Judge Napolitano: Obama Administration Wants to Go Beyond Current Gun Control Proposals (Video)

Tonight on Special Report Judge Napolitano agreed with host Bret Baier that the Obama Administration wants to go further in restricting the Second Amendment than the current proposals they are floating to the press.

Get news like this in your Facebook News Feed,
Gateway Pundit

Commenting Policy

Please adhere to our commenting policy to avoid being banned. As a privately owned website, we reserve the right to remove any comment and ban any user at any time.

Comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, anti-Semitism, or personal or abusive attacks on other users may be removed and result in a ban.

Facebook Comments

Disqus Comments

  • Pingback: Judge Napolitano: Obama Administration Wants to Go Beyond Current Gun Control Proposals (Video) « infowarsusa()

  • Highlander

    I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again. The end game is total elimination of the second amendment, and ALL rights to own or use firearms. If you don’t believe that, then you just aren’t paying attention …

  • Joe Blow

    Yeah, but I remember when Judge Napolitano and Bill O’ Reilley both said “I like him”. They knew of his upbringing and background but still thought he would overcome that and not be like the socialists and communists he grew up with and called friends. So much for “smart guys”.

  • paul52

    Can anyone name the last dictator or tyrant that did NOT disarm the populace? I can’t.

  • mcashc

    They don’t tell the truth about the actor enemy because they will be taken off the air. At what point are Americans going to F the PC and wake up and realize this actor punk is the enemy. Yes people, our elected fraud president is by far our greatest threat and enemy of our great country. The president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the enemy and number 1 threat of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. You can’t make it up. We right now have a child punk racist no experience fraud anti American fool as our president. Took them 100 years but the commies have won. Cancer.

  • bg
  • Pingback: Judge Napolitano: Obama Administration Wants to Go Beyond Current Gun Control Proposals (Video)Politifreak()

  • Oliver

    FWIW:
    Adam Lanza believed responsible for the horrific massacre of 20 children and 6 adults yesterday was the son of one of the Central Intelligence Agencies (CIA) top psychological analysts who was assigned to a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) project

    What is DARPA?? Click here for answers http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-darpa.htm

    “Though initial US news reports claimed Nancy Champion Lanza was a teacher at the Sandy Hook school, this report states this information is not true, and which has been confirmed by local school authorities, including Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011, who stated, “No one has heard of her, teachers don’t know her.”

    More here: http://twtmore.com/tweet/e0H1j

  • bg

    ++

    paul52 #4 January 10, 2013 at 6:31 pm

    Muhammad

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    re: Oliver #8 January 10, 2013 at 6:48 pm

    nor did he use a rifle..

    ==

  • Oliver

    BG: at least I now know that we’ll never learn what was on Adam Lanza’s server … so I might as well quit asking. Sigh.

    Speculation abounds that Sandyhook may have been a CIA experiment to push an anti-gun agenda. People won’t believe that of course because it’s too horrible to contemplate.

  • COLO KID

    …for sure King Obama is, first, going to force universal gun registration and, second, a complete ban on semi-automatic weapons on this country. An Obama executive order will do the job. The government media has paved the way for these two actions.

  • luke duke

    FFS! The economy is in shambles, the Senate can’t pass a budget, the tax code is impossibly complex, etc, etc, etc, and the liberals and MSM will let the deranged act of a loser dictate the national conversation for weeks? This is nuts.

    Wake me up when TFG “pivots to jobs.”

  • Patty

    Obama doesn’t care.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    We are witnessing a battle of two men—one fighting to preserve his ability to transform the American economy further, the other battling to keep his job. In one corner we have the president of the United States, who dearly wants to leave a legacy of a society in which incomes are more equally (not necessarily equitably) distributed, subsidized green energy sources replace a diminished production of fossil fuels, and the regulations implementing Obamacare and financial restructuring are in place. He needs the enthusiastic support of his increasingly leftish congressional party, but can no longer offer Democratic candidates coattails to which to cling when their election campaigns roll around in 2014. So he woos them by taking a hard line in the current negotiations.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/elections-matter-president-will-get-what-he-wants_665263.html

    ~~~~~~~~~
    Congress isn’t going to change their stripes because they have been caving in lately. But if and it is a small if, Obama goes one step to far, Congress won’t deal but watch then what Obama does. Executive Power, then I hope the Supreme Court.
    And this will hold true with gun control. No accountability, no one to atone too, and a spineless Congress and this enthusiastic attitude for fundamental change is Obama’s end game and he will go as far as possible to take his agenda to the max. Period.

