I spoke with conservative icon Phyllis Schlafly at the “Metro East Miracle” event today in Collinsville, Illinois sponsored today by former gubernatorial candidate Adam Andrzejewski. Phyllis said that we need to have some experts now look at the birth certificate that was released today. She also gave credit to Donald Trump for forcing Obama to finally release the document.

Phyllis Schlafly: Well have to have some people analyze the birth certificate. I don’t know what the answer to that is. BUt I notice that he did call Donald Trump a nasty name. But, what was so interesting was Trump’s response. He took credit. He looked upon it as a great victory. And, I think that was right because it was Trump who forced the issue on the table.

Question: What do you think of the fact that Obama took two years or three years to release the birth certificate?

Phyllis Schlafly: Well, there has to be a reason for it but I don’t think we know what the reason is for it yet… It’s very strange we do not know. It’s kind of the big mystery of our time.

Question: Now, you don’t call anyone a carnival barker generally, do you?

Phyllis Schlafly: I don’t believe in epithet debating. I think when you resort to epithets you’re losing.

Question: And, Obama lost today didn’t he?

Phyllis Schlafly: I don’t think he gained by it but we’ll see how it plays out.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  1. Now Trump can ask Obama to “prove” that raising taxes is a good idea or to “prove” than universal healthcare will actually save money.

  2. The one they produced is fraudulent. Google the birth certificate and Adobe Illustrator.

    Obama is such a lying putz. He needs to just admit that his momma was a promiscuous whore and she acted stupidly and irresponsibly all of her life throwing Barry on anyone else to raise. He’s as stupid as she was.

    .

  3. Is it or is it not true that obama is using a social security number issued to someone born in Connecticut?

    Surely that alone would shed doubt on the BC.

  4. And a bad fake at that:
    http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=185094

    You can’t possibly by serious.

    This document has been altered and whoever did it wasn’t even very clever in doing so.

  5. I never really doubted the citizenship issue. I just thought there was something on the long form that would be embarrassing or damaging. Now that he’s released it and there’s not, I have no idea why he didn’t release it before. He’s never said WHY he didn’t want to release it. He spent millions on attorney fees to protect the release of a document that didn’t reveal anything we didn’t already know. Doesn’t make sense at all.

  6. It is not just about the Birth certificate. . this is but ONE of many issues. .all stemming from the key question. .WHO IS BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA and is he eligible to be PRESIDENT of the US. . .

    While I agree with others about his dual citizenship, the Birth Certificate issue is also relevant as are the college transcripts, his passport application, how he traveled to Pakistan and the Soviet Union when he was a teen, why his social security number is assigned to people from Connecticut, . .etc. .

    Much of this would BE NON_ISSUES if the media and professional journalists did their job to investigate and ask serious questions. Instead they lied and threw softballs at Obama.

    Even today, if you listen to the media, they are touting the official WH line that Obama released his long form Birth Certificate.

    Really??

    This is NOT the orginial. .look way down at the bottom right of picture. .this is not even a photo-copy but a “true copy or abstract of the record on file”

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

    So were is the original?

    It doesn’t exist!!

  7. It doesn’t look to me like Kapiolani is following the same curve as the letters above and below it, but that must just be my horribly racist vision.

  8. I think the liar in chief created a whole bunch more birthers by putting out this forgery.
    He was better off ignoring it. Lovin it.

  9. This latest birth document of Barky’s is an “abstract.” It’s just another prop, more smoke and mirrors.

    A reader/commentator at Post & Email News explains very well how this days old document came to be. I hope it’s okay that I copy that comment here because I can’t explain it any better that s/he did.

    SapphireSunday says:
    Wednesday, April 27, 2011 at 3:16 PM

    What’s important to know: Fuddy of the HDOH says this is a “computer-generated certified copy” produced outside their usual policies, which she gave herself authority to waive, just in Obama’s case, because he’s the president. What’s a computer-generated certified copy? That could include and probably does include a photoshopped image like we see here. This in no way is an actual photocopy of the original long-form birth certificate.

    A Fox News story said,

    “Officials in Hawaii had said state law PROHIBITS THEM FROM RELEASING THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FULL BIRTH CERTIFICATE FILING – EVEN IF THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF REQUESTED A COPY. But that didn’t stop the president from requesting last week two certified copies of certificate of live birth from Director of Health Loretta J. Fuddy. On Monday, Fuddy complied. ‘As director of health for the state of Hawaii, I have the legal authority TO APPROVE THE PROCESS by which copies of such records are made. Through that authority, in recognition of your status as president of the United States, I am MAKING AN EXCEPTION to the current departmental policy which is TO ISSUE A COMPUTER-GENERATED CERTIFIED COPY,’ she wrote.”

