Unreal. State-Run Media Suppresses Fact That Wikileaks Traitor Is Radical Gay Activist
Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, August 3, 2010, 2:25 PM
DON’T ASK – DON’T TELL- DON’T REPORT–
Had you heard this yet?
The Wikileaks leaker is a radical gay activist nut who was upset over a recent break up… So he leaked over 90,000 classified military documents.
Do you think this might be an important piece of information in the Wikileaks scandal?
Apparently, our corrupt journolist state-run media doesn’t think it’s important. Or maybe they’re just hiding it from the public?
…No they wouldn’t do that.
The Washington Examiner reported, via Ace of Spades:
“The revelations of Manning’s openly pro-homosexual conduct suggest that a more liberal Department of Defense policy, in deference to the wishes of the Commander-in-Chief, had already been in effect and has now backfired in a big way. The result could be not only the loss of the lives of U.S. soldiers, as a result of the enemy understanding U.S. intelligence sources and methods, but damaged relations with Afghanistan and Pakistan and a possible U.S. military defeat in the region as a whole.” – Accuracy in Media
The suspect in the leaking of classified military files, Spc. Bradley Manning, voiced his disgust with US Army commanders and U.S. “society at large” on his Facebook page just prior to his alleged downloading of thousands of secret documents, according to the British news media.According to one story appearing in Britain’s The Telegraph, Manning, who served as a US Army intelligence analyst, became depressed after a break-up with his homosexual campanion. He also wrote: “Bradley Manning is not a piece of equipment,” and quoted a joke about “military intelligence” being an oxymoron.
Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: “Bradley Manning didn’t want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast.”
The 22-year old Manning is awaiting court martial as the primary suspect in the leaking of more than 90,000 secret documents to Wikileak.org creator Julian Assang, who in turn posted the documents on his web site. The secret documents subsequently appeared in major U.S. newspapers in a security breach which Pentagon officials say has endangered the lives of serving soldiers and Afghan civilians.
You’d think this might get a mention or two, wouldn’t you?
More: Let me be clear. I don’t have an issue with gays. I have an issue with radical gay nuts who leak thousands of classified documents after a break up and put our military men and women in danger.
ADVERTISEMENT
`
Granny commented:
I don’t think it was just a break-up. It seems that he was already in the process of obtaining a discharge when he committed treason. Sounded to me like he deliberately joined the military to challenge the Don’t Ask – Don’t Tell policy.
Granny commented:
Oh BTW, that “military intelligence is an oxymoron” joke is well over 40 years old. It was all the rage when I was first a military wife back in the 60′s.
gus commented:
Does’t “GAY” to me at all.
Sounds dysfunctional and bitter.
Fuzzy wuzzy wasn’t fuzzy was he.
BuddyG commented:
The media are the enemy
Reaganite Republican commented:
Regardless, they need to start hanging these traitors again, there’s no longer sufficient deterrent aparently
Corky Boyd commented:
How in God’s green earth did a gay get a SCI clearance? Wow, have standards changed since I was in the service!
squeaky commented:
“Sounded to me like he deliberately joined the military to challenge the Don’t Ask..”wouldn’t doubt – much like this guy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmfDa_17CU
jonathan was on a speaking tour a couple years ago spinning a tale of a howard university graduate [poli-sci] who just wanted to pay off his bills and see the world. he went on to co-found appeal for redress. key term is infiltrate .
BuddyG commented:
If Bradley Manning was an evangelical Christian it would be mentioned over and over and over and over and over again by the media. Their double standard knows no bounds.
StandUp4Chuck commented:
Regardless, this little fudgepacker is going to hang from the gallows. Just ending to a wasted life.
The All Real Numbers Symbol commented:
Don’t forget the Afghan informants. I thought I read somewhere that the Taliban promised to hunt down and kill those people.
How much blood does this guy have on his hands now?
BBC commented:
Read this in the British press about a week or two ago. They’re doing a good job following up on the story probably because of the British connection: his Mum.
For anything that may be the slightest bit embarrassing to the Obama administration, I suggest reading any of the big British dailies.
squeaky commented:
“I thought I read somewhere that the Taliban promised to hunt down and kill those people.”
and that’s a fact….i heard that not only an informents name was listed but also his family and all the specifics..[And over the weekend one tribal elder, Khalifa Abdullah, who the Taliban believed had been in close contact with the Americans, was taken from his home in Monar village, in Kandahar province’s embattled Arghandab district, and executed by insurgent gunmen.]
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/02/taliban-seeks-vengeance-in-wake-of-wikileaks.html
Granny commented:
Squeaky #9 – Yup. We had somebody up here in New Hampshire screaming bloody murder when he got called up for Iraq a couple of years back. The Reserves paid for college, then they gave him a tidy sum every month to play soldier. Those are the terms. You take the pay, you get to play . . .
Chkn Fryd commented:
The attitude of BuddyG @ 10 & StandUp4Chuck @ 11 lead to my question: If you are upset about him being a “traitor” why call him a “radical gay activist nut?” Doesn’t he have to be a “radical gay activist nut traitor”?
You don’t see a difference, do you? I do, especially when I see a radical liberal activist nut; as opposed to myself, just a liberal. He’s just a Specialist and an accused traitor.
Think I and the MSM are focusing on the wrong thing? What angle in the story brought you here? Would you have read this posting if it had been just another story about just another traitor? Close your eyes and imagine the traitor in that story. Can you see them? Now imagine — that she’s straight. My thanks to co-counsel, Jake Brigance, Esq.
Think about it.
squeaky commented:
squeaky
August 3rd, 2010 | 3:29 pm | #14
and how sad it is when our own souless ghouls dismiss the execution of those who allied with us as being nothing more than getting what they deserve. another missing n’ action example of good character – do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Opus #6 commented:
To me the most interesting angle of the Gay part of the story is what is the Obama admin going to charge him with. Will they go after “mishandling of papers”? Or go for espionage? If they go for the lesser charge, could that be Obama taking it easy on a traitor because they are Gay?
aro5o75 commented:
I always thought he was a nuckin’ fancy.
Paul A\'Barge commented:
Lesson: don’t put homos in positions of trust or vulnerability.
`