A case in which Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson gave a light sentence to a child porn offender was left off materials given to Republicans.
Questions are now being raised that this was omitted intentionally.
Republicans say the White House did not include in materials given to the Judiciary Committee a grisly child porn case in which Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson departed significantly below probation office recommendation – and are raising questions of whether the White House “intentionally left it out,” which the White House disputes.
Jackson, President Biden’s Supreme Court nominee, sentenced the case less than a year ago as she was about to be elevated to the D.C. Circuit Court. Titled U.S. v. Cane, it involved “over 6,500 files depicting children appearing to be of elementary, middle and high school ages, engaged in sexual acts or posing sexually.” The probation office recommended a sentence of 84 months in the case but Jackson sentenced the man to 60 months in prison, which was the mandatory minimum.
“Not only does this case, which Judge Jackson left off her list of child abuse cases, undercut her argument that she followed the probation office’s recommended sentences, but it also underscores the perils of moving too quickly in the vetting process,” a Republican Judiciary Committee aide told Fox News.
GOP Senator Josh Hawley has exposed that Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson has a history of being lenient on child porn offenders.
MUST WATCH: Hawley Outlines Seven Cases Where Ketanji Brown Jackson Was Lenient on Pedophiles
What else are they trying to hide?