  • JDR-Taq

    Oliver:

    Speculation abounds that Sandyhook may have been a CIA experiment to push an anti-gun agenda. People won’t believe that of course because it’s too horrible to contemplate.

    And yet the same people who would say “that’s CRAZY TALK!!!” had ABSOLUTELY no problem thinking that Bush/Cheney/Halliburton and the entire U.S. Government and the Airlines and the entire “Jooooooooish Media” brought about the events of 9/11/2001.

    Amazing.

  • mark1973

    #10 and #11, Exactly! Sandy Hook was a “False Flag” http://www.thesurvivalistblog.net/are-recent-mass-shooting-false-flag-events/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PlanPrepareSurvive+%28%40TheSurvivalistBlog.net%29 As i believe Today’s incident in California was,as the student was reportedly ( Not coincidentally in my opinion ) using a ‘Pump Action shotgun’ which Feinstein wants to re-classify as a ‘semi-auto’ and therefore Banned.

    http://www.southwestiowanews.com/council_bluffs/news/grassley-gun-control-should-include-other-weapons/article_5737b43c-4a48-11e2-b7cc-0019bb2963f4.html That article Backs up that Not only Obama wants to Ban all Firearms,but repubs like Grassley want to go beyond that and Ban knives and other Weapons. That’s why we have to draw a line in the sand now and refuse to turn in our semi-auto’s, because Obama and the complicit dem and repubs are not going to stop untill they are stood up to and stopped!

  • Pingback: Judge Napolitano: Obama Administration Wants to Go Beyond Current Gun Control Proposals (Video) | Born Conservative()

  • bg

    ++

    Breaking Free From The Constitution

    by Barack Obama
    January 18, 2001

    [Mr. Obama’s comments take a turn from discussing the historical
    record. Unprovoked he laments that the Supreme Court “could not
    break free from the essential constraints placed by the Founding
    Fathers in the Constitution.” He further describes the Constitution
    as “a charter of negative liberties.” This is at odds with the preamble
    to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.]

    here & here & here, in connecting links & threads..

    [Consequently. the thrust of ARA is towards generating dialogue
    which will give people a rational handle on this controversial subject.
    this includes bringing speakers like Daniel ElIsberg to campus, publishing
    fact sheets compiled by interested faculty, and investigating the possible
    development of an interdisciplinary program in the Columbia curriculum
    dealing with peace, disarmament, and ‘world order’.]

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    re: #18 January 10, 2013 at 8:15 pm bg

    in case you missed it..

    January 9, 2013

    This Is How a Secret Gun Provision
    Made its Way Into Obamacare Legislation

    [The Washington Post first reported on Dec. 30 about the presence of this controversial wording. Under a section with the headline “Protection of Second Amendment Gun Rights,” the NRA-advocated wording is nestled deep within the law. The Post called the inclusion, “a largely overlooked but significant challenge to a movement in American medicine to treat firearms as a matter of public health.”]

    ==

  • Oliver

    #16 Mark: There are NO coincidences with this Administration.
    None.

  • bg

    ++

    re: #19 January 10, 2013 at 8:18 pm bg

    January 10, 2013

    Gun Advocates Celebrate ‘Secret’ Obamacare Provision
    Forbidding Exec Order To Regulate Guns And Ammo ….

    [As for Reid’s reasons for burying a pro-gun measure into the body of the
    Affordable Care Act, the Majority Leader is said to have been concerned
    that the NRA planned to take an active position against the passage of
    Obamacare and decided, no doubt with the permission of Reid’s friend,
    NRA boss Wayne LaPierre, to head the problem off at the pass by putting
    language in the bill that would mollify the gun lobby.

