Wikileaks Puts American Ally Saad Hariri in Danger – Media Silent
Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, April 16, 2011, 8:35 AM
On Valentine’s Day February 14, 2005, former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri was murdered when explosives equivalent to around 1,000 kg of TNT were detonated as his motorcade drove past the St. George Hotel in the Lebanese capital, Beirut. It was the first of several assassinations of anti-Syrian Lebanese politicians.
The bomb was so large it blew a crater into the street. (Middle Eastern Analysis)
Years later Rafic’s son Saad, a pro-Western leader, became Prime Minister of Lebanan. On 12 January 2011, just minutes after Hariri posed for pictures with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office his government collapsed.
Saad’s life has always been in danger. Today even more so.
Leftist hero and Wikileaks founder Julian Assange released a document that was published in the Lebanese paper this week. The leaked document shows Saad Hariri’s close ties to the US and opposition to the Iranian-Syrian axis in the region.
ABNA reported:
On August 24, 2006, (BEIRUT 273506), the head of the Future part Saad Hariri met with a US foreign ministry official and another diplomat in the US Embassy in Lebanon and discussed with them regional developments, mainly concerning Syria.
According to the cable, published Friday by Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar, Hariri expressed belief that the Syrian and Iranian regimes are the obstacles behind the deteriorating peace process in the Middle East.
He said that the US government has sought to change the behavior of the Syrian government, but failed. He explained that Israel is “protecting” the Syrian regime because it fears the unknown. However, he claimed that the moment was appropriate for the international community to weaken (Syrian President) Bashar (Assad).
Hariri claimed that the United States government needed a new and clear policy to isolate Syria. “If you don’t isolate Syria and put a siege, they will not change,” he was quoted as saying. He went on to claim that isolating Syria and imposing a siege on it would cut Iran’s link to Lebanon and Palestine “where it is creating problems.”
WE NEED TO GET RID OF SYRIAN REGIME!
“If you weaken Syria, then Iran would be forced to work alone,” Hariri said. “Saudis and other Arab countries have gotten fed up with Bashar and are not interested in getting engaged in a dialogue with Damascus after Bashar’s latest speech in which he threatened of a civil war in Lebanon.”
“We need to completely get rid the Syrian regime. This regime has been built on conflicts. These conflicts will end when this regime is abolished.”
Of course, this story will be swept under the rug just like all of the rest of the Wikileaks’ stories. The American media wouldn’t want to do anything to put President Barack Obama’s political career in danger.
Meanwhile… Just last month it was reported that several members of the Obama Administration are ready to endorse dialogue with the Hezbollah terror group.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Rough Night… Obama Loses 36 Arkansas Counties to Unknown Democrat – Loses 67 Kentucky Counties to “Uncommitted”
Published May 23, 2012 at 4:57 am - 63 Comments
Sickofobama commented:
Obama is a terrorist. That’s why he is doing what he is doing to us and to countries he hates around the world.
All Muslims aren’t terrorists. But all terrorists are Muslims.
Think about it.
Redwine commented:
“WE NEED TO GET RID OF SYRIAN REGIME!”
Jim – Is this your input? If so, this simplistic solution would be a dangerous call that would allow the Islamists now fighting the regime to take over in Syria, as it is doing in Egypt and Tunisia. It would open Syria to a complete takeover by Iran, and this would push the dominoes down from the East, across Syria, to Lebanon, Jordan and the “Palestinian”-controlled areas of the so-called West Bank. Assad is an enemy, but better the devil you know, in this case. Good grief, the US regime wants to open “dialog” with the Hizballah! Playing with fire is never a wise idea.
commonman commented:
Just came across this article by Ellen Brown must read http.//www.zerohedge.com/article/libya-all-about-oil-or-all-about-banking
chuck in st paul commented:
This was the strategy during Bush II. You take Iraq and Afgoofystan and put Iran in the middle. With a little luck and some support the students and citizens in Iran revolt. We sli-i-i-i-ide in slowly and surely and Iran’s mullocracy collapses into a secular state. They either quit exporting terroism in the name of the shia sectarianism or are so distracted by internal issues that it stops or seriously abates.
That would leave Syria pretty much standing alone against the Saudi/Egyption Wahabi/Sunni sectarianism and thus more ammenable to knocking off their crap if we kept the Sunnis out of Syria with a little gentle pressure on the Saudis. The whole world benefits.
Or something like that.
Lentenlands commented:
Firstly, we have no business there doing what we are doing. The cover story of regime change is a lie. We are installing Rothschild central banks in every Nation we attack. We should not allow ourselves to be used as the war mongering sledgehammer of the European bankers, a.k.a. the Rothschilds to impose Rothschild central banks in all the nations of the world. American lives and wealth are being expended to hand over control of the entire world to these bankers.
Secondly, Bradley Manning is being treated illegally by being tortured against the Geneva Convention, which is a War Crime.
Our own government is committing crime after crime while serving the evil cause of installing a one world dictatorship for the Rothschilds. This one world dictatorship will be hell on earth for those enslaved under it. Ask yourself why we are building such an evil thing for them?