MORE EMAILS Prove Hillary Clinton & Obama KNEW Benghazi Terror Attack Was Planned by Al-Qaeda Group

FOX News confirmed Monday that the US ran guns from Benghazi to Syria before the attack on the US consulate on September 11, 2012.

benghazi terrorists
The US Ambassador to Libya and three others were killed in the 9-11, 2012 terrorist attacks.

The Obama administration was running weapons to Syria.
benghazi guns syria

FOX News reported Monday that the US was sending guns to Banias and Borj Islam, Syria before the Benghazi terrorist attack.

US Intelligence agencies were fully aware that weapons were moving from the terrorist stronghold in Libya to Syria before the attack that killed four Americans…
September 16, 2012 DIA Memo copied to the National Security Council, CIA, and others concluded the Benghazi terrorist attack was planned at least ten or more days in advance…

The memo also tied the attack to 9-11… No discussion of a demonstration or anti-Mohammad video.

US officials were aware that weapons were being shipped to Syria by the Port of Benghazi.

The US was in fact running guns from Benghazi to Syria when the annex and consulate were attacked.

Now this…
Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal wrote Hillary Clinton two days after the 2012 Benghazi attack that an al-Qaeda group was behind the attack and had planned the attack for 10 days. This is the second memo that confirms that the Obama-Clinton State Department knew terrorists were behind the attack and yet lied about it to the American public.
FOX News reported:

A longtime Clinton confidant reportedly advised then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton two days after the 2012 Benghazi terror attack that an Al Qaeda-tied group had planned the deadly assault and used a protest as cover — but despite this warning, Clinton’s U.N. ambassador went on to publicly claim the attack was simply “spontaneous.”

The guidance from ex-Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal was contained in a memo sent Sept. 13, according to The New York Times. It is the latest documentation effectively contradicting the administration’s early narrative that the attack was driven by protests over an anti-Islam Internet video — and raising questions over why officials stuck to that story for days.

According to the Times, Blumenthal initially blamed “demonstrators” angry over that video for the attacks. But the next day, he sent Clinton a very different memo.

According to the Times, Blumenthal told Clinton the attack was driven by Al Qaeda-tied Ansar al-Shariah members who had planned it for a month and used a protest as cover. He cited “sensitive sources.”

“We should get this around asap,” Clinton reportedly told an adviser in response.

Yet, despite this guidance, then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice would go on several television programs Sept. 16 to claim the attacks were “spontaneous,” and not premeditated, and link them to protests over the anti-Islam video.

On May 16, 2013, Senator Rand Paul told FOX News that Hillary Clinton’s fingerprints were all over the bogus Benghazi talking points.
Rand Paul was right.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • saturn

    ISIS winning and now this! Still no impeachment?

  • American Patriot

    In years past, this would have brought an entire Republican administration down. This is far bigger than Watergate, people didn’t die over the willful collusion of our federal government. When will the press jump on this? The story is Pulitzer Prize worthy for any reporter who wants to get some real credibility. Where’s a Bernstein and what’s-his-name now? Those guys have been living off their reputation for decades.

  • M. Black

    “What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?”
    I’d say a lot.

  • johnfarmingdale

    Everyone deserves a trial, to defend their self. Get her on the stand.

  • rechill

    They won’t care and guess what their apologists will say? IRAN-CONTRA!

  • No Hillary

    One has to wonder is this the ace the GOP is holding to stop Hillary? The chances are very high 90%+ that criminally damaging email do exist and are in the hands of the GOP>

  • MN Jim

    How many acts of treason have to happen before Congress will do something?

  • DinaRehn

    Hillary wants to pretend she’s already president and unaccountable – and ‘impeaching’ her would be overturning the will of the people or some such nonsense”

    Your Normal Rules Don’t Apply to Hillary Clinton
    She’s treating the media as if she were already president.
    What the press still fails to appreciate about Hillary Clinton is that she’s not running for president, she’s running as president, and all the usual rules about when and how she should speak don’t apply to her. In her mind—and who can blame her?—she’s the incumbent, this is a reelection campaign, and she occupies a place miles above the liquescent bogs of petty politics into which reporters would dunk her. A president is better seen than heard, she believes, hence her extended “listening tour.”