    Further, there was concern that a conspiracy theory then in circulation
    among right – wing circles — a meme suggesting that the Obama
    Administration had cleverly planted language in the ACA that could be
    used as a tool to get to the guns—would further erode public support
    for the legislation. For these reasons, Reid determined to insert some
    cozy language for the gun people into the Senate version of the ACA
    — language certain to escape public review at a time when the
    conversation was far more focused on hot button subjects like death
    panels, taxes and mandates.
    ]

    if there’s anything these power hungry narcissists that
    rule the roost know how to do, it’s how to plan ahead,
    lets just hope & pray we won’t be losing ours any time
    soon.. *sigh*

    ==

  • YourMaster

    this is one of the many ways they are trying to implement the communist utopia
    they’ll have to disarm the public… one of the dreams of the dems has always been to be able to eat someone’s dogs, cats, rats …without being beaten or shot to death.

    as well as incorporate sharia law so they can legalize marriage to children without the consent of the parents. I mean, if gays get their rights… why shouldn’t child molesters have the same?

    😀

  • Warren Bonesteel

    Time to be honest w/ourselves.

    The Second Amendment is there not to grant rights, but to keep government from encroaching on our rights in any way, whatsoever, for any reason at all.

    Obviously, the government has ignored this limitation for decades. It moves, even now, to remove ever more of your rights, limiting and removing your rights on a daily basis.

    The Second Amendment is there so that we can kill an out of control government. All other purposes are secondary.

    You need to decide when the government needs to be killed…and you have to kill it before it kills you.

    That’s The Second Amendment. That’s the true responsibility of being a free man or woman. The responsibility to protect yourself. It’s your responsibility to protect and defend your rights. That right, that defense of your rights, can be delegated to no other, whether a great leader or a politician, a religious zealot or a political ideologue. It’s your responsibility, and yours, alone.

    You must make the decision about whether to kill your own government and then decide when and how it must be done.

    That’s freedom.

    That’s The Second Amendment.

  • Oliver

    WOW! WOW! WOW!

    Here’s a story that could change the gun control debate (assuming anyone in the media has the courage to report it):

    “In early 2009, this report continues, Nancy Champion Lanza relocated to Connecticut as the DARPA projects she was assigned to have their headquarters at the US Naval Submarine Base New London in Groton.

    Important to note is that the FSB received an extensive file on CIA and DARPA video game projects from Iranian intelligence officials after the August, 2011 arrest of CIA agent Amir Mirza Hekmati.

    In a video confession to Iranian intelligence officials, Amir Mirzaei Hekmati, a former US Marine of Iranian descent, confessed to a career in American intelligence that included a stint at a video game company in New York that he said was “a cover for the CIA.”

    entire story here: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1638.htm

  • King O is pushing lawful gun owners into a corner and dividing the country in the process..

    HAPPY NOW O VOTERS?

  • donh

    THE US Government is doing the SAME thing to its own civilians that has been done in Libya, and now Syria and other foreign countries they want to regime change. …training young male psychopaths for suicide kill missions to destabilize the established governing order. ….Note another school shooting in CA on the same day Biden has his gun ban meeting…What a convenient coincidence !…

    They are worried the Sandy Hook emotions are fading out and and closing the rabbit hole the satanic human sacrifice created to beat down our rights…..so another psycho killer was drugged up and programmed to kill…just one kid….not a mass slaughter……just a small kill…. enough to pull the scabs off the wounded public consciousness and remind everybody we have a problem. ….If the devil worshippers DON”T get their gun grab soon….then they will plan something 3-5 times WORSE than Sandyhook…like in a sports stadium on live TV 300 people gunned down. …OH…. the Piers Morgan crowd of SATANISTS will really get off on that one…They will be watching the blood bath in real time from their TV studios dressed up in vintage Nazi uniforms !

  • old timer

    some things to read and contemplate:

    http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5345
    Posted on Jan 4, 2013
    My Line In The Sand Is Drawn Here!

    http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5365
    Posted on Jan 10, 2013
    Revolution?

  • bg
  • American Patriot

    I find it amazing that liberals and the left find the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments sacrosanct, and untouchable. They will argue freedom of speech all day, every day, and the Supreme Court has gone as far as to encompass “expression” to mean speech as well. However, the same group argues that the 2nd amendment must be repealed, changed, altered or otherwise reinterpreted to mean something other than what it is — the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

    And yes, the Founding Fathers expressly used the word “ARMS,” not single shot pistol or rifle, or any other iteration of a weapon. Today’s semi-auto AR, or any other fill-in-the-blank arm is just as legitimate today, as a grooved musket was back in the 1780s.

