Obama Celebrates 40 Years of Roe v. Wade – Releases Statement

In 2008 abortion survivor Gianna Jessen joined Born Alive Truth in a campaign to shine light on Barack Obama’s horrific record in support of infanticide. Gianna, who had survived as a baby after being aborted, pointed out that–
Obama voted 4 times in support of infanticide:

In his first year as president, Barack Obama signed several pieces of abortion legislation including funding foreign abortions. He also signed legislation to use taxpayer money to kill embryos in research. And, democrats passed legislation that will force healthcare providers to perform abortions even if it violates their moral or religious convictions.

Barack Obama is the most radical pro-abortion and infanticide president in the last 35 years. He’s so radical the Vatican even attacked him for using taxpayer money to fund foreign abortions after he lied to the Pope about his plans.

Barack Obama released this statement today on the 40th Annversary of Roe v. Wade.

“On the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we reaffirm its historic commitment to protect the health and reproductive freedom of women across this country and stand by its guiding principle: that government should not intrude on our most private family matters, and women should be able to make their own choices about their bodies and their health care. Today and every day, my Administration continues our efforts to reduce unintended pregnancies, support maternal and child health, and minimize the need for abortion. On this anniversary, we recommit ourselves to supporting women and families in the choices they make and redouble our efforts to promote safe and healthy communities.”

What nonsense. Meanwhile the Catholic Church is suing the Obama Administration for intruding on its religious values.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • 50 million unborn babies have been slaughtered …….And some wonder if this marxist wouldn’t order the killings of millions americans……

  • Fuquay Steve

    What’s the big deal? Coulter and Hannity think we need to be flexible in this position and not scare away those wise and prudent moderates. The moderates probably agree with the president’s position on this matter, since they consider him the wisest of the wise. It’s important that the Republicans not stand for anything that puts them in a less-than-ideal enlightened framework. Now let’s get on with amnesty, expense control, and gun control – things we will cave in on ….eventually. Well done Bill Crystal et al. Sarcasm off.

  • Patty

    that government should not intrude on our most private family matters,

    Really, Obama, so hypocritical but when standing at the Gates of Heaven, God will be your judge.

    How many abortions altogether have there been since the Roe v. Wade decision? Given that there are disagreements over numbers and that there are abortionists who do not report, a precise figure is hard to come by. Nevertheless, we can use the numbers we do have to arrive at some pretty close estimates of the total number of children lost to abortion since 1973.

    NRLC typically uses the numbers reported by the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI) to compute its totals. Unlike the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), AGI surveys abortionists directly rather than passively accepting what is sent to it. Therefore AGI’s totals are both higher and more accurate.


    Even that figure is incomplete. As AGI itself admits, it is not able to tally all abortions. If one factors in the additional 3% of abortions AGI says may be missed due to underreporting, the total figure since 1973 rises to 39,290,477.


    Of course these totals are inaccurate.


    Abortions and Regrets




  • Adirondack Patriot

    It’s just academic, but let me ask: You think Barack’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, would have aborted Obama if Roe v. Wade had been decided in 1960?

    Considering what a great mother she was, I think we know the answer. And so should Barack.

  • Patty

    Sharon Osbourne and Penny Marshall’s Abortions: Regret vs. Indifference


  • Patty

    American Abortion Counter


  • Patty



    The number of abortions shown in the chart above are the actual numbers that were submitted (except the last three years). No attempt has been made by the collection agencies to adjust for the “unreported” abortions. How many abortions go unreported? No one really knows, but there are some who say that at least 15% of the abortions go unreported. However, for this report, I am going to use the very conservative number of 4%.


    Center for Disease control (http://www.cdc.gov)
    Office of Populations Affairs (http://opa.osophs.dhhs.gov/)
    Abortions Services in the United States
    , 1991 and 1992,
    Family Planning Perspectives,
    vol.26, no.3 (May/June 1994)


  • Vicky Hernandez

    “Mwuah, mwuah, mwuah…”
    Oh? Charlie Brown’s teacher is the Preezy o’the United Steezy?

    Seriously, it would’ve been more acurate had he said that government would not “intrude ” on government approved “private family matters.”

