The official instructions from the corrupt media have arrived just in time for Christmas Day. Slate Magazine has ordered you to whitewash any valuable knowledge your family has of the Regime leader’s ne’er do well son Hunter Biden.
The liberal rag earlier this week released a long guide toward “rebutting” conservative relatives’ arguments about Hunter. The author, Molly Olmstead, acknowledges the Hunter situation presents “a new challenge” to standard liberal propaganda due to Hunter’s well-known “naughty” behavior:
“The Hunter Biden situation, though, presents a new challenge, simply because of the sheer breadth and complexity of the naughty behavior (Santa Claus reference!) that the president’s black-sheep son has been accused of being involved in (or has thoroughly been proven to be involved in).”
The reason for this is conservatives have been telling truth about Hunter Biden from Day One. The Gateway Pundit has produced numerous articles detailing not only Hunter’s bizarre and corrupt behavior but also Joe’s successful attempts cash in on Hunter’s business dealings.
Nevertheless, Slate tries anyway. The Gateway Pundit will provide counterpoints to Olmstead’s attempted gaslighting on the central facts regarding Hunter Biden.
Olmstead starts by arguing Joe Biden’s efforts to pressure Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor and withhold $1 billion in aid had nothing to do with Hunter Biden. Rather, Biden was just trying to clean up Ukrainian corruption and the prosecutor was part of the problem.
She makes these assertions even though we all know the prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, was investigating Biden’s son and the Ukrainian company he served on the board of Burisma.
All of this defies common sense. First, anyone who believes the then-vice president was not thinking about his son is a moron. You don’t think George W. Bush had his father in mind before he invaded Iraq? Saddam Hussein, after all, tried to kill Bush Sr.
Second, Rudy Giuliani’s notes show Shokin said he was told to back off the Burisma investigation due to Joe Biden’s interference. Biden even boasted about getting the prosecutor fired in a now infamous 2018 interview (scroll to the 52-minute mark).
“I said, I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours.”
“I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.”
Yep, nothing to see here. Move along.
Olmstead then turns her attention to the 100% factual New York Post story on Hunter’s laptop which Twitter colluded with the Biden campaign and the corrupt FBI to censor. The legacy media also played their role by flat-out lying about the laptop being Russian disinformation.
But Olmstead ignores these facts and claims Big Tech and the Corporate media acted out of good faith. Here’s her attempted obfuscation:
“At the time, many in the media worried that these emails had been hacked, stolen, or doctored, or weren’t real at all. Twitter responded by banning any links to the New York Post article, citing a policy against allowing the publication of hacked materials and private information.”
Spoken like someone who did not bother to read the Twitter files. Cannot afford to have the liberal narrative ruptured.
Olmstead further attempts to argue none of the Hunter Biden emails are so bad. First, she starts with the 2017 email about one of Hunter’s business partners writing the words “10 held by H for the big guy.” The 10 refers to percent.
Hunter and his uncle Jim Biden were forming a partnership with a major Chinese firm called Chinese energy. Tony Bobulinski, a partner to the business deal, claimed the H was for Hunter and the “big guy” was his father Joe Biden.
Trending: BREAKING: Trump to Be Indicted Wednesday, Will Be Asked to Surrender for Arraignment Next Week — According to Report
Nevertheless, Olmstead claims there is no evidence Joe was involved. Yet she never bothers to find out who the “big guy” is if not Joe Biden. Lazy journalism at best.
Furthermore, documents obtained by Kentucky Republican James Comer and reported on by Jim Hoft prove Hunter and Joe Biden were working to sell U.S. natural gas and drilling assets to China. Two whistleblowers will also testify under oath that Joe and his son committed these treasonous acts.
The second email is one written in April 2015 where a Burisma representative thanked Hunter “for the opportunity to meet your father” at a dinner the previous day. Seems damning, no? Yet Olmstead says:
“We don’t know for sure that the Burisma exec actually did attend the dinner, which took place at Cafe Milano in D.C. and was attended by about a dozen people. (He wasn’t on the guest list.) Nor do we know how long Joe Biden was there. (At least one person has said the vice president only stopped by briefly to visit with a leader in the Greek Orthodox Church.)”
So you admit Biden was there, Molly? And what motivation would the Burisma representative have to lie in the email? Bet you cannot answer that question. Also, you fail to mention Joe met with Hunter’s business partners at least 16 times (h/t Jim Hoft).
The final email is another one from 2017. Hunter Biden called the manager of an office building to have keys made for the “Biden Foundation” and “Hudson West” (CEFC). He also requested keys for his father and Jill Biden in addition to an “emissary” of CEFC.
The Biden Foundation, of course denied the story, and the property manager claimed Hunter never bothered picking up the keys. Olmstead as expected takes this all at face value.
We cannot discount the possibility Hunter was on crack when he made the call and had no clue what he was doing. The more realistic explanation is Joe Biden found out and told his son to stop before they got in trouble for selling to China.
Liberals love to ruin everything with politics and Christmas is no exception. They will even lie about incontrovertible facts regarding a president’s problem child.
Hopefully politics will not come up at your Christmas dinner. But if this occurs, you have the truth on your side in order to fight back.