    “The words of the president have an enormous weight and ought not to be used indiscriminately,” as President Calvin Coolidge once put it.

    The press isn’t buying that, of course, so every time Clinton dons her media-deflecting shroud in public, reporters attempt to tear it off, like Tuesday in Cedar Falls, Iowa. After 28 days of shaking off reporters’ questions like a fussy major-league pitcher, and after answering only 13 queries since announcing her candidacy, Clinton finally fielded a few at a forum and volleyed in a way guaranteed to make almost no news.

  • William Hofmeister

    Excellent. Can we then have mutli-year long investigations by the House and Senate as we did then? Can we put at least one of this administration lackeys in prison for it and derail Hillary’s career? Can we apply the same microscope to this administration’s sins as we did then? If I were the Democrats I would not go that route.

  • corday_d_armont

    Hillary Clinton and Skippy were inadvertently(?) arming ISIS with Muammar Gaddafis’ weapons through the ISIS beard the “Free Syrian Army” (the same group who duped John McCain into his famous photo-op debacle). When this threatened to become known they tried to reign it all back in, AL-Queida struck the Annex and then the CIA mission in response. Now we find out that Hillary and Skippy knew 10 days in advance that AL-Queida was planning the strike and did nothing to counter it or take measures to protect the ambassador, the annex or the CIA mission and denied any support during the attacks

    This explains the, at the time inexplicable, false “protest over a video gone bad” narrative. They were just covering their political rear-ends, lying over the media
    and the coffins of the Benghazi heroes to the loved ones of those heroes and to the people of the United States.

    Hillary is now proven a blood soaked ghoul.

  • cargosquid

    But..that can’t be…….because every conservative that pointed out the stories of arms trafficking were told that they were crazy.

    The progressives wouldn’t lie…..would they?

  • corday_d_armont

    What is more to the point is that all the deleted e-mails are most certainly in the hands of every competent intelligence network on earth, including Russia, China, N. Korea and Israel.

  • DinaRehn

    8 Questions The Media Should Ask Hillary…But Won’t
    Here are the top eight questions Hillary has not been asked, even as her media sycophants suggest that she should not be expected to answer questions:
    Why Did You Specifically Set Up a Private Email Server As Secretary of State?

    Why Didn’t You Comply With State Department Guidelines In Hiding Clinton Foundation Donations?

    What Relationships Do You Have With Particular Media Members?

    Should Women Be Permitted to Abort Full-Term Babies?
    Why Do You Think Religious Americans Should Be Re-Educated? Speaking at the 2015 Women in the World Summit, Hillary Clinton said, “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural code, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.” She spoke specifically about such changes in the context of making access to abortion easier. How, exactly, does Hillary Clinton proposed to use law and “political will” to change “religious beliefs?”

    Did You Make The Right Decision in Libya?

    Did Your Russian Re-Set Work?

    Why Didn’t You Label Boko Haram a Terrorist Group?

  • American Patriot

    If memory serves me, I seem to remember her appearances before Trey Gowdy’s committee were mostly choreographed by her handlers. She would not testify under oath, and gave them a specific duration of time she would allow herself to be questioned. I may fuzzy on some of those details, but I think that’s the way it happened.

    Personally, she needs to be ordered by subpoena to testify under oath. If she refuses, or fails to answer questions put to her, then she needs to be held in contempt of Congress, and her fat, cankled a$$ should be tossed in jail until she is ready to truthfully answer questions asked of her by Gowdy.

    Don’t tell me Gowdy has no authority to do that, hell, Republicans hold both houses of Congress, they can do whatever they damn well please. The Democrats and 0bama have been teaching us that lesson for years.

  • American Patriot

    ….based off that one news event.

  • US Patriot

    Don’t hold your breath.

  • 57nomad

    For President: Madam Secretary Reset the Lying Bribetaker!!

  • perpetualwar

    They will not impeach the first affirmative action president. And Clinton will never see jail time. I have no faith in our judicial system and our government. They no longer represent us.

  • clevonlittle

    Morrell says the arms weren’t shipped by CIA , who then , State ?

  • clevonlittle

    it would bring a future Republican administration down , not this one . The Pulitzer chase will start 5 minutes after Obama leaves , and the story needs to be told .