  • Patty

    Illinois State Senate

    In 2001, Illinois Senators introduced legislation to care for children who survived a practice known as “induced abortions,” where a surviving baby is left unattended after labor is induced. State Senator Obama opposed this legislation, stating that by defining a “pre-viable” fetus as a person, the legislation was defining rights to that person. He then stated that by extending those protections to a fetus less than 9 months old, the practice would outlaw abortion.


  • Our Father God forms us in the womb, knits us together in His own image, Christ Jesus tells us not to stop the little children from coming to Him… blessed is the Nation whose Lord is God. BUT America has chosen another path, one of supreme mankind knowledge and made laws according to this ‘enlightenment’. How can we say “God bless America” when we purposefully choose to not only disobey Him, but to act in direct contradiction to His Word? May God forgive America.

  • Patty

    Via John McCormack, whose post you should read as a refresher on how dismal The One’s abortion record is. In fact, it’s so dismal that I think it undercuts the power of the clip he found. Show of hands: Who didn’t already assume before watching this that Obama supports “choice” in virtually every conceivable situation, including when a baby emerges alive after a botched abortion? I realize, per McCormack, that O endorsed banning late-term abortions in 2008, but he said a lot of things he doesn’t really believe to get elected four years ago. Where is he on this now? If he’s willing to “evolve” on gay marriage, by which I mean openly advocate what he’s secretly believed for decades, he should feel safe enough in his lame-duck term to make the case for Week 39 abortions, no? He’s already got Sandra Fluke writing campaign e-mails for him, as I learned around an hour ago; imagine how impressed feminists would be if he finally exploded the facade that the Democratic Party is meaningfully opposed to abortion in any circumstance.


    Read on.

  • Anonerik

    Obama continues to get away with one outrageous lie after another because of the fawning cover provided by the main stream media. We need to adopt a two step program if we are going to save this Republic. We can’t change the fact that Obama is our President but we can act decisively against the traitorous media that is aiding and abetting him in his destructive programs and deceptions. Two things that may help are, first, if every citizen who can see what is happening would share that insight with a friend or family member and,second, begin a nationwide boycott of the advertisers who support those media outlets.
    I don’t like boycotts but these are desperate times and other effective steps would be even more desperate. Take away the cover being given Obama by the media and he will be exposed as for what he is.

  • Patty

    Beyond creepy: Obama uses daughters to push abortion

    On July 24 President Barack Obama used his daughters as props to promote abortion, stating at an Oregon fundraiser (video here):

    Mr. Romney wants to get rid of funding for Planned Parenthood. I think that’s a bad idea. I’ve got two daughters. I want them to control their own health care choices. We’re not going backwards, we’re going forwards.

    We all know the word “choice” is a euphemism for “abortion.” And the fight to defund Planned Parenthood is all about abortion. So clear as mud, Obama was advocating the freedom for his daughters to abort his own grandchildren. I’m not the only one who took his statement that way. Wrote CP Politics:

    President Barack Obama drew a sharp line between himself and GOP opponent Mitt Romney on federally funded abortion rights Tuesday, arguing that federal funding of Planned Parenthood is necessary to preserve his daughters’ right to chose.

    This is at least the second time Obama has used his daughters to promote sex without consequences, which is creepy in itself, particularly given the fact they are only 14 and 11.

    But the first time was when they were even younger – way younger. From the 2008 wayback machine, on a day Obama was promoting comprehensive sex ed:[……………………]



  • Patty

    #12 January 22, 2013 at 3:25 pm
    Anonerik commented:

    It is a great start but in the meantime we have a dictator for another 4 more years.

  • Economan

    If a person is capable of this unspeakable evil, then they are capable of any evil.

  • Pingback: Obama Celebrates 40 Years of Roe v. Wade – Releases Statement « infowarsusa()

  • jb

    government should not intrude on our most private family matters….
    Wow, who would have thought that? Obamacare —bearing his name – certainly does.

  • Patty

    What nonsense. Meanwhile the Catholic Church is suing the Obama Administration for intruding on its religious values.

    That seems to be going NO WHERE fast.

  • Patty
  • Patty


    Cuomo wants to be the next president.

  • Patty

    O endorsed banning late-term abortions in 2008, but he said a lot of things he doesn’t really believe to get elected four years ago.

    And this is why we have a liar, hypocrite and con man in Office.