  • lincoln’s widow

    “You must make the decision about whether to kill your own government and then decide when and how it must be done.”

    Inciting sedition and treason.
    The FBI will be knocking on your door soon.

  • bg

    ++

    one effing toke over the line /s/

    damn all you IslaMarxists to hell..

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    “There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in
    the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes
    to enslave men by force, socialism – by vote. It is merely the difference
    between murder and suicide.” — Ayn Rand

    ==

  • Oliver

    I know some of this sounds like tin hat territory, but worth taking a look at in any case:

    “It can now be reported that Nancy Champion Lanza, the mother of the alleged Connecticut shooter, Adam Lanza, was a CIA P2 analyist working for the Defense Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and also for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

    DARPA specializes in the use of simulated video internet games for the purpose of mind control and staging psyops.

    http://shininglight2012.blogspot.mx/2012/12/tom-heneghan-psyops-black-ops-and-rip.html

    and…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ku3qwJe4gv4

  • bg

    ++

    lincoln’s widow #30 January 10, 2013 at 9:43 pm

    “No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest
    reason for the people to retain their right to keep and bear arms is as
    a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

    ~ Thomas Jefferson

    more here & here/a> & you can Google for more..

    ==

  • lincoln’s widow

    Threatening to kill your govt is treason. You don’t like the way things are going? Then vote ’em out. Btw, how much do you make regurgitating The old crap?

    Pound sand.

  • bg

    ++

    donh #26 January 10, 2013 at 9:24 pm

    re: Syria

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    lincoln’s widow #35 January 10, 2013 at 9:58 pm

    Founding Fathers

    “This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it.
    Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can
    exercise their constitutional right of amending it or their revolutionary
    right to dismember it or overthrow it.”

    — Abraham Lincoln, 4 April 1861

    ==

  • lincoln’s widow
  • bg

    ++

    lincoln’s widow #38 January 10, 2013 at 10:14 pm

    and you what, think that’s a secret??

    we all know who and what you are,
    but thanks for putting it in writing..

    rotf 😆 mbo

    ==

    ==

  • lincoln’s widow

    Treason is treason is treason. This won’t go unnoticed. Simpleton.

  • Highlander

    No, Lincoln’s Widow, YOU pound sand. Nobody here is inciting violence or threatening to kill anyone. They’re simply stating fact … that it is indeed up to the people to decide when our government has become tyrannical. Nobody else can do that for us …. If you don’t like the fact that people are having this discussion, why don’t you make yourself useful? Contact your government officials, and ask them why THEY are trampling our Constitution and destabilizing this society. You’re getting yourself all worked up and angry at the WRONG people…

  • bg

    ++

    lincoln’s widow #40 January 10, 2013 at 10:20 pm

    hey TW, only stated what your dear hubby said..

    ==

  • donh

    HA #38

    I saw the same story on FR today and saved it …..I and many here have been saying there are government facilities with cubicles full of paid government trolls given talking points to post in blog commentary…..> http://consciouslifenews.com/paid-internet-shill-shadowy-groups-manipulate-internet-opinion-debate/1147073/

  • Highlander

    And by the way Widow…THIS is exactly why the FIRST amendment was written. I find it interesting that someone like you would try to suppress someone’s free speech with threats and intimidation. Pretty hypocritical if you ask me … but why am I not surprised?

  • theBuckWheat

    The goal is obvious even if the timeline is not: 30 to 10 to “five or six” to 3 to 1 to NONE:

    The following cite is just one of many indicating yet another infringement is planned and yearned for against a right that “shall NOT be infringed.”::

    Bloomberg Blasts NRA: ‘Connecticut Is Because of Some of Their Actions’


    But if he had his preference, Bloomberg said he would go farther than the 1994 ban and outlaw all automatic and semi-automatic weapons and high-capacity magazines. The mayor said magazines shouldn’t be allowed to contain more than five or six rounds.

    “If you haven’t hit the deer with three shots, you’re a pretty lousy shot. The deer deserves to get away,” he said….

    link: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bloomberg-blasts-nra-connecticut-actions/story?id=18029157

  • theBuckWheat

    #29:: “I find it amazing that liberals and the left find the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments sacrosanct, and untouchable. They will argue freedom of speech all day, every day, and the Supreme Court has gone as far as to encompass “expression” to mean speech as well.”

