips about how to be a horrible, evil, stupid, health care oriented, grant-giving human being…

  • Chisum

    That’s it, margaret. Smear me in typical dishonest liberal fashion then run away.

    You are GARBAGE!

  • Nine-of-Diamonds

    “you know how when you see a car accident and you don’t want to look, but you can’t help it? or you watch ‘reality’ tv knowing full well that it’s not real and that it should be an embarrassment to everyone involved with it?

    yeah, this site is kind of like that…”

    You hear that?? Don’t get angry at Weiner – oh, no. Save the rage for the people who have the nerve to, oh, I dunno … report on what he did. How dare they.

    “fight injustice against the vulnerable and the exploited. ”

    By running interference for the likes of Anthony Weiner. Makes a lotta sense.

    “my daughter has cerebral palsy and is mildly retarded, so therefore, ‘special’ needs…mocking the developmentally disabled is juvenile, appalling and just plain wrong.”

    All the more tragic that she’s got a mother like this. Assuming, of course, that this isn’t a lie for sympathy.

  • Chisum

    Oh look!

    In addition, the Democratic National Party chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, told The Associated Press that Mr. Weiner’s behavior was “indefensible” and that his role in Congress was “untenable.”

    Even Wasserman-Schultz couldn’t stomach Weiner’s behavior. I give her credit for that.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/12/nyregion/pelosi-calls-on-weiner-to-resign.html?emc=na

  • margaret

    You missed the phrase “traffic numbers” but picked right up on ‘special’, didn’t you?

    that’s not the comment i was referring to. i was referring to your #92 comment not your #86 one…and thanks for keeping it classy and calling me dishonest garbage even though i offered an apology. and i don’t find the ny times to be any more credible or worse than any other publication these days…

    daryl, really? i am not trying to impose anything on anybody except pointing out the fact that we see things differently which doesn’t necessarily make me bad or you good…and as far as being fractious? i have learned a huge lesson in that from most of you here…

    and i don’t frequent this site…i only come over when i hear about another epic jim hoft fail…

  • Chisum

    Nine-Of-Diamonds,

    margaret is a lying piece of garbage. Did you notice she dropped her load of crap and ran off? Even after saying she would apologize if I proved her wrong?

    Here’s a little something for you to contemplate, margaret. MMfA would never allow you to make comparable comments about them on their site. They would be deleted and you banned.

  • Chisum

    and i don’t frequent this site…i only come over when i hear about another epic jim hoft fail…

    And how did Hoft fail?

    You dishonest POS!

  • margaret

    nine of diamonds, no…not a lie for sympathy and thank you for your judgement of me…very nice. i have stated that i do not condone wiener’s actions…i simply pointed out that for hoft to compare that situation to foley’s is apples to oranges…

    you people really are something…i have been called stupid, a liar, dishonest garbage and a horrible mother, when all i did was call you dumb asses for not being able to distinguish the difference between wiener/foley…

    but you’re right…you are much, nicer, better people than i…

  • Chisum

    Oh LOOK!

    margaret has morphed into a VICTIM TROLL!

    Keep spinning, trash.

  • margaret


    #107 June 11, 2011 at 2:31 pm
    Chisum commented:

    Nine-Of-Diamonds,

    margaret is a lying piece of garbage. Did you notice she dropped her load of crap and ran off? Even after saying she would apologize if I proved her wrong?

    Here’s a little something for you to contemplate, margaret. MMfA would never allow you to make comparable comments about them on their site. They would be deleted and you banned.

    hi chisum! i’m still here! and i did apologize…i have not lied about a single thing i said here…

    i may be what you call a lying piece of garbage and a dishonest pos, but wow…you are one of the most angry and bitter people i’ve ever come across…

  • Ron

    A bunch of liberal trolls here today. Jenn and Margie. You throw out names like Mark Foley, you start insulting and labeling,then offer excuses for Anthony “Penis Boy Wonder” Weiner and get called out on the incideousness of his actions you start propping yourselves up as normal everyday people and we’re suddenly a bunch of puritans or knuckle dragging neandertals. What are they paying trolls nowadays. Mark Foley was told to step down immediatley by the Republican leadership and he was crucified in the media and the whole Republican party was labeled as crooks and miscreants by Pelosi. Well, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander, the shoe is on the other foot now ladies and your bashing our side now for doing the exact same thing your side did to us. I don’t know where you come from, but here in Texas 18 is the age of consent not 17. But that’s ok , it’s on your hands if something bad happens to one of your kids for allowing this type of contact. Most of us normal people would prefer not to take that chance.

