Wisconsin Protest Signs May Land in the Smithsonian
Posted by Jim Hoft on Monday, March 7, 2011, 8:38 PM
The Smithsonian may collect the Wisconsin union protest signs for their historical content.
The Chicago Tribune reported:
The signs, banners and papers taped to the walls of the Wisconsin Capitol these last three weeks to protest a union bill have been removed — but most may be preserved and some may end up at the Smithsonian.
Many of the signs were photographed before they were taken down Sunday and preserved by the Wisconsin Historical Society.
The state Department of Administration says the signs will be evaluated for historical content by both the Smithsonian and the historical society.
The Smithsonian may be appalled when they start evaluating the pro-union signs.
Especially if these signs make the cut.
Walker sucks Koch. —
teabagger = Rich Man’s Whore
More… Tea Party is a Koch Party.
More teabagger hate signs.
Nice.
Hitler + Hosni = Dictator Hosni Mubarak
Hitler, Stalin, Walker.
One more…
Another Nazi sign.
Of course, the media didn’t show signs like this in their reports.
ADVERTISEMENT
`
NC Cop commented:
“The Smithsonian may collect the Wisconsin union protest signs for their historical content.”
Or, from the looks of it, they may end up in a courtroom with a tag that says “Exhibit A”.
Stay classy, lefties!!
GP Loves Obama commented:
That fat chick with ..’ i neve been screwed before..’ is actualy true. Who would screw a retarded blimp?
Rhoda A commented:
Historians will be interested in the visual manifistation of the insanity of the early 2000′s. Just like they’re interested in old Nazi and Facist implementiae.
MrGoodWench commented:
So Smithsonian will help in re-writing history .
Maybe thats what Moochelle meant , in 2008
toongoon commented:
In the future we can look back at how Obama with the socialists and the communists tried to take over America. Good idea.
pst314 commented:
Would the Smithsonian be interested in Tea Party signs? Of course not! The Smithsonian is only interested in preserving and respecting leftist ideas.
Gman commented:
By the look of pic #5 she hasn’t been screwed by anyone before.
Redpillpatriot commented:
She has more chins than a chinese phonebook!!!!!!!!!!!!
Opus#6@AmericanPerspective commented:
If the Smithsonian is a left-leaning organization I will add that to the list of businesses I am wary of.
B3tterD3adthanR3d commented:
Hitler, Stalin, Walker.
Everyone knows the left claims Hitler was a right winger, now Stalin.
My how they re- write history.
Waiting for the “Stalin was a conservative and a free market capitalist, that’s what caused the slave labor camps and genocide”
NSagan commented:
Desperate to call it even … wait a minute. I saw photos just like these from Tea Party rallies, so what’s the point?
B3tterD3adthanR3d commented:
Picture # 4 must mean >
The Communist Manifesto, originally titled Manifesto of the Communist Party (German: Manifest der Kommunistischen Partei) is a short 1848 book written by the German Marxist political theorists Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
Ladue Pundit commented:
The last time I visited the Smithsonian there was no “R” rated room. Where else can they put their “Gang Rape the Fox Anchors” sign?
bigred commented:
Geez, first Ed Gein, then Jeffery Dahmer, now these clowns. We just can’t get a break.
tommy mc donnell commented:
i guess the smithsonian is back to its clinton days.
retire05 commented:
Wrap your heads around this one, boys and girls:
While Obama has banned off shore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico (although only one rig has ever had problems and that would be the BP Deep Horizon rig and all other rigs in the process of drilling have been deeded in compliance with federal regulations) , the Washington Post is announcing that Russia has a joint relationship with Cuba and will start drilling in Cuban waters in the Gulf. To quote: “It [Russia] recently concluded four contracts securing oil-exploration rights in Cuba’s economic zone in the Gulf of Mexico.”
Enter an international incident, and let me explain how: a rig can be placed in Cuban waters near the line of demarcation between Cuba and the U.S. but with was is called “slant” drilling, the rig will actually be able to drill oil sitting under U.S. waters. And technology allows for those rigs to actually drill miles from where the rig sit.
So………………… what will Obama do? Will he demand that Russia/Cuba be honest about the direction of their drilling?
We here in Texas alone are sitting on gallons and gallons of oil. But companies are pretty well shut down because permits are not being given, and they are not being given to drill off the coast of Texas, Louisiana in spite of the judge’s orders.
Some one tell me again whose side Obama is on.
BetterDeadthanRed commented:
Obama probably has Russian oil stocks in a “blind ‘ trust.
KR commented:
I hope the exhibit includes the 14 heroic fleebagger dems. saga., and they should commission wax figures of J. Jackson and M. Moore. Include drums also for the visiting children to bang on. So educational.
/s
Rick commented:
retire05
He’s not on our side. Not drilling is so painful to think about, from so many different perspectives: the work, the availability of the oil, the tax revenues, our national security, our standard of living. Obama wants none of that.
L.E. Liesner commented:
I wonder how the Smithsonian and the Historical Society are going to spin this into civility.
`