  • GotFreedom

    Encourage your Reps to support Rep. Marsha Blackburn’s HR 61 (http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/61)

    Currently there are 77 co-sponsors; check to see if your Rep is a co-sponsor and if they aren’t, use the info from this GP article (ie funding foreign abortions) as reasons to sponsor HR 61 (http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/61/cosponsors)

  • Jeannie

    It is not legislation that the Catholic church is using primarily to settle this. JUst as with the elections, it is the hearts and minds of hte voters that have to change first.

    Slavery was outlawed in the hearts of people first.

    MLKs niece has been making amazing headway getting blacks to realize that planned parenthood’s eugenics is what lies behind abortion, as well as the heavily Gates/Soros/UN funded coffers.

    Obama either doesn’t view himself as black (likely not) or he views himself as the one of his race who is part of the group that should promote their issue for the future of hte world.

    Most people do not suffer from megalomania and that is why it’s impossible for them to see this in our governments, our media and our academia.

    Now hollywood we recognize it but it’s expected there.

  • Angelfire

    Mothers Who Murder………Should there be a website like the gun owners that were published. Abortion is legal…….and so is gun ownership. Should we start giving the liberal/progressives some of their own medicine?

  • Jeannie

    As disclosed in an article on Townhall.com, a military leader told that Obama primarily wanted military figures willing to fire on Americans.
    This goes right along with the complete lack of humanity for the conservative Nashvillians who were flooded or for those on Ellis Island, also largely ignored.
    It goes right to his idea of a private militia that will outnumber and outgun military and police combined (visible if you visit Obama youth and see the heavy borrowing from Hitler youth and note how well it’s faring among teh gangs of Chicago, not visibly chastened in their quest to murder unarmed Chicagoans).
    It also ties in with the 50 million bullets still mysteriously unexplained for delivery to state departments that normally have no role in quieting riots, especially domestic riots. These are for terrorrists.

    Tianmen Square, Haiti, Cube, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Egypt.

    THere is zero mystery to Obama’s actions.

    The people are the only hope for themselves. All in office are funded, right and left, by the death culture.
    read, rather than easily dismiss this as the ravings of a loon.
    Read and search yourselves. You don’t need to be led.

  • Concerned Conservative

    I’m outraged . . . as usual. This is an impeachable offense.

  • Happy Birthday to them! Happy Birthday to them…. HAPPY BIRTH….oh. Wait.

    Never mind.

  • lizzy84

    Happy Anniversary, Baby………..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YEMnyiDKUJI

    Pure evil.

  • paul52

    I’m SO tired of the ‘choice’ BS line. Did the fetus get a ‘choice’? Did the father get a ‘choice’?… We all remember that IL Sen. Obama voted for infanticide FOUR times. This creep has no soul or one that Satan covets.

  • Ella

    That bastard that they just inaugurated yesterday should be forced to attend an abortion procedure. Come to think of it, everyone in favor of this should be.

  • Chris f

    Aren’t condoms easier to change than diapers?

  • Clebrities

    GP made many rEPUBLICANS hate the party and did not show up at the polls. You are too opinionated. Obortion is a dead issue. GP is one of the reasons that Mitt R. lost. get your head out of your arse.

  • This “man” sickens me. Never in my 52 year life have I despised another person as I do him. He is despicable.

  • Valerie

    Guys, I know you don’t agree with me, but I’m going to give you the link, in hopes that somebody will actually park their butt long enough to read it. Anybody who does read it will be one of a vanishingly small number of people to do so. Most of the people who write about it haven’t read it, and I know, because I can see the mistakes.

    There is a discussion about the consequences of a grant of power to our government that is extremely important. In brief, if you grant our government the power to intervene in a decision, you cannot control how the decision will come out. To grant the government the power to deny abortions is to ALSO grant the government the power to compel them.


    You are going to wind up glad to have it, because it’s what stands between you and those death panels in the Obamacare legislation.

    Remember all the [email protected] that got unloaded by the lefties on Sarah Palin for refusing to abort Trig? Those are the people who would be glad to deny medical to “defective” babies. Guess what stands in their way?

    Under Roe v. Wade, you can’t a baby aborted without the mother’s consent. It’s not even a stretch to find that you can’t arrange the regulations to coerce one by denying coverage.