    The exception was to issue a COMPUTER-GENERATED certified copy. So they admit it’s computer generated. That might include all the photoshopping that seems to be in evidence. Another exception might be to not print the late or delayed or amended notification. Another exception might be to make this an abstract containing only the LATEST (most recent) permutation of all the facts contained in the “full birth certificate filing.” Which might mean elimination of the names of the biological parents, if he was adopted, replaced by the adoptive parents. Which might mean elimination of his name at birth, as opposed to what it is now, after being amended in their records. Which might mean elimination of the fact that at birth no father was named, but one was later added, via amendment, but this computer-generated abstract isn’t showing that out of deference to his status as president. You see how it goes?

    Even he can’t get access to the FULL information. So what was embarrassing on the original that is now not evident on this supposed long-form which is NOT a TRUE COPY OF HIS ORIGINAL LONG-FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE? It’s a computer-generated abstract, created just for him outside their usual policies and procedures. Didn’t a legislator want to pass a law so they could do just this? Create a “something” especially for Obama? Well, looks like it’s been done without a special law.
    http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/04/27/has-the-white-house-has-released-obamas-long-from-birth-certificate/comment-page-4/#comment-53396

  10. The White House was careful to make sure it provided little to no information.

    - The resolution was too low to give up any information
    - The document appears to be heavily processed;

    No other ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ posted on the net has this green border. It also appears to have been a scan of a ‘book-form’ document.

    I would expect that the documented handed to Stanley Ann Dunham would be wrinkled and worn. I would expect it to show some form of wear over four decades. This is NOT a scan of that original document.

    At some point, an original BC would have to be scanned in order to make it into a public records ledger. From there, the caretakers of public records would have to scan that scan, so that a copy could be provided upon request.

    This is a copy of a copy of a birth certificate. (The mask could be added at this time)

    Add the sheet of ‘official birth certificate paper’, and scan it again for the White House posted PDF-document.

    That makes it a copy of a copy of a copy of a birth certificate. That should be enough to obscure any objective analysis of it.
    .

  11. Wow.

    WOW.

    Think about the implications of this if, indeed, he did release a fake (but accurate!) birth certificate.

    All I can say is… wow.

    Truly, truly the end of his presidency. The demands for his impeachment would be thunderous even if not legally justified.

    If only…

  12. Having some familiarity with Photoshop and how one builds an image, I don’t know how you explain the layers in the birth certificate released today.
    Usually at a records office, they just type on a form. It’s one flat layer. It wasn’t built the way this thing was.
    I don’t know how you take a normal flat document and then pull it apart into layers. Once a pig become sausage, there’s no way to get it to be a pig again. What program knows what should be separated from what? Some kind of NSA spy program? How’d the guy on youtube just open it in Illustrator and find all the layers? Can we do that to other documents created by the CIA? If so, cool!
    I’m extremely excited to hear this explanation.

  13. The operative phrase at the bottom is that it is a “COPY OR ABSTRACT” (abstract meaning lifted summary information; not necessarily complete information or a reproduction of the entire document.)

  14. #1
    Conservative to the Core commented:

    Your hovering a little to be first are’nt you? Being first does not make you right, just patient.

    powder is dry

  15. This newly released BC is a fraud. From me and no one else, the signatures for the date are identical in crusive studies, This suggest that one person signed both dates, not each of his parents. Also, the backing of the paper is transparent, which is a fraud in and of its self.

  16. Is Hawaii the only state in the Union where persons born there can never, ever request a BC?

    If I had been born in Hawaii and tried to get my actual BC, some government worker would have to photoshop one for me?

  17. Just a few months ago Hawaii’s new governor was going to release the birth certificate to prove it and couldn’t find it. But zero puts in a request and they find it immediately? Kinda makes me think that that maybe they had this thing ready for showing just in case their hand was forced.

  18. This is not the long-form, either.

    There is no offical seal watermark, what is promulgated in Federal Law.

  19. @ #13 vityaz – Someone explained that the image was broken up into elements, seen by Adobe software products as layers, when the hard copy was scanned. Also, Adobe products will automatically create clipping objects and masks for editing purposes (because Adobe products are created and used for editing) when scanning.

  20. date of mother was four days after the birth, this is a fraud.

    No state watermark, iether, all long-forms have it. This is a fraud, and Obumer is again a filthy liar.

  21. @ #20 toongoon – No one at the Hawaii DOH found anything. This document is identified at the bottom of the page as an abstract.

    The operative phrase at the bottom is that it is a “COPY OR ABSTRACT” (abstract meaning lifted summary information; not necessarily complete information or a reproduction of the entire document.)

    Fuddy sat at her pc a few days ago and created the document “special-order” for Barky. She said as much.

    On Monday, Fuddy complied. ‘As director of health for the state of Hawaii, I have the legal authority TO APPROVE THE PROCESS by which copies of such records are made. Through that authority, in recognition of your status as president of the United States, I am MAKING AN EXCEPTION to the current departmental policy which is TO ISSUE A COMPUTER-GENERATED CERTIFIED COPY,’ she wrote.”

    Read the rest at #10 (above).

