Former White House adviser Fiona Hill testified before Democrat investigators Monday as part of their closed door impeachment inquiry of President Donald Trump.
The liberal media pushed the line all day that she was a very important Russia adviser — they really propped her up.
This can only mean that they know she is an anti-Trump hack.
Advertisement - story continues below
Intel expert Tony Shaffer has no idea who she is which says a lot about the Democratic party witness.
LOL – I know most of @realDonaldTrump "top advisors" and I've never even heard of Ms Hill… apparently she is a top advisor in @cnn's alternate universe… https://t.co/2NLM74iLFV
— Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) October 14, 2019
According to reports Ms. Hill was not even working in the White House at the time of the call with the Ukrainian president on July 25th. Hill resigned before the call. So it’s not clear why they needed to speak with her for 11 hours. Hill had ZERO knowledge of the call, and only heard rumors. Democrats don’t care. They want to impeach Trump on rumors.
What a clown show.
And now this…
Advertisement - story continues below
According to her resume Fiona Hill worked for the George Soros Open Society Institute from 2000-2006, just 13 years ago.
So why was this woman allowed anywhere near the Trump White House?
Late on Monday Democrats leaked out that Fiona Hill was “very disturbed” about the Trump phone call with Ukrainian President Zelensky.
Hill is definitely biased against this president and may even be the second whistleblower for all we know.
Advertisement - story continues below
The Gateway Pundit is moving back to Disqus! All of your account information and comment history has been saved and will be uploaded as quickly as possible to Disqus. If you do not already have a Disqus account, you will need to create one. Please use the same email address that you used for Insticator for your comment history to be carried over. We greatly appreciate your patience and continued support!