Figures: NY Times 2013 Benghazi Report Contradicts NY Times 2012 Benghazi Report

Well, what do you know?
The New York Times 2013 report on Benghazi completely contradicts The New York Times 2012 report on Benghazi.
Laura Ingraham on The Factor reported:

This past weekend the New York Times claimed Al-Qaeda had nothing to do with the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack.

Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault.

But that is not what they said about the attack back in October 2012.

In the months leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks on the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, the Obama administration received intelligence reports that Islamic extremist groups were operating training camps in the mountains near the Libyan city and that some of the fighters were “Al Qaeda-leaning,” according to American and European officials.

For the record, there is plenty of evidence the Benghazi attack on 9-11 was a planned attack by Al-Qaeda linked terrorists.

Thomas Wictor has more on the real Benghazi story.

Comments

As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. The same applies to trolling, the use of multiple aliases, or just generally being a jerk. Enforcement of this policy is at the sole discretion of the site administrators and repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without warning