  • Nine-of-Diamonds

    I’m reminded of the dead enders like Charles Johnson and Kos. Some of whom are still insisting that Weiner is innocent, the photos are fake, and that he lied during the press conference because Breitbart is still blackmailing him. When even Pelosi & Schultz bail you know it’s bad. Unfortunately, the loyal little foot soldiers still haven’t gotten the message yet. Like the German Werewolves post-WWII, these trolls still believe that ultimate victory’s just around the bend. Even though the Dem leadership is scattering like rats. It’s fanaticism, plain and simple.

  • margaret

    nope, i don’t feel victimized at all…thanks for your concern though…and now, truly i’m done here…i do have better things to do and work is calling…take care, y’all…it’s a truly blighted world you are all living in…

  • Chisum

    margaret,

    Keep spinning and trying to make it about me.

    I only got angry when you started making your ridiculous accusations in your typical dishonest liberal fashion.

    You should move on. You’ve lost all credibility here.

    But please continue to make it all about me.

  • Chisum

    Whatever you do people don’t use the word ‘color’ in a sentence. margaret will accuse you of being a RACIST!

    You know it’s coming. It’s what liberals…dishonest liberals…do.

  • Nine-of-Diamonds

    Hhaha…love how the little dissembler plays the victim.

    I haz disabled daughter!
    I goez to Church!
    I I I me me me…

    I do feel sorry for the daughter (if she exists). With a mother like that she’s just asking to become a “Jane Doe”. Not all men stop at just taking pictures. It’s truly frightening, Chisum, how these trashy apologists will give someone the benefit of the doubt as long as he has the right politics and says the right things. This idiot would probably hand her son over to John Wayne Gacy because he was a loyal Democrat (fun fact: during his political career, Gacy once got his pic taken with President Carter’s wife). Because, you know, that little (D) behind his name makes all the difference.

    To all you dumb female – trolls. If it makes you feel any better, please replace “Anthony Weiner” with “Todd Palin”; then, maybe you’ll be able to understand why this situation stinks, and why it transcends little things like politics.

  • Chisum

    margaret is a one-trick-troll.

    She should go back to her handlers at Troll Central (Media Matters) and tell them to beat her for being such a lousy, miserable, dumbass (her word) TROLL.

  • Gary Williams

    It’s websites like this featuring such extreme overstatements and mutually confirmed delusions that researchers to theorize that maybe RWA-SDO conservatives(authoritarian personalities) are really just people who for some reason never realised that it’s not only possible to change one’s mind without the world collapsing, but that it’s actually an essential part of socially mature adult personality.
    So, FYI. If the POV you hold requires you to lie and make up things up in order to promote or defend that view….Then that POV is one you should immediately throw out as one not worth defending in the first place, nevertheless lieing for.

  • Ron

    Good one N-O-D. Call them out. All of us here know that if this had been an “R” congressman, these two fine and upstanding church women would be yelling sexism, misogynism and expressing fear at the mere thought of one of their precious flowers from receiving a text or tweet from one of those dirty old men in the republican party.

  • Gary Williams

    “It appears that conservatism has pathological dimensions manifested in violence and distorted psycho-sexual development” (Boshier, 1983, p. 159). This is supported by a study conducted by Walker, Rowe, and Quincey (1993) in which there was a direct correlation between authoritarianism and sexually aggressive behavior. An investigation done by Muehlenhard (1988) revealed that rape justification and aggression toward subordinate individuals was much higher in traditional (conservative personality) than non-traditional personalities.”

    “Conservatism is not the doctrine of the intellectual elite or of the more intelligent segments of the population, but the reverse. By every measure available to us, conservative beliefs are found most frequently among the uniformed, the poorly educated, and the less intelligent” McClosky, H. Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review, 52, 27-45.

    http://www.doc.state.ok.us/offenders/ocjrc/95/950725C.htm

  • Chisum

    Gary Williams,

    Why don’t you toddle off and take your sanctimonious psychobabble with you.

    Good grief! Where do they find these weirdos?

  • Ron

    #119:

    Extreme overstatements and delusions? Sounds like a Democratic fundraiser to me. Instead of asking us to change our point of view, why don’t you change yours? I theorize that the liberal point of view is a form of sociopathy that promotes self destructive behavior and contributes to the downfall of society. See; now I sound like an overeducated dumbass too.