    We were duped this morning, baffled by BS, again. We’ve got to stop being so gullible.

  22. #15. . You got it. .so obvious. .right in front of everybodies’ noses yet MSM hasn’t said a word. . . they just regurgitate WH propaganda.

    Be careful of these LIARS. . . and it starts with the snake in the WH. .

    Snake is a fake. .

  23. Uhhh h the longform does not have a green background, Hellloooooooo?

  24. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
    Just looked at the link to the COLB…again no birth certificate, but look at the word Kansas.
    The K is floating above the rest of the letters. How could that happen?

  25. I agree with post #10 AuntieMadder.

    Releasing this computer generated fake long form, does NOT help Obama.

    Trump is still the winner here by having the guts to take this issue head-on…where others were too politically correct, and afraid.

    2012 cannot come fast enough…our Country is in big trouble.

  26. Agreed that it is fake. Did some research and found that Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Center did not EXIST in 1961. It was two separate facilities called Kapiolani Maternity House and Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital. The two facilities did not merge and get their new name until 1978, so how could the name POSSIBLY appear on a legitimate copy of his 1961 birth certificate? Check the hospital’s own website.

  27. #10,
    What I am curious about is Obama’s BC or COLB that was changed when he was adopted by Soetoro in Indonesia. I have read that back then Indonesia did not allow for dual citizenship and Barry would have to be an Indonesian citizen to attend public school there.

    So if this is true, I am wondering if Barry ever became a US citizen after living in Indonesia?

    I wonder if the BC/COLB on record in Hawaii has Soetoro’s name on it as father, and this would open the Indonesia citizenship can of worms.

  28. Someone spent a lot of time on this……..clarifying it?

    I opened the PDF up in Photoshop @300 pixels/inch, but i did not see what i expected to see. Whenever i scanned a text document in the past, the letters were all mad of blocks of varying degrees of black and grey. Most of the letters on this document, not all of them, look like they’ve been filled in with black.

    Some that were legible were left alone. The “Date Accepted By” entry was just the wrong color, except for the last letter. They’re a khaki……uhhh……kinda grey-green, instead of black. (like everything else)

    Only of few of the letter seem to match the border lines of the different item boxes.

    Someone went through and painted each of those letters in to………….to make them easier to read????
    .

  29. #29
    that hospital name is on the Nordyke Twins LFCB….just sayin’

    there are still many things wrong with the abstract released today…not sure if that is one of them.
    http://nativeborncitizen.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/nordyke-61.gif

  30. Wow! You can see the same thing by just zooming in with Acrobat Reader.
    .

  31. I have a bigger problem with Uk L Lee…..hello?

  32. #10,
    “Officials in Hawaii had said state law PROHIBITS THEM FROM RELEASING THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE FULL BIRTH CERTIFICATE FILING – EVEN IF THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF REQUESTED A COPY”

    I think this has to do with Barrys adoption.

    My father was adopted also and he does not have the authority to see his original (stating biological parents) BC, only the one altered after his adoption.

    They want to keep the adoption under wraps? Is that it?

  33. #22 Auntie Madder

    Okay. Totally unfamiliar with that process.
    Photoshop doesn’t seem to have gotten the memo on it. It’s just a flat layer for me.

  34. Obama Birth Certificate fraud ??????

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt7oi2qfxlY

  35. Post # 44 on the Trump Takes Credit for Release of Records thread has a link to a PDF of the birth certificates of twins born in Honolulu on the day AFTER Obama. Those two records bear LOWER consecutive official record numbers (10637 and 10638) than Obama’s (10641), presumably issued earlier since he was born earlier. The official date of accepatance by the registrar at the bottom of the form is also earlier for the Obama birth certificate (8/8/61) than for the lower numbered certificates of the twins (8/11/61). It seems a bit odd that official document numbers would not follow chronological order.

    What’s even more odd is that Post # 44 has been taken down. Why?

  36. Kenya was not called Kenya in 1961, it was called British East Africa Protectorate,it was called Kenya until 1963.

  37. So this is where all the weirdos hang out. What a bunch of foul mouth nut cakes. Obama 2012!

  38. LOL… comedy gold seeing you rascist neanderthals scramble over yourselves trying to grab for straws. Sickening this country has such a high number of mentally unstable idiots like you people.

    Enjoy 2012, losers, it’s going to be a rough year for you bigots! :D

  39. Why would anyone listen to Phyllis anyway?

  40. Wow. So this is where you people hang out. I am amazed at the number of forensic scientists out there. You people are sad. No one says you are racist when you argue against Obama’s policies. You are called racist when you have to make up garbage to try to discredit the president. His mom was American. He was born in Hawaii. We’re done here; move along.

  41. Schafly is an old crone but I bet she enjoys having Medicare.

  42. Any evidence that there is no birth certificate conspiracy is evidence of the birth certificate conspiracy!

© Copyright 2012, TheGatewayPundit.com. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions | Web Development By Arlington Kirk