Guest post by Joe Hoft
The Special Counsel’s witch hunt is epitomized through its first case against 13 Russians and 3 Russian companies. The one Russian firm represented in court, Concord Management, is making a mockery of the Mueller gang as the witch hunt falls apart!
In an effort to tie their corrupt investigation to Russia, the Mueller team indicted 13 Russians after presenting their cases to a grand jury in February of this year. Immediately, these indictments were suspect as everyone on the corrupt Mueller team knew that these ‘Russians’ would never be brought to justice, even if they were real, because they would never come to the US to stand trial and risk being put in jail.
Unfortunately for Mueller however, this soon turned into a royal mess. Lawyers defending one of three Russian companies indicted with the 13 Russians, Concord Management, showed up for court. Mueller’s team was caught off guard and never expected this. They immediately asked the judge for more time but the judge denied their pleas noting that they were the ones who indicted the Russian company in the first place.
When the case proceeded, the Concord attorneys noted that another of the three companies indicted by Mueller was not in existence at the time of Mueller’s indictment. They called this a case of Mueller indicting the proverbial ‘ham sandwich’.
At a following court appearance, the attorneys representing Concord stated that the corrupt Mueller team’s allegations of 13 Russian individuals impacting the 2016 election were “made up” nonsense. The individuals were not even real.
Concord Management’s lawyers revealed that Mueller’s team had ignored over 70 discovery requests they had made for information in the case. In response Mueller’s team offered to give Concord Management’s lawyers a massive amount of social media data from those dangerous trolls who sought to influence the US election and the majority of the data was in RUSSIAN.
Mueller’s lawyers then admitted that they didn’t even have English translations for the Russian social media posts. However, somehow Mueller’s lawyers believed Americans were influenced by these Russian language posts?
The case of the Russians has now turned into a big joke as the legitimacy of the Mueller indictment is being challenged by Concord Management.
In a hearing on October 15th, Concord Management claimed that the Special Counsel’s entire case is built around a 100 year old law that he Mueller team is trying to use in a manner it was not built for.
The Defense hits the Special Counsel for relying on a “100 year-old Supreme Court case which doesn’t stand for the proposition that they want it to stand for”
“The Special Counsel..never advised you” that the case required a willful violation of the law. pic.twitter.com/5V53wGiWYl
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 24, 2018
Then Concord Management accused Mueller of making up a crime because they don’t have evidence they need to push their cases forward –
The blistering critique continues.
The Special Counsel didn’t have the evidence, so they “make up a new crime that has never been charged in the history of the United States” pic.twitter.com/qCApwSViDp
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 24, 2018
Concord Management argues that Mueller’s team wants to be able to regulate what people say on the Internet –
A very important quote on what may be the real goal of the DOJ and the Special Counsel:
“They want to be able to regulate what people say on the internet” by removing anonymity. pic.twitter.com/X36yAB00u2
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 24, 2018
In a follow up brief to the court on October 23rd, Concord states –
Concord has consistently argued that hte Indictment charges no crime at all (interference with an election), but to the extent if purports to charge a crime the essential element of willfulness is fatally absent. The Special Counsel’s retort has been that he was not required to charge willfulness because he did not charge violations of FECA or FARA. Now, in mind-bending, intergalactic, whiplash fashion, he says for the first time, I did, I charged violations of FECA and FARA.(1) Reminiscent of the old adage, “Give a man enough rope and he will hang himself,” the Special Counsel just did so.
(1) Which sounds a lot like “I did, I did, I taw a puddy tat.” Tweetie (1948).
Russian Troll case update. Concord responds to govt brief opposing motion to dismiss the indictment
They’re mocking Robert Mueller:
“‘Give a man enough rope and he will hang himself,’ the Special Counsel just did so.”
Also included is a 1948 quote from Tweetie bird. lol pic.twitter.com/3lH2sq8OkO
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) October 25, 2018