  • Chisum

    “It appears that conservatism has pathological dimensions manifested in violence and distorted psycho-sexual development”

    ========================================

    Sure, because we are the ones on this board excusing and minimizing The Weiner’s behavior.

    Are these trolls for real?

  • Ron

    #124:

    So much for that edumication huh? Remember, thanks to the “O” there’s not many jobs out there for recent college grads.

  • daryl

    Hey! The commenter who thinks he’s dr. phil

    British National Party Scotland: Liberalism is a sickness

    http://bnpscotland.blogspot.com/2011/02/liberalism-is-sickness.html

    Just noticed that jennifer’s handle is a link to some liberal site called “three wired sisters”. Or mabe it was “three weird sisters”.
    I didn’t check it out too extensively but from just giving it a cursory glance she’s as nuts there as here. Probably just here to “pimp” her site. Looks like mine might have been one of the few hits today from the comments.
    Hope they had fun attempting to “hoist us on their petards”, Chisum. I wonder sometimes what gets into liberal women that makes them the way they are. Probably wormy weiners.

  • Chisum

    Ron,

    Gary sounds like a pompous, over educated virgin that still lives at home with Mama. Even though he’s 42.

    I had a professor like him.

  • mcc

    Like most of you, I was wondering why sweet “margaret” and Jennifer suddenly appeared. Looks like Team BO realized it was time to do some serious mopping up:

    …i really should be at work getting the things done that i didn’t this week because i was too busy attending a conference where i was learning more tips about how to be a horrible, evil, stupid, health care oriented, grant-giving human being…

    Too bad that mop was dry as a bone.

    But I do think – with this fiasco – the Dems have handed the Republicans another example of their poor judgment. It, along with so many others, will disgust thinking, decent Americans who’re realizing more each day what a terrible direction liberals are taking our country —

    Right into the toilet. (Where Dems usually put those mops before they start swinging ’em.) And who’da thunk: we have a Weiner to thank for it…

  • Chisum

    daryl,

    Weird Jennifer exposed herself early on in this thread.

    Anybody that thinks it is acceptable for a married 46 yo man to be communicating secretly with a school girl is certifiable.

  • daryl

    Damn! Mr. Boufant didn’t stay long did he?

  • margaret

    #117 June 11, 2011 at 2:51 pm
    Nine-of-Diamonds commented:
    Hhaha…love how the little dissembler plays the victim.

    I haz disabled daughter!
    I goez to Church!
    I I I me me me…

    I do feel sorry for the daughter (if she exists). With a mother like that she’s just asking to become a “Jane Doe”.

    you are a truly, horrible, soulless person…go ahead, make fun of me, call me a liar, a pos, garbage, dishonest and *gasp* liberal…but don’t ever dare to make fun of my daughter or doubt her existence. and for f*ck’s sake, i AM NOT condoning or minimizing what wiener has done!!! i find it icky, disgusting, embarrassing and weird…all i said in the first place is that you can’t compare wiener to foley!!!

    and you complain about me giving you my bio and all the i,i,i, me, me, me…i was only giving you a little insight as to who i really am since you felt so free to cast judgement on me and doubt my veracity. well, here’s a little more, especially for you nine of diamonds: i have done everything i possibly can to make sure my daughter is safe…do you know what it’s like to worried that your disabled daughter (not to mention all her friends and those like her) could be raped, abused, abducted, or any other myriad of atrocities? yes, as parents we worry about those things happening to our children, but children like mine are doubly vulnerable…it makes me literally sick to my stomach that you would even make the remarks you did.

    as for mocking me about church, i don’t use my church as something that makes me look good, or think that my attendance and involvement is going to get me into heaven, for the record, my attendance has been pretty spotty…i only referenced it to show you that liberals go to church and believe in god and morals as well…i should have known better, though. you people will latch on to anything to try to undercut the other guy…

    this will be my last post…i just wanted to point out that you cannot conceivably compare a pedophile to a freakish philanderer (who only was truly inappropriate with adults), but civil discourse (pardon my calling you dumb asses) and rational debate are apparently not welcome here…so, to reiterate: you people think jim hoft is really smart…proving my point…

  • margaret

    I wonder sometimes what gets into liberal women that makes them the way they are. Probably wormy weiners.

    it’s certainly not douchebags like you two…

  • margaret

    #120 June 11, 2011 at 3:08 pm
    Ron commented:
    Good one N-O-D. Call them out. All of us here know that if this had been an “R” congressman, these two fine and upstanding church women would be yelling sexism, misogynism and expressing fear at the mere thought of one of their precious flowers from receiving a text or tweet from one of those dirty old men in the republican party.

    and, no…i wouldn’t…

  • Chisum

    you people will latch on to anything to try to undercut the other guy…

    Oh THAT’S RICH coming from YOU. After latching on to my using the term “feel special” and accusing me of making fun of handicapped people.