    When that opinion issued, people were horrified, and said there was no way a government would compel abortions. Then the Chinese started their population containment program, and today we have an imbalance between the sexes in China, because so many babies have been aborted, an so many more of them were girls.

    I’ll say this for you, though: your hearts are in the right place.

  • Joanne

    The above quote in the post is decoded here:

    “On the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, we reaffirm its historic commitment to slaughter the unborn, leave those aborted who are born alive to die without any attempt to save their lives, risk the lives of women, and increase their risk of breast cancer across this ountry and stand by its guiding principle: that government should not intrude on the right of women to terminate the life of their unborn, and thus, commit murder with no charges brought against them. Today and every day, my Administration continues our efforts to reduce unintended pregnancies with the morning after pill and contraceptives funded with taxpayer dollars; ignore anyone else’s right to freedom of religion, which may prevent them morally from paying for and promoting birth control and mass murder; and minimize the need for abortion with the financial support given to Planned Parenthood, who make sure the majority of their services go towards the slaughter of the unborn. On this anniversary, we recommit ourselves to supporting women and families in the choices they make to slaughter their own flesh and blood and redouble our efforts to make sure anyone who wants an abortion can get one on the taxpayer dime.”

  • Valerie

    You see the typos, I see the typos. I’m sure you can figure it out, anyway. Sorry. Sticky keyboard.

  • Obama and the Marxist/communist view of mariage and abortion……….http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/obama_and_the_marxistcommunist_view_of_marriage_and_abortion.html

  • Jeannie

    Ella, part of the result of continued exposure to porn, violence and outrageous incivility and brutality in film is that even seeing real life videos people are unmoved by the dismemenberment of human babies in the historically most protected place in existence.

    The distancing of the population from empathy and humanity can be laid at the door of the technological, secular liberalism that promotes self-interest as THE interest that trumps all, most especially the lives of the unborn, the handicapped (yes I used that word) and the unproductive elderly.

  • Jeannie

    Valerie, in case you have not seen our country the last 10 years, the government has done many things that historically they have been denied doing.

    when you grant government the right to RULE on abortion or marriage or on healthcare, you have given away any safeguards.

    where have you been as people have been hauled away without charges against them? Where were you when Teri Schiavo was able to be tortured to death with her family helpless with ZERO written consent given to her husband to do so?

    Where have you been when cities have allowed thugs and gangs kill innocent civilians without worrying about any real police retaliation?

    If you think that we are not lawless at present then all I can say is that your glasses must not only be rose colored but they must be opaque.

  • accidentwaitingtohappen

    Obama: “…to protect the health and reproductive freedom of women across this country…”

    English translation: “men must keep the privilege of putting their girlfriends in a taxi or bus to the abortion clinic so they won’t have to deal with responsibility, despite the tears and pleading of the women to keep their child; men everywhere must posses this freedom.”

  • Lim Lynn
  • Pingback: Obama Celebrates 40 Years of Roe v. Wade – Releases Statement | Born Conservative()

  • bg


    re: suing the Obama Administration

    ahah, no wonder the MSM started in with their
    old reliable “priests molestation” canard again..

    odd that not ONE WORD about PEDOPHILIA being a part of ISLAM
    is ever spoken, not to mention fistgate, nor the Holly “woodie”.. /s/

    more at link, in connecting links & threads..


  • RKflorida

    54 million dead babies as of a few days ago, and this evil bastard celebrates.

  • bg



    [Parents should be allowed to have their newborn babies killed
    because they are “morally irrelevant” and ending their lives is
    no different to abortion, a group of medical ethicists linked to
    Oxford University has argued.

    [Rather than being “actual persons”, newborns were “potential
    persons”. They explained: “Both a fetus and a newborn certainly
    are human beings and potential persons, but neither is a ‘person’
    in the sense of ‘subject of a moral right to life’.

    “We take ‘person’ to mean an individual who is capable of attributing to
    her own existence some (at least) basic value such that being deprived
    of this existence represents a loss to her.”

    As such they argued it was “not possible to damage a newborn by
    preventing her from developing the potentiality to become a person
    in the morally relevant sense”.]

    [When circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified
    abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … We
    propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’
    to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable
    with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim
    that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances
    where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the
    newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the
    well-being of the family is at risk.

