Here We Go… Socialist Schakowsky Says Republicans Are “Taking Food Out of the Mouths of Babies” (Video)

Here we go.
Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), a top socialist in the Democratic Party, told reporters that by cutting spending in Washington Republicans are “taking food out of the mouths of babies” with their proposed budget cuts. Barack Obama increased the annual budget by over a trillion dollars since coming into office. Despit this, Democrats don’t want to cut a thing.

Schakowsky is the same socialist who told Russian television that the U.S. is a “banana republic” without wealth redistribution.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • mope

    …but ‘spoding them with drones is OK, right Jan?

    Aw, shaddup.

  • cavt

    Explain to me how when the dems talk/insult like this(which is all the time,) the ability to compromise and come together is furthered? Why would someone on the receiving end of these constant, insulting lies want to compromise with this type of person? But the lying dems and DSMS will continue blabbering about the other side who won’t compromise with them.

  • Carbon Monoxide

    Aborting them is fine.

  • F Amman

    We can call Schakowsky stupid, evil, fool, traitor and so forth.

    And while she may be all of those things and more, she’s also one other thing. She’s a Member of Congress. Put there by the equally stupid. The stupid voter is every much the enemy of true constitutional/limited government which explains why the Democrat party works ever so hard to keep people from learning how wealth is created.

  • Bigkahuna

    When will some republicans stand up and say STFU you moron. You don’t deserve to be in office and stupid and bringing down the country is no way to go through life

  • Jack Burton

    Of course we are. Because it’s yummy food and I want some.

  • Economan

    The gov’t isn’t supposed to feed anyone, that’s not it’s function you stupid parasite. Feed them yourself if you’re that concerned you stupid Marxist! I’m sure you can redistribute your own paycheck since you make more money than I do.

  • Joe

    So long America, hello Amerika.

  • even steven

    She represents the teeming masses of lead paint chip eating morons in Chicago quite well. Chicago’s idiocy is legendary.

  • This Beotch is a Rep from the City of Chicago, She claims the GOP is taking the food out of the mouth of babies, but it is perfectly fine last year for that city to have 500+ murders, and a high percentage of them were children…..Hypocrisy much Jan, or are you just this illiterate ?

    The road to Hell is paved in Democrats…..

  • accidentwaitingtohappen

    I always marvel how socialists shut down perfectly good farm land, to protect a species that doesn’t even live there, and then claim conservatives are to blame for hunger.

  • Comrade J

    Completely missed this one… So let’s get this straight. She accuses GOP of taking food out of the mouth of babies, while advocating butchering them in their mothers’ wombs?

    any time any marxist opens mouth with “it’s for the children”, everyone should remember that they advocate butchering these children in ways that make nazis look like angels

  • SeniorD

    How interesting that a devoted Communist Party member represents one of the most affluent areas in the country.

  • Jack

    Get ready for a shock and awe counter offensive from the republicans. They won’t stand still for these kinds of attacks from the democrats. Oh wait… they aren’t called the Stuck on Stupid party for nothing. They’re probably running for a dark closet as we speak. Ok forget the counter attack stuff.

  • taxes take food out of the mouths of babies too.

  • Flintstone F.

    Ah, Jan Schakowsky:

    She told the truth about their goals for “healthcare.”

    I’ll bet she’s all for taking food away from the world to put into a car. Children are starving, let’s drive up the cost of corn by using it to save the planet from the myth of man made global warming.

  • Mahdi Al-Dajjal

    For all those who don’t realize it, she’s NOT talking about babies who have survived an abortion. THOSE BABIES aren’t fed anything at all and are left to starve to death. Just ask Barack!

  • taxes take parents out of the home too.

  • paul52

    Jan, with Chi-town being the murder capital of America, there should be some extra munchies laying around. Commie beeatch.

  • Lily

    What do these people think will happen to the poor and the elderly when our economy crashes and we have no more money to spend? The poor are going to be devistated by our collapse.

  • Finncrisp

    Stalinists love misery. The commie lib theology is based on wide spread misery. And blaming their created misery on those who are not responsible for it.

  • Cee

    People should not be having children that they cannot afford to feed, clothe, house, educate and pay for medical insurance and care.

  • shadow

    Barack Obama increased the annual budget by over a trillion dollars since coming into office.

    How do you figure that?

  • Gort

    My first job, after retiring from the service, was security manager at a regional hospital. The hospital had the largest mental health facility in the area, so it had quite a population. Had to go there numerous times, with officers, and the look on the faces . . . . .Just saying!