    Why does anyone need 30 pages of Hustler Magazine? Why not limit it to just ten, or “five or six”, or 3 or even 1 page? But Hustler is revolting to me and I really want ZERO pages. It is just common sense, and everyone supports common sense restrictions against some vile rag like Hustler, don’t they?

  • Highlander

    There’s no question about it donh. I’ve tripped them up several times and got them to admit it … plus, from time to time, if you have an extended exchange with one of them, you can catch a shift change, where the “personality” of the author makes a sudden, definite change. The talking points always remain the same though. This is where a large chunk of our stimulus money went, I’m convinced of it …

  • Winston Wolfe

    This won’t go unnoticed. – lincoln’s b!tch

    Snort. And just the hell are you going to do about it, boy?

    Report it to somebody?

    Go for it. I’m sure they could use a laugh.

  • Highlander

    BuckWheat, we just gave to keep hammering and hammering on the intent of the second amendment. It says NOTHING about HUNTING, and it has NOTHING to do with hunting. Period. We cannot let the people of America forget that fact …

  • Highlander

    Sorry .. should read “just have to keep hammering”

  • Oliver

    #46 Buckwheat: Don’t forget the Benghazi video maker who’s still in jail. Haven’t heard anyone in Hollywood or anywhere defending his first amendment rights!

    More selective outrage.

  • bg

    ++

    seems to me everything is a dog and pony show, they keep US
    busy with one thing, while doing other things behind our back..

    Federal Assault Weapons Ban

    [The Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB), or Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act, was a subtitle of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a federal law in the United States that included a prohibition on the manufacture for civilian use of certain semi-automatic firearms, so called “assault weapons”. The 10-year ban was passed by Congress on September 13, 1994, and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban only applied to weapons manufactured after the date of the ban’s enactment.

    The Federal Assault Weapons Ban expired on September 13, 2004, as
    part of the law’s sunset provision. There have been multiple attempts
    to renew the ban, but no bill has reached the House floor for a vote.
    ]

    a False Assault on Assault Weapons

    [Machine Guns Still Illegal

    Contrary to what the ad clearly implies, any weapon that can fire 300 rounds per minute remains illegal for civilians to own without specific clearance by the US Department of Justice.

    In fact, machine guns have been tightly regulated since the passage of the National Firearms Act in 1934, in the wake of the gangster era. Legal ownership of a machine gun requires an extensive federal background check, fingerprinting, signed clearance from the chief of local law enforcement (such as a county sheriff), a $200 excise tax, and weeks of paperwork. That was true before the assault-weapon ban was enacted in 1994, and it remains true with the expiration of the ban at midnight Sept. 13, 2004.

    That’s made clear in a question-and-answer document posted Sept.
    13 on the Web site of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and
    Explosives (ATF), explaining the effect of the expiration of the assault
    -weapon ban:

    ATF: All provisions of the National Firearms Act (NFA) relating
    to registration and transfer of machine guns . . . still apply.

    The fully automatic version of the AK47 — pictured and described
    in the ad — remains just as illegal as it was before the ban expired.

    [..]

    But it is also a fact that Bush was publicly committed to sign
    an extension if Congress passed it, and it was Congress that
    failed to do so.]

    January 10, 2013

    The Obamas of The World ‘Don’t Want to Save Lives’:
    The Ted Nugent Gun Interview You’ve Been Waiting For

    ==

  • bg

    ++

    Oliver #51 January 10, 2013 at 10:38 pm

    he’s purportedly spending one year in
    jail for “VIOLATING HIS PAROLE”.. 🙄

    no mention of the flick, and no surprise either..

    ==

  • onbe

    Eliminate armed guards for the President, Vice-President, and their families, and establish Gun Free Zones around them
    Gun Free Zones are supposed to protect our children, and some politicians wish to strip us of our right to keep and bear arms. Those same politicians and their families are currently under the protection of armed Secret Service agents. If Gun Free Zones are sufficient protection for our children, then Gun Free Zones should be good enough for politicians.

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/eliminate-armed-guards-president-vice-president-and-their-families-and-establish-gun-free-zones/6RDGkxLK

  • Pingback: » Judge Napolitano: Obama Administration Wants to Go Beyond …()