SCOTUS Rules 5-4 Against Public Unions in Harris vs. Quinn Decision

Public service Unions Demand Dues From Disabled People And Their Caregiver Family Members
It’s the #Progressive Way.
Pam Harris was forced to pay union dues and join a union because she took care of her disabled son in her home.

The SEIU and AFSCME demanded the right to seize money from disabled people.

Today the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Pat Harris in her case against Democrat Governor Pat Quinn.

The Harris vs. Quinn decision is here.
The court ruled 5-4 against public unions.

** Paul Kersey, an attorney and director of labor policy at the Illinois Policy Institute, has more on the case here.

You Might Like


As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning. Guest posting is disabled for security reasons.

You Might Like