  • Indiana

    Wow….Jan! That was sooooo prophetic! Now go back to studying your bellybutton….and STFU!

  • Your Mom

    Well.. if you cut programs that feed poor mothers/infants who have few other choices, what would you call it? Perhaps she could have said, “Due to budget cut’s proposed by the opposing party X amount of poor mothers/infants will lose government assistance.” Which sounds so much better, don’t you agree?

    If Obama makes one cut to a military program, Jim and the commenters on this site blame him for gutting the military.

    There are no objective standards on this website, if a liberal does something it’s bad.. if a conservative does the same exact thing it’s good.

  • sablegsd

    But her royal huge ass says they are all fat. Which is it, you insane regressive commiecrat scrunt? Are you calling the first fat ass a liar?

  • Deport this hag.

  • Sasja

    Those of us, who years ago elected to educate ourselves on baseline budgeting and all the bs associated with it, know there are no cuts in anything. Rush explained it again today, an excerpt I provide below:

    “See, the current services baseline is the magic that makes sure there is never, ever a real budget cut. And so it will be in this case. Now, the current services baseline calls for the federal government to spend $44.8 trillion between now and 2022. In other words, they go ten years out with all these budget projections. The budget every year is done for that next year, but there is always a ten-year projection. Nobody’s ever held to it because you can’t constitutionally bind future Congresses in items like the budget. That’s why there has to be one every year, there has to be a vote by law. Democrats have not done it, but there has to be.

    So the latest ten-year projection calls for — and this is Obama, CBO, doesn’t matter which, the ten-year projection, current services baseline calls for the federal government to spend $44.8 trillion between now and 2022. That is on the books. Now, you know what the baseline is, current services baseline, it is the magical device by which every line item in the budget automatically increases anywhere from three to 8% every year, regardless how much money was spent on that line item previous year, just automatically goes up.

    So let’s say that the spending on road repair, just to give you an item here, was scheduled to go up 8% next year, but it actually only goes up 5%, that’s when the Democrats start howling about a budget cut. And they accuse the Republicans of massive, Draconian budget cuts, when in fact we’re gonna spend 5% more than we did last year, just not the 8% that the baseline called for. Okay, so the baseline says that for the next ten years we’re gonna spend $44.8 trillion. The sequester that everybody is panicking over, the sequester, part of the debt deal, the sequester, these automatic spending cuts, would reduce the increases to the baseline budget by $1.16 trillion.

    So, instead of spending over ten years $44.8 trillion, we would spend $43.7 trillion over ten years. Amortized over ten years, it is a rounding error. It is inconsequential, like every supposed spending cut always is. In reality, even if the sequester goes through, if it happens, the federal government is gonna spend $2.14 trillion more in 2022 than it does today, in inflation-adjusted dollars. So even if the sequester happens, the federal government’s gonna spend more money.

    The annual spending on discretionary programs will still increase by $90 billion over the next ten years. After ten years of the sequester, by 2022, spending will consume 23% of GDP. And the sequester was Obama’s idea, by the way. Let’s not forget that. It was his proposal to get everybody to come to the table and negotiate in good faith. So, yes, there are reductions in spending, but they are, as always, for the most part reductions in the rate of growth, and they’re amortized to spread out over ten years. It’s chump change that we’re talking about here, as every spending cut always is.”

  • JoyO

    I guess we should be thankful that she is still not brave enough to call herself a Communist but is still hiding behind the Socialist label.

    When our economy comes crushing down because the Progressives, Socialists and Communists among our political elites have spent so much money that no country will loan them more money, they will still not accept responsibility for spending too much and taxing too much. Everyone knows what happens after you have run up a big credit card bill and keep trying to spend more. Eventually, the credit card company starts making it impossible for you to buy anything more on credit. Members of both parties have run up a credit card bill of $16+ trillion and unfunded liabilities ranging from $80 trillion to $100 trillion. The bill will come due one of these days.

  • Obamao

    “Taking Food Out of the Mouths of Babies” ?

    Yeah, you commie bastard, YOU are taking the food out of my kids mouths with your thug statist taxing stealing.

  • shadow

    The sequester that everybody is panicking over, the sequester, part of the debt deal, the sequester, these automatic spending cuts, would reduce the increases to the baseline budget by $1.16 trillion.

    If the sequester is not actually a cut, why are right wingers almost apoplectic over the military portion of these negligible “reductions in increases?”?