    You are SHAMELESS and DISHONEST.

    One can only wonder what you see when you look in the mirror.

    margaret the Victim Troll.

  • Chisum

    Unlike margaret the Victim Troll I will NOT promise that this will be my last post.

  • Chisum

    #130 June 11, 2011 at 3:45 pm
    daryl commented:

    Damn! Mr. Boufant didn’t stay long did he?

    ===========================

    I think he inhaled too much hair spray.

  • daryl

    Ooooohhh, now we’re douchebags

    Couldn’t resist one last barb, huh “marge”?

  • Chisum

    daryl.

    She need not worry. This ‘douchebag’ wouldn’t touch her with Weiner’s worm.

  • Chisum

    daryl,

    Don’t waste your time responding to margaret. She said (for the fourth time) that that was her last post.

  • margaret

    THAT’S RICH coming from YOU. After latching on to my using the term “feel special

    no you did not say “feel special” in the comment i took exception to, you said (and here’s your words) #92 June 11, 2011 at 1:56 pm
    Chisum commented:

    margaret,

    And yet you link to MMfA. Truly, you are special.

    in my apology to you, i stated that in my experience, this usage of ‘special’ is not meant as unique, and again, i truly apologize to you if i took this the wrong way…how many more times do you need to hear it?

    and quit calling me a victim troll…i do not feel victimized at all…i just love a good debate…

  • Chisum

    You don’t think it’s a LEAP to go from “are special” and “feel special” to “making fun of handicapped people”?

    Could you possibly be any more TRANSPARENT.

  • margaret

    But I do think – with this fiasco – the Dems have handed the Republicans another example of their poor judgment. It, along with so many others, will disgust thinking, decent Americans who’re realizing more each day what a terrible direction liberals are taking our country —

    yes, and here is a list of some of those fine, upstanding, decent folks:

    http://www.republicansexoffenders.com/

    and to be fair, here’s the dem’s list…but i must point out, that the prominent offenses here are adulterous and/or homosexual…and by saying that i am by no means condoning or minimizing them…especially the rape and child rape cases…

    http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=151648

    just merely pointing out that politicians on both sides, just like regular folks, have issues…

  • daryl

    I resemble the hell outta her calling me a dooshbag. No call fer that.

    Tell us “marge”. does your “homer” know you’re off on a political blog having discourse with several men?

  • Chisum

    Well, since margaret the Victim Troll is posting about “fine, upstanding, decent folks”, here are some stats for you:

    The Democrats’ corruption problem

    * NOTE: I originally wrote that Democratic government officials were “three times” more likely to find themselves facing federal corruption charges. I’ve changed the wording from “three times” to “several times” to reflect the fact that Gordon found that the partisan composition of the defendants in corruption cases varies depending on which party controls the presidency. For example, Gordon finds that Democrats were 2.57 times more likely than Republicans to face federal public corruption charges during the Clinton administration but 6.13 times more likely than Republicans to face federal public corruption charges during the George W. Bush administration. Those numbers are based on representative samples of federal public corruption defendants during both administrations.

    http://dailycaller.com/2011/06/07/the-democrats-corruption-problem/

  • mcc

    It seems to me that, in the eyes of God, we’re all sinners. One is not more guilty than the other of falling short. He wants us to look into our hearts and see that we need to repent and return to Him.

    Politicians who choose to take full responsibility for their actions and resign from office show they’re probably better on their way toward realizing the fullness of their sins.

    Vitter is the one Republican who didn’t resign because his situation was different: his actions were in his past (some 10 yrs. earlier, I think) and he’d long ago confessed them both to God and to his wife. They’d sought counseling and grown closer as a couple because of it. His wife testified to this as she stood by him when he held his press conference. He was reelected. I’d like to think not because constituents turned a blind eye and dismissed his actions, but because he’d earned their trust as a man humble enough to admit to and deal with his own failings and sin.

