Maricopa County Election Director Scott Jarrett likely perjured himself in a court of law by lying about the ballot printer settings that caused tabulation failures and disenfranchised thousands of election day voters.
Jarrett testified under oath during Kari Lake’s historic election contest trial against Democrat Katie Hobbs and the Maricopa County election officials.
On Election Day in Maricopa County, over 50% of tabulators and printers failed the moment that polls opened, causing voters to be turned away from the polls and creating long wait times of four hours or more. According to cybersecurity expert Clay Parikh’s testimony, this was an intentional act aimed at disenfranchising Republican voters who turned out 3:1 for Trump-Endorsed candidates.
Parikh testified under oath on Wednesday that he inspected a sample of ballots, and it was “easily identifiable” that nearly half of them were printed with a 19-inch ballot image on 20-inch paper. He also stated that this could not have happened accidentally or by coincidence, and this caused Election Day tabulators across Maricopa County to fail and create extremely long wait times for Election Day voters.
Here, Jarrett can be seen stating on Wednesday of the trial that he “did not” hear of any reports of a 19-inch ballot image being placed on a 20-inch ballot paper. He then changed his testimony on Thursday to state that he learned of a fit-to-paper issue “a few days after Election Day” that printed “a slightly smaller image of a 20-inch image on a 20-inch paper ballot.”
He also confirmed Thursday that this fit-to-paper printing issue “happened in the August 2020 primary election, the November 2020 general election, and the August 2022 primary election.”
As The Gateway Pundit reported, Gutless Judge Peter Thompson dismissed Kari Lake’s election lawsuit against Democrat Katie Hobbs in the stolen 2022 midterm election on Saturday, Christmas Eve, despite the clear and convincing evidence that was presented by Lake’s attorneys of massive voter disenfranchisement targeting Republicans and obviously false testimony by elections officials.
In the video below of testimony from Wednesday, Jarret is seen testifying twice under oath that he had no idea how a slightly smaller image of a 20-inch ballot image could be printed onto a paper ballot.
This materially conflicts with his testimony on Thursday, stating, “when we started doing the audit reconciliation of those door three ballots, we identified some of those ballots had a fit-to-paper issue.” According to Jarrett’s testimony, the issue was identified “a few days after Election Day” on November 8.
This is more evidence that Scott Jarrett perjured himself, which is a felony offense.
Additionally, Clay Parikh’s testimony on Wednesday states that a fit-to-paper or shrink-to-fit setting “can’t be accidental as all the employees that man the EMS are trained.”
This is more evidence that the issues on election day were a result of intentional misconduct.
Watch Kari Lake attorney Kurt Olsen examine crooked Scott Jarrett below:
Olsen: Counsel asked you some questions about a 19-inch ballot image being projected onto a 20-inch paper. Do you recall that?
Jarrett: Yes, I recall.
Olsen: Do you have any idea how that could occur?
Jarrett: I do not.
Olsen: Would it require two different ballot definitions to be installed on the EMS?
Jarrett: Your first question asked if I have any idea how could occur, and I said I do not.