Putin Writes To The American People: “Don’t Strike Syria, And You’re Not Exceptional” UPDATE: White House Responds…”Putin Now Owns This”


So very interesting.  Russian President, Vladimir Putin, addressed the American people in a New York Times Op-Ed today.  Entitled “A Plea For Caution From Russia”, Putin implored Americans to stop and consider his outlined consequences before they intervene in Syria’s civil war.  After describing the potential fallout of a U.S. attack, Putin makes the case for the U.S. to look to the United Nations for a solution.  A solution including “peaceful dialogue” with the Syrians.  Putin also argued that it is likely the chemical weapons were used by the Syrian rebels and not the Assad regime…an assertion that Egyptian-born Middle East expert, Dr. Mark Christian, made the other day on Gateway Pundit, as well.

Excerpts from the New York Times Op-Ed article,

The potential strike by the United States against Syria, despite strong opposition from many countries and major political and religious leaders, including the pope, will result in more innocent victims and escalation, potentially spreading the conflict far beyond Syria’s borders. A strike would increase violence and unleash a new wave of terrorism. It could undermine multilateral efforts to resolve the Iranian nuclear problem and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and further destabilize the Middle East and North Africa. It could throw the entire system of international law and order out of balance.

Syria is not witnessing a battle for democracy, but an armed conflict between government and opposition in a multireligious country. There are few champions of democracy in Syria. But there are more than enough Qaeda fighters and extremists of all stripes battling the government. The United States State Department has designated Al Nusra Front and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, fighting with the opposition, as terrorist organizations. This internal conflict, fueled by foreign weapons supplied to the opposition, is one of the bloodiest in the world.

Mercenaries from Arab countries fighting there, and hundreds of militants from Western countries and even Russia, are an issue of our deep concern. Might they not return to our countries with experience acquired in Syria? After all, after fighting in Libya, extremists moved on to Mali. This threatens us all.

From the outset, Russia has advocated peaceful dialogue enabling Syrians to develop a compromise plan for their own future. We are not protecting the Syrian government, but international law. We need to use the United Nations Security Council and believe that preserving law and order in today’s complex and turbulent world is one of the few ways to keep international relations from sliding into chaos. The law is still the law, and we must follow it whether we like it or not. Under current international law, force is permitted only in self-defense or by the decision of the Security Council. Anything else is unacceptable under the United Nations Charter and would constitute an act of aggression.

No one doubts that poison gas was used in Syria. But there is every reason to believe it was used not by the Syrian Army, but by opposition forces, to provoke intervention by their powerful foreign patrons, who would be siding with the fundamentalists. Reports that militants are preparing another attack — this time against Israel — cannot be ignored.

It is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is it in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy but as relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the slogan “you’re either with us or against us.”

But force has proved ineffective and pointless. Afghanistan is reeling, and no one can say what will happen after international forces withdraw. Libya is divided into tribes and clans. In Iraq the civil war continues, with dozens killed each day. In the United States, many draw an analogy between Iraq and Syria, and ask why their government would want to repeat recent mistakes. …

We must stop using the language of force and return to the path of civilized diplomatic and political settlement. …

I welcome the president’s interest in continuing the dialogue with Russia on Syria. We must work together to keep this hope alive, as we agreed to at the Group of 8 meeting in Lough Erne in Northern Ireland in June, and steer the discussion back toward negotiations.

Putin ends with explaining why America “is not exceptional”.  The essence of what Putin says may be correct, but as IowaHawk so eloquently put it, “Putin is now just basically doing donuts in Obama’s front yard”.

More…The German press says Assad did not order Syrian chemical weapons attack.

UPDATE:  The White House responds.  Jake Tapper reports,

“That’s all irrelevant,” the White House official said in response. “He put this proposal forward and he’s now invested in it. That’s good. That’s the best possible reaction. He’s fully invested in Syria’s CW disarmament and that’s potentially better than a military strike – which would deter and degrade but wouldn’t get rid of all the chemical weapons. He now owns this. He has fully asserted ownership of it and he needs to deliver.

Wow!  “Putin now owns this”.  Obama thinks he’s playing Old Maid and Putin just drew his red line card.  Phew!  It’s Russia’s problem, now.


Thanks for sharing!