    Americans need to wake up and see how much trouble we’re in as a nation. We can’t afford selfish, arrogant leaders with poor judgment. But that seems to be all the Democrat party offers these days.

    For that reason alone, they put us all in danger.

  • #142 June 11, 2011 at 4:16 pm
    margaret commented:
    ………………………

    You forgot the Democrat KKK members, the list of Democrats who owned slaves, who preserved segregation, who ignored desegregation laws.
    The Republican Party was established as the anti-slavery party.
    SOME things are NOT found in BOTH parties. Just ONE.

    I’m happy that sex offenders regardless of political party get served justice. Good riddence!
    The more offensive problem is the Party that harbors for DECADES those who DON’T get held accountable: like for example: The Kennedys, the Clintons.

    so, to be fair…?

  • margaret

    #141 June 11, 2011 at 4:11 pm
    Chisum commented:
    You don’t think it’s a LEAP to go from “are special” and “feel special” to “making fun of handicapped people”?

    no, not when it’s used as it was in your second comment…like i said, i’m very sensitive to that type of thing because of bumper stickers such as: “I don’t care if you lick windows, take the special bus or pee on yourself…you hang in there, sunshine, you’re frigging special!” and with pictures of the ‘short bus’ that says “you’re special!” i’m sure you can see where i’m coming from…

  • margaret

    You forgot the Democrat KKK members, the list of Democrats who owned slaves, who preserved segregation, who ignored desegregation laws.
    The Republican Party was established as the anti-slavery party.
    SOME things are NOT found in BOTH parties. Just ONE.

    try to stay on topic…we’re talking about sex scandals…also, as you stated, the republican party WAS estasblished…that’s in the past, as is most people’s views of slavery and segregation…and aren’t the dems always being mocked for being too politically correct?

  • margaret

    Tell us “marge”. does your “homer” know you’re off on a political blog having discourse with several men?

    daryl, it’s not ‘marge’, it’s margaret, we are not on familiar terms…and yes, my husband knows this…and is getting annoyed at me for wasting my time…

  • Chisum

    i’m sure you can see where i’m coming from…

    ================================

    No, I can’t! The definition of the word special was determined a very long time ago. Just because you have co opted it to fit your narrow definition does NOT give you the right to impose YOUR definition on others.

    So take your sanctimonious self and shut up,

  • Chisum

    And just for the record, margaret, my niece has Down’s Syndrome. We don’t refer to her as ‘special’. We refer to her as a PERSON!

    So stuff it up your nose!

  • mcc

    Let’s stay “on topic” for margaret:

    I wonder what she thinks of Bill Clinton, who, one woman said, had actually committed rape.

    “Better put some ice on that…”

  • daryl

    I’m outta here. Poor thing just wants the attention.

  • thenthelightningwill

    mcc commented

    Vitter is the one Republican who didn’t resign because his situation was different: his actions were in his past (some 10 yrs. earlier, I think) and he’d long ago confessed them both to God and to his wife.

    Your memory is faulty.

    1) David Vitter began his career in D.C. by winning a special election to Louisiana’s 1st congressional district in 1999, succeeding Republican Congressman Bob Livingston, who resigned after an adultery scandal.

    2) In 2004, Vitter ran for U.S. Senate. During the campaign, Vitter was accused by a member of the Louisiana Republican State Central Committee of having had a lengthy affair with a prostitute in New Orleans. Vitter responded that the allegation was “absolutely and completely untrue” and that it was “just crass Louisiana politics.

    On July 10, 2007, Jeanette Maier, the “Canal Street Madam”, alleged that Vitter was a customer on more than one occasion in the 1990s, when Maier was identified by federal prosecutors as operating a $300 per hour brothel.

    3) In early July 2007, Vitter’s phone number was included in a published list of phone records of Pamela Martin and Associates, a company owned and run by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, also known as the “D.C. Madam”, convicted by the U.S. government for running a prostitution service. Deborah Palfrey committed suicide in May, 2008, rather than be sentenced to prison.

    Vitter incurred significant legal and public relations expenses in his efforts to avoid giving testimony in the Palfrey trial and to respond to the ethics complaint. Consequently, his attorneys sought permission from the Federal Election Commission to use campaign funds to pay for these expenses.

