Unreal. State-Run Media Suppresses Fact That Wikileaks Traitor Is Radical Gay Activist
Posted by Jim Hoft on Tuesday, August 3, 2010, 2:25 PM
DON’T ASK – DON’T TELL- DON’T REPORT–
Had you heard this yet?
The Wikileaks leaker is a radical gay activist nut who was upset over a recent break up… So he leaked over 90,000 classified military documents.
Do you think this might be an important piece of information in the Wikileaks scandal?
Apparently, our corrupt journolist state-run media doesn’t think it’s important. Or maybe they’re just hiding it from the public?
…No they wouldn’t do that.
The Washington Examiner reported, via Ace of Spades:
“The revelations of Manning’s openly pro-homosexual conduct suggest that a more liberal Department of Defense policy, in deference to the wishes of the Commander-in-Chief, had already been in effect and has now backfired in a big way. The result could be not only the loss of the lives of U.S. soldiers, as a result of the enemy understanding U.S. intelligence sources and methods, but damaged relations with Afghanistan and Pakistan and a possible U.S. military defeat in the region as a whole.” – Accuracy in Media
The suspect in the leaking of classified military files, Spc. Bradley Manning, voiced his disgust with US Army commanders and U.S. “society at large” on his Facebook page just prior to his alleged downloading of thousands of secret documents, according to the British news media.According to one story appearing in Britain’s The Telegraph, Manning, who served as a US Army intelligence analyst, became depressed after a break-up with his homosexual campanion. He also wrote: “Bradley Manning is not a piece of equipment,” and quoted a joke about “military intelligence” being an oxymoron.
Manning, who is openly homosexual, began his gloomy postings on January 12, saying: “Bradley Manning didn’t want this fight. Too much to lose, too fast.”
The 22-year old Manning is awaiting court martial as the primary suspect in the leaking of more than 90,000 secret documents to Wikileak.org creator Julian Assang, who in turn posted the documents on his web site. The secret documents subsequently appeared in major U.S. newspapers in a security breach which Pentagon officials say has endangered the lives of serving soldiers and Afghan civilians.
You’d think this might get a mention or two, wouldn’t you?
More: Let me be clear. I don’t have an issue with gays. I have an issue with radical gay nuts who leak thousands of classified documents after a break up and put our military men and women in danger.
ADVERTISEMENT
-
Featured Story:
Republican Military Hero & First Female to Command Fighter Squadron Will Announce Run For Congress Today
Published February 8, 2012 at 8:42 pm - 87 Comments
Granny commented:
I don’t think it was just a break-up. It seems that he was already in the process of obtaining a discharge when he committed treason. Sounded to me like he deliberately joined the military to challenge the Don’t Ask – Don’t Tell policy.
Granny commented:
Oh BTW, that “military intelligence is an oxymoron” joke is well over 40 years old. It was all the rage when I was first a military wife back in the 60′s.
ADVERTISEMENT
gus commented:
Does’t “GAY” to me at all.
Sounds dysfunctional and bitter.
Fuzzy wuzzy wasn’t fuzzy was he.
BuddyG commented:
The media are the enemy
Reaganite Republican commented:
Regardless, they need to start hanging these traitors again, there’s no longer sufficient deterrent aparently
Corky Boyd commented:
How in God’s green earth did a gay get a SCI clearance? Wow, have standards changed since I was in the service!
squeaky commented:
“Sounded to me like he deliberately joined the military to challenge the Don’t Ask..”wouldn’t doubt – much like this guy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqmfDa_17CU
jonathan was on a speaking tour a couple years ago spinning a tale of a howard university graduate [poli-sci] who just wanted to pay off his bills and see the world. he went on to co-found appeal for redress. key term is infiltrate .
BuddyG commented:
If Bradley Manning was an evangelical Christian it would be mentioned over and over and over and over and over again by the media. Their double standard knows no bounds.
StandUp4Chuck commented:
Regardless, this little fudgepacker is going to hang from the gallows. Just ending to a wasted life.
The All Real Numbers Symbol commented:
Don’t forget the Afghan informants. I thought I read somewhere that the Taliban promised to hunt down and kill those people.
How much blood does this guy have on his hands now?
BBC commented:
Read this in the British press about a week or two ago. They’re doing a good job following up on the story probably because of the British connection: his Mum.
For anything that may be the slightest bit embarrassing to the Obama administration, I suggest reading any of the big British dailies.
squeaky commented:
“I thought I read somewhere that the Taliban promised to hunt down and kill those people.”
and that’s a fact….i heard that not only an informents name was listed but also his family and all the specifics..[And over the weekend one tribal elder, Khalifa Abdullah, who the Taliban believed had been in close contact with the Americans, was taken from his home in Monar village, in Kandahar province’s embattled Arghandab district, and executed by insurgent gunmen.]