    ~ BHO

    PP: We Did 333,964 Abortions; 1 Every 94 Seconds


  • Buzzy

    And unfortunately the libertarians agree. It’s a womans choice. Her body is her personal property, and if she doesn’t want that baby growing in her body, she has the right to abort it, because she has the right to make that choice.

  • bg


    re: #45 January 22, 2013 at 6:54 pm bg

    re: [Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could
    be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where
    abortion would be.]

    Life Unworthy of Life

    [July 1933: Adolf Hitler passes the Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily
    Diseased Offspring, in turn enforcing the compulsory sterilisation of any
    citizen with a “genetic defect.” Defects include schizophrenia, deafness
    and even chronic alcoholism. In the coming years, approximately
    400,000 sterilisations will be carried out.

    May 1939: Hitler — as per a request from the boy’s father — agrees to
    authorise the killing of Gerhard Kretschmar, a child born blind and with
    limbs missing. After the 5-month-old child’s death in July, Hitler quickly
    initiates a Children’s Euthanasia program and upwards of 5,000
    youngsters are killed due to “defects.”

    October 1939: Hitler signs the following memo, backdated to September,
    and the euthanasia program becomes official. Now named Action T4, the
    program no longer discriminates with regards to age and all persons,
    young and old, can now be killed should they be “unworthy of life.” As
    noted in the memo, Karl Brandt and Philipp Bouhler are handed the
    reigns and over the next few years will oversee the murder of
    approximately 200,000 people. Action T4’s need to kill humans in such
    vast numbers will also result in the introduction of “death by gas” to the
    Nazi regime.]

    lest not forget the elitists main goal is to drastically depopulated the planet,
    enhance and advance their offspring and live like godless Earthly gods and goddesses of old once clontion is perfected, they will have an endless supply
    of serfs to attend to their needs, not to mention themselves (or so goes
    plans for the future anyways).. /back to the future sci-fi sarc/

    please scroll thread for more, thank you..

    Global Reproductive Health Prevention

    there, i fixed it for them.. 😡

    White Paper. When Does Human Life Begin?, and
    much more at link, in connecting links & threads..


  • Lim Lynn

    Catholic Apollyon. Greek numeral.

  • Pingback: » Obama Celebrates 40 Years of Roe v. Wade – Releases Statement …()

  • bg


    re: #47 January 22, 2013 at 7:42 pm bg

    clontion = clanation = cloning

    “If the upper class is able to give it’s children, grandchildren more and
    more genetic advantages, they will move away form the people who
    are naturally born..”

    ~ Lee Silver

    [Question: What should be the role of Obama’s new bioethics panel?

    Lee Silver: It’s very interesting to ask what the goal of the bioethics panel
    is because it’s not clear what a bioethics panel should do. A bioethics panel
    could serve to give advice to the President, or to Congress, or it could serve
    as a means for educating the public. Two bioethics panels that have had any
    weight, the one that President Clinton formed, and the one that President
    Bush formed, were formed for different purposes. I would like the Obama
    bioethics commission to be more like the Clinton commission. The Clinton
    commission is chaired by Princeton University President, Harold Shapiro. He
    was an economist and Clinton brought him in because he didn’t know any
    bioethics or biotechnology, he put together any committee of well-known
    legal scholars, and he had public policy people, and economists, and he had
    some representatives from religion. The point there was really to educate
    rather than suggest laws.

    Abortion & Nazi Ideology

    [Today, America and other nations have adopted this element of
    Nazi ideology into their society through the heinous practice of the
    abortion of unborn babies whose lives are deemed to be not worth

    In doing so, we have allowed an element of Nazi
    ideology to conquer a segment of our nation.

    A 2002 literature review of elective abortion rates found that 91 to
    93% of pregnancies in the United States with a diagnosis of Down
    syndrome were terminated.]

    Attorney Who Aided Terri Schiavo’s
    Husband Now Advising Barack Obama

    yes, the politicians are well aware of the goals they’re working towards, Obama did not fall from the sky, nor did he ride in on a UNACORN.. oh wait.. on second thought, yes, he most certainly did, it’s name is Big Bucks Rockefeller, but alas i digress.. and last but not least, one way or another, Obama will bring about his lifelong dreams of revolution..


  • bg


    re: #47 January 22, 2013 at 7:42 pm bg

    clonation 🙄


  • bg



    hah, finally!!

