Pro-abortion protesters gathered outside of Justice Kavanaugh’s home in the Washington DC area on Saturday.
The protesters were chanting, “No Uterus, No opinion!”
Advertisement - story continues below
Suddenly, the Democrat party can define what a woman is.
Protesters have arrived to Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home chanting “No uterus, no opinion” @wusa9 pic.twitter.com/yyeShldmC0
— Rafael Sánchez-Cruz (@rafasanchezcruz) May 7, 2022
The protests in front of Kavanaugh’s home were organized BY HIS NEIGHBOR – a radical teacher named Lacie Wooten-Holway.
Advertisement - story continues below
Pro-Abortion Protesters March on Homes of Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh and Chief Justice Roberts
So far, the FBI, DOJ or any Democrat politician have not condemned the threatening protests. In fact we have not seen the left condemn the far left groups doxxing the conservative justices on social media.
In case you were wondering, it is a criminal offense to picket or parade outside a justice’s home.
Actor James Woods pointed this out on Saturday.
18 US Code 1507 pic.twitter.com/NpBtI3Xn4o
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) May 8, 2022
Advertisement - story continues below
Here is the text.
§1507. Picketing or parading
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
Advertisement - story continues below
(Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §31(a), 64 Stat. 1018 ; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147 .)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994-Pub. L. 103–322 substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $5,000” in first par.
The Gateway Pundit is moving back to Disqus! All of your account information and comment history has been saved and will be uploaded as quickly as possible to Disqus. If you do not already have a Disqus account, you will need to create one. Please use the same email address that you used for Insticator for your comment history to be carried over. We greatly appreciate your patience and continued support!