The Supreme Court in Wisconsin agreed to hear a case today that was thrown out by a Circuit Court Judge yesterday.
The hearing was today and one highlight was that not just one but two judges, who have such a limited understanding of the law and no reason for being on the court, claimed that the President’s post election litigation strategy was racist.
Advertisement - story continues below
Ongoing Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing on Trump election attack lawsuit: https://t.co/438EcmF8dZ
— Laura Walker ⚖🍸🇺🇸 🏴 (@LauraWalkerKC) December 12, 2020
Of course any judge calling the President’s actions to litigate an election that was wrought with fraud, is not acting in a racist manner:
…Seeking judicial review is not subversion of the Constitution or a call to rebellion. It is using the constitutional process. If going to the courts is “seditious,” going to church must be atheism…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 11, 2020
Advertisement - story continues below
One listener today thought the hearing was a sham:
Wisconsin Supreme Court hearing was a sham! The judges are arrogant and liberal hacks. Rebecca Dallet was all focused on saying this complaint should have been raised before election. 🙄 https://t.co/NTomLbNv7D
— President-Elect Okie Eleven (@OkieEleven) December 12, 2020
The President however has a strong case as we reported on December 3rd:
Advertisement - story continues below
The Gateway Pundit is moving back to Disqus! All of your account information and comment history has been saved and will be uploaded as quickly as possible to Disqus. If you do not already have a Disqus account, you will need to create one. Please use the same email address that you used for Insticator for your comment history to be carried over. We greatly appreciate your patience and continued support!