    January 22, 2013

    Top psychiatrist: Meds behind school massacres

    [Psychotropic drugs “prescribed for school
    children cause violent behavior,” Healy stated.

    The drugs are widely used in the U.S. as antidepressants by doctors working in the mental health field and increasingly by primary care doctors, he noted.

    Healey insisted the problem today is that doctors working with schools to control the behavior of children are inclined to prescribe SSRI drugs without serious consideration of adverse consequences.

    “The pharmaceutical companies made these drugs with the idea of making money,” he said. “There’s a wide range of problems when it comes to looking at these drugs for children. Very few children have serious problems that warrant treatment with pills that have the risks SSRI drugs have.”]

    thank you Lord, Amen..

    more re: psychotic drugs


  • PhilipJames

    Sarah Palin had her own comments re Roe v Wade and takes Obama to the woodshed at the same time – https://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin/posts/10151382475153588

    Compare that to the useless Republican leaders who have no voice at all… what a bunch of useless idiots they are. We can call them 10 percenters – that is, only 10% approval rating.

  • bg


    Januray 22, 2013

    The Negro Project

    [Sanger said a “bonus” would be “wise and profitable” and “the
    salvation of American civilization.”
    She presented her ideas to Mr.
    C. Harold Smith (of the New York Evening World) on “the welfare committee” in New York City. She said, “people must be helped to help themselves.” Any plan or program that would make them “dependent upon doles and charities” is “paternalistic” and would not be “of any permanent value.” She included an essay (what she called a “program of public welfare,”) entitled “We Must Breed a Race of Thoroughbreds.”]

    Black Genocide

    “Several years ago, when 17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster
    outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California, some 12-15,000
    were observed to be black.”

    –Erma Clardy Craven (deceased)
    Social Worker and Civil Rights Leader


  • OxyCon

    I wonder how close Stanley Ann Dunham was to aborting Barack Obama.

  • Bobbi

    And he pretends to shed a tear about the so-called Sandy Hook Hoax.
    Hoax and Pocket Change.

  • Lim Lynn

    Reminds me of 1 child policy in China. 2nd child will be aborted by China funded Socialist Commie abortion clinic.

  • Elizabeth

    Obama is a fool. He could have chosen to use his office to honor God, to influence America in a Godly manner. Instead Obama chose to sleep in the devil’s bed. All of Obama’s money and power, extravagant clothes, vacations and the adoration of millions of fools are nothing but dung.
    All these things are short lived. Obama will find that eternal damnation in hell is forever and he won’t be able to lie his way out.

  • Jonah Vark

    ‘It’s so terribly wrong. That baby is entitled to life’

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/the-woman-who-started-abortion-unwillingly/#5T37LFk2L7CHFBMS.99

  • bg
  • Questionman

    Is Barack Obama a “nation-killer” who destroys jobs?
    No, he created over 4.5 million jobs in his last term. more than Bush did with 2 terms

    Is Barack Obama a communist?
    No, he’s a capitalist. He certainly has some policies that lean towards democratic socialism (completely different from economic socialism, mind you) but most of the policies the Neo-Cons complain about are actually extensions of those GWBush put in place. There is literally nothing about Obama (or Bush) that could be misconstrued as communism by anyone with more than 2 brain cells

    Does Barack Obama hate America?
    No, as he’s shown in many ways

    Is Barack Obama a Marxist?
    No, he believes in privatized business, which is why he’s spent government money to insure private businesses don’t fail, without trying to make them partly government-owned. Just as GWBush did before him with his massive bailouts

    Is Barack Obama a terrorist?
    HELL NO!

    Is Barack Obama destroying America?
    No. He’s not doing a great job as president, but he’s certainly not destroying America. Our GDP, for instance, is higher than ever.

    Is Barack Obama a “ursuper”?
    No. He was voted into office legally, after George W Bush peaceably left office after his term was finished. Nothing about that fits the definition of usurping

    Is Barack Obama an illegal?
    No. He was born in Hawaii, as his birth certificates (both short- and long-form) have stated

    As expected the hateful scumbags who HATE Obama ARE the biggest racists in American History. I didn’t watch the Inauguration yesterday, but I slept till 3pm. All the others who are “glad” that they didn’t watch it are, racists and bigots. That’s what people who hate Obama are…racists and bigots. What’s even more disgusting is that YOU have the galls to call yourselves “Patriots” when you are nothing of the sort. What you ACTUALLY are racists! What you ACTUALLY are bigots, What you ACTUALLY are black haters. What you ACTUALLY are hypocrites

    AAND what’s even more disgusting is that you racists get pissed when Most of America are happy over the First Black President. you cancervatives created prompting a President as of God, you racists think it’s blasphemous to compare ANYONE to your Right-wing God, Ronald Reagan. That shows how pathetic you racists are!