    Note the key differences between Vitter and Weiner: actual sex with prostitutes (over a period of many years, in La. and in D.C.), vs. sending pictures to women who requested them. Ms. Palfrey is dead, while her customer, David Vitter, remains a U.S. Senator. Anthony Weiner is not alleged to have committed any crime.
    ~

  • daryl

    thenthelightningwill commented: “Your memory is faulty.”

    Nothing wrong with yours though is there brainiac? Not as long as there’s google and wikipedia which you quoted almost word for word, and then cut and pasted liberally in your ahhhhh, how can we best describe…..report on the matter. Gold stars for everyone, class!

  • Chisum

    daryl,

    These trolls are hilarious! They have turned themselves into human pretzels in their eternal quest for moral relevance.

    Go Libs, Go! Keep the inanities coming!

  • daryl

    Never seen anything like the ones here lately Chisum.

  • Chisum

    daryl,

    Media Matters trolls. Get used to it. It will get worse the closer we get to 2012.

    I smell desperation. Their formerly teflon-coated plastic messiah is a laughingstock.Yep, Captain KickAss WTF is a complete loser.

    Hope.
    Change.
    Unicorns.
    Skittles.
    Rainbows.

    generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.

    Still waiting…for “we are the ones we have been waiting for”

    Judgment To Lead!

    Yep, still waiting for THAT guy..

  • Ron

    #154:

    Deflection doesn’t cut it here. We’re talking about “Penis Boy” and Pelosi finally doing the right thing. My what a differance twenty four hours makes. Makes one wonder what has come up since her last statement; something along the lines of “Up to his constituents”, or some such nonsense. Hey Nancy; Isn’t there a swamp that needs draining somewhere.

    Now since some philandering has been brought up, I’ld like to point out something Margie Troll spewed up about earlier. The liasons between Vitter and the prostitute were between consenting adults were they not? Now you see how silly you guys look in defending Weiners’ indiscretions with a 17 year old GIRL.

  • daryl

    Yeah, it will undoubtedly get worse. That desperation, I’m afraid, will turn into riots about this time next, year if not before.

  • Chisum

    This is what the trolls are trying to deflect.

    Mark Steyn: It’s all bumps, no road in Obamaville

    http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/obama-304001-new-road.html

  • Chisum

    Ron, did you read what Weird Jennifer wrote? She doesn’t think that a married, 46 yo man secretly corresponding to a girl in high school is a big deal.

    Nope, nothing going on there.

  • cris

    You guys complain that the liberals who come here are twisting themselves into pretzels – and you are the ones calling Weiner’s deplorable, yet legal, antics equivalent to: Mark Foley chasing minor boys who are living away from home in his care, essentially, and; Vitter hiring prostitutes to put diapers on him.

    Think, folks – Foley was after minors. Vitter committed crimes. What did Weiner do – Tweet pictures to adults?

    Now that’s contortionism!

  • Chisum

    Another contortionist heard from. Hello Pretzel Cris!

    Please, do tell us how it’s okay for a 47 year old man, who has a history of exposing himself, to be secretly corresponding with a 17 year old girl. I don’t care what party he belongs to. If it was my daughter he would be walking around looking over his shoulder.

    But please, join the other liberals, and tell us it’s not a big deal and if it was your daughter you would be comfortable with that

    Oh, and if it’s not so bad, why did Weiner lie about it?

  • cris

    History of exposing himself? Where do you get that?

  • jim

    Does anyone else find it interesting that this scandal broke at the exact moment when Weiner was calling for an investigation into the blatant conflict-of-interest involving the wife of (of all people) Clarence Thomas? The Tinfoil Hat Community might reasonably suggest that anyone in DC opposed to such conflicts just got sent a crystal-clear message.

    Personally, I think Weiner should quit, simply because all the noise around this story is distracting everyone from jobs, the deficit, or the need for the US to bring its troops home from its very expensive & pointless wars (i.e. things that really matter) at exactly the time when the American body politic can least afford it. But it’s his call to make, because he neither violated his oath of office nor broke any laws.

    Foley very likely broke the law – which we would know for certain if he hadn’t concealed important evidence in the case.

    Either story is truly trivial compared to that of “Jeff Gannon” of “Talon News” somehow obtaining top security clearance & a front-row seat at Bush’s press-conferences, despite his being not a journalist but a male prostitute … worth noting that the number of people investigated or fired over this serious breach of national security was ZERO.

  • lobbey

    Chisum says;

    “Ron, did you read what Weird Jennifer wrote? She doesn’t think that a married, 46 yo man secretly corresponding to a girl in high school is a big deal.”

