Palestinians: No Negotiations Unless Israel Accepts Obama’s Suicide Plan

In May Barack Obama proposed handing over half of Jerusalem, the Wailing Wall, The Temple Mount, Old Jerusalem, and the tomb of Jesus Christ to the Hamas-Fatah terrorist alliance.

Of course, this radical position is very unpopular with a most Americans.

Today the Palestinians announced that they will not hold negotiations with Israel unless they accept Barack Obama’s plan and turn over the Holy Land.
The Jerusalem Post reported, via Legal Insurrection:

Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said that the Palestinians were ready to restart peace negotiations if based around the principles US President Barack Obama laid out in his State Department dress on the Middle East, the Washington Post reported Tuesday.

According to the report, Erekat, who met Monday with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and other senior White House officials, said that if Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu accepted Obama’s platform of a return to pre-1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, then he would have a partner for negotiations.

He also said that according to what the prime minister said at the US Congress during his Washington visit, “he’s not a partner for peace.”

Netanyahu had rejected Obama’s 1967-lines formulation, saying that any borders based on the pre-Six Day War lines would be “indefensible.”

Speaking from a luncheon meeting with Middle East experts sponsored by the Saban Center of the Brookings Institution, the Palestinian negotiator said that “[If Netanyahu] wants to be a partner, he has to say it: Two states on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps.”

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • gus


  • Rhoda R

    Since the Palis have never entered into any negotiation in good faith, how does little announcement of theirs change the game in any way?

  • Chisum

    “Where’s my teleprompter? I can fix this!”


  • Redwine

    “Of course, this radical position is very unpopular with a most Americans.”
    More importantly, this radical position is even more unpopular with Israelis. After all, it’s their lives and nation that are at stake.

    Israelis are not stupid. They rightly detest and distrust Barack Hussein. They understand that he has always been anti-Israel and pro-Palithug.

  • Granny

    #2 June 8, 2011 at 12:29 pm
    Rhoda R commented:

    Since the Palis have never entered into any negotiation in good faith, how does little announcement of theirs change the game in any way?

    Even if the Israelis DID return to the 1949 borders (which is what the “pre-1967 borders are) the palestinians and the rest of the Arab world have declared those unacceptable since Day 1.

    I will agree to Israel’s return to the 1967 borders as long as it is understood that we are talking about the borders as they stood AFTER the Six Day War – all of the Sinai Peninsula, Gaza, the Negev, all of the West Bank up to the present-day borders of Jordan, Jerusalem and the Golan Heights

  • Carbon Pootprint

    Someone needs to photoshop some points to their head wear. Hell they’re bigger scum than the klan. I don’t think the klan raised their kids to blow themselves up. I’m really not up on my democrat party history to speak with authority on that one though.

  • joe buzz

    What idiot didnt see this coming?…oh wait.


    I don’t care if Israel accepted Odumbo’s plan…the palastenians will NEVER negotiate anything….,they want Israeal wiped off the map….so Israel should pre-empt that and unleash the nukes

  • Jerry C

    Israel may not agree to a peace plan but my guess is that they’ll be forced to accept it. Could the final solution involve building a 3rd temple on the Temple Mount? Of course, most students of Bible prophecy know that the “covenant of death” will be broken 3 1/2 years into it. Got Jesus?

  • jorgen

    Great idea! That saves time!

    The language the so-called Palestinians speak probably doesn’t have a word for “negotiation”. It probably have many words for “bombs”, “rockets” and “guns”.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Can Israel just drop this whole idea of “negotiating” with the Palestinians now?

    Seems to me whenever something comes up with regard to the “peace process” (hahaha), it’s always the Palestinians issuing the conditions and it’s always the Israelis that are expected to meet them.

  • KeithofBoston
  • Ipso Facto

    Negotiating with them is a waste of time anyway.

  • saveus

    Thanks obumma for screwing things up again. Or maybe this is exctlyy what he and the muslims planned. Abbas has been saying for years that obumma would deliver Israel to them and nothing he has done indicates that Abbas was making it up. There have been no negotiations since obumma took office since the PLO has been saying no and letting obumma pressure and blame Israel. Israel concessions, building freeezes and other actions have been met wiht no negotiations; instead the muslims and obuuma demand they do more. Obumma can’t even ask the muslims to end the hatred of Israel and the brainwashing and abuse of muslim children used as bombers and canon fodder.

    Given obumma’s actions or inactions regarding Egypt, Lybia, Syria and Yemen to just to name a few, it is obvious obumma stands with the radical muslims seeking to destroy the western world including the USA. Only a liar calls Assad in Syria a reformer and welcomes the muslim brotherhood which was hitler’s ally. What has obumma done about Iran’s nuclear bombs or exapnsion of its navy and missles? Nothing whatsover. But he killed a Eurpoean missle defense system Bush had started.

  • Eubulides

    The correct solution would be to make all the Palestinians Israeli citizens and annex all of the contested territories. Then they can’t destroy Israel without destroying themselves.

