This morning, far left crank Paul Krugman attacked the Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) and the GOP’s response to the SOTU Address. Krugman also bashed Bette Grenier, the Obamacare victim mentioned by the GOP, who is looking at an incredible increase in her monthly premium due to Obamacare.
Betteâ€™s tale had policy wonks scratching their heads; it was hard to see, given what we know about premiums and how the health law works, how anyone could face that large a rate increase. Sure enough, when a local newspaper, The Spokesman-Review, contacted Bette Grenier, it discovered that the real story was very different from the image Ms. McMorris Rodgers conveyed. First of all, she was comparing her previous policy with one of the pricier alternatives her insurance company was offering â€” and she refused to look for cheaper alternatives on the Washington insurance exchange, declaring, â€śI wouldnâ€™t go on that Obama website.â€ť
Even more important, all Ms. Grenier and her husband had before was a minimalist insurance plan, with a $10,000 deductible, offering very little financial protection. So yes, the new law requires that they spend more, but they would get far better coverage in return.
But, once again, Obama apologist Krugman only gives you part of the story.
Even looking at all of her healthcare options “Bette in Spokane” is still looking at a $400 a month increase in her premium.
The Spokesman reported:
The woman described only as â€śBette in Spokaneâ€ť during a nationally televised address by U.S. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers said Wednesday she had no idea her frustrations over increasing insurance premiums would become part of the Republican attack on health care reform.
Not that Bette Grenier, a critic of the Affordable Care Act, minds that much.
But the â€śnearly $700 per monthâ€ť increase in her premium that McMorris Rodgers cited in Tuesday nightâ€™s GOP response to the State of the Union address was based on one of the pricier options, a $1,200-a-month replacement plan that was pitched by Asuris Northwest to Grenier and her husband, Don.
The carrier also offered a less expensive, $1,052-per-month option in lieu of their soon-to-be-discontinued catastrophic coverage plan. And, Grenier acknowledged the couple probably could have shaved another $100 a month off the replacement policy costs by purchasing them from the stateâ€™s online portal, the Health Plan Finder website, but they chose to avoid the government health exchanges.
â€śI wouldnâ€™t go on that Obama website at all,â€ť said Grenier, 58, who lives in the Chattaroy area and owns a roofing company with her husband. â€śWe liked our old plan. It worked for us, but they canâ€™t offer it anymore.â€ť
So even if Bette Grenier found the cheapest policy available to her today she would still be paying an extra $400 more a month.
Paul Krugman believes this is a good thing.