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/02/taliban-seeks-vengeance-in-wake-of-wikileaks.html
Granny commented:
Squeaky #9 – Yup. We had somebody up here in New Hampshire screaming bloody murder when he got called up for Iraq a couple of years back. The Reserves paid for college, then they gave him a tidy sum every month to play soldier. Those are the terms. You take the pay, you get to play . . .
Chkn Fryd commented:
The attitude of BuddyG @ 10 & StandUp4Chuck @ 11 lead to my question: If you are upset about him being a “traitor” why call him a “radical gay activist nut?” Doesn’t he have to be a “radical gay activist nut traitor”?
You don’t see a difference, do you? I do, especially when I see a radical liberal activist nut; as opposed to myself, just a liberal. He’s just a Specialist and an accused traitor.
Think I and the MSM are focusing on the wrong thing? What angle in the story brought you here? Would you have read this posting if it had been just another story about just another traitor? Close your eyes and imagine the traitor in that story. Can you see them? Now imagine — that she’s straight. My thanks to co-counsel, Jake Brigance, Esq.
Think about it.
squeaky commented:
squeaky
August 3rd, 2010 | 3:29 pm | #14
and how sad it is when our own souless ghouls dismiss the execution of those who allied with us as being nothing more than getting what they deserve. another missing n’ action example of good character – do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Opus #6 commented:
To me the most interesting angle of the Gay part of the story is what is the Obama admin going to charge him with. Will they go after “mishandling of papers”? Or go for espionage? If they go for the lesser charge, could that be Obama taking it easy on a traitor because they are Gay?
aro5o75 commented:
I always thought he was a nuckin’ fancy.
Paul A\'Barge commented:
Lesson: don’t put homos in positions of trust or vulnerability.
Granny commented:
Paul, I don’t think that sexual orientation has much of anything to do with trustworthiness. After all, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were not homosexual.
jonyjoe101 commented:
Back in the day “homosexuals” weren’t allowed to have a security clearance because they can be compromised too easily. A simple “background check”‘ would have found out he was gay.
When I was in the military, I didn’t have a “security clearance”, but I always kept my mouth shut of whatever little info I knew. It’s just protecting your fellow military personnel and equipment. I took my military obligation seriously. Now they let anyone join the military, no background check required.
I hope he gets the full 50 years in prison so he can think about his “boyfreind”. George Washington would have had him hanged.
Granny commented:
jonyjoe101, when my ex got his security clearance they went so far as to investigate me too. They even came around and asked questions like did he talk in his sleep. LOL.
Still, I don’t think it has to do with his being gay. He would have been a traitor whatever sexual orientation he preferred. He went into this intending to be a traitor.
John commented:
There are reports that he was very upset about the military’s policies against gays and did this to spite the military. In that case, that would have nothing to do with a lover’s quarrel and would instead be politically motivated treason. Hmmm let’s weigh the judgments of the Wise One. General McChrystal talks to a magazine and leaks information about Obama’s competence. General gets fired. Gay activist Private First Class with Top Secret clearance (??) leaks nearly 100,000 top secret documents (none apparently criticize Obama) and what is going to happen to him? Probably nothing. Barney Frank at the defense.
rcl commented:
“Still, I don’t think it has to do with his being gay. He would have been a traitor whatever sexual orientation he preferred. He went into this intending to be a traitor”
Get a clue. The question is why place a pathologically weak mind was in a position where failure can prove fatal to our soldiers and agents. A generation ago no psychologist would allow Banning into the military because he would be considered liable to do precisely what he did. Under emotional stress he broke down in an adolescent, narcissistic fit.
Read any psych analysis published prior to the queers conquering the APA and you’ll get the real story.
kato commented:
Not a big surprise that he’s queer.
Even less of a surprise that journolists are keeping it under wraps.
Joanne commented:
The truth is if this guy thought he was going to face some real pain for treason, he would have thought again about downloading and releasing that information. If even one person is killed as a result of the release of these documents, whether American or foreign, he should be executed.
Robert commented:
If they knew he was homosexual, there is
no way he should have been in intelligence.
Stupid, stupid military. Criminally idiotic.
LogicalSC commented:
“psych analysis published prior to the queers conquering the APA and you’ll get the real story”
Bingo….simply another case of a favored leftist group who are not called the mentally unstables that they are so the rest of society has to change and adapt to overlooking the obvious.
Sooner or later they out themselves as unstable and emotionally off kilter.
Robert commented:
And somebody that works around him should have
figured it out, his communications should have been monitored.
DANEgerus commented:
Clinton’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” should have been Ask and throw them out?
artsykr commented:
I’m gay and I would like to know how many straights have been accused of treason how many have compromised this country…hmm for one ya got a couple of potus’ that have great damage and yet they are supposedly straight.
Next thing, he seems unstable so i wonder how he got a clearance for top secret work.
Next i would like to know how wikileaks and he initially got together. Who contacted him or did he contact them?
Also, i did read when this first happened that wikileaks had indeed contacted the WH to let them know that this was going to be leaked and yet they got NO response from the WH. There seems to be so much more to the story here than just that this was an unstable gay guy.
