STUNNING: Democrat Party Argues in Court It Had Right to Favor Hillary Over Bernie – Is in No Way Beholden to Voters
The DNC fired three top officials after the Democrat Party was caught rigging their primary against Bernie Sanders last year.
This came after Wikileaks released emails that revealed how Democrats rigged the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders.
DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned as party chairwoman after the emails emerged.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) August 2, 2016
Bernie Sanders voters were outraged after Wikileaks released emails that Sanders was cheated. A group of Sanders supporters sued the DNC.
The case is now being held in court but the mainstream media refuses to report on it.
And last week the DNC argued that the party has the right to choose a candidate and not the primary voters.
Zach Haller at Medium reported:
The Democratic Party views itself as having authority to favor a candidate without any legal repercussions.
Without any pretense the Democratic primary nominating process should be expected to be conducted fairly, lawyers for the Democratic Party tell Judge Zloch the lawsuit should be thrown out because the Party has the freedom to determine its nominees by “internal rule”, not voter interests, and thus the party “could have favored a candidate”.
Lawyers for the Democratic Party suggest the lawsuit “can’t be resolved” by the Court because it is based on an internal rule that “cannot be enforced”. This statement by lawyers for the Democrats to a Federal judge is a damning indictment the Party may never recover from: the party views itself in no way beholden to voters’ interest whatsoever.
These are stunning revelations.
No wonder the liberal mainstream media is ignoring this court case.