The Roosevelts – Teddy, Eleanor and Franklin (National Review)
Those who ignore history are bound to repeat it. Likewise, for those who distort and pervert history in their documentaries.
Ken Burns and PBS, with funding from working Americans, produced a 14-hour documentary, The Roosevelts – starring Teddy, Eleanor and Franklin, just in time for the midterm elections. It takes a certain amount of gall to push the progressive movement after nearly six years of failed Barack Obama policies. But, that is exactly what Burns did in this progressive love-fest.
In the fourteen hour broadcast not once did the producers question Roosevelt’s failed economic policies that extended the Great Depression for a decade.
Renowned author and Roosevelt critic Amity Shlaes was noticeably absent from the 14 hour melodrama. But Shlaes weighed in on the documentary at National Review:
When it comes to the 1930s, such twisting of the record becomes outright distortion. By his own stated goal, that of putting people to work, Roosevelt failed. Joblessness remained above 10 percent for most of the decade. The stock market did not come back. By some measures, real output passed 1929 levels monetarily in the mid 1930s only to fall back into a steep depression within the Depression. As George Will comments, “the best of the New Deal programs was Franklin Roosevelt’s smile.” The recovery might have come sooner had the smile been the only New Deal policy.
So great is Burns’s emphasis on the Roosevelt dynasty that William Howard Taft, Woodrow Wilson, Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge, and Herbert Hoover come away as mere seat warmers in the White House. Especially puzzling is the neglect of TR’s progressive heirs, Taft and Wilson, who, after all, set the stage for FDR. This omission can be explained only by Burns’s desire to cement the reign of the Roosevelts. On the surface, the series’ penchant for grandees might seem benign, like the breathless coverage of Princess Kate’s third trimester in People magazine. In this country, elevating presidential families is a common habit of television producers; the Kennedys as dynasty have enjoyed their share of airtime. Still, Burns does go further than the others, ennobling the Roosevelts as if they were true monarchs, gods almost, as in Martha Gellhorn’s abovementioned line. Burns equates progressive policy with the family that promulgates it. And when Burns enthrones the Roosevelts, he also enthrones their unkingly doctrine, progressivism.
To be sure: One documentary series, even one by Ken Burns, can reach only so many. But Burns is not alone. The new Advanced Placement history curriculum, which will touch a large portion of thinking high-schoolers, buttresses the myths of the 1920s as failure and the New Deal as rescue. Against such a lovable monolith, bound to influence our culture through multiple election cycles, conservatives and centrists offer — what?
Read the whole thing here.
Power Line has more.