I myself am gay, and would like to see him and the wikileaks folks (all of them) brought up on charges of treason. Also anyone who knew of this from the WH. There is much more to this story. Keep digging.
Beef commented:
The irony is that he reinforces a rationale for excluding gays from the military.
Larkin commented:
Widdle Bwadley’s heart was bwoken.
Now some innocents must die.
It’s only fair. It’s right up there with “reparations” and “redistribution of wealth”.
Chessy T Cat commented:
@Beef.
Yes, it does. Just like the reports of lesbian gangs going after single (and straight) women in the military.
Aberrant behavior is just that. Time to quit making excuses for them.
Jean commented:
I thought he looked gay not that I mean anything offensive by it but I wondered if that was the reason for betraying his country. A full page ad should be taken out in a national conservative news paper exposing him as a “Gay Traitor”.
Radegunda commented:
Chkn Fryd, since Manning’s actions appear to have had something to do with a homosexual relationship within military ranks, and since there is an ongoing public discussion about what happens to unit cohesion and discipline when that kind of fraternization becomes more commonplace, Manning’s orientation is quite germane to the story.
Since the mass media are quite interested in the topic of gays in the military, it’s highly noteworthy that they are completely ignoring that angle in this case. The omission has to be considered agenda-driven, like so much else in the mass media.
That’s the main point of this post. It isn’t to imply that straight soldiers can’t equally be traitors. It’s to point out the striking lacuna in the press treatment.
Aussie commented:
I have to agree with the comments by #34 in this matter.
Although the sexual orientation plays a role in what happened, I do not think that explains this person’s obvious instability.
There are obviously “gays” and “gays”…. and the same goes for straight people. By this I mean that there are gays and straight people who love their country so much that they would not consider doing something like this. Then you have the others who are traitors.
We should not be so hasty in passing judgement but should wait to see what transpires in the trial. I think that the obvious character instability should have been detected at the time of recruitment. It should have had nothing to do with sexual orientation, and everything to do with having a healthy outlook upon life. The excerpt about the Facebook page suggest someone who was unstable for other reasons not necessarily related to sexual orientation.
Some of the posters here need to stop being so judgmental about others, especially of those who are gays. Not all gays are leftwing loonies, even though there are plenty who are extremely left-wing.
I hesitate to bring up the WWJD angle, but in this case, I feel that each of us should look into our own hearts and reflect upon what they think that Jesus would do if he was confronted by someone who wanted to be His disciple but who was undisciplined in a sexual way. Would Jesus love that person anyway, as only God could love all sinners? I do not answer for God, but I feel that perhaps Jesus would not react in the same way as people here…. saying things about “fudge sandwich” etc is really very off…. it is not necessary.
expat commented:
The problem is that he is a radical activist, not that he is gay. No matter what their cause, activists tend to wall themselves off from the wider world and convince themselves that their cause trumps all others. They never consider others and they never know when to stop. Normal people have other interests in their lives, and while they might care about a certain cause, they aren’t single minded enough to rise to leadership ranks. The nuts end up speaking for all, and society becomes more divided into interest groups.
Dave In Houston commented:
Just find the poofter guilty and shoot him for treason. It’s a fate he deserves.
Is this the hope or change part Obamao promised?
bg commented:
++
make no difference to me what he is
or isn’t, it’s what he did that counts..
disclaimer: now if he were a REPUBLICAN, the tune
would be more like “they shoot traitors don’t they!?”
==
bg commented:
++
re: bg #51
on second thought..
it sure goes a long way as far as MOTIVE is concerned..
==
bg commented:
++
i am just as proud of Homosexuals who serve in the Military as i am of
heterosexuals.. rotten apples are in a class of their own, just look at the
ONE residing in “we the people’s” house.. *sigh*
==
bg commented:
++
Hasan (part 1 & part 2) is a RADICAL Islamist..
==
Rick S commented:
I have had just about enough of the rising tide of anti-Obama sentiment (which is shared by me, a gay male) causing people to lash into homosexuals as well. Believe me – please, believe me – this morally repugnant behavior is as or more offensive to me as it is to the rest of you. It’s disgusting and shameful this young “man” – and I hesitate to use the word man because he doesn’t share characteristics of being a real man – has put the lives of thousands of American heroes in jeopardy because some childish petty vendetta. I’m so sick of people like this, the prop 8 militant gays, and others giving me a bad name. I work my ass off to be a good person and equally importantly, a good American. I’m in a 4 year monogamous relationship, I’m in medical school, I volunteer, I go to church. I can’t change who I am, and believe me, this wasn’t a choice, but I make sure that I don’t put myself in a position to take advantage of double standards or special treatment. I work very hard to be a stand up, noble person. I condemn Bradley as much as anybody. But please do not assume because a person is gay , that they have a weak constitution or are less than anyone else. I was 1st string linebacker on my hs football team, I skipped 2 grades, and I’m near the top of my med school class. And I’m a proud gay conservative.