    Did you read the article that you linked to, I dont think so, for the rest of you too damn lazy to click;

    “The girl’s mother says her daughter, whose name is being withheld because she is a minor, told her that none of the messages she received from Weiner were inappropriate. ”

    &

    “The Tweets in question between the student in question and the congressman were not salacious or in any manner inappropriate, said Daniel McElhatton, the attorney representing the girl’s family. “No photographs were ever sent to her or from her.””

  • daryl

    #167
    lobotomized

    Quoting the girl’s family lawyer (who is being paid to protect her reputation) is no better than making up your own facts.
    Now go send some suggestive tweets of your own to underage girls if you have the balls and it’s such an innocent thing and leave the riding a congressman out of D.C. on the rail of known FACTS for his misdeeds to those who know what the facts are, as opposed to the media spin.
    In other words, if you have to spread lies do it somewhere else, or even better just stfu.

  • Chisum

    lobbey,

    Way to wrap yourself around The Weiner. Congrats. I noticed you didn’t address my statement. Here, let me ask you again:

    “Ron, did you read what Weird Jennifer wrote? She doesn’t think that a married, 46 yo man secretly corresponding to a girl in high school is a big deal.”

    See if you can focus on the bolded words. Stop trying to spin everything and deflect from the point. I realize that you, as a mindless troll, are trained to do just that, but try, just this once, to think outside your mindset and apply your few remaining brain cells on that sentence and reply to it.

    10 to 1 says you can’t.

  • Chisum

    My comment to lobbey @ #169 also applies to Pretzel Cris at #165.

  • Nine-of-Diamonds

    @Daryl: It’s also been proven that the family lawyer is a big-time DNC “fixer” (damage control, maybe?)

    I’d be more comfortable with an impartial source declaring that all of the deleted messages have been recovered through forensics, and that nothing inappropriate was said. Assuming, of course, that there’s nothing inherently wrong with a CONGRESSMAN who follows less than 100 people on Twitter fixating on several underage girls. Occam’s Razor, people.

    And to Margaret and the other Weiner-tools, I reiterate: just imagine it’s Todd Palin at the center of all this, if that’s what it takes you to think straight.

  • margaret

    i would say the same thing whether it was todd palin, john mccain (although that pic? ewww) george w…you can’t equate an illegal act with a legal, although extremely disgusting and disturbing act…i don’t get what’s so hard to understand about that…

  • It really makes me wonder about the future of America, when this many people don’t see the difference between propositioning underage boys for sex, and propositioning adult women for sex.

    It’s subtle, but it seems obvious to me. (Apparently too much for Hoft and his readership, but there you go…)

    Weiner may be sleazy, but at least it’s legal.

  • Nine-of-Diamonds

    Hmm… how can I simplify this for lesser minds?

    Fact: sending a picture of your genitalia (unsolicited) to someone else IS in fact grounds for prosecution regardless of the target’s age; Weiner is simply lucky that the woman he did this to didn’t press charges.

    Fact: in some if not all jurisdictions child sex crimes are STRICT LIABILITY; an honest/good faith belief that your target is of legal age means NOTHING. You’ll still get locked up if it turns out you had inappropriate contact with a minor whom you thought was 18. In fairness to Weiner, there still is no proof that his messages to the underaged girls were inappropriate.

    Fact: Contrary to what was reported earlier, the investigation of the deleted msgs is still ongoing (or at least still was as of this morning). He’s not clear by a long shot.

    But please, keep spinning like a pinwheel and babblin’ away about disabled family members who may or may not be real. Because that makes an argument more credible, you know.

  • Nine-of-Diamonds

    “Does anyone else find it interesting that this scandal broke at the exact moment when Weiner was calling for an investigation into the blatant conflict-of-interest involving the wife of (of all people) Clarence Thomas? The Tinfoil Hat Community might reasonably suggest that anyone in DC opposed to such conflicts just got sent a crystal-clear message.”

    Yeah, because Leftists haven’t been screaming for Thomas to recuse himself from cases for years. Same with Scalia (they demanded he recuse himself from Hamdi and Hamdan because his son was in the military. I kid you not.) When even “Meet the Press” admits that the pics are disgusting you know you’re in serious trouble, & bashing Thomas/Foley won’t save you. Still, if crying about Clarence Thomas is gonna make certain people feel better, well – have at it, & sniffle away.