    Obama lies less, not more than most politicians. He does present things in a light hopefully (for him) to gain the greatest amount of votes. That’s the game all politicians play.

    When a Democrat like Obama goes on the offensive. The conservative racists and idiots out there call it “campaigning.” Campaigning without trolling for votes? Maybe you should seek help!

    Those who say he is a communist, Marxist or even socialist do not even know what those things are. Is he a Muslim? No, that’s just those who do not want a democrat, or even a black, to be president. Does he hate America or is trying to destroy America, or is an Anti-American? No! again that is the lies the right is saying. Didn’t you listen to his inauguration speech? wait, you didn’t people you’re a racist! We, the people. Doesn’t sound anti-American or hateful to me. Is he a fraud or a ‘man-child’? no that’s the right that is.

    Should He be impeached???? He has done nothing to even merit that. All the things which the right claims are things which they were okay with when a republican president did the same things. They are only upset with Obama because he is a democrat. They hated Clinton also. They would hate Reagan to if they really looked at what he did during his administration, instead of picking some items and neglecting the rest.

    Obama is a politician. He is told what to do, what to say and where to go. Get with the times, you pathetic racist! Just because A President doesn’t follow your brain-dead racist right-wing idelogoy does NOT mean he hates America, It means you are just a pathetic brain-dead racist!

    He is NOT a criminal, nor a Narcissist, has he committed voter fraud! Obama won fair and square! Why can’t you racists accept that?

    Ob’s such a “SCOAMF” he grad Harvard Law and passed his bars and practiced law and beat the “war hero,” John McCain & Simple Sarah. Got Bin Laden. The white supremacists of the GOP Base reek of envy and desperation.

    Is Barack Obama a monster? he is human Is Barack Obama destroying America? no, or is unemployment going down and stock market up destroying america??

    Lighten up. You are out of your league. You racists are pathetic!

    Calling the POTUS a POS and a fraud seems to the usual calling call for you right-wing racists and bigots like you!

    Obama is not a narcissist. Look up the definition of narcissist.

    Obama is not a criminal. Don’t believe me? List the laws he has broken.

    Is he a disgrace to America? Let’s see. He prevented the US economy from utterly imploding, plunging the US into a 2nd great depression. He saved the US auto industry, and millions of US jobs that rely on it. He’s overseen 40 months of positive job growth. His administration has repaired many of the bad relations that the previous administration created which has started to return the world’s view of the US to that of respect, instead of ridicule. Do you consider that disgraceful? If so, may I suggest you buy a new dictionary – one that wasn’t written by ultra-conservative puppets at FOX News.

    Such a mob of misfits. Of course they’re racist. These fools claim their WHITE house and Obama is BLACK. They were against him before he was even sworn in and it is obvious one factor of the right wing uncontained hate of this man is his skin color.

    Obviously the majority of right wing extremists are uneducated red neck hot heads. Just reading the slop they post confirms that They can’t stand the idea of a black man running our country.

  • Lim Lynn

    Of all the diabolically clever moves the anti-choice lobby has ever pulled, surely one of the greatest has been its consistent co-opting of the word “life.” Life! Who wants to argue with that? Who wants be on the side of … not-life? That’s why the language of those who support abortion has for so long been carefully couched in other terms. While opponents of abortion eagerly describe themselves as “pro-life,” the rest of have had to scramble around with not nearly as big-ticket words like “choice” and “reproductive freedom.” The “life” conversation is often too a thorny one to even broach. Yet I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. I believe that’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesn’t make me one iota less solidly pro-choice.

  • gts

    nice gts here~~ nice lalala~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • ann

    what’s a little MURDER…oh wait it’s ONLY THE UNBORN THAT’S THE GOOD MURDER…what REAL women stands in LINE TO MURDER THEIR BABIES???