  • WillofLa

    Why do we continue to allow Communists and Socialists in our government, either state or Federal? Why don’t we know that people who are members of these two subversive organizations are dire threats to our way of life, and are destructive to our society, and are destroyer’s of Constitutional Republicanism?

  • CT

    This socialist administration is driving the cost of food and fuel through the roof, leaving families hungry and cold. So shut your pie hole Schakowski. An extra trillion dollars a year in Obama redistribution and the problem is getting worse not better.

  • BurrmaShave

    Thanks, Illinois, for sending unhinged lunatics to the US Congress.

  • Patty

    7.8% unemployment

    7 million have no insurance

    Coal industry is being killed by Obama

    Job creators are moving overseas

    China is getting richer and richer each day.

    CBO Confirms That Obama Is The Undisputed Debt King
    Posted February 5, 2013

    “Deficits Are Projected To Increase Later In The Coming Decade, However, Because Of The Pressures Of An Aging Population, Rising Health Care Costs, An Expansion Of Federal Subsidies For Health Insurance, And Growing Interest Payments On Federal Debt.” (“The Budget And Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2013 To 2023,” Congressional Budget Office, 2/5/13)

    “By 2023, If Current Laws Remain In Place, Debt Will Equal 77 Percent Of GDP And Be On An Upward Path, CBO Projects.” “As a result, federal debt held by the public is projected to remain historically high relative to the size of the economy for the next decade. By 2023, if current laws remain in place, debt will equal 77 percent of GDP and be on an upward path, CBO projects (see Summary Figure 1).” (“The Budget And Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2013 To 2023,” Congressional Budget Office, 2/5/13)[……………….]

    People are struggling because of Obama, not because of the GOP.

  • Jo Capritta

    Why is this administration allowed to keep going on and on and destroying this country? When is this going to end? When are the “non-Democrats” going to stand up to this administration and impeach this so called “president” who is destroying this country? Obama has done so much against our laws, constitution, and the American people….Why is he still in office? I wish someone would answer?

  • mg4us

    So she must be talking about those hungry little babies with names like Solyndra. . .or California bullet train. . .

    Give me a brake. . .

    She is evil. . if we cannot feed babies on a few million. .then something is wrong. .so why then does DC need to spend TRILLIONS. .

  • Jo Capritta

    Will “ILLEGALS” lose anything or will it be for their benefit? It seems everything is being done for them and LEGAL AMERICANS are being “left out” to dry….IMPEACHMENT..IMPEACHMENT…IMPEACHMENT….IMPEACHMENT…IMPEACHMENT….ALL OF THEM……

  • Jo Capritta

    Shame, shame on those that put this “man” back into office….you should hang your heads and pray for your souls….this man is arrogant, rude, disrespectful, cocky, and aggressive towards anyone who does not “think” like him…..IMPEACHMENT needs to take place….get him out….

  • Immortal Fish

    Okay. So?

    People like her are taking fetuses out of the wombs of mothers.

  • Repousa

    Mindless parasite. If the dems had their way, the money would be given to planned parenthood and there wouldn’t be any babies to feed. Remember, conservatives love babies and want them to live. Libtards want them to die so they can be irresponsible and keep screwing.

  • Glenn47

    Really?? I would like her to prove it, since it was her side that raised taxes, cut all temporary federal employees, put all permenent employees on furlough, and started taking money from the federal retirement accounts. Money that is not theirs. All, of which, takes money from hard working families and servicemen, and us food from their children’s mouths.
    Next, they fe going after everyone’s 401Ks and their IRAs.
    They need the money to cover for all the nefarious things they re doing behind our backs.
    Time to leave the water frogs.

  • TryingNotToPuke

    And Dems are behind taking babies out of the wombs of females – how many abortions per year????
    Why this fake concern over babies when they have no qualms of using abortion as a form of birth control?
    And obama’s “healthcare” funds are used for this? Certainly not the fetus’ health. I never associated health with the taking of lives – but this is what the idiots that voted this amateur into office wanted I guess.

  • MarkJ

    “Jumping Jan Flash”: Living proof that intelligence, wisdom, and common sense are no longer barriers to a successful career in Illinois Democratic politics.

  • Maybe the babies are going hungry because babies mommas are using their govt income to get their hair and nails done. Oh yes, and definitely a new outfit so we can look like a diva on Sat. night. And have you noticed these divas weigh over 300 lbs? Some body’s getting something to eat from somewhere.