  • Blacque Jacques Shellacque

    Nah, I’d rather they stay in their self-made hellholes. Anyone remember the last time there was a Palestinian suicide bombing in Israel that took a large amount of Israeli civilian lives?

  • Geoff

    @ #15 EUbulides

    The one state solution is not the correct solution. If there were to be one state come into existence today, Israelis and Palis would have approximate parity in population numbers, with Palis slightly ahead. However, the birth rate demographics indicate that the Pali will population is growing at a faster pace than the Israeli population and the Palis will soon vastly outnumber Israelis.

    Yasser Afarfat proposed a one state solution based on majority Palis rule with “minority rights” for the Israelis. Of course this solution was flatly rejected by the Israelis, and rightly so, for history, both past and present, gives a clear example of what minority rights mean under an Islamic government.

    In those examples given by the left of modern and moderate Islamic countries, Indonesia and Malaysia, the minorities exist as second class citizens with discriminatory laws on how they can conduct their own religious affairs and their social interactions with the Muslim majority. Now in the Arab lands, minority rights for the non-Muslim are virtually nonexistent. The Jews as a minority in their own homeland under majority Muslim rule would be facing the same consequences as the indigenous Coptic Christians under Arab/Muslim rule in Egypt.

    This gradual extinction of the religious minority is exactly what Arafat had in mind for the Israelis. After all, it’s in the koran that Jews are the most despised of creatures, the descendents of apes and pigs, that a Muslim is not to take friends with the Jew or Christian as they are friends of each other and that the people of the Book (Jew and Christian) must be humiliated and subdued. That is some not-so-liberal basis upon which to base minority rights.

  • #12

    I’ve been saying this for awhile this part Obama plan cause his Muslim first and formost everything else is not important.

  • Kingslayor

    oBUMMA, take a look at the picture at the top of the article. Does that ressemble suicide bombers? And you want Israel to nagotiate with that kind of mentalitie??? Just how did you get to be president any way?? OH YEA, thats right acorn signing up illegal aliens or rigging the election by ficticious voters!!!! Not to mention the intimidation of voters by the black panters with out procicution.. Well pal you may have just started up the next third world war!!! Sometimes its better to stand there and look stupid than openning your mouth and proving it!!!

  • Joanne

    I wouldn’t give them a damn thing – they can all go to h*ll, which is where they will all be going anyhow.

  • Eubulides

    @ #17 Geoff

    Could you please provide citations for the assertions in your last paragraph.

  • Words have consequences Mr. Empty-suit.

  • Valerie

    #6 June 8, 2011 at 12:45 pm
    Carbon Pootprint commented:

    I can just see the recruiting advertisements, now: “The only organization dumber than the Ku Klux Klan.”

  • Valerie

    “#21 June 8, 2011 at 6:33 pm
    Eubulides commented:

    @ #17 Geoff

    Could you please provide citations for the assertions in your last paragraph.”

    Here are the cites you want.

    Since 1988, Hamas has engaged in an advertising campaign to convince individual Muslims that they each have a personal obligation to kill every Jew on the face of the earth, and re-conquer every square inch of land ever held by a “Muslim” regime.

    In my opinion, their position is not supported by the Koran, any more than the Bible says “there is no God.” (It does. Twice. If you make some important deletions from the rest of the sentence.) What those jerks generally cite to are the hadiths.

    Further, the Saudis have abundantly furnished teaching materials worldwide that are similarly horrible. Supposedly they have resolved to review their textbooks and make substantial revisions. If it began, the project has been in existence only a few years, and the objectionable texts can be expected to survive for decades unless the local owners choose to withdraw and destroy them.

  • Valerie

    The correct solution is for those surrounding “Muslim” governments to allow the Palestinians to use their own money to buy houses in their countries. With that single change in policy, without even granting the Palis citizenship, this mess would be over.

  • Geoff

    @ #21 Eubulides

    Jews are referred to as despised as being transformed into or descended from apes and pigs, see koran 2:63-66; 5:59-60; and 7:166.

    Muslims are not to take Jews and Christians as friends, see koran 5:51/

    Jews and Christians are to be fought until humiliated and subdued, see koran 9:29.

    Muslims and their apologists are oft to claim that the koran says whoever kill a man kills all of humanity to assert the peaceful nature of Islam. However, when one reads the full passage, at koran 5:32, it bears an entirely different meaning: “We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person – unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land – it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our messengers with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land” (Yusufali). Note the prefatory phrase as being ordained for the Children of Israel, and not the Muslim. The next verse states what mischief in the land is, the rejection of Allah and Mohammed. This verse thus can be interpreted that the Muslim is commanded to kill those who reject Allah and Mohammed, as in the Hamas charter. This is not a love thy neighbor religion.

    You can read these passages and the surrounding passages for context from the online koran as provided by the Muslim Student Association and hosted at the Univ. of Southern California (USC), with the three most common English translations accepted by Muslim scholars, at